. China EMS manufacturing facility case 7. US-China joint manufacturing facility case 8. Axle assembly line improvement case Page 24.472.3Using these cases to discuss systems engineering process and systems thinking as well as theirimplementations, the instructor provides some discussion points that reflect the issues of systemsthinking and the achievement of systems objectives. For example, one discussion is on the initialimplementation of lean approach to outsource various processes to multiple suppliers located atdifferent countries for Boeing 787 Dreamliner’s design and production activities. Some of theissues discussed include how
” and “Homework questions on the Avengers made the homeworksomething cool to research of [sic] figure out rather than just get through and done with.”The students also submitted reflections on the class as part of their final. In 2013, the studentswere unanimously positive about the class. Their comments included statements like “All myfriends in other classes are jealous” and “It helped me see that engineering doesn’t have to beseparate from my real life.” Their level of enthusiasm for the class was certainly higher thanstudents in previous years. For the first time since I have taught the class, people who were notin the class have come to me, sometimes months later, to talk about the ideas we discussed in theclass. The students have been
experience due to the PhD requirements.The attainment of a PhD has grown as a requirement as research and external funding for hasbecome more important. The essential aspect of industry experience is a result of the appliedscience nature of construction management education. 6 The importance is reflected not only injob postings but also in accrediting body requirements. Both the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) and the American Council for Construction Education(ACCE) note that faculty in construction engineering and construction engineering programsshould have relevant professional experience. 1, 2 In fact, ABET considers this one of the ways inwhich faculty demonstrate their competence. 1This current demand on faculty for
video-recordings. The conversationsin these frames were compared to the related part of their documented works to see how theyconveyed their ideas. Portions of the video-recordings which were found to be related to theresearch question of this study were transcribed and used to triangulate findings from the writtendocuments and interviews.Interviews were transcribed and relevant pieces about how they respond to TA feedback wereselected. These pieces provided insights to students’ individual reflection on their teamwork.Results of Team A and Team B were constantly compared with each other to identify thesimilarities and differences in the ways they respond to TA feedback and conveyed their ideas intheir documented works.IV. ResultsSubmitted
0.55 2.98 1.27 Personal qualities Integrity 3.55 0.63 2.86 1.09 Self-confidence 3.43 0.66 2.61 1.08 Self-reflection 3.30 0.70 2.61 1.10 Responsibility 3.50 0.66 2.59 0.95 Preparation and 3.30 0.59 2.82 1.04 Self management prioritization Commitment to research 3.18 0.58
andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 24.259.5 References1 Genco, N., Holtta-Otto, K., & Seepersad, C. C. (2010). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of engineering students. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.2 Atman, C. J., Sheppard, S. D., Turns, J., Adams, R. S., Fleming, L. N., Stevens, R., et al. (2010). Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering
placing a pieceof reflective tape on the orbiting mass (internal to the sander) and using an optical tachometer tomeasure the revolutions. Figure 5: Mounting of the Orbital Sander Vibration Source Page 24.317.5The accelerometer can be mounted in several different manners. The easiest is a simple drill andtap in the side of the wooden tier. This is sufficient for a short time, but the threads willeventually strip and a new fastening hole must be created. If a longer lasting mount is desired, itis possible to use a small nut to hold the accelerometer (Figure 6). In order to install the nut,drill a shallow hole in the side of the
Minnesota Office of HigherEducation [3]. The third intention is to argue that reconciliation between the two literacies is more easilyaccomplished if new curriculum structures can be embraced. While it is understood that particular notions ofcurriculum structure are deeply embedded in a culture, it is argued that this embededness prevents a culturefrom reflecting on how it should respond to the explosion in knowledge that has occurred in the last century.This requires thinking outside the box about alternative curriculum structures.A model curriculum for a college engineering and technological literacy program is described. Its framework isderived from elements of an experimental program in technology education designed for the transition year
completethe objectives without an unreasonable amount of time so that it does not adversely affecttheir other courses. Proper testing facilities should be available to students throughout theproject so that they can learn to operate them, measure attachment points, etc. Materialsand shop facilities must also be made available if prototypes will be required. Andcertainly the projects must be carefully aligned with the desired outcomes.Third, many students struggle to accurately assess the causes for the difference betweentheir theoretical results and what they find during testing. Taking time in class to reflect onthe possible causes is important. For example, we have found that often the students dothe analysis correctly, but fail to take into
project? 2) How do student motivation and goal orientations change throughout their interaction with the curriculum changes? 3) How does students’ self-efficacy for design learning, specifically their comfort with “messy” open-ended engineering design problems and use of higher-level cognitive strategies change as they experience and reflect on errors or failure during prototyping and design activities?The quantitative project evaluation will consist of three previously developed and validated in-struments, the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS26), the Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire (MSLQ27), Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI28) and the Learning Inven-tory29, while qualitative data will be
results during the conference presentation.ConclusionThe encouraging survey results have reflected a strong agreement with the main goals ofincorporation of the PBL into traditional lecture-based courses. Projects have served as bridgesto connect classroom learning and real-life applications. The implementation of hand-on projectshave made the learning of science and engineering principles more enjoyable. Through project-based learning, students are not only more confident with their understandings of the materialspresented in a course, but they are also better prepared for the upper-level engineering design andlaboratory courses.References 1. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991
enrolled in the course if it were notrequired of them. At the conclusion of the course, students were asked to reflect on thecontribution of the course to their enjoyment of programming. We used this data tocreate a pre and post-score, where like/dislike of programming was measured in thebeginning and end of the course.We used this data to test four research questions about attitudes toward programming: 1) Can an inclusive, supportive environment that is catered to the non-programmer lead to improved attitudes about programming? 2) Can students with low-positive feelings (LP) increase their confidence in programming? 3) Does prior experience with programming influence the degree of attitudinal change? 4) Do specific
students must becomerepresentative of the nation’s population. This call is especially pronounced in the field ofengineering.These representative numbers can only be realized through increased preparation of college-agestudents. Undergraduate engineering has become a test bed for pedagogy to increase studentinterest and abilities, reflecting the progress of cognitive development research in STEMlearning. Analysis of best practices can improve instruction at all levels, including K-12. Aboveall, an environment to nurture problem solving and innovation skills is imperative.Unfortunately, there are few K-12 settings for students to obtain real-world experience that mightattract them to STEM careers. To address this problem, the St Vrain Valley School
, habitsof mind, and analytic practices of the design sciences (engineering and technology) with those ofthe natural sciences (science and mathematics) (e.g., Ref. 38).In educational practice and in research, the term “integrated” is used loosely and is typically notcarefully distinguished from related terms such as connected, unified, interdisciplinary,multidisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, or transdisciplinary. Defining integrated STEM education isfurther complicated by the fact that connections can be reflected at more than one level at thesame time: in the student’s thinking or behavior, in the teacher’s instruction, in the curriculum,between and among teachers themselves, or in larger units of the education system, such as theorganization of an
omega slip. We want to control omega M. So… right now omega slip is at 50 and we need to make omega slip much larger, don’t we?”Critiquing / Critically reflecting on “That doesn’t make sense.” EvaluateChallenging interpretations/ reasoning(CR) in which proposals may “I don’t think that those two (IMs and Is) are in be challenged and phase.” counter-challenged. “We don’t need total power. We need power loss.”Conscious Purposeful citations of
multipleprobes33, 34. The open ended questions were developed to allow rich, deep descriptions ofparticipant’s experiences and beliefs35, 36. Distinctions between the protocols included ensuringthe questions were appropriate to capture participants’ perspectives relative to high schoolexperiences (either current or reflection). The final protocols captured information on theparticipants’ experiences during high school including reasons for choosing their career goals aswell as information related to the other constructs of the SCCT model. Detailed information onthe protocol development was previously documented37.ParticipantsAll high school and college participants were from one of nine counties located in thesouthwestern most portion of Virginia. The
standards, reflecting the increasing acceptance of engineering at the K-12 leveland its potential value to students. In addition to promoting outcomes that benefit all studentsregardless of career aspirations such as increased math and science achievement and greatertechnological literacy, K-12 engineering programs have been identified as a means of recruitingand retaining potential students in engineering.The growth of precollege engineering programs means that increasing numbers of incomingengineering students will have had some exposure to engineering prior to their enrollment inengineering programs. However, the impact of precollege engineering experiences onundergraduate engineering students is relatively unexplored. To address this lack
Landscape: Summary of a Summit, 57.11. Payton, F. C. (2004). Making STEM Careers More Accessible. Black Issues in Higher Education, 21(2), 90.12. National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.13. Fifolt, M., & Searby, L. (2010). Mentoring in Cooperative Education and Internships: Preparing Proteges for STEM Professions. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(1), 17-26.14. Packard, B. W. L. (2004). Mentoring and retention in college science: Reflections on the sophomore year. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 6(3), 289-300
Page 24.911.1 using pre- and post- concept inventories to assess improvement, an online reflection tool to assess pro- cess, and a grading rubric to assess the solution (general model and specific solution). We are identifying numerous problem solving processes used by the student teams, as well as the range of problems that c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #10443 can be addressed, to determine how effective the various processes are relative to improved conceptual understanding. Collaborators Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh, Larry Shuman, University
student success is parental education levels, which appear to affectstudents’ likelihoods of majoring in science and engineering26 as well as their probabilities ofearning a bachelor’s degree in any field27.Academic preparation as reflected in high school GPA, high school class rank, and standardizedtest scores is also a significant predictor of college academic performance28,29. One early studyof more than 36,000 college students found that a student’s high school records and SAT scoreswere positively related to academic performance in college18. Similarly, data on over 1,000freshmen engineers at Penn State indicated that high school GPA and grades in calculus andphysics were the best predictors of persistence in engineering in the first two
statesof completion, have raised awareness of BOKs and have provided lessons in how todevelop and implement them.Numerous volunteers worked long and hard to develop the NSPE mission-vision-values,produce the NAE report, and initiate BOK efforts in various engineering disciplines. TheNSPE EBOK effort benefitted from those earlier efforts. This reflects a lesson learned asa result of ASCE’s development of the CEBOK. That lesson was to stand respectfullyand thankfully on the shoulders of others. 2The Body of Knowledge ConceptA profession’s BOK is its common intellectual ground – it is shared by everyone in theprofession regardless of employment or engineering discipline. The EBOK, as used inthis paper, is defined as the depth and breadth of knowledge
(n) (n) 52 50 0 717.500 <0.0001ConclusionsThis study was conducted with the premise that forms of assessment can be extended orbuilt upon to reflect the needs and values of a discipline. Specifically, the researcherswanted to see if replacing the PSVT-VOR with one that uses pictures of everyday objects(i.e. Pictorial VRT), that by common everyday associations students might do betterusing images on visual-based tests. But, as the findings indicate it is just the opposite,students that participated in this study did statistically better using the traditionalgeometry or isometric drawing version of the same test that was repurposed witheveryday images.Based on the
faculty Page 24.1006.2members, who taught in both conditions, also completed reflection papers related to theirexperiences. The following describes guiding research questions for the study.Research questions: 1. Do students in inverted classrooms spend additional time actively working with instructors on meaningful tasks in comparison to those students in control classrooms? 2. Do students in inverted classrooms show higher learning gains as compared to students in traditional classrooms? 3. Do students in inverted classrooms demonstrate an increased ability to apply material in new situations as compared to students in
courses contributed to their views of SR. Atthe small public university all of the civil and environmental engineering students worked on SL projects,but 21% still indicated that none of their courses contributed to their understanding of SR. These resultsseem to indicate that the impacts of courses on the SR of students may be more limited than instructorsintend. This may reflect a typical dichotomy between “what is taught” versus “what is learned”. It mayalso indicate that instructors should use reflective essays or in-class discussions to encouragemetacognition and thinking around how engineering can and should try to positively impact society andhelp underserved populations.26Ethics provides a counter example to the minimal impact of courses
rubber bands. Wire allowed the instructor tocreate links that reflected those on the drawing, with bends and a single, sturdy line. Rubber Page 24.1167.6bands allowed the student to modify the diagram herself. Roles were indicated on associationsusing smaller Post-it notes, also with Braille.A set of foam symbols was found at a local craft store that included several symbols close to theUML symbols used on edges. Figure 3 shows some of these symbols and their correspondingUML element. The zero, one, and star symbols represented the most common multiplicities.Inheritance was indicated using a triangle. Composition was indicated with the two
’ learningprocesses, and reflect on their own teaching (Merceron and Yacef, 2005, Romero and Ventura,2007, Baker and Yacef, 2009, Baker, 2010) Several Educational Data Mining studies of student Page 24.1181.4behavior in online and other educational tools revealed differences between groups of students interms of such variables as level of participation in discussion boards (Anaya and Boticario, 2009),Questions & Answers boards, completion of assignments, and annotations (Zakrzewska, 2008,Anaya and Boticario, 2009, Macfadyen and Dawson, 2010). Each of these studies has helped tovalidate these techniques as methods of identifying pedagogically interesting
succeed, and where institutions support such communities of learners.3 Higher education should produce new frames of understanding by piloting new ideas, tools, and approaches to keep students’ learning on the cutting edge.4In 2010 the Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, an imaging systems engineeringdepartment at the Rochester Institute of Technology, developed and implemented a newfreshman-level course, known as the Freshman Imaging Project, which embodies thispedagogical framework. While the architects of this new pedagogy wanted it to reflect the mostrecent research on STEM education, it was also built upon other fundamental beliefs. Forexample, the belief that first year students are capable of understanding advanced
about students’ majors in Year 1 and Year 2 reflecttheir pre-major status or preferences. Retention data about students’ majors in Year 3 reflect themajor into which they were admitted after going through the Entrance-to-Major process. Becauseit reflects objective major status rather than preferences and is available for students exposed tothe three interventions, we focus on retention in Year 3 rather than on graduation rates. Math Tutoring OutcomesTo improve performance and retention in the foundational math classes for STEM majors, wepresent data on two math interventions administered for the eight semesters of the project. Fourcampuses instituted a 1-credit weekly tutoring class taken in conjunction with
solving by connecting diagnosed problems with solution types42. Participatingin review encourages student reviewers to reflect upon their own skills while examining peerwork43-44.Some of the emerging technologies are also enabling new ways of peer review. For example,online videos changed the way we create, view and share videos online today. With smartphoneslike the iPhone, and phones running on Android and Windows operating systems, it is effortlessto create, share and evaluate videos using the basic features phones offer. Videos can be aneffective media to quickly generate content and provide feedback to peers.Overview of Teaching to Learn: The SystemAs part of our work, we intend to test the potential of technology-enhanced peer-learning
instructors from industry, who brought a truly multi-disciplinary character to these courses. Finally, we gave students numerous opportunities topractice their critical thinking skills by answering non-trivial questions, formulating decisions,and reflecting on their actions.Motivation for the sequence of technology commercialization coursesA recent survey of engineering students showed that 41% of them wanted to start their ownbusinesses, and 66% thought that entrepreneurship education would strengthen their careerprospects and improve their learning experiences8,9. Another survey showed that 50% of facultyand administrators believed that access to entrepreneurship programs would improve engineeringeducation10. These statistics show that many people