Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 4: Sociotechnical Integration

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Rabb, California State University Los Angeles; Desen Sevi Özkan, University of Connecticut

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

, but does so in a way that inspires hopein others through a vision rich with motivating values, ultimately mobilizing collective action.​ We use [28]’s framework in this study because it precisely captures prerequisites toethical action that we are concerned with: remaining steadfast, visioning better futures, rejectingpessimism, and imagining individual or collective steps to new worlds. By measuring these typesof hope, we capture the attitudes necessary for feeling efficacious and motivated, ultimatelydriving ethical action based on critical views of a sociotechnical world.Course DescriptionThe course driving this research was taught as an elective, special topics course offered throughthe computer science department at a medium-sized

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Teaching Engineering Decision and Process

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Conference Session

ME Division 8: Measuring What Matters: Concept Inventories, FE Exam, and Learning Skills

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ozge Uyanik, University of South Florida; Autar Kaw, University of South Florida; Rasim Guldiken, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

measure a single construct are generallyconsidered interchangeable. However, Item Response Theory (IRT) [45] evaluates the distinctcharacteristics of each item. Examining the resulting Item Characteristic Curves (ICCs) is astraightforward method for understanding this. These curves illustrate the likelihood of anexaminee answering correctly based on their ability. This probability is small for individuals withlower ability and higher for those with greater ability. Each item produces a smooth S-shapedcurve. In Figure 1, with ability ranging from -4 to +4, the probability starts near zero at lowerlevels and approaches one at higher levels. An S-shaped curve is considered to be an indicator ofa good question. For the FMCI, as shown in Figure 1, we

Conference Session

DSAI Technical Session 4: Workshops, Professional Development, and Training

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

yilin zhang, University of Florida; Bruce F. Carroll, University of Florida; Jinnie Shin, University of Florida; Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (DSAI) Constituent Committee

inestablished educational and developmental theories. A talk move consists of an initialstatement by one participant and a corresponding response from another, which may fallwithin the same category or transition between different categories.This framework integrates several key theoretical perspectives from mentoring research: OurGoal Setting and Planning category is grounded in Lent et al.’s [17] social cognitive model ofengineering career choice, emphasizing the importance of structured support in academic andcareer planning. The Problem Solving and Critical Thinking category builds on Colvin andAshman’s [18] research on peer mentoring roles, particularly focusing on the learning coachrole in developing analytical skills.The Understanding and

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meghan Allen, University of British Columbia

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

related to these theories will be presented in another paper. The goalof this paper is to examine students’ perspectives in relation to course assessment practices.2.1 Theoretical FoundationsPost-secondary computer science education researchers hold diverse epistemological andtheoretical perspectives [7], [8], [9], although, as with much higher education research, thesefundamental perspectives are often unexpressed in published research articles [10], [11].Epistemology and theoretical perspective, even when unacknowledged, affect researchers’ tacitbeliefs and underlie their theories of learning. Since this study uses Braun et al.’s [12] reflexivethematic analysis and they recommend that “[r]esearchers should always reflect on and specifythe

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 6: LEES Works in Progress

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sakshi Solanki, University of Connecticut; Achal Duhoon, University of Connecticut; Desen Sevi Özkan, University of Connecticut

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Conference Session

Leveraging AI and Computational Tools for Enhanced Learning

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Christopher V.H.-H. Chen, Columbia University; Stephanie Butler Velegol, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

s ce ng us es tio fo ne an l vi in di Tr en m ua nd So rm an ce ut

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 10

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donggil Song, Texas A&M University; ANNE LIPPERT, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

with validity and reliability checks [10], which is based onFischer, Bruhn, Gräsel and Mandl [11]’s framework. For example, the Evaluating category ismeasured on a scale from 1 (Minimally determined the significance or relevance of informationneeded for the writing task) to 5 (Completely determined the significance or relevance ofinformation needed for the writing task). When scoring student work in this category, studentsreceive high scores if they identify and articulate the most relevant and significant informationfor their argument. For instance, when discussing a principle of network security, one studentcorrectly highlighted the most relevant and significant aspect: “… confidentiality can beachieved through encryption, access controls

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Lessons Learned Papers and Lightning Talks

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanos Matsumoto, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Zachary Riggins Del Rosario, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Jean Huang, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Caitrin Lynch, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Kenechukwu Churchill Mbanisi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Paul Ruvolo; Georgia D. Van de Zande, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

work, we hope to build a more formal development program around the ideas here that cancontinue to help faculty transition to new research areas together, both here and beyond.References[1] M. Ju, “The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions,” phdthesis, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, Jun. 2010.[2] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid, and K. Bauer, “Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate research experience in science and engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 291–297, Jul. 2002.[3] T. Saddler and E. Creamer, “Socialization to the professoriate through research collaboration: Examining

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 2.D

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Tsang, University of California, Davis; SYDNEY Y WOOD, University of California, Davis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

form for the study.Checkpoint assessment results were collected and graded using a 3-pass process. Graders con-ducted a first pass to familiarize themselves with questions and the range of answers, then a secondpass to create detailed rubric items based on answer classifications, ending with a final pass withthe finalized rubric to ensure all students were scored by the same metrics. Rubrics were createdon a per-question basis and credit was assigned based on answers’ resemblance to solution keysand demonstrated understanding of the questions’ underlying concepts.Post-assessment surveys asked students to report the perceived usefulness of the chatbot(s) theyused during preparation and prompted an open-ended reflection on how they used the

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Broadening Methodological Impacts

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yunmeng Han, University of Cincinnati; David Reeping, University of Cincinnati; Siqing Wei, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. References[1] J. Meyer and R. Land, “Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines,” 2003, Accessed: May 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b98202852dc631ced19a9 8414cbd9e9461c10417[2] S. Male and D. Bennett, “Threshold concepts in undergraduate engineering: Exploring engineering roles and value of learning,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–69, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.7158/D14-006.2015.20.1.[3] K. A

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) GIFTS Session 2: Foundational Skills in the First-Year Engineering Classroom

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holli Finnell, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Alexander Douglas, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

the educationalexperience for first-year students in the introductory mining engineering course.References[1] N. Nelavai and S. Ramesh, "An Insight into the challenges faced by First Year Engineering Students: Poor Foundational Knowledge," Procedia Computer Science, pp. 823-830, 2020.[2] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of Learning and Development Second Edition, Pearson Education, 2015.[3] D. Rae and D. E. Melton, "Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineering education: an international view of the KEEN project," The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 7, no. 3, 2017.[4] M. Peel, "Nobody Cares: The challenge of isolation in school to university transition," Journal of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 8: Division Best Papers

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

, understand and thus determine if they define themselves asbelonging to identities such as FLI, is explicitly defining what ‘first-generation’ and‘low-income’ means, and providing examples. The wording of these definitions should be givenin plain language, such as defining ‘first-generation student’ meaning the completion of a degreeby participants' parents', not just partial completion. In the AACRE pre-program survey, thesequestions include a plain language definition to explain and give example of any jargon, such as: Question 27: “Are you a first generation college student? (Meaning your parent(s) / caregiver(s) have NOT completed a bachelor's degree)These small but significant details are important to explain, so that

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Kaczynski, Tufts University; G. R. Marvez, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, in CHI ’08. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Apr. 2008, pp. 423–432. doi: 10.1145/1357054.1357123.[3]​ L. Buechley and H. Perner-Wilson, “Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics,” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 19, no. 3, p. 21:1-21:21, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1145/2362364.2362369.[4]​ M. A. Kazemitabar, S. P. Lajoie, and T. Li, “A classification of Challenges encountered in Complex Teamwork Settings,” Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 225–247, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11412-022-09370-0.[5]​ E. S. Ferguson, Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. MIT

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kassandra Fernandez, University of Florida; Krista Dulany Chisholm, University of Florida; Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

are defined as non-technical skills necessary for engineeringpractice [22], such as teamwork, leadership, and communication. Perceptions of mentorship aredefined as an individual’s thoughts and feelings about their experience as part of a mentoringrelationship, which may form between any more experienced individual (mentor) and any lessexperienced individual (mentee).1.1 The GGEE Summer ProgramThe Goldberg Gator Engineering Explorers (GGEE) program, designed in 2021 and firstimplemented in 2022, serves K-12 students from under-resourced school districts at STEMsummer and afterschool programs across the state of Florida at no cost to their parent(s) orguardian(s) [23], [24]. These programs are meant to foster a computational thinking

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hyeree Cho, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette; Woongbin Park, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

without thedominance of societal biases.References[1] T. Camp, W. R. Adrion, B. Bizot, S. Davidson, M. Hall, S. Hambrusch, E. Walker and S. Zweben, “Generation CS: The growth of computer science,” ACM Inroads, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 44–50, May 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi:10.1145/3084362. [Accessed Jan 14, 2025].[2] T. G. Zimmerman, D. Johnson, C. Wambsgans and A. Fuentes, “Why latino high school students select computer science as a major,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–17, Jul. 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi:10.1145/1993069.1993074. [Accessed Jan 14, 2025].[3] S. R. Roy, “Educating Chinese, Japanese, and Korean international students: Recommendations to American professors

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Fagundes; Daniel Guberman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kelsey Smart; Kal Holder, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

perceptions in these classes fitand align with the instructor's and the SPA’s perceptions. Because the program is ongoing anditerative, we will also refine the training and development of Student Pedagogy Advocates inresponse to these findings.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under the project CreatingAutonomy-Supportive Learning Environments Using Undergraduate Student PedagogyAdvocates (NSF Award #2236118), conducted at Purdue University. Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session (Track 1.A)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Marchiori, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

; def testbench():14 reg a, b; wire out; a = reg(); b = reg()15 andgate device (out, a, b); device = andgate(a, b)16 initial begin def monitor():17 $monitor("a=%b, b=%b, out=%b", print("a=%s, b=%s, out=%s" %\18 a, b, out); (a(), b(), device()))19 // step through the inputs # step through the inputs20 #10 a = 0; b = 0; a.set(0); b.set(0); monitor()21 #10 a = 0; b = 1; a.set(0); b.set(1); monitor()22 #10 a = 1; b = 0; a.set(1); b.set(0); monitor

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

?” and “How can we improvethe session(s) to be more responsive to your needs?” respectively.Preliminary Findings Participant Ratings for Question 1 For the first question in which participants rated about “Designing Powerful Questions to 5 4 fit the situation”, three participants (37.5%) 4 rated “Excellent”, four participants (50%) 3 3 rated “Above Average”, and one participant (12.5%) rated

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida; Swarup Bhunia; Pavlo Antonenko; Woorin Hwang, University of Florida; Christine Wusylko, University of Florida; Yessy Eka Ambarwati, University of Florida; Tanvir Hossain, The University of Kansas; Tamzidul Hoque, The University of Kansas; Rohan Reddy Kalavakonda, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Teaching,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 20–26, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.1900242.[7] A. Ramirez-Salgado et al., “Board 265: Engaging Students in Exploring Computer Hardware Fundamentals Using FPGA Board Games,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[8] A. Ramirez-Salgado, T. Hossain, S. Bhunia, and P. Antonenko, “Board 393: Supporting Hardware Engineering Career Choice in First-Year Engineering Students,” presented at the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024.[9] S. Hidi and K. A. Renninger, “The four-phase model of interest development,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 2006.[10] A. Bandura, Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maya Menon, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Stephanie Adams, Oregon State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Jeff Knowles, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

advancing engineering education and promoting the widespreadadoption of evidence-based practices.NSF ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis work is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation through Grant numbers2111052 and 2111087. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.REFERENCES[1] S. Freeman et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[2] M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no.3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[3] M. Borrego and C. Henderson

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dorian Bobbett, University of Michigan; Larkin Martini; Karin Jensen, University of Michigan; Jeanne Sanders, University of Michigan; Mark Vincent Huerta, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

doctoral engineering students and their research advisor(s). COR statesthat people seek to gain, retain, and protect their resources, and that they experience stress whentheir resources are threatened or lost [10]. Resources can include physical objects, energy,relationships, and more [10]. We posit that faculty advisors serve as a resource to students and, inturn, influence psychological safety in student research environments, which impacts studentoutcomes such as well-being and research quality.MethodsThe survey was completed by 469 doctoral engineering students across two R1 institutions.Survey methods and preliminary results can be found in [9], [11]. Explanatory interviewparticipants were selected to stratify demographics and offer a broad

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 8: Communication and Liberal Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John William Lynch, University of Cincinnati; Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati; Teri J Murphy, University of Cincinnati; Betsy M. Aller, Western Michigan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

administered four fluency tasks: • Name all the words that you can that begin with the letter “s” within 60 seconds (phonemic) • Name all the animals you can think of within 60 seconds (semantic) • Name all the words that you can that begin with the letter “t’ within 60 seconds (phonemic) • Name all the fruits and vegetables you can think of within 60 seconds (semantic)The word totals were tallied for each unique instance of a word and no morphological changeswere counted (twenty-one and twenty-two would not count as two words) to follow normalconventions for evaluation of the tasks [39].Data AnalysisAll data analysis was conducted in RStudio 2024.12.0 using build 467. Eighty-eight participantscompleted all Phase 1 and

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Works-in-Progress room 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isabel Anne Boyd, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kelly J Cross, Georgia Institute of Technology; Julia Machele Brisbane, Georgia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

mapping table, which is used to provide the pre-determined numerical value to eachresponse option across each construct of interest. User gameplay files—each associated with aunique, anonymized identifier—are loaded into MATLAB as structured tables. The script thenmatches each scenario-response pair to the appropriate score(s) from the mapping table,populating new columns in the user’s data file with these scores. This updated dataset can thenbe used for statistical analysis, either within MATLAB or exported to another software.Code Applications The application of this MATLAB code can be used to analyze and visualize game users’data in multiple ways. Basic descriptive statistics can reveal trends in individual users' data oracross groups

Conference Session

ENT-8: Mentorship, Creativity, and Ethics in Academic Entrepreneurship

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Voichita Maria Dadarlat; Yi Wang, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

). Potential issues include the following:Selective Data ReportingResearchers involved in a startup or commercial activity might be tempted to present select dataor manipulate data, either intentionally or subconsciously (Cho et al., 2000). This can involvefocusing on specific datasets that align with the desired outcome for a venture, or altering data orits presentation. In extreme cases, this can lead to falsifying results, undermining scientificintegrity and trust in the individual researcher(s) and their research community.Suppression of Alternative HypothesesWhen the focus of research is closely tied to commercialization outcomes, there can be anunintended suppression of alternative hypotheses that might not support the new venture or itsbusiness

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Collaborations

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence R Chen, McGill University; Stephen Mattucci, University of Guelph

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

faculty identified inour landscape though we may then miss important information from those that were notidentified / profiled. We hope that our process will be useful for helping others conduct similarstudies in countries where engineering education is emerging as a field of study and research inorder to identify more specific questions and topics of exploration that will allow us to betterunderstand the social reality of EER faculty.References[1] S. Mattucci, “A snapshot of the Canadian engineering education system: reflections from anemerging scholar trying to support national curriculum change,” Canadian EngineeringEducation Association Conference, Ottawa, ON, June 9-12, 2019.[2] P. Sheridan, J. S. Cicek, L. Kuley, and R. M. Paul

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ian Bermudez Rivera, University of South Carolina; Fitya Syarifa Mozar; Christian Harito; Dianing Novita Nurmala Putri; Alessandro Vittorio Zago, Oregon Institute of Technology; Mohsin Al Mufargi, Oregon Institute of Technology; Vitaliy Vasilyevich Tveritin, Oregon Institute of Technology; Keora O'Meara, Oregon Institute of Technology; Roni Jack Rountree, Lehigh University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering; Tim Pasang, Western Michigan University; Bens Pardamean; Feng Shi, Oregon Institute of Technology; Derrick Speaks, Arizona State University; Endang Djuana; Arief Budiman, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Multidisciplinary Hands-on Student Design ProjectIan Bermudez Rivera1,2, Fitya S. Mozar3, Christian Harito4, Dianing N.N. Putri5,6, Alessandro Zago2,Mohsin Al Mufargi2, Vitaliy Tveritin2, Keora O’Meara7,8, Roni Rountree8,9, Tim Pasang8,10, BensPardamean3,11, Feng Shi2,7, Derrick Speaks7,8, Endang Djuana5,6, Arief S. Budiman4,7,8*1. Molinaroli College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, SC, 292082. Department of Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy Engineering, Oregon Institute of Technology3. Bioinformatics and Data Science Research Center (BDSRC), Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 114804. Industrial Engineering Department, BINUS Graduate Program - Master of Industrial Engineering

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Postcard Session (Best of WIPs)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leah Rebecca Thomas, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jenna Yasmin Altaii, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christopher Arena, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

- or within-semester models, that improve students’stakeholder engagement and robust understanding of health equity.References:[1] A. Baciu, Y. Negussie, A. Geller, and J. N. Weinstein, “The state of health disparities in theUnited States,” Communities in Action - NCBI Bookshelf, Jan. 11, 2017.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425844/[2] M. W. Sjoding, R. P. Dickson, T. J. Iwashyna, S. E. Gay, and T. S. Valley, “Racial bias inpulse oximetry measurement,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 383, no. 25, pp. 2477–2478, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1056/nejmc2029240.[3] C. M. Madla, F. K. H. Gavins, H. A. Merchant, M. Orlu, S. Murdan, and A. W. Basit, “Let’stalk about sex: Differences in drug therapy in males and females,” Advanced Drug

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Best in DEED

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Eller, Duke University; Megan Madonna, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

students and acknowledge that the constraints of a one-semester designcourse may impose tighter timelines onto partners.References[1] C. Titus, C. B. Zoltowski, and W. C. Oakes, “Designing in a Social Context: Situating Design in a Human-Centered, Social World,” presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.444.1-22.444.11. Accessed: Sep. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/designing-in-a-social-context-situating-design-in- a-human-centered-social-world[2] M. E. Beier, M. H. Kim, A. Saterbak, V. Leautaud, S. Bishnoi, and J. M. Gilberto, “The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–23

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kleio Avrithi, Marian University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

, “We must teach more effectively: here are four ways to getstarted,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 26(12), pp. 2151-2155, 2015.[3] Rossow, M., “Learning statics by studying worked examples,” ASEE National AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-27, 2018.[4] R. O’Neill, R.C. Geiger, K. Csavina, and C. Orndoff, “Making statics dynamic!” Combininglecture and laboratory into an interdisciplinary, problem-based, active learning environment,”ASEE National Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007.[5] A.K.T. Howard, “Gamification Design for Engineering Statics,” ASEE National AnnualConference, Virtual, July 26-29, 2021.[6] S. Mehta and S. Danielson, “Teaching statics “dynamically,” Session 1368, ASEE NationalAnnual Conference, Charlotte