Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE).Anthony Bourne, Wright State University Tony Bourne is the Director of Enrollment Management for the Wright State University College of En- gineering and Computer Science. He is a Wright State alumnus were he received a BA in Economics and completed his PhD in Engineering Spring 2014. He also holds an MPA from Walden University. His graduate research focused on interventions that increase student retention in open enrollment schools like Wright State. Tony worked several years in workforce development and education outside Wright State starting there in 2007, when he was hired as an enrollment adviser for the Department
Paper ID #10957Implementing Mechatronics Design Methodology in Mechanical EngineeringTechnology Senior Design Projects at the Old Dominion UniversityDr. Vukica Jovanovic, Old Dominion University Dr. Jovanovic is currently serving as Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology De- partment, Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. Prior to joining ODU’s Engineering Technology Department Dr. Jovanovic was teaching at Trine Uni- versity, Angola, Indiana at Design Engineering Technology Department. Before Trine, she was working as an instructor and a graduate
. Page 24.30.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A collaborative, multinational cyberinfrastructure for big data analyticsIntroductionThe emergence of Big Data and Data Intensive Systems as specialized fields within computinghas seen the creation and delivery of curricula to provide education in the techniques andtechnologies needed to distill knowledge from datasets where traditional methods, like relationaldatabases, do not suffice. Within the current literature and these new curricula, there is a seeminglack of a thorough and coherent method for teaching Data Intensive Systems so that studentsunderstand the theory and the practice of these
mostly lectureand laboratory based (Grayson, 1993). Engineers learn and exercise their theories and practiceswithin particular social settings - within classrooms, within a laboratory, and during the designreview (Bucciarelli, 2001 , p. 298). In this study we consider the studio environment as a socialclassroom setting (where some laboratory facilities are within the students reach) and wherestudents are engage in the process of design. IStudio Model Page 24.1113.2 A slightly different teaching and learning model in technical education is the “studio model”(Little & Cardenas, 2001). According to Kuhn (2001), Little and Cardenas (2001
, knowledge of domain, intellectual style,personality, motivation, and environmental context. Creative performance ensues from aconfluence of these six elements.6-8 Introduction to Chemical, Food, and EnvironmentalEngineering Design is a 3 credit required course for CE, FE, and EE. Course content andclassroom activities are divided into two, 75-minute sessions (Concepts, and Laboratory) perweek. Students have three different facilitators (an instructor and two teaching assistants).Course main goal is to introduce students to the Engineering Method, this is accomplished byfocusing on six course objectives: self-regulation, communication, working cooperatively andcollaboratively, problem solving, modeling, and quality. Introduction to Chemical, Food
, and a Ph.D. From Simon Fraser University, Canada. Dr. Cherif ’s professional work includes curriculum design, development and re- form, instructional and assessment design, evaluation techniques, faculty, and academic leadership. He has published more than fifteen science lab kits, a number of student laboratory manuals, coauthored and coedited a number of science textbooks, and published many articles in professional journals and newspapers. He has received a number of teaching, curriculum development, instructional strategies, and Page 24.98.1 leadership awards. Dr. Cherif serves on the executive and
accomplishment.We hope that other programs can learn from this experience, and that we can draw on eachother’s lessons as the discipline continues to evolve. Page 24.813.16References 1. O. Asbjornsen and R. Hamman, Towards a unified systems engineering education, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2000, 175-182. 2. W. Bauer, W. Biedermann, B. Helms, and M. Maurer, Student laboratory for Systems Engineering: teaching Systems Engineering to students without previous SE knowledge based on an industry-oriented example, 2012 International Systems Conference, IEEE
considerable effort to develop pedagogical techniques inorder to teach CTSS courses more effectively. Various pedagogical techniques have been tried,such as the "chalk-and-talk" lecturing style [1], teaching continuous-time concepts beforediscrete-time concepts [2], or vice versa [3], developing signals and systems concept inventories[4], using MATLAB ™ [5-7], instituting hardware-based signal processing laboratories [8], and P Pusing LEGO™ MINDSTORMS NXT platforms for signal processing experimentation [9].Despite all the efforts, conceptual learning of the course content still remains to be a challenge.Without a better understanding of the educational challenges associated with this course, anyattempts to improve student learning
promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations”, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ., Res. 6, 020117, 2010.11. M.G. Rasteiro et al. “LABVIRTUAL—A virtual platform to teach chemical processes”, Education for Chemical Engineers, Volume 4, Issue 1, April 2009.12. S. Vaidyanath, J. Williams, M. Hilliard, T. Wiesner. “The development and deployment of a virtual unit ops laboratory”, Chem. Eng. Ed, 41 (2), 144–152, 2007.13. M.D. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E.S. Gummer. “Student Learning in Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories”, Chem. Eng. Ed., 45(3), 219-228, 2011.14. P. Mokhasi, J. Adduci, and D. Kapadia. “Understanding differential equations using Mathematica and interactive demonstrations”, CODEE Journal. http
. Dr. Thole has published over 180 peer-reviewed archival journal and conference papers and advised over 50 theses and dissertations. She founded the Experimental and Computational Convection Laboratory (ExCCL) which is a Pratt and Whitney Center of Excellence for heat transfer. She is a Fellow of ASME and serves as the Chair of the Board of Directors for the International Gas Turbine Institute, as the Chair of the ASME - ME Department Head Executive Committee, as a member of the Vision 2030 Committee, and as the Chair of ASME’s Committee on Honors. She has been recognized by the U.S. White House Champion of Change for recruitment efforts in STEM and by Penn State’s Rosemary Schraer Mentoring Award.Ms. Melissa
engineering and engineering technology. The universities,community colleges, and the public schools in this collaboration each have similar goals, since Page 24.27.2each of them teach robotics, embedded systems, and other supporting technology courses. Thisinstruction can teach a great deal of the same common material at the different levels. One of thegoals of the collaborative process is to build on what instructors at each previous level areteaching, and then further the students’ education without having to cover the same topics again.Figure 1 depicts the relationships between the technology platform described in this educationalproject in the
. Vernier was heavily involved in teaching and content development with the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors (FEH) program.Mr. Patrick M. Wensing, The Ohio State University Patrick M. Wensing is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow and Graduate Teaching Assistant at The Ohio State University. Mr. Wensing received his B.S. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The Ohio Sate University in 2009. Since 2009, he has been working toward a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Ohio State. Mr. Wensing currently teaches and develops content for the laboratory portion of the Fundamentals for Engineering for Honors (FEH) program and is actively involved in humanoid locomotion research.Mr. Craig E Morin
more active role in their own learning [1]. However, there existdiverse interpretations and discussions around the idea of what active learning means as well asthe types of teaching and learning approaches that have been utilized by engineering facultyaimed at including active learning in their course delivery. In a comparative literature review [2],it was discovered that there are significant differences in what has been understood and appliedin science classrooms as active learning. Consequently, Chi [2] developed a framework oflearning activities aimed at highlighting the different types of learning activities that are and canbe included in classrooms for maximized results. Building on the work of Chi [2], this paper seeksto explore the
. Page 24.663.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Helicopters as a Theme in a Machine Design CourseAbstract The idea proposed here is to study helicopters and their components throughout a machinedesign course as a theme to teach students about different mechanical elements. A helicopter isan ideal system to exemplify the concepts taught in the course since all aspects of machinedesign are encapsulated in its design. Furthermore, a helicopter deeply pushes the limits ofsafety; the price of failure of one or more components or of the overall system is high (humanfatality). This suggests large factors of safety in the design, but there is an inherent tradeoff. Iffactors of safety are
within the Mechanicaland Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum”, Grant #1044698, 2011-2013.Bibliography[1] Prince, M.J. and Felder, R.M., “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases,” Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2), pp. 123-138, 2006.[2] National Science Digital Library Serving science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education, http://nsdl.org/ (last accessed: December 2013).[3] Balamuralithara, B., and Woods, P.C., “Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab”, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 17(1), pp. 108–118, 2009.[4] Virtual Laboratories, Johns Hopkins University, http://www.jhu.edu/virtlab/virtual
was implemented in the Fall2012 semester and is ongoing at our university. The central objective of this pilot was to examinehow adaptation and later adoption of the new MIT edX 6.002x (Electronics and Circuits) MOOCcontent in a flipped model of teaching might improve student learning in a credit-bearing collegecourse. Multiple objectives for this pilot included: to improve the department’s typical passagerate of 59% for this course; to improve students’ retention rate; to shorten students’ time-to-degree; to improve the quality of the content of the course; and to reduce the prerequisitecontribution for successful passage of subsequent courses. Student pass rates from the blendedlearning model Fall 2012 pilot jumped to 91%, as compared to a
opportunity that has come from the College and the Provost’s office. This resulted in significant renovations of manufacturing teaching laboratories shared between the industrial and mechanical engineering departments. This also included working strategically on scheduling of shared resources. Our collaboration on improvements to teaching laboratories has distinguished our resources and programs both locally and nationally as some of the very best available in manufacturing education. b) With university initiatives: We participated with the Student Innovation Space Building planning committee by facilitating collaboration with the local animal shelter who provided the context for the design challenges that
currently under construction. Initially, the purpose of the website wasenvisioned as a repository of project resources, but as our research proceeded, it becameobvious that the students perceived the concept map and web tools as essential parts of theproject and their view of their personal success strategies.Overall, the basic principles implemented in the project are supported by theory based incognitive and social constructivism and the substantial body of evidence that favorscollaborative learning and the inductive approach over the traditional lecture driven,deductive teaching approach. Collaborative learning, active/inquiry learning, conceptlearning, peer learning, problem/case-based learning, low stakes quizzing, mini-lectureswith just-in
Paper ID #8583Examining water quality in the Chesapeake Bay: A hands-on sustainabilityactivity for 5th to 7th gradersDr. Bradley A. Striebig, James Madison University Dr. Striebig is a founding faculty member and first full professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. Dr. Striebig came to the JMU School of from Gonzaga University where he developed the WATER program in cooperation with other faculty members. Dr. Striebig is also the former Head of the Environmental Technology Group at Penn State’s Applied Research Laboratory. In addition to Dr’ Striebig’s engineering work, he is also a published
other members of the community; an example of this hazard is interferenceover aeronautical channels during the landing of airplanes in an airport. Therefore fundamentalsof radio regulation are necessary for all academic, commercial and military users who want toutilize a frequency band width for wireless application. Furthermore radio frequency spectrum isalso an expensive resource, and it needs special attention. By teaching the current topic inwireless communications course, the future graduates of electrical and computer engineering willlearn to use the radio spectrum frequency efficiently and free from interferences. This paperstarts with background of radio regulation and spectrum efficiency and after those licensing,regulation and
numerous research and teaching related papers and presentations. Dr. Aliyazicioglu is a member of the IEEE, Eta Kappa Nu, and Tau Beta Pi.Shailesh Sujanani, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Shailesh Sujanani is a student from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona currently working on a B.S. in Computer Engineering. He currently works under Dr. Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu and Dr. Rajan Chandra on a project to improve student learning and retention of basic electronic circuits concepts using web-based tools.Mr. Jolly Kuo, Cal Poly Pomona Jolly Kuo is born in Mountain View California. Graduated from Los Altos High school California. Cur- rently a computer engineering student at Cal Poly Pomona
in Engineering Technology.Courses such as Robotics and Mechatronics, Quality Control, Manufacturing Materials,Microcontrollers, and Applied Mechanics can benefit from the laboratory experience inapplications of sustainability and eco design as well as material and processes selection. As wellas helping in the teaching of various courses, such experience benefits students who are pursuingdegrees in the engineering field. Students in the Mechanical, Electrical, Industrial andBiomedical fields along with many others can learn many new skills from case study projectssuch as designing and fabricating various consumer products, machines and equipment. Suchprojects show students how to use different types of technology, and demonstrate how
of Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a Bachelor’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering (2005). He has received the UA Graduate Access Fellowship, the Mary & Maude Miller Scholarship, and the SRP Learning Grant. Beau’s research interest lies in understanding how students can best learn and teachers can best teach engineering in the pre-college setting.Prof. James C. Baygents, University of ArizonaDr. Jeffrey B. Goldberg, University of Arizona Dr. Jeff Goldberg is Dean, College of Engineering, and Professor in Systems and Industrial Engineering at Arizona. He was employed at Vector Research and Bell Laboratories. He is currently a Principal of Silver Oak Research Inc. which specializes in deployment
is active in professional societies (American Physical Society (APS), American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), etc.), ASEE, ASME. Dr. Richard has authored or co-authored about 25 techni- cal articles (19 of which are refereed publications). Dr. Richard teaches courses ranging from first-year introductory engineering design, fluid mechanics, to space plasma propulsion.Mr. Logan N CollinsDr. Kristi J Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She is also an Instructional Associate Professor in the Department. She received her Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary
Paper ID #9697Reinforcing a ”Design Thinking” Course by Restructuring Student-InstructorInteractionsDr. Ang Liu Dr. Liu is a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow and Manager of Viterbi iPodia Program at University of South- ern California.Dr. Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California Dr. Lu is the David Packard Chair in Manufacturing Engineering, Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Computer Science, and Industrial and Systems Engineering, and Director of Viterbi iPodia Program, at University of Southern California
Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching in 2011, and the College of Engineering’s Teacher of the Year Award in 2013. Dr. Huang is a Fellow of the IEEE.Daniel H. Robinson, Colorado State University Dan Robinson is Professor in the School of Education at Colorado State University. He received his Page 24.568.1 Ph.D. in Educational Psychology in 1993 from the University of Nebraska where he majored in both learning/cognition and statistics/research. He has taught at Mississippi State University (1993-1997), the University of South Dakota (1997-1998), the University of Louisville (1998-1999), and the University of
skills, and toteach the fundamentals of a computer aided design. The students meet the instructor twice aweek in the laboratory during this three-credit-hour semester-long course with each class lastingtwo hours. The course is taught using traditional teaching methods with the introduction tographics concepts and examples in the first hour, and tutoring the homework in the second hour.Students passively absorb the information and work individually to solve the problems. Thelimited class time means that not all students get the immediate help they need. In addition,many of them do not follow up during office or tutoring hours for additional assistance. Since itis early in their university career, they often are not mature enough to admit they are
. Dr. Palomera-Arias has over 15 years of experience teaching at the college level, in engineering and construction management courses. Prior to joining the faculty of the Department of Construction Science at UTSA, he was an assistant professor in the Construction Management department at the Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, Massachusetts where he was the lead instructor for the Mechanical and Electrical Building System courses. The main teaching responsibilities in the department of Construction Science at UTSA are the courses in Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Building Systems in Construction, as well as the Structural Design for construction management courses. He is also part of the team
Paper ID #8578Ms. Hines and the Sick 5th Graders -– Making hands-on outreach and learn-ing about the Environment engaging through the use of Case Stories!Mrs. Janie Gina Locklear, NC A&T I am a Senior Civil Engineering major with 5 years experience teaching elementary science. I returned to school to obtain a second degree in engineering after learning that I have a stronger passion for design and problem solving. As a teacher, I emphasized to my students daily the importance of science and en- gineering and promoted love and passion for the related work by using hands-on experience with EVERY lesson taught. My
the College of Engi- neering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research focuses on idea gen- eration, design strategies, design ethnography, creativity instruction, and engineering practitioners who return to graduate school. She teaches design and entrepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Her work is often cross-disciplinary, collaborating with colleagues from engineering, education, psychology, and industrial design.Prof. Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan Kathleen H. Sienko is a Miller Faculty Scholar and Associate Professor of Mechanical and