Paper ID #9125Examining Diffusion Networks and Identifying Opinion Leaders: A CaseStudy of the AIChE Concept WarehouseDr. Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a postdoctoral scholar in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. Debra has an M.BA, an M.S, and four years of industrial experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is also an area in which she holds a patent. She currently has research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories and the diffusion of educational interventions and
manufacturing facilitate energy-efficiency in the commercial building industry. Another research interest of Kristen’s is engineering education, where she explores how project- and experience-based learning foster better understanding of engineering and management principles. Prior to joining ASU, Kristen was at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) as a Postdoctoral Fellow (2009-11) and then a Scientific Engineering Associate (2011-2012) in the Building Technologies and Urban Systems Department. She worked in the Commercial Buildings group, developing energy effi- ciency programs and researching technical and non-technical barriers to energy efficiency in the buildings industry. She has a background in
Youngstown State University, with a Bachelors of Engineering degree in Electrical Engineering in 1981. He then obtained his MS and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from GA Tech in 1982, and 1988 respectively. He joined the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at the University of New Mexico where he is currently professor and was the chair between 2005 and June 30, 2011. Since July 1, 2011, Professor Abdallah is the Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs at UNM. Professor Abdallah conducts research and teaches courses in the general area of systems theory with focus on control and communica- tions systems. His research has been funded by national funding agencies, national laboratories, and by
Paper ID #10526Curriculum Development for Embedded Systems SecurityDr. Janusz Zalewski, Florida Gulf Coast University Janusz Zalewski, Ph.D., is a professor of computer science and software engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Prior to an academic appointment, he worked for various nuclear research institutions, including the Data Acquisition Group of Superconducting Super Collider and Computer Safety and Re- liability Center at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also worked on projects and consulted for a number of private companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris, and Boeing. Zalewski served as a
learning environment and “real"environment, and making available training of “real world” situations that are difficult tosimulate in a hands-on lab environment. Traditionally for teaching technology-based courses,laboratory experiments were offered using a hands-on approach. With the miniaturization ofintegrated circuits, it is becoming very difficult to construct a PC board or assemble surfacemount chips in a lab environment. This shortcoming of the hands-on approach has led professorsand teachers to incorporate simulation in place of hands-on in technology-based lab courses. Page 24.701.2 In spite of the advantages of simulations, hands
Engineering, PaperEngineering, and Engineering – Undecided; Engineering Design Technology, EngineeringManagement Technology, Manufacturing Engineering Technology; and Computer Science. AGraphic and Printing Science degree program has not been a part of this effort, as it is notrecognized by the National Science Foundation as a STEM discipline.A typical College graduate profile, as gathered from senior exit survey and from employersurvey, is a student who worked part-time while attending classes and took 10.5 semesters tograduate. The students enjoyed the practical hands-on side of engineering which they learn atthrough projects, laboratory, design-build competitions, and involvement in applied research.Employers rated College graduates as highly
in Engineering Technology.Courses such as Robotics and Mechatronics, Quality Control, Manufacturing Materials,Microcontrollers, and Applied Mechanics can benefit from the laboratory experience inapplications of sustainability and eco design as well as material and processes selection. As wellas helping in the teaching of various courses, such experience benefits students who are pursuingdegrees in the engineering field. Students in the Mechanical, Electrical, Industrial andBiomedical fields along with many others can learn many new skills from case study projectssuch as designing and fabricating various consumer products, machines and equipment. Suchprojects show students how to use different types of technology, and demonstrate how
Paper ID #9966Introducing High School Students to Biomedical Engineering through Sum-mer CampsDr. Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Mansoor Nasir received his B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from University of Cincinnati and Ph.D.in Bioengineering from University of California-Berkeley. Thereafter, he pursued his research interests first as a postdoctoral associate and then as a Mechanical Engineer at the US Naval Research Laboratory in Washington DC. He has several publications in the areas of microfluidics, chemical and biological sensors and MEMS technology. He is also is passionate about
Paper ID #10406Introducing Nanotechnology into an Undergraduate Microelectronics CourseProf. Chung Hoon Lee, Marquette University Chung Hoon Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.Dr. Susan C. Schneider, Marquette University Susan Schneider is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI. She is also the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories for the Electrical Engineering program. Dr. Schneider is a member of ASEE, the IEEE, Sigma Xi and Eta Kappa Nu.Mr. Trevor
construction project engineer for a construction contractor and as a research engineer for the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory in Port Hueneme California. His teaching interests include construction equipment, cost estimating and construction process design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods and innovations in construction process administration.Dr. Natalya A. Koehler Koehler, Franklin University, OH Instructional Design Faculty Franklin University, OHDr. Aliye Karabulut Ilgu, Iowa State University Page 24.1400.1 c
curriculum. Don was a published game developer, with over a dozen titles ranging from Orbiter in 1985 to Harpoon 3 Professional in 2012. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #10328Dr. Reza Toossi, California State University, Long Beach Dr. Reza Toossi is a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at CSULB. He received his B.S. degree from the Sharif University of Technology in Tehran, Iran, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of California, Berkeley. He continued his Post Doctoral research studies in the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and joined the CSULB
be coveredin a laboratory course, rather than in a course called statistics. Further comments on this point arein the Discussion. Universities do not all use semester credit hours, but when necessary weconverted a university’s system to a credit hour basis. We did not consider general chemistry,physics, math, or humanities and social sciences, but confined our attention to engineeringcourses as well as biology and organic chemistry, which are less common topics for other types Page 24.1082.3of engineers. For the 2004 data sample, 40 of the 43 programs accredited at the end of 2004 wereevaluated, along with 31 programs that were not
. and R.D. Braatz (2002). Experimental projects for the process control laboratory. Chemical Engineering Education, 36(3): 182-187.[23] Pérez-Herranz, V., A.I. Muñoz, J.L. Guiñon, J. Garcia-Antón, S.C. Navarrete (2003). An Internet-based Process Control Laboratory Project. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education, 21-25.[24] Selmer, A., M. Goodson, M. Kraft, S. Sen, V.F. McNeill, B.S. Johnston, C.K. Colton (2005). Performing Process Control Experiments Across the Atlantic. Chemical Engineering Education 39(3): 232-237.[25] Gossage, J.L., C.L. Yaws, D.H. Chen, K. Li, T.C. Ho, J. Hopper, D.L. Cocke (2001). Integrating best practice pedagogy with computer-aided modeling and simulation to improve
implemented in a junior-level fluid mechanics course thatincluded both lecture and laboratory components. A total of nine learning objectives werespecified for the course. These learning objectives are: calculate fluid thrust forces, calculateaerodynamic forces, solve pipe flow problems, select a pump for a system, select a flowmeter fora system, write a computer program to solve transient fluids problems, write a professionalquality lab report, acquire and analyze laboratory data, and be a valuable member of team thatsuccessfully completes a project. The learning objectives can be mapped to ABET studentoutcomes. In this implementation of Standards-Based Grading, all assessments are done on apass-fail basis. That is to say, there is no partial credit
IntroductionThe operating systems course is part of the classical curriculum of undergraduates in softwareand computer engineering. The content is well established from decades of iterative refine-ment and covers topics such as task management, system calls, synchronization, scheduling,memory management, and file system structure.1, 2 There are usually practical activities,or laboratory assignments, that complement the lectures. One approach to these activitiesconsists in using simulators.3–5 A simulator can help visualize the execution of classicalalgorithms, step-by-step. However, subsystems interaction is not covered from these ac-tivities, such that the global perspective is missing. The other common approach involvesprogramming a small scale
intuitive.According to Moreno, “The importance of feedback in promoting learning is inarguable butadditional research is needed to determine the effects of structured guidance on other educationalareas, methods, and student populations.”15 One way to better understand the effect of simulatedactivities on students’ learning is to expand the research to uncommon educational areas suchlearning technical concepts related to information technology (IT). Even though for severaldecades researchers have explored the use of simulation to augment the laboratory experiences inthe areas of surgery, physics, chemistry, biology, math, and dental education, there is nosignificant study that measures the effect of students’ learning of IT matters using simulationsoftware
obvious differences between the discussion topics selected by more- andless-experienced mentors, combining the responses from both groups highlights interestinggroupings among the topics. For instance, nearly all mentors chose to discuss logistics, the valueof the research, and the student’s role: 98% of mentors discussed how students can seek help for research-related questions 93% of mentors discussed the intellectual merits or significance of the research area/topic 91% of mentors discussed students’ expected work schedules 91% of mentors discussed the value of the student’s role within the project/groupDiscussions of how the student would be integrated with existing research and laboratory/groupprocesses were the next
Education Director for the NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST).Prof. Mehmet C. Ozturk, North Carolina State University Mehmet C. Ozturk received his BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Bogazici University in Istanbul, Turkey in 1980. He received his MS degree from Michigan Tech in 1983 and his PhD degree from NC State University in 1988. Immediately after graduation, he joined the faculty in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Since 2008, Dr. Ozturk has been serving as the director of the NCSU Nanofabrication Facility, which operates as the central laboratory for the entire University. In 2012, he became the
UnLecture furthers theunderstanding of concepts that students learn from traditional lectures and laboratory projects. “I do remember seeing a diagram (in my co-op) that was made during one of our meetings … I believe it was a class diagram, since it showed what some classes would contain and what methods we would need to implement. I didn’t know UML then…” “It does seem like it takes a lot of time to create models for a software project but it will force you to think and know how the software will be structured and designed. This can also lead to solving many issues that may arise before any coding is actually begun.” “Another point from this Unlecture I found interesting was when one student talked about his experience as
Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and
projects are appropriate to run as full-fledged interdepartmental multi-discipline efforts,the course coordinators must use their judgment, and be somewhat selective.Collaborations with Non-Engineering Departments Over the years, a number of Senior Design projects at our College have also involvedcollaborations with departments outside of the engineering school, thereby further extending themultidisciplinary reach and scope of our program. For example, for the last three years, two of our departments (ECE and ME) haveengaged in a partnership with Florida State’s department of Earth, Ocean & AtmosphericSciences department, and two of its associated research laboratories, to have teams of ourengineering students develop various new
specific to the subject, basedon understanding of the subject’s life and career, and more general questions designed to furtherthe more general aims of a study to be based on a group of related interviews.Training of Undergraduates in Human Subjects TrainingBoth Ms. Irvin, Ms. Hiteshue, as well as the PI, Dr. Lanzerotti, completed Human Subjects Page 24.962.6Training through the institution’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to conducting the oralhistory interviews of the distinguished leaders. This course is “suitable for investigators andstaff conducting research with human subjects at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)and for
laboratory access iswithheld until all team members complete the assignments.IntroductionThe Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) Program1-4 is an innovative educationalinitiative at the College of Engineering of the University of Florida (UF). In weekly classesspanning two consecutive academic semesters, (eight months), students from various engineeringand business disciplines are taught how to design products and processes. Then, working in smallmultidisciplinary teams under the guidance of faculty coaches and industrial liaison engineers, Page 24.1240.2the students design and build an industrial product or design a manufacturing process
researchare free; two are commercial standalone tools. This prevents students from viewing the vul-nerabilities as a whole problem. We think this could be useful for a course that is focused onsecurity testing but not for an introductory course on software testing.Garousi7 presents open modern software testing laboratory courseware that is similar to theone we report in this paper, but he uses several tools and SUTs. One of his findings is thattesting educators should align the choices of SUTs and tools with the ultimate goal of thecourse at hand, the type of students, and the time and resources available to the students inthe course.Other forays into improving the teaching of software testing have been reported. For in-stance, Cowling5 describes how
: The National Academies Press.10) Denson, C. D., & Hill, R. B. (2010). Impact of an engineering mentorship program on African- American male high school students’ perceptions and self-efficacy. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 47(1), 99-127.11) Sanders, T. (2004). No Time to Waste: The Vital Role of College and University Leaders in Improving Science and Mathematics Education. United States Department of Education. http://www.ecs.org/html/Document.asp?chouseid=548012) Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory
including prevalence[11, 12, 13, and 14]; motivations [15]; personal characteristics and attitudes of perpetrators [12,16, and 17]; detection [14]; deterrence [15, and 18] and the correlation between academicdishonesty and the students’ ethical behaviors going forward into their careers [19]. Many ofthese studies [11, 15, 16 and 17] have used surveys of students and/or faculty as the main sourceof data. Anyanwu [20] provides case studies that indicate that plagiarism may often be a result ofstudents’ failure to understand the rules of proper citation. Others concentrate on academicdishonesty in laboratory setting [13] or in test taking [11, 16, and 17] or consider a wide range offorms of academic dishonesty in the aggregate [15].Some studies [15
developed a Creativity Index based on the MBTI instrument.Higuchi 32 explains analysis of empirical experiment for measuring effect of creativityimprovement before and after the Idea Marathon System training for about a 3 monthsperiod, for R&D and laboratories staff using TTCT Figural tests. There are some efforts indeveloping the competency at colleges. Putkonen, et al. 33 have proposed pedagogy andconcluded that the context of working life offers better opportunities for inculcatinginnovative (creative) skills. They have not used any specific measures, though. Jiazeng, etal.34 have introduced a separate course on Creative Studies and used TTCT to prove thatcreativity can be improved through education. While they have provided pre measurements
Paper ID #10870Eliminating Lectures (and video lectures) in Large Introductory MaterialsScience and Engineering Courses: Large Gains in Student LearningProf. Steven M. Yalisove, University of Michigan S. M. Yalisove obtained a PhD in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania in 1986. After a post doc at Bell Laboratories, he joined the Michigan faculty in 1989. In 1996 he was a Fulbright scholar at the FOM institute in the Netherlands. He is currently the Associate Director of the Materials Laboratory at the Center for Ultrafast Optical Sciences at the University of Michigan. Yalisove’s
therapeutics, thus PNIPAAm has beenextensively investigated for applications such as protein delivery 58-61. We produce PNIPAAm polymers in our laboratory regularly, and it can be achieved with astraightforward free-radical polymerization of NIPAAm monomer in water using a redoxinitiator 26. The hydrogel can be made magnetic by suspending magnetic Fe3O4 powder inaqueous solutions of PNIPAAm, below the LCST. Upon application of a magnetic field with asolenoid, the presence of the magnetic particles will cause the solution to heat above the LCST,causing collapse of the polymer around the magnetic particles and the squeezing out of the drug.A pulsatile release profile can be generated by turning on and off the magnetic field 53. The K-12 students
materials and technical data, participation mustbe limited to U.S. Persons as defined in ITAR 12019 with proof of citizenship/naturalization. Aregistration of project participants must be maintained for access control to any ITAR restrictedclassroom or laboratory. A laboratory manager must ensure positive ID of all entrants into thelaboratory, and any foreign nationals must be escorted. Citizenship must be verified before thesharing of any export controlled materials within the lab. All persons working within the ITARcontrolled space must be adequately briefed on ITAR policies and sign the University's ITARnon-disclosure form.ITAR controlled items must be clearly identifiable. The item should be labeled “ITAR Export-Controlled”. If the item is of