recommended collaboratingbetween academia and industry to develop in-house training programs.Various methods are available to introduce sensing technologies in construction managementeducation. Workshops and seminars offer an intensive, focused approach, allowing students togain practical skills through direct interaction with technologies like LiDAR and GPS.Additionally, short presentations or modules embedded within existing courses ensure that thesetechnologies are seamlessly integrated into the broader curriculum. For example, adding aLiDAR demonstration to a Plan Reading course or a GPS exercise to an Estimating course canprovide students with context-specific applications of these tools.Blending new material with traditional course delivery
Engineering Outstanding Faculty Service Award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Personalized Learning Paths: LLM-Based Course Recommendations in Manufacturing EducationAbstractThis study presents a novel approach to developing a personalized course recommendationsystem tailored for online learners pursuing a specific curriculum. The system leverages a state-of-the-art Large Language Model (LLM) operating on structured curriculum data such as courseintroductions, module descriptions, syllabi, and learner-specific queries. By integrating this data,the system can generate precise course and module recommendations based on the learner'sindividual learning objectives, prior
concerning the roleof empathy in the engineering profession and engineering education; we describe how theZachry Leadership Program at Texas A&M University integrates empathy into our leadershipdevelopment curriculum; we present our plan to collect feedback from alumni of the programwho learned about, developed, and practiced empathy during their time in the program; and weshare our conclusions and possible next steps for researchers and practitioners who desire toincorporate empathy development to help prepare future engineers to make valuable andimpactful contributions to their organizations and our broader society.II. Literature Review Empathy is increasingly recognized as an essential component in engineering,influencing both
Paper ID #46450WIP: Enhancing Task Distribution in Project-Based Learning: A ManagementTool for Improved Course EfficiencyPrarthona Paul, University of Toronto Prarthona Paul completed her undergraduate degree in Computer Engineering at the University of Toronto, and is an incoming graduate student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering education practices, engineering leadership at the workplace and university settings and integrating technology in engineering education.Anipreet Chowdhury, University of TorontoLoura Elshaer, University of TorontoAnushka Sethi
resistance to design thinking principles, resourceconstraints, industry collaboration barriers, and assessment complexities. The findings highlighthow these challenges interact and compound each other, particularly in how resource limitationsaffect both teaching quality and industry engagement.The findings suggest that the inconsistent integration of design into engineering programs posessignificant challenges for developing well-rounded engineers. This study contributes tounderstanding design thinking implementation in engineering education and suggests the needfor systematic changes in curriculum development, educator support, and resource allocation tobetter prepare engineers for complex, interdisciplinary problems.1. INTRODUCTIONThe integration
Paper ID #47921Building Intercultural Skills in Engineering Students through Study AbroadJack NelsonKatherine ChehAkshat GargAtin Dewan, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)Dr. Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Aparajita Jaiswal is an Intercultural Research Specialist with CILMAR, Purdue University. Her research endeavors revolve around exploring strategies for seamlessly integrating intercultural learning into both regular STEM curriculum and study abroad programs. Aparajita actively engages in offering guidance in developing research studies, curriculum enhancements, and assessment methods
theprinciple that societal considerations are an integral part of the engineering design process, ratherthan a separate or peripheral domain. In 2020, the School of Engineering & Applied Sciencelaunched a pilot program which I have been leading to embed ethics modules within coretechnical courses and since then, a comprehensive ethics curriculum has been developed withinthe Bioengineering Department, with modules in the first-year introductory course, a sophomorelab course, the junior year two-semester lab sequence, and senior design. Here, I elaborate on thepedagogical choice for embedding ethics within these technical courses, including a specificcurriculum example and findings from student surveys.The decision to develop ethics modules within
online courses such as "Mechanical ManufacturingInternship". Together with "School Online", the center focused on creating an onlinecourse of 15 practical training links in mechanical manufacturing practice. Not onlythat, the center will also put the above resources on the school's online videoresources for students to learn. In addition, the center has also established a videocenter for engineering training courses, where video materials such as basicengineering courses and engineering culture courses are shared on the website. In terms of general education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University implements theconcept of integration of disciplines and integration of science and education, andestablishes a curriculum system of general education
, simulationof entrepreneurial activity may also occur earlier in the ME curriculum [2]. Pre and post studentsurveys show no statistically significant change in entrepreneurial affects resulting from thisinteraction, though. Unsurprisingly, the literature holds examples of pedagogy meant toencourage potential enterprises based on engineering innovation. Wang and Kleepe describe acapstone course for ME and EE seniors that incorporates legal, financial and venture capitalconsiderations alongside engineering prototyping as part of an effort to develop a new product[3]. Their qualitative and quantitative assessments of the educational intervention found that itmet their learning objectives using a format desired by their students. Moreover, the
training into the engineering curriculum canbe undermined by unsupportive faculties and departments. In their study of undergraduateengineering students, Guanes et al. [28] found that even when students could identify theimportance of empathy to engineering work, they prioritized personal goals over empatheticchoices. This disconnect reflects students’ struggle to meaningfully integrate empathy into theirprofessional epistemology. To shift students’ view of what it means to be an engineer and howengineering work is done, empathy must be well integrated and effectively modelled throughouttheir post-secondary training [4], [28], [31], [37]. While technical skills are important, when theprimary focus of an engineering program is technical content
challengesof the 21st century.Looking toward the future, we see the next decade as being pivotal in establishing HCE as arecognized and impactful discipline. By uniting stakeholders around a shared vision, the HCEcommunity can drive meaningful change in both education and practice. The integration of HCEprinciples into engineering programs will not only enhance technical outcomes but also ensurethat engineering solutions are equitable, ethical, and deeply attuned to the needs of humanity. Wecall on educators, researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders to contribute their expertiseand vision to advance HCE as a transformative force within the engineering profession.VII. ConclusionIn this paper, we explored Human-Centered Engineering (HCE) as an
concepts, though the majority demonstrated a clear understanding.In Question 2 (To what extent do you feel the current engineering courses integratedsustainability and digital twin principles?), the results diverged significantly. Dominant 86% ofrespondents chose Option c (not at all), reflecting a lack of integration of sustainability anddigital twin principles in the current engineering curriculum. This stark contrast with the otheroptions highlights a gap in the inclusion of these critical concepts within academic courses. Thesubstantial difference between Option c and the other choices indicates that sustainability anddigital twin technologies are not being sufficiently addressed within the curriculum, which maypoint to an area for curriculum
requirements while prompting students to consider factors beyond traditionalengineering constraints. Utilizing an inductive coding approach, emergent themes include theperceived value of exposing students to societal impact considerations, challenges faced byclients in formulating project topics that effectively integrate these considerations, and perceivedbenefits for student learning and skill development.This research contributes to the nascent body of literature addressing client-based pedagogywithin engineering education by highlighting the critical role of client-instructor collaboration indeveloping project topics that prepare future engineers to address complex societal challenges.The findings offer practical implications for curriculum
expertise to her role. Maintaining an active research agenda, her work primarily revolves around enhancing the efficiency, safety, and eco-friendliness of the construction industry. Additionally, she is dedicated to integrating cutting-edge technologies into her teaching methods to elevate the overall educational experience. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Use of AI in a Graduate Construction Estimating CourseAbstractThe construction industry faces ongoing challenges such as low productivity, cost overruns, andlabor shortages, prompting increased interest in digital and AI solutions to enhance efficiency.This study explores the integration of Togal.AI, an artificial intelligence
experience (e.g., familiarity with generative design or decisionsupport systems), ensuring diversity in expertise.4.3 Data Collection4.3.1 Pre-Assessment SurveyA 20-item survey evaluates students’ prior AI experience (e.g., “Have you usedgenerative design software?”) and critical thinking skills (e.g., “Rate your ability toevaluate design trade-offs”). Responses are scored on a Likert scale to establishbaseline profiles.4.3.2 Design TasksStudents complete four prototype design tasks to accommodate the diverse disciplines,including computer engineering: (1) a lightweight bridge (civil/mechanical), (2) amechanical component (mechanical/electrical), (3) a sustainable building facade (civil),and (4) a hardware-software integrated system, such as an IoT
trying to extrapolate or parallel to internal force diagrams, andthere’s not [a relationship] in the way they’re trying to see it.” - Participant DEducators can help by integrating software tools that dynamically generate influence lines andconnect them to practical examples, such as bridges with moving loads. Simplifying theintroduction of these diagrams and demonstrating their real-world applications can make theconcept more accessible.Spatial Design and ConstructabilityDesigning structures in three dimensions requires an understanding of spatial relationships andthe ability to visualize stress distributions within a system. Constructability—the practicalaspects of assembling a structure, such as tying rebar or pouring concrete—is
with social justice work. These studies provide valuable insights into the integration of socialjustice in engineering education, demonstrating its significance in developing engineers who are notonly technically proficient but also socially conscious and ethically responsible. This work aims to show that a hands-on real-world problem intervention at a specific time during astudent’s academic development could affect their interest in STEM subjects. We explore the effect ofan immersive STEM outreach program in civil engineering with a social justice aspect to it on a groupof 23 juniors in high school. The author designed an academically appropriate project based on a civilengineering core statics course application centering on one of the
integrate mathematical analysis and modeling in a way that reflects its central role inengineering problem-solving [2, 4, 5]. This gap in instruction suggests that K-12 students maynot fully understand how mathematical reasoning underpins engineering design, which limitstheir ability to develop critical problem formulation skills [6].To effectively prepare students for the challenges of engineering careers, it is essential tointegrate problem-solving and analytical skills into the K-12 mathematics curriculum. As definedby the National Academies [7], engineering education revolves around real-world applications ofscientific principles through an iterative problem-solving process. However, despite its growingemphasis in K-12 education [8
and professional awareness, preparing them toaddress future challenges in sustainable energy. This paper outlines the program's framework,implementation, and outcomes, illustrating the integration of industry expertise in an academicsetting to inspire the next generation of engineers.KeywordsRenewable Energy Education, Integrative and Inclusive Approach, High School Summer Camp,University-industry Collaborations (UIC), Community Outreach, Project-based Learning,Sustainable Connected CommunitiesIntroductionUniversity-industry collaborations (UICs) play a crucial role in shaping engineering educationby integrating academic knowledge with real-world industry practices. These collaborationsplay a vital role of aligning curriculum with evolving
Paper ID #47042Sustainability in a Polymer Engineering Course: Evaluating the Student ExperienceDr. Kelley E Dugan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kelley E. Dugan is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Their research aims to understand and support complex sociotechnical problem solving in engineering, which can often be framed as engineering design problems. She focuses on how social dimensions can be recognized and integrated into problem solving processes by studying student and practicing engineers’ processes with and without problem solving tools
has shown that effective curriculum alignment can lead to improved studentachievement, as it ensures that the instructional methods and assessments are coherent with theintended learning outcomes [1]. This principle is particularly relevant in STEM education, wherethe integration of various disciplines is essential for fostering innovation and entrepreneurship.The alignment between the formal curriculum, which outlines the intended learning outcomes,and the hidden curriculum, which encompasses the implicit values and norms conveyed throughteaching practices, is crucial for creating an educational environment conducive to developingentrepreneurial competencies [1].Teachers' perceptions regarding their role in fostering innovation and
setup costing at least $10,000–$20,000. Without early exposure to NDT concepts, student interestmay be insufficient to justify such investments.At the authors' institution, we recognized an opportunity to introduce new experiments into thesophomore-level testing lab, which traditionally includes tensile, hardness, and impact testing.Given its widespread industrial application and relatively low equipment costs, ultrasonic NDTpresents a feasible option for integration. To address the lack of NDT exposure in the curriculum,the authors implemented an ultrasonic NDT system consisting of transducers, a pulser/receiver,and an oscilloscope, with a total cost of under $10,000. This system is multi-functional, capableof material characterization by
faced byunderrepresented groups in higher education. By focusing on enrollment pathways, financialsupport, curriculum integration, faculty development, and campus inclusivity, the university ispaving the way for a more diverse and equitable industry. These efforts not only benefit theacademic community but also contribute to the broader goal of creating an inclusive and diverseworkforce, particularly in the construction sector. Continued innovation and collaboration will beessential to sustaining and expanding these successes, ensuring lasting impact in the years tocome.Review of DEI Initiatives at Other UniversitiesThis study also examines the outcomes of other universities’ DEI initiatives in engineering andconstruction education, focusing on
± 0.71 3.78 ± 1.08instructors. b(n=41)1c: I will successfully get a good grade in this course if I follow thecourse curriculum and do the assignments as given to me by my 4.51 ± 0.64 4.37 ± 0.83instructors. b(n=41)1d: I see myself as an associate of Mountain Top Engineering -Class of 2023 LLC. b,** 3.38 ± 1.07 4.46 ± 1.00(n=39)Perceptions of the 3 pillars of operation as useful/relevant to the capstone course and/or futurecareer (αadj = 0.00106): On average, students were slightly familiar with the three pillars ofoperation at the onset of the course (pre-course perceptions) but reported being moderately tovery familiar by
presents an experiential learning framework implemented in a university’sstudent innovation center and makerspace from June 2023 to December 2024. This framework is designed toaccommodate students from various fields, effectively integrating AI elements into their extracurricularactivities in the makerspace. Specifically, we adopt a project-based learning approach that invites students witheither technical backgrounds or professional training related to the problems being tackled. For example, weassembled teams of CS students and social work students to develop a chatbot for interactive coaching of socialworkers. Recognizing that AI applications extend beyond chatbots, we encourage exploration of diverse topics(e.g., AI and robotics), seamlessly
students apply their training in real-worldbiomanufacturing settings, further reinforcing both technical competencies and professionalskills. By integrating industry feedback and aligning our curriculum with employer needs, weaim to create a workforce that is not only technically proficient but also adept in workplacecommunication, teamwork, and problem-solving. The final assessment of student preparednesswill include industry partner evaluations, providing external validation of student competency.Data Analysis All quantitative analyses will be conducted using R Studio (R Core Team, 2024). We willassess missingness of data. Using the pwr package (Champely et al., 2022), we ran an a prioripower analyses (1−β = .80, α = .05) and
ofbelonging rather than merely integrating into the college community [11]. Retention programsdesigned to support these students focus on fostering a supportive culture, challenging negativestereotypes, developing communities of supportive peers and faculty, and affirming students’capabilities as learners [9], [11]. Tinto’s subsequent research expanded the conversation onstudent persistence by examining students’ beliefs in their own success (sense of self-efficacy),their affiliations and connections within the community (sense of belonging), and theirperceptions of the curriculum [5].Strayhorn describes a sense of belonging as a basic human need, a need that is more important incertain contexts at certain times and often results from the
his contributions to engineering education.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineering is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture change in engineering curricula and spaces to shift engineering to be a field more inclusive of diversity in all forms. Her scholarly
is an Associate Professor in the Software and Societal Systems Department at Carnegie Mellon University. Prior to this, he spent over 16 years as a Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research. Andrew’s goal is to create inclusive workplaces where all people, especially those with disabilities and the neurodivergent, can be successful, without discrimination. His recent work has helped people on the autism spectrum gain employment and facilitate social interaction, helped blind software developers collaborate with their sighted colleagues, and used affective computing and biometrics to better understand how software developers do their work.Rick Kubina, Pennsylvania State UniversityProf. Somayeh Asadi, University of
transform theirexperiences in makerspaces into actionable insights, providing valuable implications for thedesign and management of these spaces in educational settings.Literature Makerspaces have become increasingly integrated into educational settings, providingstudents with hands-on engagement and problem-solving opportunities that bridge theoreticallearning with practical application (Halverson & Sheridan, 2014). One of the definingcharacteristics of makerspaces is their reliance on undergraduate students, who serve both asusers and staff. These dual roles create an environment where students can explore careerpathways while fostering learning and collaboration among their peers (Foster, 2015).Integrating undergraduate staff in