Conference Session

ERM WIP III: Post-Undergraduate Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; Racheida S Lewis, University of Georgia; Nyna Jaye DeWitt, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Paper ID #47250Deconstructing School-to-Work Transitions in Engineering: A Scoping ReviewAnimesh Paul, University of Georgia Animesh (he/they) was born and raised in Tripura, India, within a liberal ”brown” military upbringing. He earned a bachelor’s degree in Electronics and Electrical Engineering from KIIT University. Currently, he is a Ph.D. candidate at the Engineering Education Transformation Institute, advised by Dr. Racheida Lewis. His research focuses on engineering education, specifically exploring user experience in engineering classrooms and students’ transition experiences.Dr. Racheida S Lewis, University of

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: A Focus on Faculty Experiences & Perceptions

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Camila Olivero-Araya, The Ohio State University; Monique S. Ross, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

, Chile.Mrs. Monique S. Ross, The Ohio State University Monique Ross earned a doctoral degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from Elizabethtown College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring Tenure and Promotion Policies in Engineering Colleges Through Policy Discourse AnalysisDescription of Research Brief PapersTenure is vital for academic freedom, job security, and integrity in American higher education. Itensures that faculty can express their views, publish their work, and share their research

Conference Session

ERM WIP I: Methodological Applications in the Disciplines

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Evan J Aldrich, Texas A&M University; Yanwen Chen, Texas A&M University; Alex Gonce, Texas A&M University; Aaron Peter Thibault, Texas A&M University; Michael S Rugh, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

development and strategy of over 30 commercial videogames including the popular Borderlands games, and brought science research and videogames together through the development of the Borderlands Science ”citizen science” game that supported genomic research with millions of game players repairing genetic sequences.Dr. Michael S Rugh, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael S. Rugh is an Associate Research Scientist at the LIVE Lab at Texas A and M University and Director of STEM Education Research for the Aggie Research Program. He leads interdisciplinary research teams investigating game-based learning and the impact of educational technologies, including video games, simulations, apps, and virtual environments created by

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Student Mental Health & Wellbeing I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katharine Getz, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Butler Velegol, Pennsylvania State University; Mechteld Veltman Hillsley, The Pennsylvania State University; Karen A High, Clemson University; Jennifer S. Brown, University of Georgia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

. Jennifer S. Brown, University of Georgia Dr. Jennifer Brown earned her PhD in Engineering and Science Education (2023) and her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering (2020) from Clemson University. She is currently working as a postdoctoral scholar with the Elevate research team in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute at the University of Georgia. Her primary research foci include using asset-based frameworks in student and faculty development, graduate well-being, and mentorship of women and others with marginalized identities in STEM. Her engineering background is in advanced manufacturing and design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Empirical Study of Growth Mindset of

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Student Mental Health & Wellbeing I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Whitwer, University of Kentucky; Sarah A Wilson, University of Kentucky; Joseph H Hammer, University of Kentucky; Jerrod A Henderson, University of Houston - William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering; Sherri S Frizell, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

interventions to improve student success. He was most recently recognized by INSIGHT Into Diversity Magazine as an Inspiring STEM Leader, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (LAS) Outstanding Young Alumni Award, Career Communications Group with a Black Engineer of the Year Award for college-level promotion of engineering education and a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2023 to advance his work that centers engineering identities of Black men in engineering.Dr. Sherri S Frizell, Prairie View A&M University Sherri S. Frizell is a Professor in the Computer Science Department at Prairie View A&M University. She has a B.S. in Computer Science from

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Evolution of Engineering Education Research Methods

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jack Elliott, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Justine Chasmar, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Katie Scherf, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

the engineeringeducation context which included SNA. To guide our research toward the study purpose, weprepared the following Research Questions (RQs):RQ1: What is the current breadth of SNA in the engineering education context?RQ2: What areas of SNA in engineering education warrant systematic review(s)?For this research brief, we present key publication, study context, and methodological trends inthe data through an analysis of code frequency. Specifically, we will focus on findings related toRQ1 by identifying the number of records that included each code.MethodologyA scoping review, as presented by Grant and Booth “provides a preliminary assessment of thepotential size and scope of available research literature” [30, p. 95]. We selected

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh; Samuel J Dickerson, University of Pittsburgh; Andreea Toader, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

double coded. A Cohen’sKappa value of κ = 0.72 across all three rounds was achieved, indicating strong inter-raterreliability and agreement beyond chance [39].3. ResultsSince this is a research brief, only the results of the Delphi study after round 3 will be presentednext. The full set of results from rounds 1 through 3 will be presented in a forthcoming article.Relevance Ratings. The average relevance ratings (on a 1-5 scale) and standard deviations (s)for the various conceptions of judgment given in Table 1 during the final Delphi round rangedfrom 3.00 (s=1.17) to 4.88 (s=0.33) based on n=17 responses. Decision making (item 7 in Table1) had the highest average relevance of 4.88 and the smallest standard deviation of s=0.33,indicating the

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samantha Splendido, Pennsylvania State University; Vaishnavi Wagh, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

questions that relied heavily within the applying, analyzing,and evaluating levels of knowledge from Bloom’s revised taxonomy, building upon the lowerlevels of knowledge like remembering and understanding, but not asking questions that focusedwithin those lower levels. Differences between these collected domain-specific studies are basedheavily on the intentions of the surveys. Turner et al. [31]’s survey is intended for a widerpopulation of US adults and to establish a concept inventory for energy and power grid knowledge.Basic energy knowledge questions are included in Turner et al.’s survey, but a majority of thequestions require higher-level energy knowledge applied specifically to power grid use andinfrastructure. While Prince et al. [32]’s

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Strategies for Student Support

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jan Edwards, College of Lake County; Carrie Kortegast, Northern Illinois University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

. She is also serving as the Principal Investigator on the college’s NSF S-STEM grant, Building an Academic Community of Engineering Scholars.Carrie Kortegast, Northern Illinois University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Guides on the transfer journey: A qualitative study exploring the academic and social supports of community college transfer studentsIntroductionThis research brief explores the community college student’s transfer journey guided by thetransfer student capital and engineering identity frameworks. Academic supports, socialrelationships, and experiential learning are common programmatic approaches to fostering asense of belonging and engineering identity

Conference Session

ERM WIP I: Methodological Applications in the Disciplines

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sungwon Shin, Texas Tech University; Sunho Lim; Suhkyung Shin, Hanyang University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

computing education and its longitudinal impact on ethical decision making. Futurestudies could also measure the framework’s impact on students’ problem-solving abilities,especially when dealing with even more complex, real-world security or privacy challenges.AcknowledgementThis research is supported by the National Science Foundation (Award #: 2335681).AppendixS. Shin, J. Lee, S. Lim, and S. Shin. “Draft of ethical motivation and behavioral intention surveyin engineering education,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,June 22-25, 2025, Montreal, Canada, 2025.Sample Survey Items for Ethical Motivation and Behavioral IntentionWe used a 6-point Likert scale (including “Don’t Know” as an option) for this survey. Thesurvey is

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Professional Formation & Career Aspirations

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Edwin R. Schmeckpeper P.E., Norwich University; Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

. For example, three changes were made to the definition for outcome 2 “Students considerimpacts of solutions on relevant contexts.” The word “approaches” substituted “solutions” sincethe performance task prompt doesn’t ask students to specifically identify technical solutions tothe problems raised in the scenario but, rather, to propose approaches that could address or beginto solve the problems. The next modifications were to add two contexts to the existing list:professional and legal. Thus, the revised definition reads: “Students consider how their proposedapproaches to solve the problem(s) impact relevant local, global, professional, economic, legal,environmental, and cultural/societal contexts.”The fourth modification was in the last

Conference Session

ERM WIP V: Assessing & Developing Competencies in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason J Saleem, University of Louisville; Edward James Isoghie, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville; Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

of conversationalways, that students could discover during their analysis of the interviews and include in theirworkstation designs.Table 1: Human-centered Design (HCD) Problem Workstation Design: You have been asked to design the workstations The workstation, at a minimum, that will be constructed in each faculty and staff private office for a should account for: brand-new Industrial Engineering building at the university. Each University assigned desktop computer private office will have a window. This is a workstation meant for a and monitor(s), placement of the sitting individual while working with a desktop computer. There are computer tower / central processing about the same number of male and females

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Examining Identity

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Thompson, University of Louisville; Jessica Buckley; Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville; Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville; Gholam Abbas Sattar-Shamsabadi II, University of Louisville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

engineering.ConclusionThis study described underrepresented students’ own perceptions of sense of belonging,highlighting the multiple and varied ways that students describe what belonging in engineeringmeans to them. Responses demonstrated the ways in which students described belonging asmeaning (a) having competence, (b) positive experiences in the learning environment, and (c)finding meaningful social connections. These findings, part of a broader mixed-methods study onsense of belonging in engineering students, can inform further research, helping to contextualizestudent interpretations of belonging and providing strategies to improving learning environmentsto support student sense of belonging.References[1] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “’I wish

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Methods in Graduate Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin Johnson, Pennsylvania State University; Jiuqing Yu, Pennsylvania State University; Nosakhare Iyobosa Idiaghe, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Jessica Deters, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

, orresearch competency development among engineering graduate students.Main and Wang [3] are two of the only researchers to date who have conducted interculturalcompetency research among engineering doctoral students, and the results demonstrate that femaleengineering doctoral students are more likely to score higher on the MGUDS-S than maleengineering doctoral students. Proficiency in multiple languages is positively associated withdoctoral students’ intercultural competency.Several additional papers assessing the current status of graduate students [3], [4] recommendhaving work/volunteer-related international experience due to the positive correlation ofinternational experiences to the development of intercultural/global competencies in their

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: A Focus on Faculty Experiences & Perceptions

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibukunoluwa Eunice Salami, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Kasey Moomau, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Tareq Daher, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Jessica Deters, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Yusong Li, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Ursula Nguyen, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Lance C. Pérez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Markeya Peteranetz, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Trish Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 217–239. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_10.[11] S. Baker, P. Tancred, and S. Whitesides, “Gender and Graduate School: Engineering Students Confront Life after the B. Eng.,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2013, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00671.x.[12] K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 371–392, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20391.[13] “How To Meet the Increasing Demand for Engineers | National Society of Professional Engineers.” Accessed: Apr. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/career- growth/pe-magazine/spring-2021

Conference Session

ERM WIP III: Post-Undergraduate Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander V Struck Jannini PhD, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Eunsil Lee, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.[7] M. Gopalan and S. T. Brady, “College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A National Perspective,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 134–137, 2020, doi: 10.3102/0013189X19897622.[8] A. Master and A. N. Meltzoff, “Cultural Stereotypes and Sense of Belonging Contribute to Gender Gaps in STEM,” Int. J. Gender, Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 152–198, 2020.[9] K. Rainey, M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller, “Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6.[10] C. U. Lawrence and E. Lee, “WIP: Sense of Belonging Research in

Conference Session

ERM WIP II: Equity & Accessibility in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Figard, University of Georgia; Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

degree program at a large, public, research-intensive(R1) university in the southern U.S.Data Collection Co-creators were recruited through emails sent by each university’s disability resourceoffice and engineering department(s) to undergraduate students. These emails outlined eligibilitycriteria, which required co-creators to be currently enrolled undergraduate engineering studentsat that university who identify as disabled or as a person with disabilities. The emails invitedeligible individuals to participate in the study by reflecting on their disability-related experiencesat their university. Additionally, the emails detailed the participation process and offered a $40gift card as compensation upon completing the interview. To ensure

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gibin Raju, Texas A&M University; Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

, 2005.[2] J. K. Murray, J. A. Studer, S. R. Daly, S. McKilligan and C. M. Seifert, "Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 248-275, 2019.[3] E. Sung and T. R. Kelley, "Identifying design process patterns: a sequential analysis study of design thinking," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 29, pp. 283-302, 2019.[4] Y. Deng and W. Liu, "Board 72: How to Develop Engineering Students as Design Thinkers: A Systematic Review of Design Thinking Implementations in Engineering Education," in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, 2023.[5] Y. Y. Seah and A. J. Magana, "Exploring Students’ Experimentation

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Methods in Graduate Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nosakhare Iyobosa Idiaghe, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Erin Johnson, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University; Jessica Deters, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

] witheach differing in focus and scope. Some tools emphasize broad abilities, while others targetspecific subskills. Some prioritize language over culture or focus on international differenceswhile overlooking intracultural variation. Others remain ambiguous, with unclear objectives[58], [59]. A summary of some of these tools is provided in [58], including those designed forindividuals, teams, leaders, and organizations [59].In the process of identifying a suitable theoretical framing for this study, we reviewed severalinstruments, each offering unique perspectives on cultural awareness and interaction. TheMiville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale - Short Form (MGUDS-S), for instance, measuresindividuals' awareness and acceptance of similarities

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Faculty Influences on Student Support

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kayt Frisch, George Fox University; Chris Sharp, George Fox University; Jeffrey Walters, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

toward plant sciences,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 387–396, 2014, doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0231.[2] A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development,” Sci. Educ., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 36–74, 2007, doi: 10.1002/sce.20173.[3] S. E. Brownell et al., “A High-Enrollment Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Improves Student Conceptions of Scientific Thinking and Ability to Interpret Data,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, p. ar21, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092.[4] M. T. Jones, A. E. L. Barlow, and M. Villarejo, “Importance of Undergraduate Research for Minority Persistence and

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Examining Undergraduate Recruitment & Retention

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean Maw, University of Saskatchewan; Peter M Ostafichuk P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Brian M Frank P.Eng., Queen's University; Lawrence R Chen, McGill University; Paul Neufeld P.Eng., MBA, PMP, University of Saskatchewan; Jason Grove P.E., University of Waterloo; Carolyn G. MacGregor P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto; Grant McSorley, University of Prince Edward Island; Rubaina Khan, Queens University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

the support of the Jerry G. Huff Chair in Innovative Teaching in the Ron and JaneGraham School of Professional Development in the College of Engineering at the University ofSaskatchewan, the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Developmentin Smith Engineering at Queen’s University, and the Enhancing Learning and Teaching inEngineering Faculty Scholar Award at McGill University.References[1] S. Maw, P. Neufeld, L. Chen, C. Jaeger, K. Moozeh, P. Ostafichuk, B. Frank, C. MacGregor,G. McSorley, and J. Grove. “Preliminary employment trajectory findings from a pan-Canadiansurvey on career motivations and aspirations of undergraduate engineering students,” CanadianEngineering Education Association (CEEA) Conference, June 15-19

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Quantitative Instrument Development

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ethan Peter Lum Cisneros, Northwestern University; David P O'Neill, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Identity measures and the Research-Science/tist Identity measures here.Recognition measurements between all three identities were particularly strongly correlated(r>0.999), suggesting these constructs largely measure the same (or very similar) underlyingidentity component(s) in engineering doctoral students.The relative contribution of identity subconstructs to overall identity strength was examinedthrough ridge regression against implicit association scores. This approach differs from previouswork with this instrument [24] where recognition, performance, and interest were weightedequally in identity calculations. The regression revealed recognition as the dominant predictor,with performance contributing moderately and interest showing a

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies III

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Grace Daniels, Johns Hopkins University; Rachel E Durham

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

-efficacy and STEM identity in the context of structural inequalities,pointing to directions for future research for both SCCT and PVEST.References[1] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, “Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span.,” J Couns Psychol, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 557–568, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0033446.[2] Y. Yang, Y. Maeda, and M. Gentry, “The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: Multilevel analysis with NAEP 2019,” Large Scale Assess Educ, vol. 12, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40536-024-00204-z.[3] A. V. Maltese and R. H. Tai, “Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Broadening Methodological Impacts

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Volpe PhD, EIT, LEED-GA, University of Florida; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

approaches,amplifying their impact.AcknowledgmentsThe authors sincerely thank the research participants and advisory board members for theirvaluable contributions and insights that shaped this important work. They also extend theirgratitude to their editor Alison Bowers for their assistance in reviewing and refining this paper.This material is based upon grants supported by NSF award ID 2429274; Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Y. T. E. Chew, E. Atay, and S. Bayraktaroglu, “Female Engineers’ Happiness and Productivity in Organizations with Paternalistic Culture,” Journal of

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies III

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew M Grondin, University of Wisconsin - Madison

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

collaborative settingsstudents’ gesture production also leveraged various forms of speech, not only including formalizedspeech (i.e., speech explicitly used in theory-based or lab courses) but also non-formalized speech.Among these formalized and non-formalized components of speech, Grondin and colleagues [12]identified instances of engineering students’ speech as referring to either the structure (S) orfunction (F) of engineering objects. Structure refers to the static nature of an engineering object(e.g., the metallic rod or the geometry of the sample) whereas function refers to the dynamic ortime-dependent nature of an engineering object being acted upon (e.g., deformation due to torsion). Mechanical reasoning tasks elicit both static and

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Faculty Influences on Student Support

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida; Yuxuan Wang, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Edwin Marte, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Look Like and How Can It Be Explored?,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2018, p. 31234. doi: 10.18260/1-2--31234.[2] L. A. Gelles, K. L. Youmans, and I. Villanueva, “Sparking Action: How Emotions Fuel or Inhibit Advocacy around Hidden Curriculum in Engineering”.[3] R. Plutchik, “A GENERAL PSYCHOEVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF EMOTION,” in Theories of Emotion, Elsevier, 1980, pp. 3–33. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7.[4] P. Ekman, “An argument for basic emotions,” Cogn. Emot., vol. 6, no. 3–4, pp. 169–200, May 1992, doi: 10.1080/02699939208411068.[5] S. An, L.-J. Ji, M. Marks, and Z. Zhang, “Two Sides of Emotion: Exploring Positivity and Negativity in Six

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Developing Engineering Competencies II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Harriss; Ian McGill; Elizabeth Gray; Aparajita Jaiswal, CILMAR Purdue University; Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent: The Differential Effects of Perspective Taking and Empathy in Negotiations,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 378–384, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2008.02096.x.[2] C. D. Batson, S. Early, and G. Salvarani, “Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels Versus Imaging How You Would Feel,” Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 751–758, Jul. 1997, doi: 10.1177/0146167297237008.[3] S. Wu and B. Keysar, “The Effect of Culture on Perspective Taking,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 600–606, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01946.x.[4] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, “The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Methods in Graduate Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tabe Ako Abane, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew Bahnson, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

advisor with my own needs, Overall, my relationship with my advisor isgood. Participants indicated their agreement with the items on a scale from Strongly Disagree (1)to Strongly Agree (5) on a series of questions on advisor relationships. The mean of these itemsis used as the advisor relationship variable. The scale demonstrated strong internal reliability(Cronbach’s alpha = .94).The demographic questions included: "How do you describe your gender identity?" with theoptions: Woman, Man, Genderqueer, Agender, Transgender, Cisgender, Non-binary/third gender,Prefer not to say, and a text write-in option. Race/ethnicity was collected with the question,“With which racial and ethnic group(s) do you identify?" The options included American Indianor

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Evolution of Engineering Education Research Methods

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Lowell Romeo, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Undergraduate Engineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 475– 526, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20171.[4] C. Young and M. L. Pate, “Compact Power Equipment Troubleshooting Training: Formative Assessment using Think-Aloud Pair Problem Solving,” in 2013 Kansas City, Missouri, July 21-July 24, 2013, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2013, p. 1. Accessed: Sep. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=43359[5] S. Ramachandran, R. Jensen, J. Ludwig, E. Domeshek, and T. Haines, “ITADS: A Real-World Intelligent Tutor to Train Troubleshooting Skills,” in Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 10948, C. Penstein Rosé

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Broadening Methodological Impacts

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yunmeng Han, University of Cincinnati; David Reeping, University of Cincinnati; Siqing Wei, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. References[1] J. Meyer and R. Land, “Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines,” 2003, Accessed: May 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b98202852dc631ced19a9 8414cbd9e9461c10417[2] S. Male and D. Bennett, “Threshold concepts in undergraduate engineering: Exploring engineering roles and value of learning,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–69, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.7158/D14-006.2015.20.1.[3] K. A