Engineering Management Program(s)University of Pennsylvania Executive Masters in Technology ManagementStevens Institute of Technology Master of Engineering in Engineering ManagementDrexel University Master of Science in Engineering ManagementWidener University Master of Engineering/MBANew Jersey Institute of Technology Master of Science in Engineering ManagementUniv. of Maryland – Baltimore County Master of Science in Engineering ManagementThe Catholic University of America Engineering Management ProgramCornell University Master of Science Program – Engineering Manage.Duke University Master of
/DrSalimian: http://www.youtube.com/user/DrSalimian5. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press.6. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pentice Hall.7. Goodlad, S. (1998) , Mentoring and Tutoring by Students, Psychology Press8. Falchikov, N. (2002) Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education, Routledge9. Salimian, M., & Mahmud, Y. (2012.).10. Bransford et al., 200011. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 1.12. Bransford et al., 2000Appendix ASome Guidelines
, S. K. A. “The Hyatt Horror”: Failure and Responsibility in American Engineering. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 14, 62–66 (2000).12. Newson, T. A. & Delatte, N. J. Case methods in civil engineering teaching. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 38, 1016–1030 (2011). Page 24.703.9Appendix A Table 1: 2009 Self-Reported Interest Raw Data % of Grp. Ind. Category Count total Lectures Act. Res. Projects Readings Male 283 80.17% 2.744 2.744 3.271 3.094 3.229 Female 70 19.83
discussion and advice regarding PBL implementation; George Chiu for support ofthe work at Purdue; and the reviewers for thoughtful comments which improved the work.References 1. Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. (2005) “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 87-101. 2. Smith, K. (2011) “Cooperative Learning: Lessons and Insights from Thirty Years of Championing a Research-Based Innovative Practice.” Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD. 3. Prince, M. (2004) “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 223-331
Hall, 2004. 9. Black, B.A.; Dipiazza, P.S.; Ferguson, B.A.; Voltmer, D.R.; Berry, F.C., “ Introduction to Wireless Systems” Prentice Hall, 2008. 10. www.abet.org/defining-student-outcomes. 11. Kamali-Sarvestani R., "Spectrum engineering and private frequency utilization in wireless communications education," Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 2013 10th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on, June 2013. 12. Christopher S., and Kittross J. M., Stay Tuned: A Concise History of American Broadcasting, 2nd Ed., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1978. 13. Barnouw E., A Tower in Babel: A History of Broadcasting in the United States. vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press
disabilities. Testimony in Hearing before the Subcommittee on Education Reform, Committee on Education and the Workforce, United States House of Representatives, Available at: http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/108th/edr/idea031303/carnine.htm. 2. Davis, R. & Braun, E. (2010). The Gift of Dyslexia. Perigee Books. 3. Eide, B.L. & Eide, F.F. (2011). The Dyslexic Advantage: Unlocking the Hidden Potential of the Dyslexic Brain. Hudson Street Press. 4. Schneps, M. & Rose, T. & Fischer, K. (2007). “Visual Learning and the Brain: Implications for Dyslexia.” International Mind Brain and Education Society. Volume 1, Number 3, pp 128-139. Blackwell Publishing, Inc. 5. Shaywitz, S
energy and design-for-manufacturing research in an undergraduate research project. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. 2003:S1E-10-5.14. Yildiz F, Coogler KL, Pecen RR. An overview: Applied interdisciplinary renewable energy projects. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 2012:1-18.15. Zhuo X, Ding J, Yang X, Chen S, Yang J. The experimentation system design and experimental study of the air-conditioning by desiccant type using solar energy. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations, Shenzhen, China. 2006:1-8.16. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Review 2010. 2011
,n3, July, 2002.[3] Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., Helmick, M. T., “Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering”,Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 10-18, 2008, pp. 777-786.[4] Hegarty, M. “Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions” Learning and Instruction14, pp. 343-351, 2004.[5] Flori, R. E., Koen, M. A. and Oglesby, D. B. (1996), Basic Engineering Software for Teaching (“BEST”)Dynamics, Journal of Engineering Education, 85: 61–68. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00209.x[6] Brophy, S. P., Walker, G. D., “Case study of the pedagogical impact of tablet PC’s as a presentation medium inlarge-scale engineering classrooms”, Proc. ASEE 2005.[7] Prince, M. "Does
professors on the tenure track, balancing research, teaching and servicecommitments is an ongoing challenge. Organizing and running a program like MaterialsCamp falls in the service category, which is generally considered the least important areafor tenure and promotion decisions. Any camp program requires a significant amount oftime and effort from the organizing faculty member(s), and will inevitably decrease theamount of time available for proposal and paper writing, research activity, and coursepreparation.Feedback from several UAB faculty members in administrative positions with P&Tcommittee experience was collected informally, regarding their impressions of theMaterials Camp program, and its potential impact on the author’s career
the 21st Century; Proceedings of Construction ’91. Cambridge, MA: ASCE; 1991:484-489.10. LePatner, Barry B. Broken Buildings, Busted Budgets: How to Fix America’s Trillion-Dollar Construction Industry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007.11. Johnson S. Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation. New York: Riverhead Books; 2010. Page 24.756.912. Construction Innovation Forum: NOVA Award. NOVA Award. 2013. Available at: http://www.cif.org/nova- award.php. Accessed December 30, 2013.13. Zakaria F. “Restoring the American Dream – How to Innovate” – Global Public Square - CNN.com
Approach for Engineering Curriculum Integration in Capstone Design Courses,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 14(3), 197-203, 1998.6. Ana Vila-Parrish, Dianne Raubenheimer, “Integrating Project Management & Lean-Six Sigma Methodologies in an Industrial Engineering Capstone Course,” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.7. John Lamancusa, Jens Jorgensen, Jose Zayas-Castro, Julie Ratner, “THE LEARNING FACTORY – A new approach to integrating design and manufacturing into engineering curricula,” Proceedings of the 1995 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.8. R.S. Sawhney, S. Maleki, J.H. Wilck, P
understanding of the course concepts? Why? ____________________ Why not? ____________________What additional subject(s) would be better understood if pencasts were added?What did you like least about using the pencasts?What suggestions do you have to improve pencasts for future students? Page 24.790.16Appendix C – Focus Group ProtocolFocus Group Protocol -Perceptions of Student LearningThe purpose of the focus group is to discuss how participation in the pencast tutorials has been beneficial to students. In other words, how you see using these tutorials outside of class are beneficial to you. 1. To start off this conversation, I’d first like to
beginning to permeate our campus.We recommend that other engineering programs that want to increase multidisciplinarityconsider the framework of sustainability as a way to move toward that goal, by increasing theintegration of engineering disciplines as well as by increasing the integration of engineering withother fields.References:1. Chen, C S, Steven Elliott, and Mark Boardman. “A Multidisciplinary Energy Based Curriculum. ASEE Conference Proceedings 2011.2. Fraser, Jane M, Leonardo Bedoya-Valencia, Jude L DePalma, Nebojsa I Jaksic, Ananda Mani Paudel, Hüseyin Sarper, and Ding Yuan. “Community Outreach and Engagement through Sustainability.” ASEE Conference Proceedings 2013.3. Lenczewski, Melissa, Cliff Mirman, and Lesley Rigg
presentation to faculty andpracticing engineers from industry. Since this is a capstone project course, many ABET StudentOutcomes are assessed each quarter as indicated in Table 1. Written, oral and studentcontribution rubrics were developed specifically for the capstone project course and are usedduring assessment and evaluation. Assessor body include Engineering Technology programfaculty, sponsoring company engineers and invited Drexel University faculty.Table 1. ABET Students Outcomes assessed per quarter offering. ET COURSES OUTCOME(s) MET 421 Project Design I a-k MET 422 Project Design II a-h, j, k MET 423
Industrial and Operations Engineering from The University of Michigan, and the A.B. degree in Engineering Science from Dartmouth College.Dr. Laura Stanley, Montana State University - BozemanProf. Nicholas Ward, Montana State University Professor Nicholas Ward (F. Erg. S) obtained his Ph.D. in Human Factors psychology from Queen’s University (Canada). He is currently a Professor of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Montana State University and a Senior Research Scientist in the Center for Health and Safety Culture at the Western Transportation Institute. Professor Ward has led interdisciplinary and international research consortia to study traffic safety research including intelligent transportation systems, driver
Engineering Education, 1946, 37, 8, 117-135 The Co-operative System – A manifesto, 1946.[8] Lev Vigotsky (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (V. J.-S. M. Cole, Ed.).[9] What will your personal brand look like? (2010). [brochure]. PricewaterhouseCoopers.[10] Bconnor123. (2008, November 5)Don't just stand there - say something intelligent!. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CkzKMdEeQ4[11] Board of Directors., ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission., (October 29, 2011). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation_Process/Accreditation_Docume nts/Current/eac- criteria-2012- 2013.pdfabethttp
with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcastengagetoexcelfinal_22512.pdf. 5. J. J. Duderstadt, 2008, Engineering for a Changing World A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education, The Millennium Project, The University of Michigan, available at: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/88645/1/2008_Duderstadt_Grasso.pdf. 6. Yoon, S. Y., Evans, M. G., and J. Strobel, “Development of the Teaching Engineering SelfEfficacy Scale (TESS) for K12 Teachers,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2012, ASEE Annual Conference
Page 24.387.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Developing a Reactor Operator Training Course Series at Oregon State University Wade R. Marcum1, Steve R. Reese2, S. Todd Keller2, Robert A. Schickler2 1 Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics, Oregon State University 2 Radiation Center, Oregon State UniversityABSTRACTOregon State University’s (OSU’s) Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation HealthPhysics (NERHP) recently graduated its first influx of students participating in the inaugural“Reactor Operator Training” course series
) (S Reactive Power (Q) r we t Po en par Ap θ Real Power (P) Figure 1: Power triangleThe importance of the cosine of the phase angle also known as the power factor is emphasized.The students are made aware of the implications of low power factor. For instance
Fall of 2012. Based upon both published results on “writing to learn” from the literatureand the authors’ observations from Fall 2012, it was reasonable to hypothesize that the activity ofwriting homework abstracts would lead to improved attainment of the course instructionalobjectives. However, the control experiment that was conducted in the Fall of 2013 did notproduce any evidence to support of this hypothesis.Literature Cited i Felder, R.M., “Stoichiometry without Tears”, Chemical Engineering Education, 24(4), 188-196, 1990. ii XXXX and YYYYY, “Effects of Requiring Students to Write Abstracts for Homework Problem Solutions,”Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013). iii Maharaj, S
. She is the PI of an NSF S-STEM grant and helps to direct the un- dergraduate research program at SAU. She leads a study-abroad trip for engineering students to Ilheus, Bahia, Brazil every-other-year.Prof. Hank Yochum, Sweet Briar College Hank Yochum is the Director of the Margaret Jones Wyllie ’45 Engineering Program and Professor of Physics and Engineering at Sweet Briar College. Sweet Briar is one of two women’s colleges in the United States with an ABET accredited engineering degree. He earned his BS in Physics from the College of Charleston and PhD in Physics from Wake Forest University. Prior to joining Sweet Briar, he was a Member of Technical Staff at OFS Specialty Photonics in the Optical Amplifier
Khonsari, M.M., 2007, ”Granular Collision Lubrication: Experimental Investigation and Comparison with Theory,” ASME Journal of Tribology – V. 129, pp. 923-932 Synergistic Activities: Engineering Program Manager, Baton Rouge Community College, August 2011 – Present: LA-SiGMA EPSCoR - collaborate with LSU engineering and mathematics faculty to develop modules to train community college students to use sophisticated materials research instrumentation, assist with the Beowulf Boot Camp for high school students and teachers and facilitate the participation of BRCC students in the research experiences for undergraduates (REU) programs focused on computational and experimental materials science NSF S-STEM Scholarships
the focus fromteaching to learning, Delmar Publishers, 2000Uchiyama, K. P., and Radin, J., Curriculum mapping in Higher Education: a Vehicle forCollaboration, Innovations in Higher Education, 2009 33:271-280Angelo, T., Cross, K., Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, 2ndedition, 1993Saad, I., Elgamal, S., Interactive Student Portfolios: Proceedings of Construction Congress VII, ASCE,Honolulu, Hawaii, March 2003 Page 24.884.9
significantlyimprove educational standards and career opportunities for technical college graduates. Page 24.886.9 References1. ETA/ Business Relations Group Report. (2005). Addressing the Workforce Challenges of America’s Advanced Manufacturing Workforce. Retrieved September, 5, 2011.2. Labor Market Information Division, Industry Employment and Labor Force, November 18, 2005.3. Center for Workforce Success, “The Skill Gap 2001,” P.5.4. Rosenfeld, S. (1998). Technical Colleges, Technology Deployment, and Regional Development (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Chapel Hill, North
Engng. Educ., Bangkok, Thailand, 19-23 (2007).4. Terenzini, P.; Cabrera, A.; Colbeck, C.; Parente, J.; Bjorklund, S., "Collaborative Learning Vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains." Journal of Engineering Education (2001): 123-130. Web.5. Guzdial, M.; Ludovice, P.; Realff, M.; Morley, T.; Carroll, K.; Ladak, A., "The Challenge of Collaborative Page 24.921.9 Learning in Engineering and Math," Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual , vol.1, T3B,24-9 vol.1, 2001
Optimization: State of the Art: SIAM, 19973 Kodiyalam S, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization - some formal methods, framework requirements, and application to vehicle design. International Journal of Vehicle Design 2001; 25:3-224 Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) methods: Their synergy with computer technology in the design process. Aeronautical Journal 1999; 103:373-3825 Xiaoyu G, Renaud JE, Penninger CL. Implicit uncertainty propagation for robust collaborative optimization. Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design 2006; 128:1001-10136 Tovar A, Khandelwal K. Topology Optimization for Minimum Compliance using a Control Strategy
of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. ISBN: 0-309-65442-4, (2007).2. G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B.Claar, H. L. Chen, , K. Jackson, S. D. Sheppard, “An Engineering Major Does Not (Necessarily) Make an Engineer: Career Decision Making Among Undergraduate Engineering Majors,” Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 3, 227-234, (2009). Page 24.943.11
-specific Outreach Activities within the faculty member’s annualproductivity plan thus providing significant benefits to the faculty member, to his/her students, tothe industry sponsors who support the process, and to the local economies where participatingworkforce members live and work.References1. Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service & Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.2. Ellison, J., & Eatman, T. (2008). Scholarship in public: Knowledge creation and tenure policy in the engaged university. Imagining America, Syracuse University. Retrieved from http://imaginingamerica.org/TTI/TTI.html3. Freeman, E., Gust, S., & Aloshen, D. (2009). Why faculty promotion and tenure matters to community
engineering through a microfabrication project, Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov 11-15, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Carlson, L., Sullivan, J., Poole, S., and M. Picket-May. (1999). Engineers as Entrepreneurs: Invention and Innovation in Design and Build Courses, 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rice. 3. Hein, G.L., S.A. Sorby, (2001). Engineering Explorations: Introducing First-Year Students to Engineering, 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 21, Reno, Nevada, USA. 4. Carlson, L.E., Sullivan, J.F. (1999). Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning
expressing the things they believe about teaching,learning, and their role(s) in the teaching/learning processes. For example, “What are yourbeliefs about teaching? What are your aims for students, and why are these aims important toyou? How do your actions as a teacher reflect your beliefs about teaching and learning?”3Portfolio authors could also adapt guidance intended to help students creating learning portfoliosto their situation, and utilize prompts such as “What have I learned? Why did I learn?”4 (aboutteaching); “What difference has the learning made in my intellectual, personal, and ethicaldevelopment?”4 (as a teacher); “How does what I have learned fit into a full, continual plan forlearning?”4 (for teaching, for professional development