Asee peer logo
Displaying all 27 results
Conference Session
WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sara Wadia-Fascetti, Northeastern University; Jan Rinehart, Northeastern University; Simon Pitts, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership Program and Professor of Practice in Engineering Leadership. A graduate of Loughborough University and executive education at INSEAD, Simon began his career in advanced powertrain development and research at Ford Motor Com- pany. During his time with Ford, his assignments included leading engineering and cross functional teams as Vehicle Line Director, Director of Manufacturing Operations, and Director of Powertrain Planning and then Product Development Operations for all Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Mazda and Volvo brands globally. Prior to joining Northeastern, Simon served as Director of the Ford-MIT Research Alliance
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelsey Morgan Irvin, Washington University in St. Louis; Elizabeth Hiteshue, University of Pennsylvania; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Sheldon Hochheiser, IEEE History Center; Michael Geselowitz, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #8538Oral Histories of Distinguished Female Leaders: Inspiring the Next Genera-tion of Young People in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM)Ms. Kelsey Morgan Irvin Kelsey Irvin is currently an undergraduate sophomore at Washington University in St. Louis. She is ma- joring in the Cognitive Neuroscience Track of Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology and hopes to pursue a career in social work or a related psychological field. She is currently working in a Cognition and Development Lab at Washington University in St. Louis studying child preferences.Ms. Elizabeth Hiteshue, University of Pennsylvania
Conference Session
WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
opportunity toconnect with other women faculty was also valued. Assessment indicates that over halfthe women faculty report feeling more confident about professional abilities and moreassertive in advocating for career needs. Male faculty/administrators report beingfamiliar with issues impacting the success of women, as well as strategies that can beemployed to manage around these issues. Women faculty are less likely to report feelingisolated in their department/on campus. This paper will review the plan to transition tosustainable status at the conclusion of the project, including a report on the first year ofthat transition effort.BackgroundLouisiana Tech University is in a medium-sized state university with an increasedemphasis on high-quality
Conference Session
WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jane Andrews, Aston University; Robin Clark P.E., Aston University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Page 24.1367.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 What do Schoolgirls think of Engineering? A critique of conversations from a participatory research approachAbstractWhilst statistics vary, putting the percentage of women engineers at between 6%[1] and 9% [2]of the UK Engineering workforce, what cannot be disputed is that there is a need to attractmore young women into the profession. Building on previous work which examined whyengineering continues to fail to attract high numbers of young women[3,4] and starting withthe research question “What do High School girls think of engineering as a future career andstudy choice?”, this paper critiques research conducted utilising a
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
first-year projects courses were beneficial in helping students understand thepotential for engineering to positively impact people’s lives. Of the students who indicated thattheir primary reason for selecting an engineering major was to help people, 50% persisted in CE,AE, or EvE disciplines, 11% transferred to other engineering disciplines, and 39% transferred tonon-engineering disciplines. These students cited multiple reasons for plans to transfer out ofengineering. Most of the students motivated to a career where they could help people maintainedthis vision for non-engineering disciplines. The study results indicate that serving societythrough engineering is a significant motivation for many female students and that furtheremphasis on the
Conference Session
WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Stefi Alison Baum, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
to increase the repre- sentation and advancement of women STEM/SBS faculty, widely represented across ethnic, social, and cultural backgrounds, by removing barriers to resources that support career success and creating new interventions and resources. An additional emphasis will be upon adapting interventions to address the needs of key sub-populations including women of color and deaf and hard-of-hearing women faculty. The project aims to: 1) refine and strengthen targeted institutional structures; 2) improve the quality of women faculty’s work life; 3) align institutional, administrative, and informal systems of power and resources to support and sustain progress towards the project goal; 4) enhance the working
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Raquel Perez-Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Priya Radhi Santhanam, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
inengineering careers in our institute.The very broad literature on the gender gap affecting women in STEM fields shows that one ofthe primary reasons for the appalling statistics1,2 is the lack of a positive support system forwomen in STEM—references 3 through 7 in this paper are excellent reviews of the currentliterature relevant to our work described here.3-7 As a result, the NJIT-SWE team rapidly agreedto develop a retention program for our institute that was based on the creation of a locally rootedpositive support system for female students at the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT).In the definition of the optimal characteristics and format of our program, we focused on fourmajor aspects: Student-led program. Numerous support programs
Conference Session
WIED: Medley
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, King Saud University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
-representation is analyzed by researchers11 of female education in Saudi Arabia and the SaudiMOHE12 as pertaining to the “historical socio-economic” factors11, higher education policies,stereotyping, gender-related household responsibilities, career-related conditions, politics, andthe “role of researchers in society”12 in Saudi Arabia . Such gap is also described as accountingfor the near non-availability of engineering-related careers for females, mostly due to thecommon notion that complete segregation is required between males and females in such a male-dominated workplace. Until today, such factors force many parents who are open or enthusiasticto their daughters acquiring degrees or jobs in various engineering fields to mainly having toresort to
Conference Session
From Industry to the Academy - Female Faculty Boundary Spanners Offering and Gaining Perspective
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Diana Bairaktarova, The University of Oklahoma; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, andor research-based Ph.D. In addition, FOP often come with rich personal connections andexternal contacts that would take years to develop organically from inside an academicinstitution. This panel will engage a variety of “boundary spanning” faculty from a range ofinstitutions for a lively panel discussion surrounding topics such as: common attributes andassignments associated with the FOP role; professional decisions around joining the academiccommunity; first impressions and experiences in the FOP role; opportunities and benefits to non-FOP faculty colleagues and institutions; considerations for FOP as a career pathway; and lessonslearned/advice for individuals and institutions considering FOP faculty roles, to name a few. Anopen
Conference Session
Interactive Panel on Advocacy Tips: an Initiative to Provide Individuals the Tools to Advocate for Women and Underrepresented Minorities
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Kristen P. Constant, Iowa State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sandra D. Eksioglu, Mississippi State University; Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #9377Interactive Panel on Advocacy Tips: an Initiative to Provide Individuals theTools to Advocate for Women and Underrepresented MinoritiesDr. Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Technological University in 1998. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics, predominantly dielectrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microde- vices. She earned a NSF CAREER award, has published research in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Conference Session
WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica R. McCormick, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Charles Feldhaus, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
faculty advisor to the EDDP’s Engineering Club and the Society of Women Engineers student organization. She also teaches a career planning class for engineers and a first-year engineering course. From 2006-2008, she was the Director for the Preparing Outstanding Women for Engineering Roles–POWER– Summer Camp. Mrs. McCormick received her Masters of Science in Technology and Bachelors of Science in Engineering from the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI.Ms. Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Terri Talbert-Hatch, Ed.D. Assistant Dean for Student Services Purdue School of Engineering & Technol- ogy, IUPUI Dr. Talbert-Hatch oversees the Student Services Office
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Janis P. Terpenny, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
ofwomen in careers in higher education in STEM related fields1,2,3,4. Of course, issues arecomplicated and no single answer or antidote exists. Those seeking to improve the number ofwomen who enter and remain in careers in academe have sought to understand pipeline issuesfor entry, what factors impact career success and retention, and answers to why the number of Page 24.885.2women who are ultimately promoted to the rank of full professor in STEM fields remains low,and even lower, for those who enter leadership positions4.Much evidence exists that suggests that women role models are significant to progress in manyrespects. Women students
Conference Session
WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sruti Modekurty; Judy Fong, UC Davis; Harry H. Cheng, University of California, Davis
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
includingteamwork, presentation skills, leadership skills, self-assurance, and breaking gender stereotypes.Women professionals in various science and engineering fields also met and discussed with theparticipants helping them visualize a future career in STEM and gain exposure to the variety ofoptions available to them. As a culminating project the girls who participated in the camp createdmulti-media video presentations with robotics, similar to the RoboPlay Video Competition, andmade presentations in front of parents and peers. The girls were given robotics kits to take backto their middle schools so they can start computing and robotics clubs of their own. Coaches andassistant coaches continue to mentor girls over the academic school year to facilitate
Conference Session
WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerry Volcy, Spelman College
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
  literature  suggesting   that   incoming   college   students2,3,   as   with   the   broader   population1,   are  generally  ill-­‐informed  about  what  engineering  is  and  what  engineers  do  beyond  a  very  cursory  understanding.    Up  to  the  point  when  they  arrive  on  the  college  campus,  many  of  the  students  have  had  limited   opportunities   to   engage   in   engineering   activity.     Such   engagements,   when   they  are   available,   are   typically   offered   extra-­‐curricular   or   through   outreach   programs   that  aim  to  increase  awareness  and  entice  students  into  considering  engineering  as  a  future  career  option.    To  fulfill  this  objective,  these  programs  tend  to  highlight  the
Conference Session
WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cheryl Cass, North Carolina State University; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Anita R. Vila-Parrish, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. She received her BS in Chemical Engineering from NC State and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chem- ical Company from 1991-2000. A faculty member at NC State since 2000, Dr. Bullard has won numerous awards for both teaching and advising, including the ASEE Raymond W. Fahien Award, the John Wi- ley Premier Award for Engineering Education Courseware, NC State Faculty Advising Award, National Effective Teaching Institute Fellow, NC State Alumni Outstanding Teacher Award, George H. Blessis Out- standing Undergraduate Advisor Award, and the ASEE Southeastern Section Mid-Career Teacher Award. She is a member of the
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cate Samuelson, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Candice L. Staples, University of Maryland; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
qualitative research projects and eval- uations, including those focused on educational leadership, STEM education, and academic and social supports for disadvantaged students. Prior to her career in research, she worked as a public school teacher for eight years.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the Director for Research at the University of Washington (UW) Center for Workforce Development (CWD) and an Affiliate Assistant Professor in UW Sociology. She directs re- search projects from conceptualization, methodological design, collection of data and analysis, to dis- semination of research findings. Dr. Litzler manages the Sloan-funded Project to Assess Climate in Engineering
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Rae Volpatti, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl A. Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh; Lauren M. Byland, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #8519Implementation of a Sexual Harassment Workshop Targeting Female Engi-neersMiss Lisa Rae Volpatti, University of Pittsburgh Lisa Volpatti received her Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2013. Throughout her undergraduate career, she held several officer positions in the University of Pittsburgh’s section of the Society of Women Engineers, including section President during her senior year. She is pursuing a Master of Philosophy in Chemistry at the University of Cambridge as a Whitaker International Fellow and has received a National Science Foundation Graduate
Conference Session
WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alistar Erickson-Ludwig, Drexel University (Eng.); Alisa Morss Clyne, Drexel University (Eng.)
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
received her Doctorate in Medical and Mechanical Engineering from the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technol- ogy. Dr. Clyne received an NSF CAREER award in 2008 and an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant in 2010. She received both research and educational funding from NSF, NIH, De- partment of Education, the Nanotechnology Institute, and the State of Pennsylvania. She is a member of ASEE, ASME, BMES, IEEE-EMBC, Sigma Xi, and SWE. Her teaching focuses on mechanical engi- neering applications in biological systems, and she founded several programs to increase diversity within engineering
Conference Session
WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cristina Poleacovschi, University of Colorado, Boulder; Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. & Sexton, M. Career journeys and turning points of senior female managers in small construction firms. Constr. Manag. Econ. 28, 125–139 (2010).22. Kyriakidou, O. Fitting into technical organizations? Exploring the role of gender in construction and engineering management in Greece. Constr. Manag. Econ. 30, 845–856 (2012).23. Caven, V. & Astor, E. N. The potential for gender equality in architecture: an Anglo-Spanish comparison. Constr. Manag. Econ. 31, 874–882 (2013).24. Raiden, A. B. & Räisänen, C. Striving to achieve it all: men and work-family-life balance in Sweden and the UK. Constr. Manag. Econ. 31, 899–913 (2013).25. Bhuian, S. N. & Abdul-Muhmin, A. G. Job Satisfaction and Organizational
Conference Session
WIED: Medley
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Keith J. Bowman, Illinois Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
males. For ECE, which comprises about twenty-three percent oftenure and tenure-track engineering faculty and may have a slightly lower fraction of US bornfaculty due to a historically high fraction of foreign doctorates, about one hundred-twentydomestic engineering assistant professors are hired every year with about twenty-five per year Page 24.604.3being female. The electrical engineering devices most similar in scaling to this pathway to anengineering academic career are probably filters and not pipelines.This paper is focused on the connection between BS and PhD degree production in the context ofgender equity and domestic versus international
Conference Session
WIED: Medley
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ahmed Imran, Ajman University of Science & Technology, United Arab Emirates (UAE).; Mohamed Nasor M. Kalil; Fahar Ghalib Hayati, Ajman University of Science & Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #9785Attracting and Retaining Women in Undergraduate Engineering Programs –A Case StudyDr. Ahmed Imran, Ajman University of Science & Technology, United Arab Emirates (UAE).Dr. Mohamed Nasor M. KalilProf. Fahar Ghalib Hayati, Ajman University of Science & Technology Professor Fahar Hayati graduated with B.Eng.(Hons) in Electronic Engineering from Sheffield University in 1966. He received his Ph.D. from Edinburgh University in 1971. Since 1969 Professor Hayati has worked both in industry and in university in several countries. With a career stretching over 45 years he made vast contributions as an academic
Conference Session
WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amanda S. Parker, University of Colorado Boulder; Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
first place,thus focusing on creating capacity. Towards that end, we pervasively employed the NationalAcademy of Engineering Changing the Conversation messages4 throughout our recruitingcycle—in print materials, presentations and how we framed engineering as a “helping people”and “making the world a better place” career choice. Taken together, our strategies yielded goodresults. The percentage of female engineering students enrolled in the fall 2013 cohort jumped to27.7%, a 31% increase from the previous year.From the survey results, it appears that more personalization and contacts as well as the offeringof women-oriented events and recruiting materials do influence young women to attend aspecific college of engineering. Perhaps these efforts
Conference Session
WIED: Medley
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University; Helene Finger P.E., California Polytechnic State University; Alana Christine Snelling
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
) indicate that mathematics score gapsbetween male and female students are negligible, if they exist at all.4This increase in female student attainment, however, has not significantly impacted middleschool and high school female student interest in pursuing education and a career in science andengineering. As discussed by the AAUW (2010), “a 2009 poll of young people ages 8–17 by theAmerican Society for Quality, 24 percent of boys but only 5 percent of girls said they wereinterested in an engineering career.”5 In 2006, just over 20% of first year male students plannedto major in engineering, computer science, or the physical sciences. However, according to NSFdata from 2009, only 5% of first year female students planned to major in these non
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kerry Meyers, Youngstown State University; Leo H. McWilliams, University of Notre Dame; Catherine F. Pieronek, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #9215How Students’ Informal Experiences Shape their Views of Engineering andAffect their Plans for Professional PersistenceDr. Kerry Meyers, Youngstown State University Dr. Kerry Meyers is in her second year as the Director of the STEM College’s First-Year Engineering Program at Youngstown State University. Her career is focused on the development of common, project based First-Year Engineering experiences, beginning at the University of Notre Dame where she was also the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program from 2005-2012. Further, her research interests relate to Engineering Educational issues in the
Conference Session
WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristen B. Coletti, Northeastern University; Emily Olina Wisniewski; Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Melinda Covert, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
University prior to beginning his faculty career in Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, where he co-founded Automated Cell, Inc. He has been a Visiting Professor of Bioengineering at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering as well as a Visiting Scholar in Biomedical Engineering at Boston University. He also has led R&D teams at Organogenesis Inc. and Polymerix Corporation developing tissue-engineered medical products and drug- generating biodegradable polymers, respectively. He is the inventor on ten issued US patents. He has been the recipient of the first Whitaker Young Investigator Award from the Biomedical Engineering Society, a Searle Scholar Award, and an Early Career
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christine Valle, Georgia Institute of Technology; John D. Leonard II, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
and Engineering:2000, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2000 (NSF 00-327).7. Adelman, C., Females and Men of the Engineering Path. A Model for Analysts of Undergraduate Careers, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, D.C.; U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998.8. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M., Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997.9. Williams, F. M., Emerson, C. J., “Feedback Loops and Critical Mass: The Flow of Women into Science and Engineering,” presented at Gender and Science and Technology (GSAT 10), Denmark, 2001.10. Ro, H., Marra, R., Terenzini, P., Trautvetter, L., Walser, A., and Lord, S. “If You
Conference Session
WIED: Medley
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Beth A. Powell, Tennessee Tech University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
difficult situations. Suchresources, we hope, will increase women’s self-confidence in their abilities to persist in anengineering career, which is a common and troubling reason women cite for leaving the field[14, 15].2. Methods2. 1 Overview:This study uses a methodology known as discourse completion interview. In a discoursecompletion interview, participants are given a specific problem situation and asked to describeexactly how they would respond, providing specific wording when possible. We also promptedparticipants with potential responses to the problem and asked them to comment on the meritsand drawbacks of these responses. The goal was to find out as much detail as possible aboutspecific word choices, interactional strategies, and variables