, and learning approaches in engineering fundamentals students. Thedata gathered from four semesters of engineering fundamentals courses, includes detailed logs ofeach submission, such as submission times, errors identified, critique counts, and resolution times.By analyzing patterns across different submissions, we tracked how student learning evolved overtime and varied across disciplines. This approach allowed us to identify effective strategies inautomated feedback design that cater to the diverse needs of learners from different educationalbackgrounds.1 IntroductionProviding rich, timely feedback to the students when they are learning is a significant challenge inlarge classrooms. This is especially true in first-year engineering
andmodelling team working skills in engineering education students is desirable from the point ofview of employability, developing graduate attributes and in meeting standards set by accreditingprofessional bodies [1]-[3]. Due to the range of factors and challenges in developing teamworking skills, this is an area of interest to many academic staff working and researching inengineering education [4]-[5]. Borrego et. al highlighted the complexities in this area and havecalled for engineering education researchers to work with experts from other domains, such asindustrial and organisational psychology to address some of the challenges faced by academicstaff, students and engineering education researchers [5]. These challenges became even moreprominent
workingwith peers in the makerspace. We anticipate the outcomes of this study will provide implicationsfor faculty and staff makerspaces at other postsecondary institutions who aim to build aninclusive and accessible learning environment for all students.IntroductionThe dominant culture in western engineering has been defined by White men from middle toupper class backgrounds [1]. While local and national efforts have been made on a large scale todiversify the engineering student population and change this culture, there is still a significantdisparity in the number of STEM degrees awarded to women and other underrepresentedminority (URM) groups [2-6]. Within postsecondary engineering programs of study, thepredominance of White, males has been
, biology, and geology [1]. These conceptinventories are used as diagnostic assessments that can identify how students understand, ormisunderstand, principles of the different topics. Many of these inventories have also helpedinform instructional practices or evaluate the changes in instructional methods [2]. One of theearliest and influential examples was the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) which helped leadchange to instruction methods used in physics [3]. Informed by the success of the FCI, anoriginal Dynamics Concept Inventory (DCI) was developed to assess and update Dynamicsinstruction with a focus on particle dynamics [2, 3]. The original DCI has been downloaded over150 times from the Concept Warehouse website [1, 2, 4, 5]. The results from the
engineering education lies in equipping learners with the skills to harness cutting-edge design tools and sustainable manufacturing processes. Despite the availability of advancedtechnologies, knowledge gaps persist, limiting their adoption in academia and industry. Thispaper addresses these challenges by developing and implementing three innovative educationaldesign and manufacturing modules that integrate sustainability and entrepreneurial thinking: 1)Generative Design using Autodesk Fusion software to optimize designs and streamlineworkflows, 2) Portable Sand Casting with "foundry-in-a-box" technology for hands-on learning,and 3) Green Manufacturing through the transformation of waste plastics into no-cost additivemanufacturing (AM) printing
-traditional students havebecome the typical undergraduate students on college campus [1]. In this context, the term “post-traditional” has replaced “non-traditional” to describe this population. The literature hasidentified a few key characteristics of post-traditional students, such as individuals who startcollege at age 25 or older, attend college part-time, and have dependents. Despite the largenumber of post-traditional students, researchers in higher education and engineering educationhave devoted limited attention to this population. Additionally, extant scholarship has notunpacked the differences between this group of students and traditional students with respect togender, race, and socioeconomic status. This study aims to fill this gap in
Years of S-STEMBackgroundThe National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) states that two million bachelor’s degreeswere conferred over the 2021-22 academic year with engineering accounting for 6% of thosedegrees. While engineering is listed in the top fields for degrees awarded, it falls behind businessand health professionals, 19% and 13%, respectively [1]. NCES reports that although manyincoming post-secondary students initially pursue STEM degrees, 35% change their field ofstudy within three years [2]. A study by Eris et al. investigated the differences between persistersand non-persisters in engineering programs. They identified factors such as parents, mentors,confidence levels in math and science, financial difficulties, and
.” ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 The Husky PAWS (Pathways for Academic Wellness and Success) S-STEM ProgramAbstractThe Husky PAWS (Pathways for Academic Wellness and Success) NSF S-STEM program atMichigan Tech was awarded in 2023. Our team reviewed initial applications in Spring 2024 andlaunched the primer 3-week Husky PAWS Summer Bridge in 2024. The inaugural cohortincluded 6 students at the 4-year scholarship level and 6 students receiving one-year finishingscholarships. The Husky PAWS S-STEM program is utilizing Yosso’s Cultural Wealth Model [1]to leverage scholar’s cultural wealth assets for their academic success. The overarching programgoals are increasing retention and graduation rates of
ofengineers. Since 2011, NSF has invested over $23 million in Research Initiation Grants in theEngineering Education program and its successor, the PFE: RIEF program; however, to date, fewstudies have been conducted on the nature and outcomes of RIEF mentoring relationships [1],[2], [3], [4].In this collaborative autoethnographic study, we contribute to knowledge surrounding EERresearch capacity building by exploring a novel mentoring structure that involves two RIEFprincipal investigators (faculty mentees), their EER faculty mentor, a first-year EER graduatestudent, and a postdoctoral EER scholar. Uniquely, the graduate student and postdoctoral scholaroccupy dual mentor-mentee positions, as they possess more qualitative educational
and Social Impact Projects1Program OverviewThe University at Buffalo (UB) Scholars in Science Technology Engineering and Math (S-STEM)program, Engineering Design Innovation (EDI), supports 25 financially vulnerable students (20undergraduate students and 5 undergraduate students), all selected based on two key criteria: 1)academic excellence and 2) a commitment to understanding and improving the social impact ofcomputing and engineering. Our cohort (described below) receives last dollar scholarships andparticipates in a range of wrap around supports aimed at retaining and supporting these excellentstudents. The EDI scholars: • Have a faculty mentor and small 4-5 person mentoring cohorts, tasked with
, and available resources related to equity and ethics in their professional work,as well as how their social identities and experiences shape these perceptions and motivations.The findings will inform a subsequent round of interviews to further illuminate the early careerexperiences of engineers and help develop learning tools to help better prepare students andrecently hired engineers for the transition to practice.Keywords: survey, engineering ethics, equity, early-career engineers, engineering educationIntroductionEngineers are entrusted with a fundamental responsibility to uphold honesty, integrity, and socialaccountability, protecting both human life and the environment from harm [1, 2, 3]. As such, theethical obligations of engineers
Universities.William Taylor Schupbach, University of Colorado Denver William is working towards a PhD in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver and is a research assistant and a part time instructor. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 NSF S-STEM Urban STEM Collaboratory: Lessons Learned and Sustainable Strategies1. IntroductionAlthough increased numbers of STEM graduates are crucial for economic progress in the US [1],fewer than 40% of students entering college in a STEM major graduate with a STEM degree [2].Since 2018, the Urban STEM Collaboratory has engaged faculty and 165 students at three urbancampuses, University of Memphis (UM), University
implemented during required weekly 50-minute recitationsessions, where small peer groups of 4-5 students collaborate to solve 1-3 new and challengingcourse-related problems during the class period. Every 1-2 groups are supported by onenear-peer undergraduate facilitator who monitors progress and provides assistance whennecessary. Facilitators play a key role in promoting student discussions and interactions, whichare integral to the PLSG model. Compared to the traditional TA-led Recitation (TAR) model,where a teaching assistant or instructor solves problems in front of a class of 25 or more students,the PLSG model has been proven to significantly improve both student course grades and passrates at [the institution] [1].The foundation of the PLSG
innovation in Electrical and Computer Engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring Women Engineering Students’ Gendered Internship ExperiencesIntroductionGender disparity and inequality in engineering education and the workplace have long been apressing issue despite concerted efforts by higher education institutions to encourage womenstudents to pursue and persist in engineering majors [1, 2]. Women engineering students oftenperform equally well or better academically than men [3]. However, in the U.S., only 23% of theengineering bachelor’s degrees were awarded to women in 2020, and as of 2019, women heldabout 14% of engineering positions in the workplace [2]. This persistent decrease in
andlimited interest in the project beyond achieving a grade. In this work-in-progress study, studentschose their own project groups and then completed a guided brainstorming activity whichincorporated elements of story-telling, with the aim of increasing the emotional investment of thegroup members in successfully completing the project. Purpose: Research Question 1: To whatextent does allowing students to choose a system dynamics project based on personal/emotionalconnections to the project help them increase their self-efficacy in system dynamics? ResearchQuestion 2: To what extent does choosing their own emotionally invested project improve studentcompetency based on project and over all grades? Methodology/Approach: Students completedpre/post
traditional written assessment instruments are well-documented and such examand quiz assessments rarely represent actual experiences of a practicing engineer. Indeed, thismanner of assessment may lead to counterproductive anxiety [1] and overemphasized studentpreparation for the assessment instrument at the expense of focus on(1) the content to-be-assessed and/or(2) exercise of desirable supra-technical skills such as teamwork, lateral thinking, and effectivecommunication.Other assessment modalities such as traditional homework, “take-home” exams, and even somekinds of “authentic assessments” [2] are not robust to challenges posed by generative artificialintelligence (AI) [3, 4] or educational support portals such as Chegg (among several others) [4,5
projects.IntroductionHands-on experiences are essential in engineering education, serving as a bridge betweentheoretical knowledge and real-world application. Research consistently supports the integrationof active learning strategies -- such as lab-scale models, project-based learning, and inquiry-driven approaches -- to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. The NationalResearch Council underscores the significance of such experiences and highlights the role of lab-scale models in connecting classroom concepts to practical challenges [1]. Kloser furtherexplores how integrating lab-scale engineering models within place-based education can supportinquiry-based learning and foster interdisciplinary problem-solving skills [2]. Similarly, otherstudies
undergraduate students who keep him on his toes. At UCF, he has served on the Undergraduate Council since 2016 and as chair since 2021, helped develop the Faculty Senate Student Success Council, and serves as vice chair of the Faculty Senate. He is an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, where he serves as chair of the Adaptive Structures Technical Committee. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Fifth-Year Review of the NSF-DoD REU Site: HYPERAbstractTechnical progress has advanced the areas of futuristic modes of transportation and energyproduction, but fundamental knowledge gaps remain [1-3]. These gaps motivate the developmentof programs
integrity. This paper describes and assesses the incorporation ofAI into an existing computer laboratory course in an undergraduate structural engineeringprogram.Review of the LiteratureThe Architectural Engineering (ARCE) program at the California Polytechnic State University(Cal Poly) in San Luis Obispo (SLO) is an intense and comprehensive structural engineeringprogram, arguably providing the most structural engineering content at the undergraduate levelof any program in the Nation. While most structural engineers come from the 241 ABET-accredited civil engineering programs, the more prescriptive ABET program criteria preventthose programs from offering as much structural engineering content [1] and the other 26accredited architectural
Paper ID #48330BOARD #168: WIP: Exploring How Mentoring Influences Sense of BelongingAmong First-Year Women Engineering FacultyDr. Meredith McDevitt, North Carolina State University at Raleigh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Exploring How Mentoring Influences Sense of Belonging Among First- Year Women Engineering FacultyIntroductionThe underrepresentation of women in engineering academia continues to be a significantchallenge, specifically for first-year women faculty navigating a male-dominated field whileestablishing their professional identity [1]. Many women faculty in engineering often
, 18 scholars were selected instead of the initially planned 25.Demographics Table 1: Scholar Information for Cohort 1 Gender Race1 Department2 1st Gen Cohort Total3 M F A AA H W BME ChE CME ECE CS MIE U Y N Fall ‘24 9 9 3 3 10 2 2 2 1 4 4 4 1 11 7 181 Race - A: Asian, AA: African American, H: Hispanic, W: White.2 Department - BME: Biomedical Engineering, ChE: Chemical Engineering, CME: Civil,Materials, and Environmental Engineering, ECE: Electrical & Computer Engineering, CS:Computer Science, MIE: Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Department at the University of Florida (UF). Her research focuses on self-efficacy and critical mentoring. She is passionate about broadening participation in engineering, leveraging evidence-based approaches to improve the engineering education environment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Self-Awareness and Mentoring in STEMM Research: Faculty PerspectivesBackground Self-awareness is a psychological construct described within the confines ofphilosophical underpinnings of psychology, and its definition is generally accepted by manydisciplines. Self-awareness is our ability to see ourselves by becoming the object of our attention[1], [2], [3
others.You’ve recovered and taken away the knowledge those experiences provide. Each setback leavesa scar, but from those scars forms protective tissue, a reminder of what went wrong and clues toavoid similar mistakes in the future. These scars improve judgment, enhance resilience, andguide how to approach new challenges [1].For many years, the need for such depth of knowledge drawn from life experience was used as ajustification for why systems engineering could not be taught to undergraduate students.However, programs such as those at West Point and Loughborough University have shown thevalue of introducing students to systems engineering principles early in their academic journeys.At West Point, the goal of their introductory systems engineering
health has become a critical issue in academic institutions, particularly within graduateprograms where students also working professionals face high levels of stress and pressure.Reports indicate a significant increase in stress-related conditions among graduate students,which negatively impacts their academic performance and quality of life [1]. While traditionalmental health interventions have shown effectiveness, they often lack the scalability andpersonalization needed to address the diverse challenges faced by students [2, 3, 4].This study introduces a hybrid framework that integrates wearable technology, physiologicalbiomarkers, and artificial intelligence to address these challenges [5]. By combining datacollected from wearable devices
demonstrateddifferences in the impact each BAE course had on students’ knowledge gains that wereconsistent with the reflection implementation in each course. Ultimately, this study revealed thatthe RKGI is a valuable tool that can provide insight concerning reflection instruction andimplementation.I. IntroductionEngineering’s accreditation student outcome ABET 7 is concerned with students developing anability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies [1].Implied in this outcome is students’ transition from a reliance on pedagogy to andragogy. Theterm pedagogy refers to a structured style and method of learning that relies heavily oninstructors to help students meet learning objectives. Andragogy is adult learning
ofuncertainty in the physical world. Once the activity results have been fully analyzed and asolution is obtained, the students must both verify and validate the solution. These concepts arememorable due to the engaging nature of the activity and produce an appreciation for historicalengineering methods as a resource. The analogue nature of the tool appears to improve theunderstanding and synthesis of the lesson, as opposed to memorizing a procedure.This paper provides a valuable and customizable lab activity for educators and curriculumdevelopers seeking to improve Freshman/Sophomore mechanical engineering lab courses. TheQuadrant Activity supports ABET learning outcomes 1 (solve complex engineering problems), 4(recognize ethical responsibility/make
Paper ID #45910BOARD # 222: Advancing Wind Energy Research and Education throughthe Great Lakes Wind Energy Challenges REU Site ProgramDr. Wei Zhang, Texas Tech UniversityProf. Xiong Yu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Advancing Wind Energy Research and Education through the Great Lakes Wind Energy Challenges REU Site Program Wei Zhang1,3, Xiong (Bill) Yu2, Kathleen O'Hara4, Yong Tao1 1 Mechanical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 2 Civil and Environmental Engineering, Case Western Reserve
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Making Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Resonate with Students: An NSF-IUSE Project that Aims to Integrate NMR into the Undergraduate CurriculumMotivationQuantum science and engineering will play a huge role in the 21st-century STEM workforce, asevidenced by national investments in quantum industries [1] - [2] and the many interdisciplinaryquantum information science and engineering (QISE) programs that have emerged in recentyears. Science and engineering educators will play an important role in researching the best waysto prepare a thriving and diverse quantum workforce [3]. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) isone quantum technology that historically has
, vibration analysis, and data acquisition. In addition to technical knowledge,the course emphasizes critical skills such as data analysis, error evaluation, and technicalcommunication, essential for engineering practice. The course accommodates approximately 30students, divided into two sections of 15 students each.ABET Criterion 3 states that "engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates havean ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs." However, designinstruction is typically limited to freshman and senior years, with little emphasis during thesophomore and junior years as students focus on engineering science courses [1-3].This fragmented approach limits opportunities for students to develop design
. Analysis of the student interview datasuggests that course design, instructor feedback, and content delivery influence studentengagement in online courses. Integrating LMS-based learning analytics data with studentperspectives has the potential for educators to create engaging, student-centered onlineenvironments that bridge skill gaps, improve learning experiences, and better address studentneeds for success.IntroductionLearning analytics (LA) has become increasingly significant in higher education due to thetransition to digital and online learning environments. “Learning analytics holds the potential to:1) explain unexpected learning behaviors, 2) identify successful learning patterns, 3) detectmisconceptions and misplaced effort, 4) introduce