June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
24.1186.1 - 24.1186.14
The Accidental EngineerBackgroundThere is evidence that the key hurdle to graduating more US engineering students is recruitment,not retention. Ohland et al. (2008) show that while engineering retains to the 8th semester nearly60% of the students who begin in engineering, only 7% of first time in college students who arein engineering in their 8th semester of enrollment began their college careers outside ofengineering. Many programs have been put in place to recruit students into engineering fromunderrepresented groups, but fewer programs exist to recruit from among students alreadyenrolled in universities and the nature of the engineering curriculum makes it difficult for manystudents to switch into engineering once they have chosen a different academic pathway.MethodsIn an ongoing study of engineering matriculation practices using the Multiple InstitutionDatabase for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development that was the basis for Ohlandet al’s study cited above, 61 interviews were conducted with sophomore engineering students at6 universities in the MIDFIELD partnership. Among those were six students who entered theirinstitutions intending to major in something other than engineering. This paper uses a case studymethodology to explore the students’ motivation for beginning in the non-engineering major andsubsequently switching to an engineering major.FindingsOne student “accidentally” checked the engineering box on her application and because she didso, she was invited into a special program for “diamonds in the rough” at her college, designedfor students with potential to succeed in engineering but whose academic background does notmeet normal admissions requirements. Another student chose the engineering dorm for itslocation on campus and because there “weren’t that many options” when she went to choose herfirst year living environment. Her roommate and other engineers in the dorm convinced her thatshe would be happier in an engineering major than her original zoology major. These and otherstudents will be profiled in this paper to explore how students make the decision to switch intoengineering from other majors.ImplicationsBecause it has been shown that engineering retains students at a better rate than other disciplines(Ohland, et al 2008), in order to fill the nation’s need for more engineering graduates, studentsneed to be recruited from other disciplines into the field. This paper will provide insight into howstudents may be attracted to engineering from other disciplines and may help decision makersimprove their recruiting efforts.ReferenceOhland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., and Layton, R. (2008).Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of EngineeringEducation 97(3). 259-278.
Brawner, C. E., & Orr, M. K., & Ohland, M. W. (2014, June), The Accidental Engineer Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--23119
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015