Montreal, Quebec, Canada
June 22, 2025
June 22, 2025
August 15, 2025
Faculty Development: Lessons Learned Papers and Lightning Talks
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
5
https://peer.asee.org/56915
Stephanos (Steve) Matsumoto is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the Olin College of Engineering. His research interests are in computing education, particularly in how to incorporate better software engineering practices when teaching computing in undergraduate STEM courses.
Zachary del Rosario is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Applied Statistics at Olin College. His goal is to help scientists and engineers reason under uncertainty. Zach uses a toolkit from data science and uncertainty quantification to address a diverse set of problems, including reliable aircraft design and AI-assisted discovery of novel materials.
Caitrin Lynch is an Professor of Anthropology at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, where she teaches courses in anthropology, design, engineering, and entrepreneurship. Dr. Lynch was Dean of Faculty at Olin from 2021-2023. She is the author of two books: Retirement on the Line: Age, Work, and Value in An American Factory, and Juki Girls, Good Girls: Gender and Cultural Politics in Sri Lanka's Global Garment Industry.
Georgia Van de Zande is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Olin College of Engineering. She earned her Ph.D., S.M., and B.S. from MIT's Department of Mechanical Engineering. Her research focuses on human–machine interaction, collaborative design teams, and sustainable agriculture. She teaches courses in human-centered design, design processes, and manufacturing.
In this Lessons Learned paper, we report on an ongoing effort to build a community of practice among faculty who are exploring, or transitioning to, new research areas within engineering and engineering education. This effort is taking place at a small, primarily-undergraduate institution (PUI) in the northeastern United States, and is part of a broader institutional effort to increase our faculty's capacity to do impactful research through interdisciplinary exploration and collaboration. Our work is motivated by an increasing emphasis on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary work in engineering practice, and on complex, systemic problems that require broad collaboration to address. While faculty are interested in broadening their research horizons to address problems that they find meaningful to work on, finding sufficient support, bandwidth, and mentorship to explore a new field is difficult, particularly at small PUIs where a faculty may be the only person doing research in a specific discipline.
To help faculty transition to new research areas, we are seeding an effort to build a community of practice among our faculty that will help sustain these types of research explorations or transitions in future faculty members. Specifically, we supported a small amount of formal training in new areas for some faculty, and established a series of small (3-4 members) peer mentoring groups called "brain trusts" that are modeled after Wenger's communities of practice framework. Each group's members span diverse programs, majors, or areas, but members share the common bond of making a foray or transition into a new research area (joint enterprise). Each group meets regularly, and meetings consist of one member presenting artifacts from their new research area, including data, paper drafts, or grant proposals, while other members critique these artifacts (mutual engagement). Through this practice of interdisciplinary critique, we have developed a rich exchange of ideas and disciplinary paradigms, as well as a set of evolving best practices that help support our development in new research areas (shared repertoire). Our paper will share further details from this practice.
This paper also serves as a collective reflective analysis, exploring how we ourselves make sense of how this experience has shaped our faculty careers and professional development. Through methods drawn and adapted from collaborative autoethnography, we analyze various outcomes of our community of practice, including our research output, collaborations within and outside the institution, student involvement, the resources required to start and sustain this effort, and our perceived self-efficacy in these newfound research areas. We conclude with recommendations on best practices that we hope will help other faculty adapt these communities at their own institutions.
We prefer to present this paper as a lightning talk.
Matsumoto, S., & Del Rosario, Z. R., & Huang, J., & Lynch, C., & Mbanisi, K. C., & Ruvolo, P., & Van de Zande, G. D. (2025, June), Lessons Learned from Helping Faculty "Make the Pivot" to New Research Areas through a Community of Practice Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56915
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015