topic and software operation. By forming a social, collaborative environment, the Girls CREATE program encouragesfuture interest in science, engineering, and technology through the strengthening of creativewriting skills. The instructional material is intended to teach the students how to identify, plan,solve, and portray solutions to the types of problems scientists and engineers encounter inpractice using a hands-on, three-dimensional building approach. By utilizing modern technologyand software, the program’s curriculum includes projects designed to prepare students for theirfuture academic careers and teach them about the role of technology in society.List of Engineering Topics: 1. Environment: e.g., air pollution, recycling, clean
professional development, and opening the Innovation Center which will provide a pipeline for all students in the Skyline feeder for a vision of future opportunity and career success. Patty served as Principal at Skyline high school for 5 years , she transformed and formed the STEM & VPA Academies which have currently 500 students as part of these certification programs. She was instrumental in securing grants, business and educational partnerships for Skyline and continues to do this work in her new position. Ms. Quinones also organized efforts to implement: 1 on 1 Laptop Initiative, Mini-STEM Academy in the summer, HS Department of Computer Science, internships & jobs for STEM students. Ms. Quinones has presented
standards, reflecting the increasing acceptance of engineering at the K-12 leveland its potential value to students. In addition to promoting outcomes that benefit all studentsregardless of career aspirations such as increased math and science achievement and greatertechnological literacy, K-12 engineering programs have been identified as a means of recruitingand retaining potential students in engineering.The growth of precollege engineering programs means that increasing numbers of incomingengineering students will have had some exposure to engineering prior to their enrollment inengineering programs. However, the impact of precollege engineering experiences onundergraduate engineering students is relatively unexplored. To address this lack
positive outcomes from their mentoring relationship.6 Typically, students whoparticipate in mentoring programs have a higher GPA, take more credit hours, and have a lowerdrop-out rate.7 Traditionally, mentors challenge students to develop critical thinking, self-discipline and good study habits.1, 8 Moreover, the mentors also benefit from their experience ofworking with mentees and report heightened career satisfaction and commitment as a result.1, 9Additionally, students belonging to disadvantaged groups have been shown to significantlybenefit from mentoring relationships. Research has shown that many women, minorities, anddisabled students that are interested in STEM disciplines may lack the self-confidence, socialconnections and information to
Mentoring (PAESMEM), the Anita Borg Institute Women of Vision Award for Innovation, Okawa Foundation Award, NSF Career Award, the MIT TR100 Innovation Award, and the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society Early Career Award. She served as the elected president of the USC faculty and the Academic Senate. At USC she has been awarded the Viterbi School of Engineering Service Award and Junior Research Award, the Provost’s Center for Interdisci- plinary Research Fellowship, the Mellon Mentoring Award, the Academic Senate Distinguished Faculty Service Award, and a Remarkable Woman Award. She is featured in the science documentary movie ”Me & Isaac Newton”, in The New Yorker (”Robots that Care” by Jerome Groopman, 2009
engineering outreach.The effectiveness of summer high school science and engineering workshops has been reportedin the literature [3–8]. In [4], Anderson et al. found that engineering outreach programs canincrease the students’ awareness of engineering. In this study, women were the focus participantsof the engineering outreach program. There was a significant increase in the interest in pursuingengineering as a career among women participating in the program. In [8], researchers Yilmazet al. concluded the success of the program is dependent on the quality of the ”hands-on nature” Page 24.1141.2of the engineering projects. The diversity of the
faculty advisor to the EDDP’s Engineering Club and the Society of Women Engineers student organization. She also teaches a career planning class for engineers and a first-year engineering course. From 2006-2008, she was the Director for the Preparing Outstanding Women for Engineering Roles–POWER– Summer Camp. Mrs. McCormick received her Masters of Science in Technology and Bachelors of Science in Engineering from the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI.Ms. Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Terri Talbert-Hatch, Ed.D. Assistant Dean for Student Services Purdue School of Engineering & Technol- ogy, IUPUI Dr. Talbert-Hatch oversees the Student Services Office
ofwomen in careers in higher education in STEM related fields1,2,3,4. Of course, issues arecomplicated and no single answer or antidote exists. Those seeking to improve the number ofwomen who enter and remain in careers in academe have sought to understand pipeline issuesfor entry, what factors impact career success and retention, and answers to why the number of Page 24.885.2women who are ultimately promoted to the rank of full professor in STEM fields remains low,and even lower, for those who enter leadership positions4.Much evidence exists that suggests that women role models are significant to progress in manyrespects. Women students
. Steven R Little, University of Pittsburgh Page 24.1384.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Work in Progress: A Vision for the First “Product Innovation Sequence” for Chemical EngineersChemical engineers who enter the marketplace today are facing a vastly different reality thanthose who started their careers even five years ago. Keith Watson, (Senior Director, StrategicMarketing, Dow Chemical Company) noted in 2011, “The attributes needed to compete foremployment in the modern chemical industry have changed
received his B.S in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design) from Stanford University’s Center for Design Research.Dr. Shawn S Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Shawn Jordan, Ph.D.is an Assistant Professor in theDepartment of Engineering atArizona State Univer- sity. He is the PI on three NSF-funded projects: CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society (EEC 1351728), Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?(EEC 1329321), and Broadening the Reach of Engineering through Community Engagement (BRECE)(DUE 1259356). He is also Co-PI on one NSF-funded project: Should Makers be the
factors that contribute tothis phenomenon, including societal bias and the environment of the STEM classroom. As asociety, it seems to be a natural assumption that the subjects of math, science, and engineeringare traditionally “male” subjects. Research has been done to show how “stereotypes can lowergirls’ aspirations for science and engineering careers over time.”2 In order to eliminate societalbias, the environment and manner in which STEM subjects are taught to girls must change. “Ifgirls grow up in an environment that cultivates their success in science and math with spatialskills training, they are more likely to develop their skills as well as their confidence andconsider a future in a STEM field.”2 This project was designed to target
who have college degrees roughly doubled over the past three decades, as did theshare of those with some college education. Over the same time, the share of those attaining ahigh school diploma or less declined. Employment of college graduates is projected to growfaster than average from 2006 to 2016 [2]. Increasing demand for technological advances meansmore jobs for STEM workers. More STEM workers also will be needed to replace those who areleaving these occupations. Many highly skilled workers will retire, change careers, or move tomanagement positions over the next decade. Employers are expected to hire about 2.5 millionSTEM workers who are entering their occupation for the first time [3,4]. Along with near futurehigh demand for a well
the last day to assess studentinterests and opinions. The survey contained the following questions, with a 5 pointLikert scale labeled as “not at all” (1), “slightly” (2), “somewhat” (3), “quite a bit” (4)and “very much” (5). Q9 and Q10 were only included on the post-camp survey. Page 24.754.5 Q1 I am familiar with the field of materials science and engineering. Q2 I understand the career opportunities in materials engineering. Q3 I want to study engineering in college. Q4 I want to study materials engineering in college. Q5 I want to go to UAB for college. Q6 I like to take things apart to see how they work
their curriculum while 52 % claimed BIM contentwas embedded in conventional courses 4. It is important to note that some programs have morethan one BIM courses. The same study also suggested that partnership might be the solution toadvancing BIM education as well as BIM staff acquisition in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction industry4. The process of BIM created new career paths for young professionals6.New positions such as “BIM engineer/BIM manager” became a choice for current collegegraduates and may become their future career path. While the industry, especially medium tolarge size contractors, is progressively taking advantage of BIM technology, structured BIMeducation at university level is slowly progressing. It is critical to
coordinator attended the workshop. Drs. Richard Felder and Rebecca Brent facilitated the workshop. Topics included active learning techniques such as think-‐pair-‐share, group projects, problem based learning and appropriate learning objectives. Transfer Programs from BRCC to LSU The grant calls for a “bridge type program” for transfer students. A survey of the current transfer students at BRCC and the potential students at both institutions indicated that the students wanted more information about classes, course transfers and scholarships, as well as opportunities for meeting other students, finding jobs and learning about career options
students registering forthis course represent many engineering departments. Of the 80 students, 27.5% are ChemicalEngineers, 38.75% are Electrical and/or Computer engineers, 6.25% are Materials Engineers,and 27.5% represent other engineering departments including Biomedical, Mechanical andAerospace, Industrial, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering departments.In order to evaluate the minor program and its impact on students, we will gather data related tostudent self-reported skill gain, attitudes, perceptions, and dispositions towards nanoscience andnano-related careers. This data will be collected in the form of anonymous and confidentialsurveys throughout students’ participation in the minor program. In addition, we will trackstudents
transferat the 3rd year level from 2-year schools to a sub-set of the five-year engineering & engineeringtechnology programs at our university, and provides scholarship support of $8,000 per studentfor a total of 75 students. In support of this grant, our university is contributing $50,000 to ensurethat the TiPi transfer students have continuing financial support after the grant expires and helpthem graduate on time. The TiPi project is a collaborative effort of five academic departmentsfrom two colleges, the Enrollment Management & Career Services Division, and the Office ofFinancial Aid & Scholarships. Table 1 lists the departments and their offerings. Table 1: Participating Colleges, Academic Departments, and
College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Mr. Paul Carrick Brunson, Paul Carrick Brunson AgencyMs. Nikitha Sambamurthy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nikitha Sambamurthy is pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests include: blended
andmaking presentations, all while working as a part of a team. This project was designed to meetmany of the course objectives as well as to develop skills that will be needed in many of theirfuture engineering classes.This paper presents an overview of the project and individual assignments as well as theoutcomes and feedback from the students that participated in the project. The plans for furthermodifications and improvements to this project and assignments will also be presented.IntroductionThe Introduction to Engineering course at Grand Valley State University (GVSU) is a one creditcourse that is designed to be an introduction to engineering as a career. It discusses the majorfields of engineering and the typical responsibilities of an
pursue educational and career pathways in the high-growth, high-paying STEM sector.Over the past 10 years, growth in STEM jobs [in the United States] was three times as fast asgrowth in non-STEM jobs.9 STEM employment is expected to grow 17% between 2008 and2018, outpacing the 10% growth projected for overall employment.9 Also, the average annualwage for all STEM occupations was $77,880 in May 2009, significantly above the U.S. averageof $43,460 for non-STEM occupations.9 In the United States demand for STEM workers isunmet. In the STEM occupations, job postings outnumbered unemployed people by 1.9 toone.9 These national workforce trends are also reflected in Hawaii, where projections indicatethat there will be 29,000 STEM-related jobs to be
educational process andprepares students for success entering a constantly-evolving professional landscape. The modelis designed to strengthen the relationship between our college and industry from four strategicdirections. • Providing faculty from engineering and technology disciplines as consultants to industry through a dedicate outreach program, the Center for Innovation in Technology and Engineering. • Generating continuous feedback through establishing relationships with industry professionals at the college and university level. • Encouraging student professional and technical development through a Career and Development Leadership Center. • Creating opportunities for students to gain valuable industry
includingteamwork, presentation skills, leadership skills, self-assurance, and breaking gender stereotypes.Women professionals in various science and engineering fields also met and discussed with theparticipants helping them visualize a future career in STEM and gain exposure to the variety ofoptions available to them. As a culminating project the girls who participated in the camp createdmulti-media video presentations with robotics, similar to the RoboPlay Video Competition, andmade presentations in front of parents and peers. The girls were given robotics kits to take backto their middle schools so they can start computing and robotics clubs of their own. Coaches andassistant coaches continue to mentor girls over the academic school year to facilitate
goals for its K-12 educator development. - Inspire and motivate students at all levels to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). - Enhance K-12 educator knowledge in STEM cross-curricular space related fields. - Increase K-12 student knowledge in STEM education through age-appropriate space related activities. - Increase underrepresented and underserved participation. - Enhance career exploration by including space science professionals, NASA employees, and NASA-sponsored scientists, technical and engineering experts as role and career models.In 1990, the consortium imported a workshop from NASA Ames5 as the first offering of aprogram that became the “LiftOff
education ofengineers. ABET accreditation requires “an ability to communicate effectively” as a generallearning outcome for engineering students.7 Communication and other interpersonal skills canmake or break the career of an engineer. As J. Ben O’Neal notes, “most engineers are limited intheir career not by a lack of technical knowledge, but by an inability to reason verbally,communicate their ideas to others, and furnish leadership.” 8Perhaps the most important of communications skills for students is writing. Writing is theprocess through which students think on paper, explore ideas, raise questions, attempt solutions,uncover processes, build and defend arguments, brainstorm, introspect, and figure out what isgoing on. 9 Writing organizes
engaged in mentoring early career faculty and a recent research project uncovers the narratives of ex- emplar engineering faculty that have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campusDr. Matthew A Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Matthew Verleger is Assistant Professor in Freshman Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univer- sity. He has a BS in Computer Engineering, an MS in Agricultural & Biological Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education, all from Purdue University. Prior to joining the Embry-Riddle faculty, he spent two years as an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Utah State University
technical and moreimportantly non-technical audiences. The information contained in Appendix A is offered in the spirit of the ASME’s WhichPath Will You Take guidelines5 in order to assist prospective students, counselors, and industryrecruiters in better identifying ET as a path to a career in engineering. The information is genericand can be easily inserted in a flier with the university or departmental logos and colors. Againnote in particular the intentional omission of direct comparisons with other engineeringprograms. The message being: this is what ET is and what it does. ET has been around for many decades, it exists in well over 100 institutions of highereducation awarding 6,000+ degrees in 2012, and it has matured to spur
and development ,4-‐6 with the goal of introducing strategies toimprove education and retention in engineering7. The theory of identity-trajectory wasintroduced by McAlpine8 to explain the professional identity development through time ofgraduate students and emerging academics through intellectual, institutional, and networkstrands. The three strands work independently, and at times, weave together to explain identitydevelopment for those early in their academic career. Identity-trajectory provides a means tounderstand these early influences impact on one’s professional trajectory as they progressprofessionally.The intellectual strand focuses on learning within and the contributions of an individual to theirfield. Past experiences, agency
from. In 2010 the college started aninitiative to enhance the college’s efforts related to engineering leadership education. The resultof this effort is eli2. The mission of eli2 is to: Help students discover their burning desire and confidence to create, innovate, and collaborate to deliver world-changing solutions.To deliver world-changing solutions, the eli2 program believes the engineering leader needs toknow how to create, innovate, collaborate, and deliver. There are many skills within these keycompetency areas. The specific skills depend on the current career expectations of the students.By students eli2 means anyone looking to explore, study, and learn about engineering leadership
were allowed to choosetheir own topic, such as Green Building or Bottled Water versus Tap Water, so that they couldtake ownership of their work and peak their interest in STEM topics, courses, and majors. Theeffectiveness of this course is based on both its ability to meet its learning objectives and itsability to engage students in sustainability topics, projects, and career choices. Both classroomdiscussions and major assignments served as the basis for course assessment and revision of thiscourse.1.0 IntroductionThe focus of this paper is to assess the use of Sustainability Engineering within a Composition II Page 24.778.2course to increase
presentations. His publication record includes articles related to academic program development and assessment of academic programs. Dr. Latif was the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Technology.Mr. Aco Sikoski, Ivy Tech Community College Mr. Sikoski completed his Bachelors of Science in Electrical Engineering at the University of Kiril I Metodi in Skopje, Macedonia. He continued his education at Purdue University where he obtained his Masters of Science in Engineering. Intermittently, Mr. Sikoski has consulted for various institutions and organizations. In 1997, he started his career at Ivy Tech Community College where he has stayed until present. He served as a professor, program chair, dean, and the campus