. Familiarity with four source databases. Finds information in a handbook.Standard 3. The information literate student Evaluates information using ABCDcritically evaluates the procured information mnemonic.and its sources, and as a result, decideswhether or not to modify the initial queryand/or seek additional sources and whether todevelop a new research process.Standard 4. The information literate student Knows four types of intellectual property.understands the economic, ethical, legal, and Understands the difference between commonsocial issues surrounding the use of knowledge and not so common knowledge.information and its technologies and either as Understands plagiarism and
State University. His research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Application of Telecom- munications Technologies in Distance Education, and Social and Ethical Implications of Technology. He is the author of many educational papers and presentations. He has authored/coauthored the following books: • Nanotechnology: Ethical and Social Implications (2012) • Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond 3E, (2008) • The Telecommunications Fact Book and Illustrated Dictionary 2E (2006) • Fiber Optic Communication: An Applied Approach, Prentice Hall, N.J.(2002) • Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century (2002) • Technology and
dualism” has also been used by Faulkner and others todescribe how the technical aspects of engineering are often viewed as both superior to andseparable from social dimensions.3 Further worth noting is Cech and Sherick’s discussion of howengineering education perpetuates such schisms by reinforcing historically dominant – yetincreasingly antiquated – images of the profession’s epistemological, ethical, and ontologicalfoundations. This hegemonic reproduction impedes efforts to transform engineering faculty, Page 24.1265.2courses, curricula, and culture in ways that might breach the boundaries between the field’stechnical core and the actual
skills, the objectives of a capstonecourse, project, or experience should typically include the following [4]: • Provide students an opportunity to synthesize knowledge from formal and informal learning and apply such knowledge to contemporary issues in the field • Help prepare students for a successful career by providing experiences that enhance their labor market advantage • Increase students’ understanding of the “big picture” including ethical and social issues related to the field • Help students understand the relevance of theory and research to practice • Provide opportunities for teamwork and leadershipBecause of the importance of capstone programs, ABET has delineated key components thatthese
. Technical preparation consisted of: “…theperformance of the functions of analysis and creative design…mastery of the fundamentalscientific principles associated with any branch of engineering…the ability to make criticalscientific and economic analyses and to organize these into clear, concise, and convincing oralor written report”. Socially the engineer should be prepared by: “…the development ofleadership…a deep sense of professional ethics…an understanding of the evolution of societyand of the impact of technology on it; and acquaintance with and appreciation of the heritage ofother cultural fields; and the development of both a personal philosophy… and a sense of moraland ethical values...”. Although both technical and social definitions are
and that new ones may emerge through the experience of schools in offering the curriculum. Page 24.356.9 8Attributes (most frequent ratings of ‘very important’ by employers.Professionalism (punctuality, time management, attitude).Self direction, ability to take initiative.Adaptability, willingness to learn.Professional ethics, integrity.Verbal communication skills.Most frequent ratings of ‘not at all’ or ‘not very important’ Last 5.Advanced mathematical reasoning (linear algebra, statistics, calculus).Technical communications.Fluency in a language other than English.Knowledge of
are key concepts ofservice-learning”.3 Service-learning in engineering has also been shown to meet AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) objectives.4 Particular student outcomes such as(c), (d), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k) can be mapped to results and tasks in engineering service-learning projects (Table 1).Table 1. ABET Student Outcomes.5(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and
and interpret data Exemplary Total (c) design a system, component, or process to meet desired a goals 18% 57% 25% 100% 90% (d) an ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team b 0% 0% 0% 0% (e) identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems c 2% 74% 24% 100% 80% (f) understand professional and ethical responsibility d 0% 0% 0
substantial leadership roles so that they canhelp drive initiatives for developing technological solutions to—and policy decisions for—globalproblems in our increasingly technology pervasive society. Emphasized by ABET 6, engineersare charged with understanding the global, economic, ethical, and societal impacts of theirtechnical decisions. Policy decisions in our dynamic, technical society require this firmunderstanding of the limits and effects of science and technology 3. To accomplish this goal, theNAE cites the need for engineers to understand the principles of leadership and apply themthroughout their careers. 3As the world’s technical expertise continues to globalize, leadership is also important for anindividual’s professional success in
& data 4 0.800 0.639 e: Solve Problems 3 0.033** 0.539 k: Use skills 3 0.004*** 0.121 Broad Skills 26 0.609 0.012** d: Multi-disp. Teams 3 0.293 0.227 f: Ethics 3 0.919 0.292 g: Communication 3 0.955 0.187 ABET Outcomes i: Lifelong learning 3 0.424 0.165
faculty shortly after completing her Ph.D. and chaired the Department of Computer Sci- ence from 1996 to 2010. Her research interests are in software engineering, including software processes, software measurement, and software engineering education. She also has interests in ethical and social aspects of computing and has been active in efforts to increase the number of women in computing for many years. She has been a co-PI on nearly $1.5 million in grants from industry and the National Science Foundation. Dr. Ott is a 2010 recipient of the ACM SIGSOFT Retrospective Paper Award for the paper ”The Program Dependence Graph in a Software Development Environment” co-authored with Dr. Karl Ottenstein. The paper was
: interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media.Launch communicate information and ideas effectively to multiple audiences using a variety of media and formats. contribute to project teams to produce original works or solve problems. o Research and Information Fluency – Students apply digital tools to gather, evaluate, and use information. Students: plan strategies to guide inquiry. locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and
Development1. Open-ended design problem solutions.2. Working cooperatively in a team environment.3. Communicating effectively in technical documents using drawings, written, and spoken formats to a variety of audiences.4. Understanding the technical, economic, environmental, and managerial aspects of projects.5. Incorporating non-technical aspects of engineering decisions that address safety, ethics and professional responsibilities. Capstone Learning Outcomes1. Prepare a project proposal for submission to a potential project sponsor.2. Work in a team format to complete a variety of engineering tasks in an effort to meet scheduled project goals.3. Prepare and make a technical presentation addressing the status and
Seminars and Field TripsREU fellows were required to attend weekly seminars and field visits lasting 2-5 hrs on Fridays.Examples of seminar topics are: 1) why research and how to do research; 2) effective libraryresearch; 3) how to read scientific literature critically; 4) professional ethics; 5) panel discussionwith graduate students; and 6) environmental nanotechnology. For exposing REU fellows towater industry and use of emerging technologies in water research, field trips were organized to aDrinking Water Authority, a Wastewater Plant, Green Buildings in a neighboring city, localNational Weather Service office, and a nanotechnology lab (i.e., NanotechnologyCharacterization and Fabrication Lab) of an interdisciplinary research institute at
1 23 76 5 To solve real world problems using principles 4 27 70 5 from the mathematical and natural sciences Team work 2 29 68 5 Ethics 6 28 65 5 Data analysis 4 33 63 5 Engineering Tools 3 33 63 5 Sustainability 9 42 48 5 Societal context 8 46 46 4
., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Application of Telecommunications Technologies in Distance Education, and Social and Ethical Implications of Tech- nology. He is the author of many educational papers and presentations. He has authored/coauthored the following books: • Nanotechnology: Ethical and Social Implications (2012) • Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond 3E, (2008) • The Telecommunications Fact Book and Illustrated Dictionary 2E (2006) • Fiber Optic Communication: An Applied Approach, Prentice Hall, N.J.(2002) • Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st
, engineering, and math (STEM) students who engage peers of different opinions orspend significant amounts of time studying academic work report higher scores on personal andsocial gains than their same-race peers who do so less frequently.IntroductionEmpirical research has consistently shown that the time and energy students devote toeducationally purposeful activities is the greatest predictor of college outcomes ranging fromcognitive and intellectual development,1,2 to moral and ethical development,3 to persistence anddegree completion.4 While general findings typically persist across student groups, studies haveshown that historically underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities (URMs [such as AfricanAmericans and Hispanics]) face several obstacles at
arguesthat technology-based education must extend to all areas and settings of life, both formal andinformal 6. At the same time, nationally recognized experts agree that the integration oftechnology in education is not without dangers: “as innovations multiply, so do dangers” 7.Technological competencies include not only the skills needed to operate informationtechnology, but also critical consideration of “privacy, social, cultural, ethical, and ownershipissues associated with increasing use of cyberinfrastructure for learning, research, andscholarship” 3. Achieving successful results such as scientific and engineering innovation withtechnology requires more than operating tools: it demands “an ability to understand tools andmedia critically” 8
tooling cost, but higher unit production cost. Knowledgeof both materials and manufacturing methods, combined with accurate estimates of productvolumes, determine the profitability of the end product.There is also the issue of ethics. Selection decisions for materials and processes have a dramaticimpact on environmental protection, waste management, engineering ethics and socialresponsibility. The ‘Obligation of the Engineer’, promulgated by the National Society ofProfessional Engineers (NSPE), requires that engineers ‘conserve nature’s resources’. This is anobligation that engineers of all disciplines, and particularly design engineers, materials engineers,and manufacturing engineers, should consider in any professional decision. See the
24.991.12 its dysfunction. Nature Publishing Group, 7, 942-951.19. Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.20. Oxley, J. C. (2011). The Moral Dimensions of Empathy: Limits and Applications in Ethical Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.21. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current directions in psychological science, 15(2), 54-58.22. Levenson, R. W., & Ruef, A. M. (1992). Empathy: a physiological substrate. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(2), 234-246.23. Smith, A. (1759/1976). The Theory of the Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.24. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Career preparation and planning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Intellectual Property Management 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Entrepreneurship 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ethics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
social sciences were gradually recovered, yet several newproblems emerged.To begin with, social structures and ethics have been transformed radically incontemporary China. The instrumental view of education was not checked butamplified, as the whole society focused on the central task of economic construction.Engineering education--in addition to its consistent politicization--is also greatlyreshaped by commercialization, much like its counterpart in the U.S.12The identity of Page 24.1218.12many universities was recast as quasi-corporations, whose obligation was to produceprofit for the stakeholders rather than to create and advance knowledge for the
(k) sustainability-related problems survey6 Become conscious of the ethical and professional Pre-post (f), (j) responsibilities of engineers in a global, social, and survey environmental context Page 24.1257.7MethodsIn this section we explain how concept maps, design reviews, and the pre-post tests are designedto assess the above stated learning goals. Themes from the course were developed based on aholistic analysis of students’ responses on design reviews, surveys, concept maps, a debriefsession during the final class session, faculty’s observations throughout the course
sustainability knowledge assessments, is availableelsewhere40. Page 24.1305.6Table 2. Examples of concept categorization based on ten sustainability categories [Adaptedfrom Coral41 and Segalàs et al.25].Category ExamplesEnvironment pollution, degradation, conservation (of wildlife), biodiversity, ecological footprint, green/cleanResource (scarcity) renewable/non-renewable resources, lack of materials, energy, food, waterSocial Impact quality of life, health, risk management, shelterValues ethics, awareness, respect for traditions, judgments about sustainabilityFuture
in the semesterleads into the two main deliverables for the first semester – a team portfolio of all workaccomplished (up to the point of selection of a lead design solution strategy) along with a teamposter presentation (open to the program faculty and staff). Learning outcomes for this courseinclude those focused on application of technical and engineering design skills andprofessionalism, and also refinement and demonstration of effective communication skills viadesign documentation and presentations. In the second semester of bioengineering senior design,teams carry their work forwards through engineering analysis, prototyping, and testing withmultiple design reviews. Ethical considerations including risk-benefit, human factors
Co-op or Critical Thinking Internship Intro to Departments Strength/Weakness ID Ethics Intro to Campus Team Management
teaching, and exploring ethical decision-making in undergraduate engineering students. Dr. Finelli leads a national initiative to create a taxonomy/keyword outline for the field of en- gineering education research, she is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of the American Society of Engineering Education, and she is an ASEE Fellow. Page 24.46.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Faculty Learning Community to Improve Teaching Practices in Large Engineering Courses: Lasting ImpactsBackground and OverviewStudent
training Page 24.58.9includes mainly technical issues, uninfluenced by ethical, aesthetic, political and epistemologicalconsiderations. Working with them demanded continuous monitoring in the face of resistance toreflections about education and the role of the teacher in contemporary engineering. It is fair tosay, though, that their own training does not help them to conduct group work, or encouragethem to invest in the collective creation of knowledge.5. Discussion and future worksThe issues raised by this study suggest that it will be necessary to review the objective ofengineering generally and mechatronics specifically, as well as continually
economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Bradley S. Davidson, University of Denver Bradley Davidson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dy- namics Laboratory at the University of Denver. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in biomedical engineering from the Vir- ginia Tech–Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. His research in musculoskeletal biomechanics emphasizes measurement of human movement and motor control, with applications in the lumbar spine stability, total knee
discussed during the presentation of final class projects projects,, so that green solutionsfrom the beginning of the project can be aachieved in the AEC industry. Also, guest lectures onsustainability, BIM technology, ethics, and green markets potential are delivered.Figure 2.. Schematic diagram for the proposed framework3Students in the proposed course are expected to gain (1) uunderstanding of green resources suchas building materials, building forms, and building systems, (2) hands hands-on on experience with BIM,especially 3D geometric models