Project and holds editorial roles as Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education and Editorial Board Member for the Journal of Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. He is also the upcoming Program Chair-Elect of the PCEE Division at ASEE. His current research interests include STEM+C education, specifically artificial intelligence literacy, computational thinking, and engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Bridging Gender and Disciplinary Gaps: A Tri-Pillar Framework forInclusive Artificial Intelligence Literacy among Female UndergraduatesAbstractAs Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes integral across various sectors, AI literacy has emergedas an
successful patterns for positivelearning outcomes in integrated STEM programs, specifically, those programs that mergescience and engineering with embodied signals and models, and particularly for non-majors [6],[18], [19]. The studies described here include continued refinement of two integrated STEMcurricular units, one for high school [20], [21] and one for middle school [22]. The high schoolcurriculum introduces students to bioengineering in the context of microprocessors and controlprogramming with expanded opportunities for modeling, algorithm development, andexploration of physical systems. The middle school curriculum is an IoT engineering unit thatintroduces middle school students to feedback mechanisms to control environmental conditionsin
Nebraska - Omaha Dr. Michelle Friend is an Associate Professor in the Teacher Education Department at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. She teaches CS teaching methods and research methods. Her research focuses on equity in computer science and interdisciplinary connections between computer science and other subjects. She received her Ph.D. from Stanford University in Learning Science and Technology Design, and previously taught middle school computer science.Dr. David S. Allen, Kansas State University David is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Kansas State University and the Director of the Center for STEAM Education. His work involves professional development for K-12
navigation, (ii)preliminary trials with growing plants using robotic platforms in lunarregolith in controlled indoor environments, and (iii) broadly engage the UMES campus communitythrough curriculum integration and innovative projects aligned with the long term vision of theNASA Artemis project.In alignment with the scope of the 3rd objective listed above the UMES project leaders haveincorporated an innovative mini-grant program that solicits proposals that will address any aspectof NASA’s Artemis project from UMES faculty and student teams from all disciplines in late fall.Two of these mini-proposals will be selected for funding to be implemented in the spring semesterannually for the duration of the project (2023-2026). This paper will highlight
Osiobe .Lior Shamir, Kansas State University Associate professor of computer science at Kansas State University.Dr. David S. Allen, Kansas State University David is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Kansas State University and the Director of the Center for STEAM Education. His work involves professional development for K-12 schools in STEAM related areas, and he is currently focused on on-line programing development in mathematics and computer science education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Designing a Virtual World Experience to Foster Computational Thinking in Young Learners: An Hour of Code Initiative
of Engineering and Computing Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Developing an Instrument to Understand Engineering Student usage of Digital External Resources from Solution Manuals to Generative AI IntroductionThe overall structure of the higher education system has not changed in quite some time, especiallyin engineering education. As Sorby et al. astutely observe, "Over the years, we educators havedone some tinkering around the edges, such as adding in a capstone design project, or replacingFortran with other programming languages—but the basic structure of the curriculum remainsunchanged even though our students can now
for assessing the “complexity of … thought processes” [20]. Gernsbacher etal. [13] suggests timed exams as a form of assessment should be removed from the curriculum asthey found evidence that these are less valid, reliable, inclusive, and equitable.As mentioned in the Introduction, a large number of studies demonstrate gaps in educationaloutcomes among historically underrepresented groups [21, 22]. The process of analyzing studentdata with respect to educational outcomes by separating by student gender or ethnic group is calleddata disaggregation. If a subgroup of students attains an outcome at a rate substantially lower thanthe benchmark rate, that subgroup is referred to as disproportionately impacted. According to theCalifornia Community
Paper ID #48183GIFTS: Integrating Generative AI into First-Year Engineering Education:From Knowledge Acquisition and Arduino Projects to Defining AccessibilityProblems and SolutionsAnna Leyf Peirce Starling, University of Virginia Anna Leyf Peirce Starling (Leyf Starling) is a founding faculty member and current Director of the First Year Engineering Center at the University of Virginia. She is currently developing curriculum and teaching the Foundations of Engineering 1 and 2 courses as well as advising 1st year engineering students. Starling earned a BS in Mechanical Engineering (UVA ’03); enhanced that with a MAT in
Administration £ 150 Staff £ 729 Figure 12. Workshop enhancing STEM education.ConclusionThe article work, as part of the ongoing Research Development Fund 2023, presents an approachto teaching STEM through a cost-effective AM kit. Approximately 90 primary school-agestudents took part in workshops implemented in a museum and a primary school located in theNorth of England, integrating AR and AI were used. The 3D model chosen was the Chichén Itzápyramid, selected not only to further Mexican Culture but also to teach science and engineering.Additionally, children interacted with animated university educators and experts on AMenhancing the interactive
format simplifies integration into large classes, automates scoring, and allows broaderdissemination at lower cost and time. The computer version also enables more efficient datacollection for assessment purposes. Tested in an undergraduate structural engineering course, the computer game’seffectiveness was evaluated through pre- and post-game assessments, observation, assignment,and log data analysis. The game demonstrated its ability to achieve key learning objectives relatedto resilience and equity-based decision-making.IntroductionThe field of civil engineering faces an evolving set of grand challenges, including aginginfrastructure, increasing user demand due to urban growth, and the rising prevalence andmagnitude of natural hazards
-funded e4usa program was designed and implemented as an effort to provideengineering curriculum “for us all,” with the intention of demystifying and democratizingengineering. The course authentically introduces “engineering,” not with the intent to producemore engineering students, but to improve technological literacy and to allow students todiscover their engineering identity, all while working through the engineering design processesto solve real problems. Students identify community-based problems and design engineeringsolutions while consulting with stakeholders, producing prototypes, and developing test plans.Course outcomes are clustered into color-coded tracks, including red (discover engineering),yellow (engineering in society), blue
Wetheim College of Engineering. Her focus is on developing curriculum, professional development and coaching models focused on use of system thinking and conceptual pedagogical practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Cultivating Future Engineers through Mentoring Experiences: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Mentorship in an Educational STEM K-12 Summer ProgramAbstractThe Goldberg Gator Engineering Explorers (GGEE) Summer Program is an informal STEMeducation program that offers free summer camps for K-12 students from under-resourcedcommunities. Camps are held in the K-12 student’s local school district and emphasize skillsdevelopment in
were recipients of an NSF funded S-STEM scholarship at a4-year Hispanic serving university in the Southwest of the U.S. Scholarship recipients transferredfrom 49 different community colleges and were an average of 22.6 years old with 7% of studentsabove the age of 30 years when they transferred. They enrolled in a variety of engineeringmajors at the 4-year university: 10% Aerospace Engineering, 11% Biomedical Engineering, 11%Chemical Engineering, 8% Civil Engineering, 10% Computer Engineering, 13% ElectricalEngineering, 2% Environmental Engineering, 1% Material Science and Engineering, 34%Mechanical Engineering.The goal of the scholarship program is to improve the transfer student experience in engineeringby providing co-curriculum cohort
integrate these ideas into theirassessment plans as the FYS course moves forward on a permanent basis in fall of 2025.Wright State Institutional Research conducted analyses of student persistence for every collegeinvolved in 2024 fall pilot FYS courses. CECS students enrolled in the first pilot FYS coursedemonstrated an increase of persistence of over ten percent than that of students who did notenroll in a FYS course. Persistence is measured by students registered in one academic semestercontinuing in the following academic semester.Significance testing was performed on fall 2024 FYS pilot results for completion rate (nosignificant difference found), semester grade point average (GPA) (significant difference foundwith p < 0.05), and fall to
Paper ID #45988Complete paper (evidence-based practice): Integrating Sustainability intoEngineering Education: The Impact of Complementary Field Activities onStudent EngagementMorgan F Rooney, North Carolina State University at RaleighNathalie Lavoine, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Since 2018, Nathalie Lavoine has been an Assistant Professor in the Department of Forest Biomaterials at NC State University (Raleigh, North Carolina, US). She received her PhD degree in 2013 from the Laboratory of Pulp & Paper Sciences, and Graphic Arts under the supervision of Dr. Julien Bras and Dr. Isabelle Desloges, in
their overall experience with a sense of belonging and theirplans to continue pursuing an engineering or computer science degree. Further, we plan to trackhow their performance in their math courses changes as they progress through the calculussequence so that we may modify the math preparation given during the summer bridge programto better support their continued academic performance. Our future analysis will provide furtherinsights into future curriculum modifications, such as exploring essential problem-solving andteamwork skills, as these are critical factors for long-term success in STEM fields.References[1] M. Ashley, K. M. Cooper, J. M. Cala, and S. E. Brownell, “Building Better Bridges into STEM: A Synthesis of 25 Years of
questions was removed (open-ended questions remained skippable). This change was intended to ensure that students who submitted the survey for tabulation at the end were engaged with the survey questions.1.1 BC Transfer SystemThe post-secondary system in British Columbia consists of an integrated network of colleges,TIUs, and RIUs that supports student mobility through a formalized transfer system. The BCCouncil on Admissions and Transfer1 is the agency tasked with facilitating admissions,articulation, and transfer arrangements among BC Transfer System member institutions, aswell as conducting research to support student and credit mobility.Most rural and urban colleges and TIUs in BC offer a defined set of first year courses thatallow
& 2 lecture, recitations, and laboratory, Analytical Chemistry lecture and laboratory, Organic Chemistry laboratory, and Physical Chemistry Laboratory. Natalie’s research contributions focus on innovative teaching methods to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Research interests include student misconceptions, instructional materials, and integration of technology to STEM courses. Outside of the university, Natalie has a passion for theater and architecture. Before finding her passion for chemistry education, she was a theater major and has an associate’s degree in computer aided Drafting and Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Evaluating the
building; it is about understanding how pastinnovations, challenges, and failures have shaped the world we live in today. From theconstruction of ancient aqueducts to the development of cutting-edge technologies, engineeringhas always been deeply intertwined with human history, culture, and society. However, inengineering education, the rich history of mathematicians, scientists and engineers who madesignificant contributions which greatly improved human beings’ lives are often overlooked.Some researchers recognized these issues and worked on integrating historical content intoengineering education [1-7]. Godoy [4] presents the development and application of an on-linemodule to learn historical perspectives in relation to an engineering topic. The
Paper ID #48300WIP: A Novel real-time circuit simulation tool – JSIMJohn Francis Simonis, The Ohio State University at MarionDr. Qudsia Tahmina, The Ohio State University at Marion Dr. Qudsia Tahmina, The Ohio State University at Marion Dr. Qudsia Tahmina is an Associate Professor of Practice at The Ohio State University at Marion and teaches engineering and engineering technology courses. She is involved in curriculum development, assessment of learning outcomes and ABET accreditation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Novel real-time circuit simulation tool
exploration which are essential foundations for career readiness. However, one challenge of integrating traditional professional development into engineering courses is that students often view it as disconnected from their technical curriculum. While many recognize its value, their focus on mastering technical content often leads them to brush professional development aside. As a result, some students saw this course as an ideal context to incorporate practical professional development experiences that align with their technical studies. he discussions and activities from the Design Your Life book used in the pilot course supportedTprofessional development among the students. The book encourages readers to consider
turn pedagogical challenges into opportunities. Asdoctoral education adapts to an era of AI availability, this study suggests that the technology'svalue lies not in reducing teaching complexity, but in helping faculty productively navigate thatcomplexity while maintaining pedagogical integrity and strengthening connections with students.The resulting insights offer both practical guidance for faculty considering AI integration andtheoretical contributions to our understanding of doctoral education in an AI-enhanced future.References[1] K. Holley, “The challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: A cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience,” High. Educ., vol. 58, pp. 241–255, 2009.[2] M. J. Pifer and V. L. Baker
consider it a basecourse to continue advancing in the career proper" (Student 6, Interview 2). By framing physicsas a means of developing transferable skills rather than solely as a subject with direct careerrelevance, educational programs can better align the subject’s perceived utility with students'professional aspirations.Given these findings, institutions should consider leveraging active learning techniques morewidely in physics courses. For example, integrating real-world problems or interdisciplinaryprojects into the curriculum could make the content more relatable and reduce initial resistanceamong students. Furthermore, addressing student anxiety early through orientation sessions orintroductory workshops could create a more supportive
Paper ID #46457Incorporating an engineering standard for a team design project in simulation-baseddesign courseDr. Xiaobin Le, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor, Ph.D, PE., Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02115, Phone: 617-989-4223, Email: Lex@wit.edu, Specialization in Computer Aided Design, Mechanical Design, Finite Element Analysis, Fatigue design and reliability design.Dr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She is actively
constructionmanagement programs in the U.S., raising concerns that AI may overly automate teachingprocesses, which create slow institutional processes about AI adoption. Third, the successfulimplementation of AI tools in education requires instructors with a deep understanding of bothconstruction management and AI technologies [7]. However, the lack of adequately trainededucators often limits the effective integration of AI in the curriculum. Opportunities for facultytraining in AI and construction management are often scarce or inadequately funded.Additionally, the fast-paced development of AI technologies requires continuous learning, whichcan overwhelm educators. Fourth, AI systems, such as simulation software, machine learningtools, and smart learning
Paper ID #46622Validating Future Engineering Competencies: An Innovation System Approachin Competency Modeling through Delphi MethodMr. Alexa Ray Ronsairo Fernando, National University, Philippines Alexa Ray R. Fernando is the Senior Research Management and Publication Director and an Associate Professor I at the College of Engineering, National University, Philippines. Previously, he served as Dean of the College of Engineering at the same institution. As a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, his research focuses on competency modeling, curriculum development, competency-based learning
Paper ID #47434GIFTS: An Interdisciplinary Collaboration to Foster Students’ Sense of Belongingin EngineeringDr. Nichole Ramirez, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Nichole Ramirez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at the University of Texas at El Paso. Previously, she served as the assistant director of Vertically Integrated Projects at Purdue University. Her research focuses on engineering education and the stigma surrounding mental illness. Dr. Ramirez also worked as a research data analyst in Purdue’s Department of Institutional Data Analytics & Assessment. She earned
Paper ID #46198Exploring Elementary Students’ Emotional States within Engineering DesignTasks in an Afterschool Program (Fundamental)Ms. Leyli Nouraei Yeganeh, Binghamton University Leyli Nouraei Yeganeh is a Ph.D. student in the Ed.D. program at Binghamton University, specializing in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Educational Leadership. Currently, in her final semester of coursework, her research interests include the integration of immersive technologies such as the Metaverse in education, with a particular focus on STEM learning and students with disabilities.Amber Simpson, Binghamton University State
Paper ID #49314Evaluating the inclusion of environmental justice in the civil engineering curriculum:Does it motivate students to work against inequity and strive for environmentaland social justice?Dr. Annesh Borthakur, Saint Louis University Annesh Borthakur, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Civil Engineering at Saint Louis University. His research involves developing methods to make urban areas more sustainable. He achieves this by developing nature based methods to clean stormwater and wastewater as an alternate source of water, and create energy from wastes while reducing our exposure to emerging
full credit courses and is also described by [9];here, students serve as “team coaches” for the first-year students’ ELL teams. These second-yearstudents take turns facilitating the ELL activities, a responsibility for which they receive coachingand instruction from the GEL teaching staff. The second-year students also undertake a shortcourse in project management and select an additional leadership-related elective course to take.The foundation of GEL’s curriculum, Capabilities of Effective Engineering Leaders [10], wasdeveloped soon after the program’s launch as a consensus report from workshops involvingengineering and leadership educators, leadership specialists from the military, and practicingengineering leaders. This report was also