Paper ID #9985Making and Engineering: Understanding Similarities and DifferencesJames Logan Oplinger, Arizona State University I am a student at Arizona State University, studying electrical engineering. I plan on going to graduate school at ASU for the Engineering (MS) degree. After I graduate I will work in industry, but I plan on becoming an engineering professor afterwards.Mr. Andrew Michael HeimanMatthew Dickens, Arizona State University Sophmore Electrical Engineering Student at Arizona State Universities’ Honors College interested in engineering education and the entertainment industry.Ms. Christina Hobson Foster
GuilfordCounty middle schools that are labeled as Title I schools . Title I schools are funded with federalmoney to improve the achievement of low-income students. This group is targeted because lowsocioeconomic status girls are less likely to pursue careers in science and math related fields.1The camp was led by two STEM female faculty and an undergraduate female engineeringstudent. Figure 1: Participants of Girls in Science Lab learning to using pipettes. After months of strategy and curriculum planning for the camp, applications to the campwere made available to students currently in the 6th and 7th grade; these applications included astudent essay, parent essay, and a teacher recommendation. Using a rubric, the students thatwould
Paper ID #9924Outreach Activities as an Integral Part of Promotion and TenureDr. Andrew E. Jackson, East Carolina University Dr. Jackson serves as a Tenured, Full Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at ECU. He is a senior faculty member in the Industrial Engineering Technology (IET) program where he teaches a variety of IET courses, including: Production Systems Engineering and Production Planning, Engineering Economics, Human Factors Engineering, and Risk Assessment. His career spans 40 years in the fields of aviation, aerospace, defense contract engineering support, systems acquisition, academics, and
since high school when he attended Center for Advanced Technologies in Florida. His passion leads him to constantly ponder on how evolving technologies can be deployed to find it’s applicable usage. After completing his studies in USC, Minh pursues a career in Software Engineering.Richard Phillips Richard Phillips, University of Southern California Richard Phillips is an undergraduate student at the University of Southern California majoring in Computer Science and Business Administration. He was a sophomore when he wrote this paper, and is expected to graduate in 2016. He plans on getting his Masters in Computer Science as part of USC Viterbi Engineering School’s progressive degree program in 2017. After
Glen Livesay is an Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering; he co-developed and co- teaches the biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, the statistical evaluation of assess- ment instruments, and increasing student engagement with hands-on activities. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
participation on diverse teams as “real world” and therefore Page 24.1154.2beneficial13, their behaviors and experiences on diverse teams can be more problematic1,7. Forexample, students of different genders tend to take different roles on teams, with females morelikely to complete project planning and communication work and males more likely to dotechnical planning and hands-on building1,12. It is unclear in the research whether studentschoose to take on gender-specific tasks or are pushed by teammates into those roles.Team discussions tend to privilege some students at the expense of others. Women and under-represented minorities are more likely
schedule cannot be violated. In accordance with theCorporation’s normal employee policies, each student was requested to fill out a weekly timecard documenting their effort expended, including task description and time expended on eachtask.As part of the corporation’s commitment, a corporate officer was to be in attendance at syllabus-scheduled reviews. Additionally, an interface, during class time, of pre-planned teleconferencesbetween all the students and a corporation representative was to take place every week. Theaudiologist agreed to participate in design reviews and to invite student teams to her clinicaloffice to view current hearing aid technologies, relevant programming issues and in respondingto patient expectations.The First Year
and implement a plan to address those if necessary.Data gathered during the investigation showed that in this region nearly 1 in 3 workers wereemployed by manufacturing companies – more than twice that statewide number determined byNAM. The data also revealed that 500 qualified workers are needed every year in this region justto maintain the current manufacturing economy.1 This number does not include new emergingindustries or growth of the current industrial base.Data compiled by the US Census Bureau in their American Community survey showed that inthis 10 county region the percentage of citizens 25 and over with a high school diploma was 84.1percent and the percentage of citizens 25 and over with a BS degree was 15.3 percent.3 Clearly,in
Page 24.1253.5students, the videos were partially used by the students to complete homework assignments, andthat the videos did not hold the students’ attention. The quality of information refers to the typeof information that the student needed. If the student did not understand where a variable camefrom or why compounded interest was used instead of simple interest, then the video needs toaddress those shortcomings. This may lead back into the planning of the videos and how muchtime the instructor actually needs in order to plan and produce the video.The particular application used for this exercise, ShowMe, automatically tracks the number ofviews for each video. BlackBoard application also has a feature that will track the number ofviews
study that measured current IE students’ interestin solving operations research problems in different industry sectors and their perceptions aboutindustrial engineering careers. The aim of the study is to gain greater understanding about theinterests and perceptions of current IE students at Kansas State University (KSU). While thespecific results are most directly applicable to the institution where the study was conducted, wecomment on broad insights of interest to the industrial engineering education community.The pilot study described here is part of a planned long-term effort to understand the perceptionsof prospective (pre-college) students and those of students at multiple stages in the curriculum.The overarching objective is to design
ensure that the minimum requirementsare met. In phase two, qualified applications are reviewed by the applicant’s preferred center.Each center, which has its own selection committee comprised of faculty, graduate students, andpost-doctoral researchers, reviews and ranks the applications. Then the center concludes itsreview with a short list of candidates recommended for placement. The final phase, selectionoversight, takes place when the TTE REU staff come together to review and approve the centers’selections.Evaluation and AssessmentThe TTE program has an evaluation plan that measures the success and efficacy of the REU Site.Evaluation for each cohort of TTE REU participants occurs in two stages: formative andsummative. The formative evaluation
in written and oral communication skills. Future plans to evaluate theeffectiveness of this capstone in term of learning outcomes. 1. Introduction:The 1973 oil embargo was the propulser for the creation of the first generation of multiple energysimulation programs, such as DOE and TRNSYS in USA, ESP-r in UK, CODYBA in France. Theseprograms are still in use until today, even if multiple versions have been developed, because of theirflexibility and their reliability.Among all these programs, only TRNSYS (Klein, 1976), (Klein, 1977), (Klein, 2006) reach theinternational scientific community, since it benefits from the modularity structure that makes it one of themost appropriate software for education and research. Hundreds of papers
displayed in each vehicle. The student’s research and testout their ideas to make sure plans will be beneficial to the overall performance and energyconservation of the vehicle. One of the most valuable tools the students use for research is acomputer program known as Autodesk Inventor. Inventor allows that students to test theirinnovative ideas in computer form before taking the time to actually manually create the parts.The students can simply put their design plan into the program and the simulation will informthem the approximate weight, whether or not it would actually be functional with in thevehicle, and how the design could with stand up to particular elemental conditions such asgravity or mountains. The Inventor program is an invaluable
, and six-years later (i.e. graduation) for matriculantsto the disciplines as well as all students in the major including first time in college (FTIC) andtransfers. The impact of first year engineering (FYE) programs is also considered. We focus onthe large fields of mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering, that have few women andthe smaller fields of chemical, biomedical, and industrial engineering that attract morewomen. In the supplement approved in 2013, we extended this work to also include CivilEngineering and Aerospace Engineering.Major activitiesSince September 1, 2012, the project team has been productive working together well andmaking progress on all planned tasks from the proposal. PI Susan Lord, CoPI Matt Ohland andsenior
many. To allow engineering to be taught effectively acrossthe K-12 education spectrum, particularly by teachers who themselves may not have studied orpracticed engineering, it is critical to articulate the important elements of engineering and toprovide specific assessment criteria that can be used to evaluate student proficiency with eachelement. As the elements and related assessment criteria are clearly defined, teachers can beginto consider lesson plans that teach engineering concepts at the appropriate level for theirstudents. This paper describes an ongoing effort to: Identify engineering design as a cornerstone of K-12 engineering education, Define expected learning outcomes for students studying engineering design
as alignment ofcontent with engineering concepts articulated in science standards, inclusion of well crafted,open-ended design challenges, and designed to enhance student engagement with scienceconcepts. The Teacher Practices themes include sub-components focused on items such asquality of group-based activities, encouragement of students to engage in thoughtful pre-planning, the generation of multiple solutions, and active reflection on engineering designpractices. As was the case with identifying the major categories, the leadership team engaged innumerous conversations and the sub-categories have gone through multiple iterations.Next, we developed descriptions of what implementation would look like across a spectrum ofimplementation
and encouragement.C. Sustaining the Projects and Partners10. Reuse your STEM lessons with different audiences of middle school students. Developing new curriculum can be time-consuming and when working with middle school students, the activities and lessons really need to be tested. So even if it means that it limits how much design and creativity your university students will have, reusing your STEM lessons in several service-learning projects can save a lot of time and problems. One example is having a few lessons pre-planned, and having the engineering students be helper teachers. This shows the engineering students what is contextually appropriate for middle and high school students and what to expect in a classroom
topic inquestion both in order to help them develop a deeper understanding of the topic and in order tohighlight problem areas that need further elaboration by the instructor. We discuss the theoreticalbasis behind the work, provide some details of the prototype implementation of an on-line tool thatenables such structured discussions, and describe our plans for using it in an undergraduate courseon software engineering and for assessing the approach.1. IntroductionThe most widely accepted definition of the flipped classroom is one where “events that have tra-ditionally taken place inside the classroom now take place outside the classroom and vice versa”,see, e.g., Lage et al. 1 . Thus the knowledge transfer that the traditional lecture tries
bridgeprogram. Despite the apparent advantages of the summer bridge programs its impact has beenlimited to only a small subset of students, which is a consequence of financial constraints of theindividual universities and also student interest. Summer bridge programs for 25 students cancost upwards of $40,000. Also, some high school graduates work to earn money for school ortravel during the summer prior to going to college, and participation in a multi-week residentialprogram would be disruptive to the established plans of these students.Post-secondary education summer transition/bridge programs typically recruit from targetpopulations including underrepresented students, low income students, provisionally admittedstudents, and those who are at risk
potential circumstance was to request anevaluator who had the requisite experience. If no such evaluator existed, the faculty was Page 24.138.4resigned to having to educate the evaluator on all salient aspects of BOK2. As it turned out, wewere assigned an evaluator with functional knowledge of the BOK2 and was supportive of ourefforts to “Raise the Bar”.B. Revision of Civil Engineering Program Educational Objectives and Student OutcomesThe Department assessment plan requires review of the program educational objectives (PEOs)every three years. In general, the review process commences with faculty who suggest changesif necessary. At the annual meeting
are to support students’ three-year tenure at the College, and thefourth to support transfer. Achievement Level 1 scholarship is for students who are eligible toenroll in Trigonometry or Pre-calculus at the time of the award and have three-years of study atCañada College before transfer. Achievement Level 2 is for students who are registered inCalculus 1, or higher, at the time of the award, and are within two years of completing theirStudent Educational Plans (SEP) and transferring. Achievement Level 3 is for students who arewithin a year of completing their lower-division study at Cañada. The Transfer scholarship is forstudents who have completed all coursework included in their educational plan and aretransferring at the time of the award
K-12 Engineering Education5Key Indicator DescriptionProcess of Design (POD) Design processes are at the center of engineering practice. Solving engineering problems is an iterative process involving preparing, planning and evaluating the solution. Problem and Background Identification or formulation of engineering problems and research (POD-PB) and learning activities necessary to gain background knowledge Plan and Implement (POD-PI) Brainstorming, developing multiple solutions, judging the relative importance of constraints and the creation of a prototype, model or
other design activity in previous work -- discussion about finding pieces,putting pieces in a specific location, finding a particular programming component, or connectingthe LEGO NXT to the appropriate cables.The Group Discussion (GRO) code was created to identify conversation pieces in the group thatincluded students organizing themselves, transitioning between tasks, and planning their nextdesign steps. Previous work included codes for making design decisions and communicatingdesign ideas but didn’t include codes for students working collaboratively in a busy classroom.As this task took place in a classroom setting where instructors and teaching assistants werepresent facilitating the task, the Instructor Explanation (IEXP) code was created
Reinforcement-learning Traffic Simulation Add-on Module (SMART SAM). He was also one of the key developers of the dilemma zone protection Detection Control System (D-CS) that was selected as one of the seven top research innovations and findings in the state of Texas for the year 2002. Dr. Abbas served as the chair of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) traffic engineering council committee on ”survey of the state of the practice on traffic responsive plan selection control.” He is also a member of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Traffic Signal Systems committee, Artificial Intel- ligence and Advanced Computing Applications committee, and the joint subcommittee on Intersection. In addition, he is
were asked to defineoperating conditions in order to obtain the product purity in a distillation column for amulticomponent separation; in this case the selection of the applied methodology was not pre-defined17. Further, students had to describe the methodology they employed to solve theproblems and answer sixteen MAI items (numbered 2, 6, 8, 11, 13, 21, 22, 23, 34, 37, 38, 40, 41,42, 44, and 48 on Appendix A), related to regulation of cognition, most of them particularlyassociated with planning and monitoring, which used as a form of coaching5, 8. Page 24.204.6 PROBLEM 3Kinetics and
specific workshops to address career options, in response to the 2012report by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS), “Pathways Through Graduate School and IntoCareers.” The CGS report and plans for our expanded graduate school sponsored career-focusedactivities, have been shared with graduate program directors, the Career Services Center, and thePresident's Council. We expose STEM graduate students to different kinds of careers, e.g., non-profit, government, and industry, and while maintaining a commitment to train future faculty fordifferent kinds of academic institutions. Our signature career seminars for graduate students areroundtable networking sessions, in which participants have the opportunity to interact withdiverse professionals with
lectures.Figure 2: Online lecture management Page 24.719.7Design MethodologyThis section covers some innovative techniques that were implemented in our institution toincrease students’ engagement in online classes. Some of these techniques are proved to be veryeffective and some are not. We are still in the process of measuring the effectiveness and hencethis paper doesn’t provide enough detail of assessments. In our effort to increase studentinteraction within an online course delivery system, whether the course is entirely online orbeing offered face-to-face augmented by online support, we plan to incorporate two features thatwe believe will advance the
faculty advisor to the EDDP’s Engineering Club and the Society of Women Engineers student organization. She also teaches a career planning class for engineers and a first-year engineering course. From 2006-2008, she was the Director for the Preparing Outstanding Women for Engineering Roles–POWER– Summer Camp. Mrs. McCormick received her Masters of Science in Technology and Bachelors of Science in Engineering from the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI.Ms. Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Terri Talbert-Hatch, Ed.D. Assistant Dean for Student Services Purdue School of Engineering & Technol- ogy, IUPUI Dr. Talbert-Hatch oversees the Student Services Office
necessarily based on their (uncritical) intuition.Project 2: This project builds off of Project 1 and assimilates concepts from early in the MoMcourse, such as tension, lateral shear, and bearing stress. Students are asked to design structuralelements using the reactions previously obtained at the pole base (by the time this project isassigned, the results from Project 1 have already been discussed in class). In particular, the polebase (z = 0) is assumed to be attached to a steel plate that is connected to a concrete pedestal bysteel anchors (Figure 2a). Page 24.753.5 Figure 2a. Elevation (top) and Plan (bottom) views of Pole Base Connection
course was delivered and howthe students applied the knowledge on designing and developing a ‘ReadingAssistant’. It also describes what conclusions were drawn on the effectiveness of themethod and what lessons were learned.2.0 Engineering ManagementEngineering Management is a discipline that is not rigidly defined and this is evidentfrom a variety of Engineering Management programs offered by different universities.According to Gupta President, Institution of Engineers, India [1], EngineeringManagement is the process of planning, organising, staffing, leading and influencing Page 24.759.2people, and controlling activities, which have a Technological