Paper ID #10505A Flat Learning Environment - Learning To Solve Ill-Structured ProblemsProf. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. His research interests are in areas of product design, product platform design, and engineering education. He is in- terested in peer-to-peer learning, technology enhanced education, motivation, and game-based learning for engineering. He is the faculty advisor of the Sooner Racing Team (FSAE) and coordinator of the Mechanical Engineering Capstone Program.Dr. Firas Akasheh, Tuskegee UniversityDr. Gul E. Okudan
information necessary omissions. undetermined, and/ or for full understanding. backgrounds unknown.In addition to the Critical Thinking rubric, the Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric includes the Page 24.136.12entire criterion for outcome a. The list of criteria is given below; for performance descriptions,please see the complete set of rubrics.Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric Criteria: • Topic Selection • Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or Views • Design Process • Analysis • Conclusions • Limitations and ImplicationsStudent Outcome b: knowledge of mathematics
, Maine’s Title 26, Section 807 General Training Requirements.27. Dolezalek, H. (2005). The 2005 industry report.28. Perry, E.L., C.T. Kulik, J. Bustamante, F.D. Golom (2010). The impact of reason for training on the relationship between “best practices” and sexual harassment training effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 21(2): 187-208.29. Antecol, H. and D. Cobb‐clark (2003). Does Sexual Harassment Training Change Attitudes? A View from the Federal Level*. Social Science Quarterly. 84(4): 826-842.30. Bell, M.P., J.C. Quick, and C.S. Cycyota (2002). Assessment and prevention of sexual harassment of employees: An applied guide to creating healthy organizations. International Journal of Selection and
higher-order thinking skills, amongmany other outcomes, are enhanced by experiences during their college years. The “collegeimpacts” framework by Terenzini and Reason 12; 13 brings coherence to that research andconceptually combines factors forming the “Undergraduate Experience” in an effort to explainstudent learning outcomes and persistence. Several research studies in higher education (e.g.30-32 ), including ones grounded within an engineering context (e.g.,33), empirically support theframework.Figure 1. Organizing college impacts framework for the “Engineering of 2020” learningoutcomes, which includes leadership skills (revised from Terenzini & Reason12; 13).Our study used a revised version of the framework, which was modified in light
has worked as a practicing engineer for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Lawrence Berkeley National Labs and MSC Software Corp., as well as various consulting and expert witness positions. He also held a faculty position at University of the Pacific and is an adjunct faculty member at University of Texas, Austin. He has received numerous professional awards including a NASA Post-Doctorial Fellowship, ASEE Best Paper Awards, the ASME Most Innovative Curriculum Award, the Ernest L. Boyer - International Award for Excellence in Teach- ing, the US Air Force Academy Seiler Award for Excellence in Engineering Research and the Outstanding Academy Educator Award. He has published over 100 technical articles and
, electromagnetics, and system design. His research interests include cooperative control of networked multi-agent systems, resilient and fault-tolerant control, and networked control systems. He received the Best Student Paper Award in the area of Intelligent Control Systems and Optimization at the 2010 International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, and he received an Honorable Mention Award at the 2012 International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation & Control.Dr. Bryan O’Neil Boulanger, Ohio Northern University Page 24.42.1 c American Society for
Paper ID #10169Identifying and Cultivating Diverse STEM Talent through Creative RoboticsJennifer Cross, Carnegie Mellon University Jennifer Cross graduated from the F. W. Olin College of Engineering with a BS in Electrical and Computer Engineering and is now working toward her doctorate degree in Robotics at Carnegie Mellon University. A fellow of both the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Program and the Institute of Education Sciences’ Program for Interdisciplinary Educational Research at Carnegie Mellon, Jennifer’s research focuses on the impacts of integrating creative robotics into cross-curricular
, Spain, 2002. 20. Whitehouse, T., Choy, B., Romagnoli, J.A. and Barton, G.W., “Global chemical engineering education: paradigms for on-line technology,” Hydrocarbon Processing 80, pp. 100-108. 11, 2001. 21. Cao, L., and Bengu, G., “Web-based agents for reengineering engineering education” J. Educational Computing Research, 23, pp. 421-430, 2000. 22. Watson, J. B. and Rossett, A. “Guiding the Independent Learner in Web-Based Training, Educational Technology,” Vol. 39, Number 3, May 1999. 23. Deci, Edward L., and Ryan, Richard M., “Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior.” New York: Plenum Press, 1985. 24. Uhlig, S. Viswanathan, “Effective Design, Instruction and Assessment of an On-Line Engineering
concepts?”, “How do we measure their learning?”, and “How do wedocument the measurements and continue improving?”. The answers to these four questions provide theplatform for curriculum mapping and efforts leading to continuous improvement.Keywords: Curriculum design, Curriculum mapping, Student learning outcomes, Programlearning outcomes.What is curriculum mappingCurriculum mapping as defined by Koppang (2004) is a method of collecting data about what is reallybeing taught in schools and universities. Hale (2008) states that while curriculum mapping is recognizedas a highly effective method for serving students' ongoing instructional needs and creating systemicchange, the means for putting this data-based decision-making process into practice may
Paper ID #10302Students’ Persectives on Homework and Problem Sets in STEM CoursesMs. Lea Marie Eaton, Stanford University Lea Eaton is a senior undergraduate student at Stanford University. She is working towards her B.S in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Product Design.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis
-residential program, so students areresponsible for their own transportation to and from campus each day. And exampleschedule of a camp week is shown in Appendix A. During the course of the program,participants experience a variety of tours, speakers, hands-on activities, and field trips. Alarge component of the week is a group project where teams of students design, build andlaunch a model rocket made from high-tech engineering composites. During all of theseactivities, camp participants are able to interact with faculty, graduate and undergraduatestudents, and representatives of local industry. Images of the campers in action are shownin Figures 1 and 2. Additional information about the first year of the program can befound in the 2012 paper by
to see more impact is in the major designexperience class (ECE Capstone) and later alumni surveys.Artisanal hardwareAs described in more detail in4 our embedded computing course uses custom-designed andlocally manufactured header boards interfaced to the Texas Instruments MSP430 LaunchPad 7.Programs are written in C and are developed using TI’s Code Composer Studio8.Many introductory classes in embedded computing use components that are designed for easyintegration and hide the details. Indeed many of our students have used such introductoryrobotic systems in high school, first-year intro classes or in extracurricular activities. Ourapproach in this class is instead designed to confront the details to gain a more completeunderstanding of
Research Business Center. p. 8-‐10. 16. Food Processing, in http://www.chooseneindiana.com/, Northeast Indiana Regional Partnership. 17. Gambale, G., Top States for Doing Business: A Survey of Site Selection Consultants Area Development Online: Site and Facility Planning, 2010(http://www.areadevelopment.com/siteSelection/sept2010/top-‐states-‐doing-‐ business39016.shtml). 18. Handel, S.J., Silent Partners in Transfer Admissions. Chronicle of Higher Education 2010. 19. Wiggins, G. and J. McTighe, eds. Understanding by Design. ed. M.P. Hall. 2001: Upper Saddle
Engineering and engineering education researchers underscore anecessity that U.S. engineering graduates be capable of collaborating across national boundariesto successfully “encounter worlds of professional practice that are increasingly global in nature.”As a result, this emphasis requires engineering educators and professionals to better understandwhat constitutes a globally prepared engineer and the types of learning experiences fosterpreparation of such an engineer.This paper offers an overview of a NSF funded multi-university research program thatinvestigates how globally focused learning experiences within engineering (both co- and extra-curricular) impact students’ global preparedness. The research protocol involves three studiesand
understanding ofa scheduler’s job. Their pragmatic preparation would be orientated to success if they test thecurrent business practices and/or direct applications of the subject matters in the constructionjobsite. Early in the nineties, Benjamin et. al.1 created a knowledge‐based prototype forimproving scheduling productivity; the results confirm the system's effectiveness and support thefurther development of knowledge‐based systems as tools for improving the productivity of theconstruction industry. Real-world learning based on industry project-specific context and best business practicesmay make students a lot more marketable to industry. Every student from each group is sharingcomments, opinions, concerns and experiences, field trip notes
documentation is required to start the process as users, system analyst, developers, teamleader, quality assurance analyst, and database administrator work together as a team.Recently, the agile development process got lot of attention to the researchers in the area ofinformation technology. Procter et al.24 used a case study of a project to create a Web 2.0-based,Virtual Research Environment (VRE) for researchers to share digital resources in order to reflecton the principles and practices for embedding eResearch applications within user communitiesusing agile development. Garcia et al.13 provided a set of guidelines to develop knowledge-basedProcess Asset Libraries to store system engineering best practices, implemented as a wiki andimproves the use
. Thistechnology is becoming a common practice in discrete part manufacturing industries. Studentswill measure the effects of the thermal status of the machine tool on the machining accuracy ofthe machine tool. Student teams conduct experiments to check calibration of the machine toolsusing Ballbar & LaserXL80 calibration equipment purchased through the NSF grant. Web-basedinteractive instructional modules and tutors are developed for each sensor and equipment usedfor course. MET204 & ET635 (graduate level). Quality Control topics at graduate andundergraduate level focus on the information technology aspect of the proposed project. Studentswill use design of experiments to investigate the effects of the cutting conditions on part
Alexandra Coso is a Ph.D. candidate in the Cognitive Engineering Center at Georgia Tech, where she is pursuing a doctorate in Aerospace Engineering. She is expected to graduate in May 2014. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include the integration of stakeholders into the engineering design pro- cess, development and evaluation of interdisciplinary engineering courses and programs, mixed methods research designs, and graduate student experiences in engineering programs.Dr. Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University Adam R. Carberry, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools
success or failure for graduates when they enter theworkforce. As an example, project management skills are often neglected in an engineering orscience curriculum, requiring additional training for those engineers who end up in managementpositions. Skills such as the ability to lead and work effectively as a member of a team arefrequently identified as critical to the success of an engineer, but typically are lacking in newengineering graduates. 1 This article presents some information on impact of the NSF S-STEMon development of students’ professional skills.IntroductionSoft skills are important components of both industry and organizations. While soft skills aremajor components of industry core requirements, the students attending higher
21 Century, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter st Economic Future. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press (2005). 4. Duderstadt, J. J., Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, (2007). 5. Boyer, E. , Reinventing Undergraduate Education (The Boyer Commission Report). New York: Carnegie Foundation (2001). 6. Clough, G. W. (Chair), The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academy of
into the students learning experiences.This leads to the question, “Given the increasing levels of integration of technology into modernsociety, how can this technology best be harnessed to educated people at various academic levelsabout water sustainability issues?”The present research, developed by an interdisciplinary team of faculty and graduate studentsfrom Virginia Tech (VT) and two community colleges in Virginia (i.e., Virginia WesternCommunity College (VWCC) and John Tyler Community College (JTCC)), examines thepotential of a Platform-Independent Remote Monitoring System (PIRMS) in water sustainabilityeducation for students pursuing various academic pathways within engineering.13 The PIRMSuses real-time (delivering data to end users
adjunct faculty member at University of Texas, Austin. He has received numerous professional awards including a NASA Post-Doctorial Fellowship, ASEE Best Paper Awards, the ASME Most Innovative Curriculum Award, the Ernest L. Boyer - International Award for Excellence in Teach- ing, the US Air Force Academy Seiler Award for Excellence in Engineering Research and the Outstanding Academy Educator Award. He has published over 100 technical articles and generated approximately $3.5 million of research; all at institutions with no graduate program. His research includes development of innovative design methodologies and enhancement of engineering education. The design methodology re- search focuses on development and testing
8% 75% 17% Plans Development 7% 63% 30% Stormwater 19% 49% 42%The results of the survey indicate a strong preference for the video tutorials. The authorsbelieved that the student’s preference correlated appropriately with the learning styles surveyresults. The impact on the engineering design project will now be discussed.Impact on the Engineering Design ProjectThere were two embedded indicators within the engineering design project submission to assessthe effectiveness of the Civil3D instruction10,11. The preliminary grading plan and storm waterdrainage plan, each worth 25% of the final grade for a combined 50% of the
workers2. At the same time, it isrecognized that nanotechnology is still a developing field and nanotechnology R&D is expectedto accelerate throughout the decade3. Patents and scientific papers on nanotechnology topicsquadrupled in the last decade, and this growth has accelerated in the past couple of years4. All ofthese trends point to a need to train nanoscience researchers and scientists to continue the growthin this field and meet the nanotechnology vision for 2020 set forth by NSF3.Along with continuous advances in nanoscience and technology, educators have developeddifferent courses and programs at both undergraduate and graduate levels to attract the best andbrightest students to the field and help creation of a new work-force. Wansom
skills to compete in the globalbusiness environment when they meet with international business leaders on their travels abroad.They interact with America’s best entrepreneurs to learn business strategies. They design,implement, and lead a business project that aims to be the best of its kind in the world. They aretreated to guest lectures in the classroom and a year-long series of business workshops held bysome of the Northwest’s most successful business leaders. See Appendix 2 for descriptions ofthe three courses in the E-Scholars program.E-Scholars travel both domestically and abroad to meet business leaders across the globe. Allstudents travel to New York, where they meet with companies, consultants, non-profits andgovernment agencies, to
statisticallysignificant difference at α = 0.05. It should be noted that these grades are reasonable for agraduate course since a C is generally considered unsatisfactory at the graduate level. As ameasure of practical significance, the experienced instructor’s assessment of student quality isthat the latter class was on average a weaker group—which makes their better performance evenmore significant. The students learned the material in a better way using modern tools, in a waythey will remember better, and in a way that will help them get a job. This is far more importantthan the improved test scores.The students were highly engaged in the 2013 class; they felt that learning the material usingspreadsheets was a job skill that they could market. This was
Outcomes Criterion Professional Skills from ABET General Criterion 3 3d An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 3f An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3g An ability to communicate effectively 3h The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context 3i A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning 3j A knowledge of contemporary issuesABET outcomes clearly demonstrate a focus on core technical skills as well as other skillsincluding leadership as indicated in Table 1.Preparing engineering graduates with the leadership skills necessary for real
resources practices, an ethical problem exists. Withoutthe business-provided greenhouse, the capacity for aquaponics food production would bediminished, and fewer people would benefit. This discussion was more meaningful to the studentsthan a published ethical case since it directly impacted the work of the team on their project.Another example of project-related ethics discussion arose from a team working on anentrepreneurial project. The goal of that project was to design a workable, marketable productduring the semester. Ethics discussions arose during the design and product development stages.For example: Due to cost to manufacture, will the product only be available to wealthierfamilies? What will be gained from this product and what will be
initiated a engineering education research project on the impact of online activities on mechanics self-efficacy and achievement.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2003 Dr
Paper ID #9583Nature/Society: Situating student learning outcomes in a first-year Sustain-ability Studies courseMr. James E Wilcox , Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute James Wilcox is a doctoral student in Science & Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, where his dissertation project investigates the practices and politics of energy policy interventions. From 2011 to 2013 he was the Program Coordinator for Vasudha, an Undergraduate Living & Learning Com- munity dedicated to sustainability at RPI. Prior to coming to RPI, he served as an Education & Outreach Fellow in the Office of