. Johnson, C. Pee, and J. Hall, “Beyond Selecting a Methodology: Discussing Research Quality, Ethical, and Equity Considerations in Qualitative Engineering Education Research,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: May 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/beyond-selecting-a-methodology-discussing-research-quality-ethical-an d-equity-considerations-in-qualitative-engineering-education-research[11] M. Josiam, T. Johnson, M. Ausman, and W. C. Lee, “Work in Progress: Navigating Undergraduate Engineering as a Woman of Color,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), College Station, TX, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109
been widely applied in higher education, and has shown success invarious contexts, such as application of ethical principles, improved problem-solving skills, andhigher participation rates and test scores [4-6]. Specifically within engineering education, CAcontinues to gain popularity due to its effectiveness in advancing students’ competencies andemphasis on contextual learning [7-8]. Engineering students involved in courses that used theCA framework have reported more positive attitudes toward the course, and a strong preferencefor CA due to its accommodation of diverse learning styles [9-10].The CA framework aims to teach novices the problem-solving techniques used by expertsthrough four dimensions: content, methods, sequencing, and
that three to twelve months after completing it,students stated the workshop improved their IL skills and usage of library services. As theycontinue to use these skills in their research activities, some could become habits and thusbenefit them in their future.Students in the focus group mentioned it made a real difference that the workshop was givenby librarians. Combined with the survey results, this shows that the librarians’ expertise madean important contribution to graduate students’ research habits, ethics, and critical reading.IntroductionPolytechnique Montréal, a francophone engineering university, offers over 120 programs invarious fields of engineering and applied sciences at different levels (certificate, bachelor’s,master’s and
of the continuous improvement process andtook input from students, internal program assessments, and what other programs around thenation are doing. The two-course capstone experience for the USAFA civil engineering programwas first executed during the 2023-2024 academic year. CIVENGR 451 (Civil EngineeringCapstone Design I) occurs in the fall and CIVENGR 452 (Civil Engineering Capstone Design II)occurs in the spring. Each course is worth 3.0 credit hours, and has the following objectives: 1. Work effectively within a design team in a professional and ethical manner. 2. Apply the civil engineering design process and conduct iterative analysis and design of a solution to a challenging, ill-defined and open-ended problem. 3. Apply
. Thekey NACE competencies include Critical Thinking and Problem Solving, Oral and WrittenCommunication, Teamwork and Collaboration, Digital Technology, Leadership, Professionalismand Work Ethic, Career Management, and Global/Intercultural Fluency [2].By integrating competencies like those defined by NACE into course objectives, educators aimto ensure that students not only acquire knowledge but also develop practical skills that willenhance their employability. The NACE competencies provide a structured way for educators toassess and improve students' preparedness for the workforce while also helping studentsrecognize their growth in these essential areas. Higher education is attempting to equip studentsfor careers by developing generic
principles of thediscipline to identify solutions. (Leveraging STEM)2. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practicebased on appropriate legal and ethical principles. (Evaluation)3. Utilize systematic approaches to select, develop, apply, integrate, and administer securecomputing technologies to accomplish user objectives. (Advanced Application) Formal student outcome statements are provided with concise descriptors to facilitate meaningful discussions. Listing lengthy descriptions can be cumbersome to follow, and simple enumeration of student outcomes (e.g., SO#1 lacks clarity) is more effective. For instance: Student Outcome (SO#1): Analyze a broadly defined problem within the program’s domain and apply
challenges for helping engineering students become better writers andcommunicators.Working in partnership with the lead instructor of the existing undergraduate engineering writingand communication course (second author), we sought to provide guidance on the ethical andeffective use of generative AI for writing and increase students’ AI literacy. As part of thisproject, we are iteratively developing, implementing, and evaluating a pedagogically-informedAI writing tool, which provides students scaffolded access to generative AI and researchersaccess to the student–AI interaction data. In parallel, we are creating professional development tosupport instructors’ use of the curriculum, tool, and instructional resources for integrating AIwriting tools
Paper ID #47858WIP: Efficacy of Connecting Engineering and Calculus through AI ProblemGenerationDr. Jeffrey Stransky, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Jeffrey Stransky is an assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technology with a joint appointment in the Department of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology and the Dean’s office. His research interests include engineering ethics, use of educational simulations and games, and statistical modeling. Jeff obtained his PhD in Engineering Education from Rowan University in 2023, where he also obtained his MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2021. https
instructor to broaden my skillsetto hopefully fill in some of the gaps that I found during my undergraduate internship. I originallydid not see the benefit of leadership activities in my undergraduate degree, similar to theparticipants in [14]. These experiences changed my perception of myself, as I found that Ienjoyed the teaching and service work that I did more than the technical work that I did for myresearch. This led me to pursue an academic career as a teaching-focused faculty member. In myteaching, I try to incorporate non-traditional engineering topics, like sustainability, ethics andaccessibility, and professional skills, like communication and reflective practices, into theclassroom, to introduce them to a different side of engineering
course is to answer the question, “What do engineers really do?” 1.) The student will understand the basics of the engineering profession, including problem solving, design, teamwork, creativity, and ethics. 2.) The student will demonstrate the ability to communicate graphical information concerning three-dimensional objects. 3.) The student will produce, on the sketch pad and on the computer, assigned drawings of various objects.” Finally, the overall topics covered include the following: 1.) Engineering disciplines and 6.) Teamwork functions 7.) Communication 2.) Sketching and Orthographic
Paper ID #47262The Global Context of Clean Energy Materials, an EOP aligned undergraduateengineering courseDr. James Groves, University of Virginia James Groves is a leading university educator in the field of sustainable development. In the classroom he engages with students across disciplines and educates them about sustainable energy systems. He helps students to appreciate the need for a timely energy system transformation. James Groves’ scholarly interests include a focus on the impacts of climate change upon the mid-Atlantic region. He has recently been developing an engineering ethics case study related to his local
responses to four interview questions regarding theirunderstanding of engineering and their engineering identities.1. What are some words and phrases to describe engineering or what engineers do?Students used different phrases to answer this question. A few themes emerged in theirresponses, which can be summarized as follows: • altruism was described as “helping others”, “engineering ethics”, “safety [of people and structures]”, “respect for the environment,” “[having] good morals,” “philanthropists” • adaptability was described as “constructive criticism”, “flexibility [in a team environment]” • planning and analytical thinking, described as “thinking before doing”, “[engineers are] analytical and
to providepersonalized learning experiences through adaptive feedback and real-time simulations.However, challenges such as bias, ethical considerations, and the potential for misuse are keyconcerns that educators must address. Similarly, Fatahi et al. [12] illustrated using AI in theGeotechnical Engineering discipline. They found that AI integration in education may improvestudent engagement and learning outcomes while still recognizing the limitations of quality andcompleteness.AI has been shown to have a transformative impact on higher education by enabling newlearning methodologies. Walter [13] highlighted how AI literacy, prompt engineering, andcritical thinking skills can be integrated into engineering curricula to make learning
has become increasingly essential. This work-in-progressstudy investigates how senior engineering students leverage AI-based learning tools, such asChatGPT, in design projects and explores the need for integrating formal AI training into engineeringcurricula. The study is guided by two central research questions: (1) How does AI enhancestudents’ ability to navigate complex design processes and improve outcomes? (2) What are theperceived impacts of AI on students’ learning, skill development, and ethical considerations inengineering design?Eighteen senior capstone students from three design project groups at a land-grant university inthe western United States were selected and recruited through convenience sampling toparticipate in the study
and engineering, thermo-fluids engineering, and microfluidic technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Assessing the Impact of Makerspace Workshops on Breaking Academic SilosThrough Cross-Disciplinary CollaborationI. IntroductionAs the world confronts increasingly complex global challenges from climate change and publichealth crises to rapid technological advancements, academic institutions worldwide arerecognizing that preparing future engineers requires more than traditional, siloed curricula [1],[2]. Contemporary engineers must possess an expanded skill set that combines deep technicalexpertise with strong communication, ethical reasoning, and collaboration skills, enabling themto address
of AI meant they had to do "less thinking," which put bounds on their creativity and original brainstorming.4. Ethics: A couple of responses touched on the ethics of using AI for assignments. They noted that while it is possible to use AI for all work, it is the human's responsibility not to delegate everything to AI.5. Context: The responses agreed that AI was more suitable for some contexts than others. For example, AI is more suited for quick brainstorming and "short-term" projects than long-term ones. Additionally, AI is better at providing feedback than generating novel ideas. One student noted, "AI's main strength is saving time, not generating amazing ideas."Overall, most students responded that they would use AI in
Impact of a curriculum and design course redesign on student’s engineering design process knowledgeIntroductionIn 2024, significant changes were implemented in the first-year engineering program at theUniversity of Virginia, leading to a major redesign of courses across the curriculum. Previously,first-year students took two separate courses: one focused on the engineering design process,technical communication, and prototyping, while the other centered on sociotechnical concepts,non-technical communication, and ethics. However, starting in 2024, these courses wereintegrated into a single sequence taught by one instructor to eliminate artificial distinctionsbetween technical and sociotechnical topics. This change also
, and maintenance of electricalElectrical Systems systems and equipment. Proficiency in concepts from trigonometry, calculus, chemistry, physics, andMathematics & Physics electromagnetic principles. Broad engineering principles, including thermodynamics, computer programming, andEngineering Knowledge advanced specializations like signal processing and optics.Hands-On Skills Gaining practical experience through projects, internships, or experimentation.Problem-Solving Ability to analyze and solve real-world problems using engineering principles. Professional Competencies Commitment to ethical practices
Study)Introduction Colleges and universities need to educate engineering students who are technicallycompetent and ready to contribute to the needs of our increasingly diverse society. In addition toemphasizing graduates’ ability to analyze issues in professional ethics, ABET’s EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) recently added applications of diversity, equity, and inclusionprinciples to the program criteria for civil and similarly named engineering programs [1]. Aftertwo years of optional pilot, EAC adopted the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion intogeneral Criteria 5 Curriculum and Criteria 6 Faculty in their 2025-2026 accreditation cycle [2].However, the ABET Board of Directors approved the removal of all references
energy,food security, transportation, and health. Over two quarters, students iteratively define needs, establishdesign requirements, prototype, test, and refine solutions, gaining skills in design, teamwork, projectmanagement, and ethical evaluation. Funding comes from industry affiliates and community-engagedlearning grants provided through the Haas Center for Public Service, with each team guided by anexperienced project coach. Table 1: ME 170 Learning Objectives ABET Student Outcomes [6] ME 170 Objectives Ability to apply engineering design to Deliver an engineering system addressing a real-world produce solutions that meet specified problem, using (1) the
as Boeing, identified a growing need for engineers to expand their skill sets beyondtraditional technical expertise. Boeing’s seminal list of “Desired Attributes of an Engineer”underscored the importance of communication skills, global awareness, ethics, teamwork, andlifelong learning [2]. This shift marked a broader recognition that the challenges engineers facedwere increasingly multidisciplinary, requiring a new approach to education. Organizations suchas the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and the American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) also contributed to this evolving perspective. NAE’s publication The Engineer of 2020:Visions of Engineering in the New Century [3] and ASCE’s The Vision for Civil Engineering in2025 [4] called
benefit the most from such coaching may be the most resistant toseeking such opportunities. The author A.A. Mohammed et al. [11] report that engineeringstudents who are presenting their work may experience debilitating anxiety and facilitatinganxiety, both of which can significantly and negatively impact the effectiveness of the engineercommunicator. This study found that one of the best ways to help students relieve their anxiety isthrough frequent and timely corrections.ABET Student Criterion 3, Outcome 3 specifies that students are expected to illustrate “an abilityto communicate effectively with a range of audiences.” Components of effective communicationinclude ethical communication, the ability of individuals to communicate with individuals
responses after uploading a PDFwith the 2023 course outline in a prompt to update the current course offering. Entering theprompt “new topic,” can also refresh responses in Copilot.Generative AI is providing powerful opportunities for instructors and will challenge the waysteaching and learning are approached. The potential benefits are seemingly limitless, but it isimportant to consider the ethical and societal implications as outlined in numerous publications.Generative AI tools cannot be trusted blindly and generated content should be verified andchecked for accuracy and bias. The instructor found it helpful to require the AI tool to providesources when evaluating the accuracy of some claims generated in response to a prompt. Facinga new
-intensive course simultaneously meets the general education requirementsof the institution for critical thinking, communication, teamwork, and personal ethics, while alsois flagged as ‘writing intensive’ in some way, likely allowing the course to be substituted fortraditional or literature-based academic writing courses. Comparing and coding degree maps forMechanical Engineering (ME) across institutions yielded four discrete pathways for teachingengineering communication. (1) General Education, English, or (rarely) Communication courses were found to be a common 2-course sequence with varying titles like First-year Seminar; College Writing, Composition, or Rhetoric. All schools with some form external-to
resources such as tutoring centers,libraries, academic advising and department specific “Help Rooms.” The course also coversstrategies for balancing academic workload with personal well-being, including stressmanagement and maintaining a healthy lifestyle.Additionally, students explore career opportunities, ethical considerations in engineering andtechnology with a mini research topic using AI, and the importance of teamwork andcommunication skills in professional settings. Guest lectures from practitioners offer insightsinto practical aspects and future trends in these dynamic fields. By the end of the course, studentshave a foundational understanding of engineering and computer science, preparing them forfurther study and continuing professional
interests include empathy, ethics, design thinking, and course design.Dr. Corey T Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Corey Schimpf is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. He is the Past Division Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) for the American Society of Engineering Education. His research interests include engineering and human-centered design, advancing research methods, and technology innovations to support learning in complex domains. He has a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025WIP: Developing an Empathy in Design
practice” examples we share regularlyfeatures good professional attitudes. We also formally teach professional attitudes in teamworkand leadership lessons. This includes, for example • Ethics thread: Learning in our ethics thread across the curriculum includes lessons in integrity and honesty • Leadership thread: Our teamwork and leadership learning, also a thread across the curriculum, includes dependability, consideration of others, empathy and respect, and flexibility. • Civil engineering case studies: Most of our faculty include case study learning in at least some of their classes. Some have planned learning even in required classes, such as “Professional Issues Friday”Despite faculty-driven
research forsocial change, specifically aligned with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). Collaborative efforts among three universities enabled participants—science andengineering undergraduates in their first to third years—to engage in research projects that aimedto promote social equity and community transformation. Through this program, participants notonly strengthened their technical expertise in engineering, chemistry, and physics, but alsodeepened their ethical awareness of the social, cultural and environmental implications of theirresearch. The paper highlights the lessons learned in managing and facilitating the program,with a focus on leveraging regional resources to create meaningful experiential
alternatives, prototype, test, and refine solutions. Engineering DBL emphasizes creative thinking, constraints analysis, user considerations, and technical feasibility through projects like designing medical devices, sustainable buildings, or consumer products with specific performance requirements (Gomez et al., 2011; Strobel et al., 2013). This approach naturally incorporates experiential learning cycles as students move through phases of concept development, testing, reflection, and refinement.• Case-Based Learning (CBL) - Case-based learning uses carefully selected real or simulated engineering scenarios that document successes, failures, ethical dilemmas, or complex decisions (Lavi and Martin, 2023; Vivas and Allada, 2006
reality (XR) technologies in engineering education, particularly inengineering design courses, has gained traction recently. The XR prototype demonstration wasintegrated into a junior undergraduate Mechanical Engineering design course.ME386W is a junior design course that explores engineering design methods, including projectplanning and management, effective multi-disciplinary team skills, professional and effectivetechnical writing, oral communication skills, professional ethics, and extended. This course is thelast design course before the full-year capstone graduation project and does not involve making aphysical prototype. The educational content, assessment plan, and rubric for integrating the XRdemonstration are provided. Students