his academic career, Dr. Schell spent over a decade in industry where he focused on process improve- ment and organizational development. This time included roles as VP of Strategy and Development for PrintingforLess.com, VP of Operations Engineering for Wells Fargo Bank, leadership and engineering po- sitions of increasing responsibility with American Express, where his last position was Director of Global Business Transformation for the Commercial Card division, and engineering positions with the Montana Manufacturing Extension Center.Dr. Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University Dr. Paul J. Kauffmann is a professor and former chair in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. His twenty
the last day to assess studentinterests and opinions. The survey contained the following questions, with a 5 pointLikert scale labeled as “not at all” (1), “slightly” (2), “somewhat” (3), “quite a bit” (4)and “very much” (5). Q9 and Q10 were only included on the post-camp survey. Page 24.754.5 Q1 I am familiar with the field of materials science and engineering. Q2 I understand the career opportunities in materials engineering. Q3 I want to study engineering in college. Q4 I want to study materials engineering in college. Q5 I want to go to UAB for college. Q6 I like to take things apart to see how they work
, one that considersthe intellectual, social, cultural, and professional development needs of students andyoung professionals, and the need for taking little steps - one step at a time - that maymake a big difference in student’s performance and attitudes towards learning. It isargued that such an approach to mentoring will help encourage more underrepresentedgroups, such as women and minorities, to pursue careers in engineering. The paper, also,describes some attributes of mentoring and suggests how a faculty member might becomea good mentor to students.I. IntroductionMentoring is not a new concept. Many of us have benefited from a trusted mentor.Perhaps we called them a friend, family member, or an advisor, whose opinions andexperiences we
Paper ID #9004Be the Leader of Your Class: Applying Leadership Behaviors to Manage Stu-dent Conduct and PerformanceProf. Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Calumet Page 24.223.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Be the Leader of Your Class: Applying Leadership Behaviors to Manage Student Conduct and PerformanceAbstractUniversity faculty, especially those who are just beginning their careers, are confrontedwith many professional challenges. The criteria required for promotion, includingscholarly activities
Paper ID #9847Subscribing to WII-FM: When will we Begin to Function as a Team?Dr. Andrew E. Jackson, East Carolina University Dr. Jackson serves as a Tenured, Full Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at ECU. He is a senior faculty member in the Industrial Engineering Technology (IET) program where he teaches a variety of IET courses, including: Production Systems Engineering and Production Planning, Engineering Economics, Human Factors Engineering, and Risk Assessment. His career spans 40 years in the fields of aviation, aerospace, defense contract engineering support, systems acquisition, academics, and
university is an extremelyrewarding career choice and this paper concludes by discussing some of the positive experienceswhich were also not anticipated but experienced. By confronting these topics in a frank andpublic manner others may learn from these collective experiences and perhaps find themselvesbetter prepared when they arise.Academic Misconduct Page 24.681.2Aspiring instructors should be aware that academic misconduct (i.e. cheating) is rampant inengineering and many professors are faced with it every year, if not every semester. Thisproblem is ubiquitous and even occurs at highly selective schools such as Harvard7 andvenerable military
). Remarks by the President at the Announcement of the "Change the Equation"Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/16/remarks-president-announcement-change-equation-initiative[8] Glanville, P., & Carl, M. (n.d.). Engineers in politics. Retrieved from https://www.asme.org/career-education/early-career-engineers/me-today/me-today-march-2013-issue/engineers-in-politics[9] Capaldi, Franco. Teaching Mastery in Statics Using the STEMSI Online Learning Environment. ASEE 2013 Fall Page 24.620.21Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference (2013) Washington D.C.
Glen Livesay is an Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering; he co-developed and co- teaches the biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, the statistical evaluation of assess- ment instruments, and increasing student engagement with hands-on activities. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
possibly different exams to be generated.6. Combining face-to-face and distance-education coursesAnother opportunity to teach two sections as if they were one is to combine the work fora face-to-face and distance-ed (“online”) section of the same course. Of our respondents,26 of them thought this would save time, and 13 didn’t (Figure 5). The reasons in favorof it saving time mirror those for teaching multiple face-to-face sections. For example,“I've done this dozens of times over a 40+ year career. Definitely easier because there isonly one set of exams and assignments to prepare and you are focused on the topic. Seecomment above about two sections of the same course in the same semester. [11]”Just as with multiple on-campus sections, questions
Division of the American Society for Engineering Education; chair of a new IEEE program on Early Career Faculty Development; editorial board of IEEE/HKN The Bridge magazine; and ABET EAC program evaluator.Dr. Robert W. Hasker, Milwaukee School of Engineering Rob is a professor in the software engineering program at Milwaukee School of Engineering, where he teaches courses at all levels. He was recently at University of Wisconsin - Platteville, where he taught for 17 years and helped develop an undergraduate program in software engineering and an international master’s program in computer science. In addition to academic experience, Rob has worked on a number of projects in industry ranging from avionics to cellular
todetermine whether to continue working with poor-performing students at this point.Terminating or Minimizing Interactions with Poor-Performing StudentsMentors who accept unpaid interns or who hire student research assistants themselves may beable to terminate poor-performing students after the third week evaluation. Mentors who doneed to terminate a student should approach the process thoughtfully, with the goal of makingthis a “teachable moment” for the student. While being fired from an undergraduate researchposition may be traumatic for the student, the long-term career impact is likely to be minimal andhopefully the student will learn from the experience. Mentors should take the time to providewritten feedback for the student, noting both