Paper ID #47831Enhancing Learning and Instruction through Structured Reflection in PairProgramming: A Feedback-Driven Approach in Computer Science EducationDr. Oyku Eren Ozsoy, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott Dr. Eren Ozsoy holds a Ph.D. in Health Informatics, along with an M.S. and B.S. in Computer Engineering. Her research interests include bioinformatics, machine learning, and linear optimization, with a specific focus on constructing biological networks and automating the classification of allergen proteins. Recently, Dr. Eren Ozsoy has also developed an interest in engineering education research and
University. Her research focuses on international education systems, individual and social development, technology use and STEM learning, and educational environments for ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025(Engagement in practice): Collaborative Reflection on Evolution of an Engineering Community of PracticeAbstractCommunity-engaged practices must prioritize reciprocity [1] in university-community engagement, by centering thewants and needs of the community, as identified by the community themself. In this paper, we highlight thedevelopment and evolution of a Community of Practice, emphasizing the role of community members as experts inassessing their own community needs and developing solutions to
Paper ID #49205Building Sociotechnical Competencies through an Integration of EngineeringEthics and Science, Technology and Society Studies: A Reflection on InstructionalPracticesDr. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching and Associate Director, ISTEP (Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice) at the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on the development of sociotechnical thinking and lifelong learning skills in engineering.Dr. Robert Irish, University of Toronto Robert Irish is the author of two textbooks in Engineering Communication
Paper ID #46193BOARD # 95: WIP: Students’ reflections on their attitude and how it affectstheir performance in a CS Discrete Math course.Dr. Juan Alvarez, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Juan Alvarez joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois faculty in Spring 2011 and is currently a Teaching Assistant Professor. Prior to that, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at York University, Canada, a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Chemical Physics Theory Group at the University of Toronto, Canada, and a Postdoctoral Fellow in the
Paper ID #47382BOARD # 434: Reflections from S-STEM Scholars: Relative Importance ofIntegrating Transfer Students into University Culture or College of EngineeringCommunityDr. Christy Wheeler West, University of South Alabama Christy Wheeler West is an associate professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of South Alabama, where she also serves as Director of the Office of Undergraduate Research. She holds a Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. from the University of Alabama.Nicole CarrDr. Eric Steward P.E., University of South Alabama Associate Professor in the
Paper ID #46306BOARD # 293: Reflection on Outcomes Data from Eight Years of a SummerREU Site in Systems Bioengineering and Biomedical Data SciencesDr. Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia Dr. Timothy E. Allen is a Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received a B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Allen’s teaching activities include coordinating the undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design sequence in the BME department at the University of Virginia
Paper ID #46429BOARD # 435: Reflections on a Decade of Engineering Workforce Developmentfor the Engineering Research Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics(CBBG)Dr. Jean S Larson, Arizona State University Jean Larson, Ph.D., is the Educational Director for the NSF-funded Engineering Research Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics (CBBG), and Associate Research Professor in both the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation at Arizona State University. She has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in
for Advanced Science and Technology. Her research focuses on the use of experimental and computational methods to evaluate the interdependence of mechanical, compositional, structural properties of bone, ligament, and tendon to investigate the progression and treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. Her work has been funded by NSF, NIH, and industry/foundation sponsors. She has received awards from the US and Australian Orthopedic Research Societies and the Beckman Foundation in recognition of her scholarship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Reflecting on Ten Years of Building a Community of Practice for Teaching Innovations in Fundamental Mechanics
the explicit meaningsexpressed by students in their interviews (Braun & Clarke, 2006). In the next two cycles of coding, weconstructed latent codes which focus on “deeper, more implicit or conceptual levels of meaning” (Braun& Clarke, 2021, p. 102). In latent coding, we drew on Braun & Clarke as well as Berg’s (2009)perspective of latent codes as interpretive codes that attend to the meanings encoded within or manifestthrough text or talk. In each cycle of coding, the three authors reflected on each assigned codeindividually and together to reach theoretical consensus. We used the latent codes to examine differentonto-epistemologies or the deeply entangled ways of being and knowing that are imbued with axiologicalperspectives that
slow to change [6].Everywhere we look, the world is asking us as educators and engineers to design, innovate,address global issues, and prepare future engineers to meet the needs of tomorrow. This suggeststhat traditional ways of practicing and teaching engineering design are not enough and that newstrategies are needed. Important changes have already been made but more is needed to ensurethat tomorrow’s engineers are well prepared to work and design with the rest of society to ensurea sustainable, just, and equitable future for our planet.Taking a non-traditional approach to an academic paper, this paper will use a combination ofstorytelling, reflection, and commentary in which the authors will be having a conversation withreaders. Our goal
Landscapes in Engineering EducationAbstractIn this paper, the four authors consider our roles as engineering educators teaching courses thatemphasize engineering practice as a sociotechnical endeavor. [1] [2] Situated in differentinstitutions and schools, we reflect on commonalities and differences in our approaches tosociotechnical education, particularly incorporating scholarship that illuminates the complexrelationship between science, technology and society into engineering and humanities courses.We draw heavily from disciplines such as science and technology studies, engineering studies,and the history of science and technology, among others. [3] [4] We also reflect on how ourvaried institutional homes have influenced how we approach
? AbstractDual-submission homework approaches were developed as a way to foster reflectiveness andmetacognition in students while discouraging academic dishonesty. However, the rise of largelanguage models (LLMs) challenges this approach. This paper examines whether LLMs canreplicate credible reflections and, consequently, compromise the integrity of the dual-submission approach. Experiments were conducted using reflections generated by students andLLMs, analyzed by instructors and teaching assistants, with mixed results. We discussimplications, limitations of current strategies, and potential modifications to maintain academicintegrity in an era of LLMs. 1. IntroductionOver the past decade, dual-submission homework [1] has been developed, first of all
]. Existingeducational AI tools face limitations in fostering meaningful conversations, as their responsesoften lack the natural interaction and adaptability of human communication [22, 23]. Thiswork-in-progress paper utilized an AI-driven survey tool to enhance STEM learning outcomes,with a focus on fostering collaborative skills that are critical in today’s educational landscape. Bycomparing traditional, static reflective prompts with dynamic, AI-generated survey prompts, thisresearch aims to evaluate how generative AI can promote deeper engagement and meaningfullearning in higher education. Effective teamwork is a fundamental component of STEM learning, especially given thegrowing emphasis on collaboration and communication skills in higher education
design process. The study analyses reflection journals from14 third-year material science and engineering students using a qualitative, inductive approach.Results identify four key aspects of problem scoping: (a) gathering information about clients,problem context, and the designers themselves; (b) setting goals based on gathered data; (c)developing solutions using divergent, convergent, and logical thinking; and (d) evaluating andmanaging design outcomes by reflecting on solutions by envisioning outcomes or creatingbackup plans. Both male and female students show similar approaches. Findings contribute tounderstanding students’ problem-scoping processes and highlight opportunities for futureresearch into engineering design education.Keywords
development of intercultural competence goals. The study seeks tounderstand how effectively STEM students manage teamwork, how this behavior is reflected intheir perceptions, and how these elements contribute to the development of skills that facilitateintercultural understanding.Methods:This study is focused on twenty-four first-year computer science students living in a learningcommunity at a large midwestern university. These students participated in semester-longlearning community focused on helping students develop professional skills such as teamworkand intercultural competence. As a part of the learning community students participated invarious team-based activities and were regularly asked to reflect on two primary areas: theirteamwork
uncertainty quantification to address a diverse set of problems, including reliable aircraft design and AI-assisted discovery of novel materials. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Research as Teaching: On Student Mindset and Voice in a Sustained Collaborative AutoEthnography on Mathematical ModelingAbstractIn this complete research paper, we advocate for a methodology with unique researchaffordances that also serve student mindset development. Mindset is an important element ofstudent development; in particular, metacognition helps students learn more effectively and is akey component of lifelong learning. Theory on reflective practice suggests that key elements ofmetacognition are best
ongoing study toinvestigate how our diverse mentoring group interacts to learn qualitative research methods inthe context of EER. Collaborative autoethnography is a qualitative research method that is“simultaneously collaborative, autobiographical, and ethnographic” [8, p. 17] in that it involves agroup of people collectively reflecting and documenting their perceptions of a shared cultural orlearning experience. It can be described as “a study of self [that is] conducted in the company ofothers” [8, p. 17]. In this work, we are a group of five academic researchers and practitioners atmultiple career stages collectively reflecting on our perceptions of mentoring relationshipswithin the context of the two RIEF projects that began in August 2024.A
increasingly see in students, which is studentsarriving in our courses exhibiting unprofessional behavior. It is unclear if students recognize theimportance of professional behavior. To combat this trend, we sought to encourage students tothink about their own behavior and learning by emphasizing academic and professionalgoal-setting and monitoring progress towards goals. In our required undergraduate environmentalengineering course, we tasked students with setting multiple goals related to their academicperformance (e.g., I’d like to earn an A), course content to learn (e.g., drinking water,remediation), and their professional skills (e.g., build relationships with instructional staff).Students reflected on these goals and their progress toward them
tothis skill as it allows individuals to consider different people’s viewpoints. While perspective-taking is recognized as crucial for effective human interaction and conflict resolution, thereremains a gap in understanding how to effectively teach and assess these skills in highereducation settings. The goal of the study is to understand the perspective-taking abilities ofundergraduate students and inform curriculum enhancements to help students develop suchabilities.Methods: The study employed a case study approach to analyze reflections from 15undergraduate students enrolled in an honors course at a large midwestern university. Followingthe completion of a communication module, students wrote 200-word reflections on their keylearnings. A four
culminates in acapstone reflection where students synthesize their learning and apply it to a realistic conflictscenario.Learning Objectives 1. Understand different conflict styles and their impact on team dynamics. 2. Reflect on personal conflict styles and how they influence interactions. 3. Explore the concepts of trust, including types of trust and their role in building psychological safety. 4. Develop strategies to bridge differences, shift frames, and manage emotions during conflicts. 5. Apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios through a capstone reflection.Module ComponentsTable 2 presents the description for each section within the PIM module.Table 2: Productive conflict module outline Module Section
participants. Thisstudy explores the experiences of 15 senior-level engineering students who participated in asemester-long study abroad program. Students wrote a final reflection as a part of the studyabroad. The reflections were analyzed using a mixed-method approach. A rubrics was created toscore each reflection quantitatively across five key dimensions: Identification and Awareness ofICC, Self-Examination and Reflection, Critical Assessment and Reframing of Assumptions,Exploration and Adoption of New Roles, and Development of a Plan for Action and SkillAcquisition. Further qualitative coding was performed to identify patterns and student quotespertaining to each rubric criteria. The findings reveal that students demonstrated strongawareness of ICC
Biodesign course that aimed to promote students’ transfer of design thinking from the course to their capstoneproject in the following semester.Design thinking: Design thinking (DT) reflects a professional orientation and skills considered central to thepreparation of engineers for solving complex engineering problems of the 21st century [8]. Learning standards inundergraduate engineering education call for training students in applying engineering design to engineeringproblems that include “one or more of the following characteristics: involving wide-ranging or conflicting technicalissues, having no obvious solution, addressing problems not encompassed by current standards and codes, involvingdiverse groups of stakeholders, including many
Vanderbilt University, contributing to a group funded by the Department of Energy. Her primary research focused on the long-term evaluation of near-surface waste disposal under climate change impacts at nuclear waste sites. With a background as an environmental engineer/planner at Gresham, Smith, and Partners, as well as General Motors Corporation, Dr. Worthy brings a wealth of industry experience to her academic roles. She has a proven track record of addressing critical environmental challenges. In her recent endeavors, Dr. Worthy is actively collaborating with the Lemelson Foundation to institutionalize the Engineering for One Planet framework at Kennesaw State University. This initiative reflects her commitment to
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Design Curriculum in Introductory Circuits Laboratory Assignments and the Influence on Innovation Self-EfficacyAbstractThis paper examines the impact of integrated design elements in a second-year introductorycircuits course on students’ innovation self-efficacy (ISE). Building upon a pilot study fromSpring 2024, this research focuses on the implementation of updated laboratory assignments inone section of the course while maintaining the original curriculum in a parallel section. Theupdated curriculum emphasizes experiential learning through active learning engagement,simulation exercises, open-ended design challenges, and reflection. This allows students tonavigate the full
achievement. However, no prior literature haspracticed an intervention that addresses all three phases of Zimmerman’s Cyclical Phases Modelof metacognition while aiming to help students better understand concepts in computing.Therefore, using CompassX we include 1) an initial forethought phase in which students plantheir studying, 2) a performance phase in which students self-monitor their progress, and 3) aself-reflection phase where students evaluate and adjust their strategies. In this paper, we share thekey features of CompassX that promote metacognitive study behaviors, how our users engagedwith those features, and how continued practice of metacognition using those features is related toimproved learning outcomes. Students used CompassX
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Bridging the Gap: Autoethnographic Insights into Project-Based Learning in Electrical EngineeringAbstractProject experience is crucial to electrical and computer engineering (ECE) education. Despitethis, many students are limited to extracurricular involvement or secondary opportunities to gainproject experience. This lack of a project-based curriculum creates a clear divide between thosewith and without access outside the classroom. This study focuses on the self-reflectiveexperience of an electrical engineering undergraduate designing, building, and programming arobotics project. Through autoethnography and reflective journaling, the data from this studyaims to demonstrate
. Keyactivities implemented to achieve these outcomes included – 1) guest speakers, 2)engineering passport, and 3) redesigned semester project. The grading structure wasrevised with activities spread throughout the semester. Table 1 below presents the gradingcomponents for Fall 2024. Table 1: Grading components for CEE 101 Graded Component Points Class Participation & Online Forums 200 Engineering Passport (50 each) 200 Speakers Reflection (100 each) 300 Final Assessment – Poster
is reflected in their output, which can be coherent, engaging,and, in some cases, strikingly human-like. LLMs exhibit a wide range of capabilities, which arelisted in Figure 1.While LLMs have shown remarkable performance on various tasks, they face several challenges.LLMs may generate plausibly sounding but factually incorrect statements. Secondly, LLMsstruggle with understanding and applying common sense or real-world knowledge despite theirimpressive capabilities. And LLMs can inadvertently perpetuate biases present in their trainingdata [23, 24].ChatGPT is a specific implementation of an LLM developed by OpenAI. It's designed to engagein human-like conversations, providing helpful, respectful, and honest responses while also beingable to
civil engineering and architecture professions[2], while the second article explores the integration of human and artificial intelligence in civilengineering [3]. In their analysis, the instructor asked the students to discuss how GenAI couldenhance efficiency and safety in the field and the ethical challenges associated with GenAI use.Students were asked to critically assess the AI-generated output, verify facts, and document theirinteractions with the GenAI tool by providing all prompts. Additionally, students were asked toprovide a brief reflective analysis of the AI tools they used, such as ChatGPT, and how theseinfluenced their learning. II. The Course and the AssignmentsStructural Steel Design is a senior-level elective and one of
’. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Exploring engineering students’ understanding of their social responsibilitythrough a living library of ethics case studiesIntroductionEthics education is increasingly recognized as a crucial component of the undergraduateengineering curricula. Nonetheless, many engineering students show reluctance or outrightdisengagement when exposed to ethical issues [1] [2]. Traditionally, the engineeringcurriculum privileges technico-scientific knowledge, seeing it divorced from ethics andsocietal considerations, and relegating ethics tends to standalone courses or ancillary topicswithin broader coursework [3], [4]. This hierarchization of disciplines reflects a deeper‘depoliticization’ of engineering programs