., works for Communication across the Curriculum (CxC) at Louisiana State University (LSU). She is a Ph.D. candidate in LSUˆa C™s cultural geography and anthropology program, and has over 10 years of qualitative research and teaching ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Celebrating 20 Years of the Engineering Communication Studio at Louisiana State UniversityAbstractThis practice paper reviews the 20-year history of the Engineering Communication Studio(Studio) at Louisiana State University (LSU), highlighting its role in improving communicationskills among engineering students to promote leadership, teamwork, and understanding ethicaland professional
from merely reacting tochallenges to actively learning and growing from them. Ultimately, this approach shifts themindset from reactive problem-solving to personal development and continuous learning. Beyond these alignments, in terms of connection to industry and leadership, personalmastery does have a presence in industry. Literature noting that current engineering education isnot producing leadership qualities in engineers [30] suggests that something must be done tomeet the U.S.’s leadership needs. With many of the traditional organizations within industrytransitioning to learning organizations, likely to meet the demands of the Fourth IndustrialRevolution as learning is the “currency of survival” [8, p.1], lifelong learning remains
UniversityResearch and Evaluation and Assessment Services, which we especially acknowledge.References[1] K. L. Meyers, S. E. Silliman, N. L. Gedde, and M. W. Ohland, “A Comparison of Engineering Students' Reflections on Their First‐Year Experiences.” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 169-178. 2010.[2] L. Santiago, Retention in a first-year program: Factors influencing student interest in engineering. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013. pp. 23-1045.[3] I. V. Ramteke, and J. Ansari, “Stress and Anxiety among first-year and final-year engineering students.” Stress, 3(4), 17-21. 2016.[4] Q. Tahmina, “Does Peer Mentoring Help Students be Successful in an Introductory Engineering Course?” In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
. Weisenfeld, “Leveraging faculty knowledge, experience, and training for leadership education in engineering undergraduate curricula,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 950–969, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2022.2043243.[11] D. R. Graham, D. E. Crawley, and B. R. Mendelsohn, “Engineering leadership education: A snapshot review of international good practice”.[12] S. A. Bjorklund and C. L. Colbeck, “The View from the Top: Leaders’ Perspectives on a Decade of Change in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2001, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00562.x.[13] B. Wambeke, J. Sloan, T. Frank, and D. DePorres, “Student-to-Industry Interaction in a Civil Engineering Field Course: Benefits for
. (1970). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership. 2. McClellan, Jeffrey L. (2013). Contributing to the development of student leadership through academic advising. Journal of Leadership Education, 12(1), 207-233. 3. Darroch, B. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on student engagement in STEM disciplines: A critical analysis. Journal of Higher Education, 94(1), 112-138. 4. Douglas, H. M., Settles, I. H., Cech, E. A., Montgomery, G. M., Nadolsky, L. R., Hawkins, A. K., Ma, G., Davis, T. M., Elliott, K. C., Cheruvelil, K. S., & Grundy, Q. (2022). Disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on marginalized and minoritized early- career academic scientists. PloS One, 17(9
, A., R. Welch, S. Ressler, N. Dennis, D. Larson, C. Considine, T. Nilsson, J. O'Brien, and T. Lenox. 2008. “Exceed Teaching Workshop: Tenth Year Anniversary.” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (June). 10.18260/1-2--3963.[2] Estes, A., Ressler, S., Saviz, C., Barry, B., Considine, C., Coward, D., Dennis, N., Hamilton, S., Hurwitz, D., Kunberger, T., Lenox, T., Nilsson, T., Nolen, L., O’Brien, J., O’Neill, R., Saftner, D., Salyards, K., and Welch, R. 2018. “Celebrating 20 Years of the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop.” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (June). 10.18260/1-2--30180.[3] Hamilton, S. R., C. L. Considine, T. Kunberger, T. L. Nisson, L. Nolen, D. A. Saftner, and C. M. Saviz. 2023. “Developing faculty leaders
built their owndefinitions of leadership [12]. For instance, one of the more popular definitions “borrowed” fromcommunication research defines leadership as follows: “Leadership is not defined by a title orposition, but rather as a process that takes place between leaders, followers, and/or teammembers” [13]. The field of business has defined leadership as “the process of interactiveinfluence that occurs when, in a given context, some people accept someone as their leader toachieve common goals.” [14] Winston and Patterson [15] from organizational studies defineleadership in the following way: A leader is one or more people who selects, equips, trains, and influences one or more follower(s) who have diverse gifts, abilities, and
, youth perceptions of leadership move past the traditionalleadership theories and more closely align with the contemporary theories.” [13, p.457].Interestingly, this does not agree with Komives et al.’s findings [5], which observed that studentslargely had traditional, hierarchical views of leadership when entering college.Leadership Identity DevelopmentThe process through which students develop their conceptualizations of leadership andleadership identity has been well developed in the literature. Most notably, Komives et al. [1]developed the leadership identity framework, which describes this process. In their LeadershipIdentity Development (LID) model, Komives et al. [1] conceptualized the creation of leadershipidentity into 6 stages; 1
curriculum toprovide a well-rounded education. Moreover, leadership training should extend beyondtheoretical instruction to include practical applications that demonstrate its relevance inreal-world contexts. As highlighted in the literature, integrating structured leadershipdevelopment programs into the curriculum can significantly enhance the comprehensiveeducation of engineering professionals, particularly by strengthening their leadership skills.References[1] D. Magrane, P. S. Morahan, S. Ambrose, and S. A. Dannels, "Competencies and Practices in Academic Engineering Leadership Development: Lessons From a National Survey," Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 171, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.3390/socsci7100171.[2] S. J. Perry, E. M. Hunter, S
leader? FACE aims to develop leadership skills, create opportunitiesfor students to engage in co- and extracurricular activities, and promote career and educationalgoal achievement within our engineering FYS to aid in retention of their programs.FACE is intentionally designed to align with leadership identity development models,particularly Komives et al.’s (2005) LID Model and Schell & Hughes’ (2016) EngineeringLeadership Identity Model [13], [14]. These frameworks emphasize that leadership identity iscultivated through structured experiences, reflection, and mentorship. Accordingly, FACEincorporates structured peer mentorship, self-assessment tools like CliftonStrengths, andleadership reflection activities to help students actively
development.References[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2024 - 2025 - ABET.” Accessed: Nov.27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2024-2025/#GC3[2] E. D. Lindsay, R. G. Hadgraft, F. Boyle, and R. Ulseth, “Disrupting EngineeringEducation,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st ed., New York:Routledge, 2023, pp. 115–133. doi: 10.4324/9781003287483-7.[3] B. J. Novoselich and D. B. Knight, “Measuring a moving target: Techniques forengineering leadership evaluation and assessment,” New Directions for Student Leadership, vol.2022, no. 173, pp. 63–71, 2022, doi: 10.1002/yd.20480.[4] S. Pitts, S. McGonagle, and S. W
, identifyingcomparative strengths and areas for improvement in learning across the curriculum at present. Toenable this comparison, we establish a thresholding convention shown on the graphs in Figure 2.While Figure 1 presents the factor (category) means, Figure 2’s graphs instead plot the means forall 29 individual items. The data in each of Figure 2’s eight graphs are identical, yet each separatelyhighlights the items composing a different one from among the factors. All of Figure 2’s graphsalso contain an identical triangular shaded region. With its hypotenuse matching the slope of thelinear best-fit line for the set of 29 mean self-efficacy scores, this shaded region is set to encompassthe bottom 20% of items in terms of growth (relative to outgoing self
competencies through engineering research group experiences,” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 48–64, 2017.[2]A.-K. Carstensen and J. Bernhard, “Design science research – a powerful tool for improving methods in engineering education research,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 85–102, 2019.[3]S. D. Snyder, “Vertically integrated projects and the importance of organisational culture amongst the student body,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 307–314, 2002.[4]K. Fowee Gasaway and A. Alexeenko, “Vertically integrated project-based method applied to small satellite technology development,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 216, pp. 275–281, 2024
not commonly found in other courses.Throughout the first half of the semester, the project was referenced whenever relevant to theweekly topics.In Week 8, students formed teams under the following guidelines: (1) each team must have 3 to 4members, and (2) no more than two members could be from the same major. Teams had oneweek to agree on a topic and then used a template provided in Week 9’s Universal Design forLearning session to draft a project proposal, laying out the lesson and learning objectives.Once teams were established, they could choose between presenting their lesson either at an on-campus outreach event during class time or at a local school on Week 14. The instructorpartnered with a colleague to organize the on-campus event
://infrastructurereportcard.org[3] American Society of Civil Engineers. (2019). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge:Preparing the Future Civil Engineer (3rd ed.). ASCE[4] Bae, H., Polmear, M., & Simmons, D. R. (2022). Bridging the Gap between IndustryExpectations and Academic Preparation: Civil Engineering Students’ Employability. Journal ofCivil Engineering Education, 148(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000062[5] Brunhaver S., Korte R., Barley S., Sheppard S. Bridging the Gaps between EngineeringEducation and Practice. In: U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy. University of Chicago Press;2019:129-164. doi:10.7208/9780226468471-006.[6] Congress.gov. H.R.3684 - Infrastructure Investment and JobsAct. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house
impact [11]. Ultimately, the facilitators guide EIF through definingtheir change initiative’s goals and implementation strategies, which are revisited during thecoaching sessions. In this paper, we share one of the activities designed to support EIF reflectionon their roles as leaders and opportunities for development based on the ICVF.Theoretical FoundationsGiven the importance of reflection in leadership development [31], one goal of the program wasfor faculty to reflect on their definition of leadership, explore how they enact leadership in theirrole, and identify areas where they would like to grow as leaders. To facilitate this reflection, weleveraged the Integrated Competing Values Framework [4].The ICVF was derived from Quinn et al.’s
Education and Practice,” in Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017, pp. 45–66. doi: 10.1002/9781118757369.ch1.[7] S. Turner, P. Hancock, B. Gordon, T. Carroll, and K. Stenger, “Scaffolding Social Justice in the Engineering Classroom: Constructing a More Restorative, Inclusive, Engineering Practice,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Feb. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/scaffolding-social- justice-in-the-engineering-classroom-constructing-a-more-restorative-inclusive- engineering-practice[8] “2024-2025_EAC_Criteria.pdf.” Accessed: Feb. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https
weekly learning sessions. Each of the eightlearning outcomes was addressed in at least two weekly interventions within the sessions. Theeight learning outcomes for the Summer Fellowship are outlined in Table 1.Table 1: Learning outcomes (LO) for the Summer Fellowship, matched to weeks in theprogram. Learning Outcome Leadership Focus Intervention Week(s)LO1: Apply leadership theories to personal and Self W2, W4, W6, W7,professional development W8LO2: Uncover and challenge students’ beliefs, Self W6, W4assumptions, habits and blind spotsLO3: Use tools and inventories to elevate students’ Self W1, W2self
. W. Fryer, "The goal construct in psychology," Handbook of motivation science, vol. 18, pp. 235-250, 2008.[10] S. Ambrose, M. Bridges, M. Lovett, M. DiPietro, and M. Norman, How Learning Works. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[11] M. E. Ford, Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Sage Publications, 1992.[12] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. New York City, NY: W.H. Freeman, 1997., 1997.[13] L. Ledden, S. P. Kalafatis, and P. Samouel, "The relationship between personal values and perceived value of education," Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 965-974, 2007.[14] E. Z. Rothkopf, "Course content and supportive environments for learning
Paper ID #48647Empathy: Developing This Core Leadership Skill in Engineering StudentsMr. Seth C. Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earnedMs. Maria PolyzoiSheila RiveraRachel Elizabeth Rice, Texas A&M UniversityNicholas Aleczander Barrio, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Empathy: Developing this Core
” Proceedings,American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2019, Salt Lake City,NV.Hanson, J., Sutterer, K., Aidoo, J., Collins, K., Kershaw, K., Lovell, M., Marincel Payne, M.,Mueller, J., and Shrestha, N. (2025). “Lessons Learned: Adoption of ASCE BOK3 StudentOutcomes Consistent with ABET 1-7,” Proceedings, American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference, June 2025, Montreal, Quebec.Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., and Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives:The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain, Allyn and Bacon,Boston, Mass.Lynch D., Russell, J., Evans, J. Sutterer, K. (2009). “Beyond the cognitive: The affectivedomain, values, and the achievement of the vision,” ASCE