Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, Vol. 135, No. 1.NRC, National Research Council (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Sutterer, K., Aidoo, J., Hanson, J., Kershaw, K., Lovell, M., Marincel Payne, M., Mueller, J., andRobinson, M. (2019) “A Collaborative Process Leading to Adoption of ASCE BOK3 Consistentwith ABET,” Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,June 2019, Salt Lake City, NV.Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998) Understanding by Design, Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA.
Paper ID #45949BOARD # 183: MAKER – Recycling Post Consumer Waste Via VacuumForming ProcessesDr. Austin Talley, Texas State University Dr. Austin Talley is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Ingram School of Engineering at Texas State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas State University, Dr. Austin Talley worked as a manufacturing quality engineer for a test and measurement company, National Instruments, in Austin, TX. Dr. Austin Talley is a licensed by state of Texas as a Professional Engineer. Both of Dr. Austin Talley’s graduate degrees, a doctorate and masters in Mechanical Engineering, manufacturing
Paper ID #47785BOARD # 27: Work in progress: Multiple submissions for technical writingassignments improve students’ self-efficacy and reduce anxietyDr. James Long, Rice University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in progress: Multiple submissions for technical writing assignments improve students’ self-efficacy and reduce anxietyIntroductionThe engineering education community has long understood that one of the core engineeringskills is technical writing, as shown in several works [1], [2], [3] and highlighted in the mostrecent version of the ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs [4
.20391.[2] M. L. Sánchez-Peña and S. A. Kamal, “A comparative analysis of mental health conditionsprevalence and help seeking attitudes of engineering students at two institutions in the U.S.A,”2023 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC). pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/WEEF-GEDC59520.2023.10343627.[3] M. Whitwer, S. A. Wilson, and J. H. Hammer, “Engineering Student Mental Health and HelpSeeking: Analysis of National Data from the Healthy Minds Study,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference (FIE), Oct. 2023, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343045.[4] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, “Major Differences: Variationsin Undergraduate and Graduate Student Mental Health and
problem- using engineering concepts.” solving approach. It may point out at least one of its “Human-centered engineering design is design with a major practices (empathy, focus on accessibility and use for people.” Intermediate/ iteration, consideration of Developing (2) implementation “HCED is designing something with an engineering dimensions). basis while also keeping in mind the people who it is For this level, designed for by iterating multiple times and getting specify which Implementation feedback from stakeholders multiple times so that the
engineering in young minds, providing over 300 hours of instruction. His dedication to equitable education extends to developing initiatives that engage students from all backgrounds, and his efforts have earned him the Chancellor’s Excellence in Citation Award at Syracuse University. In addition to his academic duties, Dr. Yung is an active leader in promoting humanitarian engineering, emphasizing the importance of socially inclusive and sustainable engineering solutions in his teaching. He has collaborated on various projects aimed at addressing the needs of marginalized communities and has led numerous outreach activities to expose high school students to biomedical engineering. Dr. Yung’s contributions to education
indicate significant long-term effects on students’ career preparedness and mental health,necessitating multifaceted institutional responses that include robust online educational frameworks,comprehensive mental health support, and integrity measures for online assessments. These findingsunderline the need for educational institutions to develop adaptable, inclusive, and supportivestrategies to not only manage immediate disruptions but also enhance the resilience of theeducational system against future crises, ensuring the academic integrity and mental well-being ofstudents remain prioritized.In this study, we approached the data with an open mind, focusing solely on answering our researchquestion regarding how engineering graduate students
Education, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 218-225, 2018.[31] D. K. Sheridan, M. Carr, L. can den Broeck, “Mind games: an investigation into theresponse of Irish engineering students to a mindset intervention,” European Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference, Sep. 16-19, 2019, Budapest, Hungary.[32] A. Adams, A. R. Betz, and E. Dringenberg, “Preliminary findings on students’ beliefs aboutintelligence,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,June 15-19, 2019, Tampla, FL.[33] D. M. Muñoz, J. C. C. Martínez, M. Á. G. Martos, and R. P. de Prado, “Telecommunicationengineering student profile at the University of Jaen and improvement actions,” 13thInternational Technology, Education and Development Conference, Mar
classroom.The effects of their instructors and advisorsStudents were asked to identify how their instructors and advisors could support their ownmental health and sense of belonging as an engineering student. Students wanted support fromprofessors, both academic and emotional. Academically, students stated that they wanted lesswork and that professors needed to keep in mind that they are often in several engineeringcourses at the same time and have responsibilities outside of school. Also, students wanted moreclarity on assignments, as well as opportunities for extensions. Emotionally, students wantedinstructors to be more supportive inside the classroom, desiring “constructive feedback instead ofharsh criticism.” They also wanted to develop a more
private R1 university, a thematic analysis of interviews withtwenty engineering students conducted by a faculty–student research team revealed that hustleculture impacts the academic resources that students engage with. The results of this studyemphasize the need to design academic resources with the school culture in mind and theimportance of both understanding the needs of the student body and identifying the barriers andincentives to resource engagement. Specifically, the study identifies the accessibility, flexibility,and clarity of resources as key features that, when optimized, can improve student resourceengagement.II. MotivationThe Value of Academic and Student Support ResourcesAcademic resource use is a key determinant of student
Paper ID #45968Engagement in Practice: A Case Study in Construction Engineering PracticumCourse at University ”X”Dr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He taught at The United States Military Academy during his 25 year military career. After retiring form the military he has taught at the University of Texas at Tyler and The Citadel, where he was the Dean of Engineering for
Paper ID #47978Collaborative Learning in Engineering: Analyzing the Effects of Group Formationon Student OutcomesMajor Brett Ryan Krueger, United States Military Academy MAJ Brett Krueger, Instructor of Environmental Engineering, USMA; brett.krueger@westpoint.edu MAJ Krueger is an Infantry Officer and Instructor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at West Point. Brett currently teaches courses in Environmental Engineering Technologies as well as Environmental Engineering in Developing Communities. He holds an MS in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Stanford University and a BS from the
pedagogical strategies employed. In Chile,universities have implemented innovation and entrepreneurship programs that incorporateactive methodologies such as project-based learning and the creation of startups as part oftheir courses. These strategies not only foster the development of entrepreneurialcompetencies but also strengthen students' ability to adapt to changes in the global market.In recent years, engineering education has evolved to incorporate competencies beyondtraditional technical skills, fostering an entrepreneurial mindset among future engineers. Oneof the most influential frameworks in this field is Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML),developed by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), which aims totransform
technical skills. Interms of technical attributes, students' responses ranged quite significantly from “strategicthinking” and “math and logic based mind” to “human being.” Interestingly, we found that noneof the four engineering students defined themselves as engineers in describing their technicalattributes or “Who I am” from the technical standpoint.Preliminary Discussion From this activity and preliminary work, we found that students struggled toconceptualize and distinguish technical knowledge (“What I know”), technical skills (“What Ido”), and technical attributes (“Who I am”). Students appeared to struggle both with separatingknowledge from skills and also had a difficult time reflecting deeper on their own attributes.During the
Paper ID #47444WIP: Developing an Interview Protocol to Unveil the Stories of NeurodivergentEngineering StudentsLeslie A Brown, Utah State University Leslie Brown is an Engineering Education PhD student at Utah State University. She recently completed a Master’s degree in Engineering Education at Utah State University with thesis focus on training high school STEM teachers to implement engineering curriculum into their classrooms.Dr. Catherine McGough Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine Spence is an Associate Professor at Iron Range Engineering in the Integrated Engineering Department at Minnesota State
Paper ID #46111Work in Progress: Instructional Strategies to Promote Cognitive Belongingand Engagement in Engineering CoursesDr. Michelle C Vigeant, The Pennsylvania State University Dr. Michelle Vigeant is an associate professor of acoustics and architectural engineering (AE) and the director of faculty adviser supports at the Pennsylvania State University. She primarily teaches two undergraduate courses in architectural acoustics and noise control in AE within the Department of AE, but also teaches some graduate level courses in the Graduate Program in Acoustics. Dr. Vigeant is passionate about implementing different
Paper ID #47283Presence, Participation, and Pedagogy: Revisiting Face-to-Face Learning inEngineering Programs (Work-in-Progress)Dr. Cristina Diordieva, Arizona State University Cristina Diordieva is currently a postdoctoral researcher at Arizona State University in the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at the Polytechnic School. She is a co-author of two reports published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in Switzerland. Her research focuses on inclusivity in STEM, educational technology, engineering education, and qualitative research methodologies.Dr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Dr. Medha Dalal is an
Paper ID #45563BOARD # 204: Enhancing Engineering Education for Homeschool FamiliesThrough MAKEngineering Kits (Work in Progress)Dr. Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton Amber Simpson is a Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in the Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership Department at Binghamton University. Her research interests include (1) examining individual’s identity(ies) in one or more STEM discipline, and (2) investigating family engagement in and interactions around STEM-related activities.Dr. Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington Professor of Science EducationDr. Kelli Paul
children’s career plans: “Exposure to engineering at that young,early stage in his high school career really solidified in his mind that that was what he wanted to dowith his future.” They also expressed the benefit of pre-college engineering experience for collegeapplications: “And I really think it makes a huge difference in how... higher education looks atstudents, potential candidates.”Parents also expressed concerns regarding school-provided resources and the potential to transferhigh school-level engineering courses to college. One concern involves how the development of theirchild’s interests aligned with existing high school policies and academic requirements, given thelimited time available to students: “The high school has so many
holistically and have learned to hold both the individual parts and their relationships tothe whole system in mind simultaneously. However, it can be frustrating for those who strugglewith the complexity and ambiguity of systems thinking.In preparing the engineers of the future, we are also preparing future leaders. Doing so demandsthat we consider which skills and mindsets these future leaders will need; it also requires that weassess whether the methods we are using to prepare them reflect the ways they will be expectedto enact leadership roles. In other words, how might faculty model the leadership students will beasked to enact in their careers? Faculty have a unique opportunity to demonstrate to futureleaders how they might operate within the
, interpersonal, and ethically mindful criteria in over half of ABET’s student outcomes andCEAB’s graduate attributes confirms the profession’s desire for newly minted engineers to possessa variety of social and interpersonal skills to complement their technical abilities.Successful empathy-focused instruction requires engineering educators to understand how andwhy empathy is important to engineering work and commit to guiding and supporting students asthey develop these skills. In addition to adopting new pedagogies that they are unfamiliar with orthat may feel uncomfortable to them, instructors must support and guide students as they workthrough material that may challenge their preconceived notions about what it means to be anengineer [4], [35], [36
Paper ID #47658Who Is Important? Pre-College Students’ Identification and Considerationof Stakeholders in a Front-End Design ProjectKrina Patel, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Krina Patel (she/her) is a doctorate student in Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She holds a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from UC Berkeley and a B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State.Kara Brooke Stark, University of Michigan Kara Stark is a Master’s of Engineering student in Systems Engineering & Design at the University of Michigan. She has a B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering from the same
, M. J. Nathan, M. W. Alibali, E. Simon, & E. Pier, “Being mathematical relations: Dynamic gestures support mathematical reasoning”, International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2013. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/1153.[12] M. M. Grondin, M. I. Swart, A. R. Pandey, K. Fu, & M. J. Nathan, “How does students' use of speech ground and embody their mechanical reasoning during engineering discourse?” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 25-28, 2023.[13] S. Kang &B. Tversky, (2012). “From hands to minds: gestures promote action understanding,” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications vol. 1, pp. 1-15, 2012.[14] C. E. Hmelo-Silver & M. G
] A. E. Cervantes and M. A. A. Guerra, “Work in Progress: Impact on Students Dropout rates of Introducing a First-Year Hands-on Civil Engineering Course,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023. Accessed: Apr. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-impact-on-students-dropout-rates-of-introducing- a-first-year-hands-on-civil-engineering-course[20] I. Guerra, “WIP: Utilizing Mind-Mapping to Connect the Skillsets of Architecture Students for Both Hands-On and Lecture-Oriented Teaching Approaches,” in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/wip-utilizing-mind-mapping-to-connect-the-skillsets-of
Paper ID #46116Lasting Impacts of Credited Information Literacy Library Instruction forGraduate Engineering StudentsElise Anne Basque, Polytechnique Montreal Elise Anne Basque has been a Science and Engineering Librarian at Polytechnique Montreal since 2011. She holds a B.Sc. in mathematics and a Master’s degree in Information Science from Universite de Montreal, and a B.Ed. in education from University of Ottawa. At the Polytechnique Library, she specializes in mathematics, statistical data, biomedical engineering, and physics engineering. She is involved in information literacy workshops, open educational resources and
thinking, up from 5), though some founddocumentation cumbersome and noted AI’s mathematical errors. A notable critique was that AIintegration sometimes reduced class time for geotechnical content, with one student commenting,“We spent too much class time talking about AI instead of geotechnical engineering.” Bothgroups expressed concerns about AI as a crutch, despite initial optimism, highlighting a nuancedconfidence dynamic influenced by implementation approach. The qualitative responses suggestthat students remained mindful of maintaining a balance between AI assistance and directinstructor engagement throughout the course.DiscussionThis study reveals complex dynamics of structured AI implementation in a technical engineeringcourse, with three
Paper ID #47594Lessons Learned in Developing ROS Asynchronous Tutorials for Roboticscourse: Guided versus Inquiry based LearningEvan Kusa, Duke UniversityProf. Siobhan Oca, Duke University Siobhan Rigby Oca is an assistant professor of the practice in the Thomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Duke University, NC, USA. She received her B.Sc. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Master in Translational Medicine from the Universities of California Berkeley and San Francisco. She completed her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2022 from Duke University. Her research interests include
Paper ID #45722Collaborative Online Interactive Laboratory on Software Defined Radio FundamentalsDr. Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University Dr. Otilia Popescu received the Engineering Diploma and M.S. degree from the Polytechnic Institute of Bucharest, Romania, and the PhD degree from Rutgers University, all in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Her research interests are in the general areas of communication systems, wireless communications, control theory, signal processing and engineering education. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Old Dominion University in
Paper ID #48292WIP: Integrating Human Rights Frameworks and Reflective Learning intoEngineering Senior DesignDr. Jorge Paricio Garcia, University of Connecticut Dr. Jorge Paricio is an Associate Professor-in-Residence in Industrial Design, at the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Connecticut. He received his Bachelor’s degree from the Complutense University of Madrid. He also holds a Master’s Degree in Industrial Design from Pratt Institute and a second Master’s in Human Resources Management from Johnson &Wales University. He holds a PhD from the Complutense University in Madrid, Spain, with a
Paper ID #47474The Impact of Cybersecurity Research in Problem-Solving Through A SwarmInfiltration ExerciseMiss Noa Teed, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Noa Teed is pursuing a Bachelor’s in Software Engineering with a minor in Systems Engineering. She has worked on the development of a roving swarm test platform. This platform implements biologically inspired algorithms for proof-of-concept and experimentation. Her research evaluates how a cybersecurity course influences undergraduate students’ problem-solving approaches, with a particular emphasis on the application of students’ theoretical