Native American undergraduates [5], [6]. Additionally, within the community collegepopulation, 58 percent are women and approximately 30 percent would qualify as firstgeneration college or low income students [2], [7] . Overall, 41 percent of all undergraduatesattend community college [5].First generation students make up almost one-third of all undergraduates and are more likely toattend community college [8], [9]. Additionally, first generation students with low-incomebackgrounds and an underrepresented racial identity often have less personal experience inacademic planning and are aware of fewer academic and career opportunities. These factorscontribute to the struggle many face with completing STEM degree programs. Supporting STEMdevelopment
ResearchInfrastructure Assessment Tool (RIAT), a self-assessment of an individual’s understanding ofSponsored Research Office (SRO) services available at one’s institution. MSI-RFP was scaledup into the CyBR-MSI: Infrastructure Research Readiness (CyBR-MSI:IRR) (CNS-2233087)that sought to (1) help participants assess campus research infrastructure and prioritizeimprovements; (2) form a community of practice among researchers and research infrastructure 3administrators from MSIs focused on capacity building of research infrastructure; and (3) co-create, with campus leadership, an action plan for research ready infrastructure for strong grantproposals for NSF CISE core programs, through a Community of Practice (CoP
decolonizing design methods during the first fewweeks of the field course activities. As a result, they spent considerable time in the first twoweeks of their project visiting the women’s collective and talking with its members about theirneeds.However, the research, including several collaborative workshops planned with the localcommunity organization to better align with local interests, was cut short when the students hadto pack up and return home abruptly. As a result, they had to shift the project’s trajectory,working remotely to develop digital resources instead of working on-site to design and buildsomething physical that the women’s collective could use. The changes they implementedincluded using digital graphics and online meetings with a
Paper ID #47337Bridging the Gap: Autoethnographic Insights into Project-Based Learning inElectrical EngineeringWylam Patrick DeSimone, University of Georgia Wylam Desimone is an Electrical Engineering student at the Georgia Institute of Technology, having transferred from the University of Georgia. He focuses on hardware development, product ideation, and rapid prototyping, creating innovative solutions for technical challenges. At the University of Georgia’s Cultivate Lab, Wylam worked on a robotic guitar project as well as other studies focused on engineering education. He plans to continue research at the Georgia
terms of 50%. We plan tocontinue to collect data each time the course is offered to strengthen the sample size. That beingsaid, the results are no less valid in the students' experiences in this course. This has encouragedus to use proficiency-based grading in other courses. We also acknowledge that two differentsurveys were used across the two courses. The first pilot survey was quite simple and was usedto determine whether further research would be done on student learning with proficiency-basedgrading. Given the positive responses, a more thorough survey was developed for the secondoffering. This survey will be used in future course offerings enabling us to aggregate our data.Another limitation of our work is that we do not have longitudinal
practical applications of clean energy. • Day 4: Robotics Integration and Industry Insight o Morning: Robotics assembly and motion planning exercises. o Afternoon: Guest lecture by the City of Tallahassee’s clean energy representative. • Day 5: Operational Carbon and Closing o Morning: Workshop on operational and embodied carbon, followed by solar panel assembly. o Afternoon: Post-survey, graduation ceremony, and distribution of certificates. Figure 1. Empowered Clean Energy Summer Camp ScheduleData Collection Tools and TechniquesTo assess the camp’s impact, data collection included both quantitative and qualitative methods: • Pre- and Post-Surveys
member of the editorial board of several peer-reviewed highly ranked journals. His research is published in recognized journalsMichel Elkhoury, Lebanese American University Dr. Michel Khoury is the Dean of the School of Engineering at the Lebanese American University (LAU), where he leads strategic initiatives in academic innovation, industry partnerships, and program development. Previously Assistant Provost and Associate Dean, he played a key role in implementing LAU’s strategic plan and launching new programs such as Engineering PreMed and Chemical Engineering. A Professor of Mechanical Engineering, he has led ABET accreditation renewals, curriculum modernization, and major lab expansions. His research focuses on
increased success in their student chapter. The success isdocumented annually by each student chapter in their annual report. The annual report is scoredbased on several criteria including: ● Student Chapter SMART Goals; ● Community Service and Outreach Activities; ● Meetings: Planning meetings, professional speakers, student presentations; ● Field Trips; and ● Collaboration with other organizations.Engaged FAs and PAs contribute by sharing their experiences, including what strategies haveworked well or fallen short for their student organizations, fostering a collaborative environmentto enhance student chapter development. The main objective of this study is to show that studentchapter annual report scores improve due to the
other key moments can be described/illustrated to help the development team? Table 1: Digital Tool Design Planning Document Questionswas able to provide access through a checkout system while they were implementing their units.The demonstrations were also meant to show the PLCs different possibilities they could explorewhen designing a custom solution with the development team.6 Summarizing the Summer ExperienceOn the morning of Day 1 of the Wisconsin summer institute, the development team presented thedemonstrations of existing digital tools to the teachers. As anticipated, the teachers wereunfamiliar with many of the tools and were eager to experiment with the technology immediatelyfollowing the demonstrations. As the
curriculum.They then developed a method to build new courses and a plan for putting together the contentand projects for the new first- and second-year environmental engineering courses. Thesecourses were first implemented in the 2023-2024 academic year and a description of theoutcomes, content, projects, and lessons learned follows in Section 3.0.3.0 IPBC DiscussionOne overarching goal of implementing project-based courses in the first and second yearof the curriculum is to motivate students with diverse skills and backgrounds to continue topursue environmental engineering. Too often, students with less experience in technical subjects,such as calculus or chemistry, fall behind their peers in courses and may begin to feel as ifengineering is “not for
It facilitates hydrosanitary pipes cross the Good initial promotin structured beams. So with BIM this would be organization g planning known earlier and this problem is of the team, communi and real- avoided. with clear cation. time roles and progress Working on a BIM project, team defined tracking. building has been more
continued during Fall 2023 and Fall 2024. Theassessment of the mentoring program was strategically planned to ensure complete datasets werecollected to investigate the experiences of mentees and near-peer mentors, and the effectiveness ofthe integrated mentoring model. Therefore, the first semester (Fall 2022) was dedicated to studyingthe experience and feedback from mentees, and the second semester (Fall 2023) was focused onexamining the learning experience and mentor identity development of the near-peer mentors. Theresults from the third semester will holistically inform the experiences of the three acting groups,including mentees, peer-mentors, and professors, as well as the effectiveness of the integratedmentoring program. But these results
add value to society. ● Identify and analyze issues when bringing a solution to scale. Blue Thread: Engineering Professional Skills ● Use various engineering communication methods. ● Collaborate effectively in a team. ● Develop, implement, and adapt a project management plan. Green Thread: Engineering Design ● Identify and describe a problem that can be solved with a potentially new product or process. ● Identify appropriate stakeholders and content experts and evaluate their input. ● Plan and conduct research by gathering relevant and credible data, facts, and information. ● Articulate appropriate STEM practices and principles in the design ● Evaluate
thinking, teamwork, andtechnical skills that are essential for their future careers. Through hands-on projects, students gainexposure to the entire lifecycle of a PV system, starting with the conceptual stages of system designand planning, followed by the installation, testing, troubleshooting, and performance analysis,Working in teams to address practical, real-world challenges, students not only deepen theirtechnical expertise but also develop key soft skills such as communication, adaptability, andleadership. For instance, they might collaborate to design and install a PV system for a specificapplication, analyze its performance under varying environmental conditions, or devise strategiesfor optimizing its efficiency. These tasks encourage
training, and curriculum development [4]. In one partnership between a university and aschool district in the U.S. West, undergraduate students were hired as tutors for the schooldistrict’s students and teachers [4]. For community partnerships focused on engineering, service-learning can also play a significant role in community engagement [5]. For example, in afreshman engineering course, students developed lesson plans to help teachers with limitedrobotics experience. They worked with middle-school teachers and student teams for 8 weeks todesign robots for a competition [6]. Teachers in this program appreciated the freshmen“engineering experts” because this was their and their students’ sole exposure to engineering [6].Undergraduates who work
things make you stressed? Why? Be detailed. Have you Mindfulness used mindfulness strategies in the past? Which ones? What are some mindfulness strategies you plan to use moving forward? How do you think these strategies will help you manage your stress? 4 - Belonging, Part 1: What identities are important to you? What do you feel is the Identity, Meaning, & most important part of your identities? How about the least? How Purpose does this identity contribute to meaning & purpose you have for your life? Part 2: Has this semester's focus on mental health in engineering shifted your
curriculum covers tool setup, initiation of checks, scripting for automation, and result analysis to confirm design consistency. Mastery of this stage is essential for ensuring circuit reliability and performance, solidifying students' expertise in design verification. e) Physical Design Stage: In this final module, students dive into the physical design process, which is critical for producing the final GDSII layout. They start by learning how to import and analyze design files, execute floorplanning, and manage pin assignments and power planning. The course then guides students through placement optimization, clock tree synthesis, and routing, complemented by detailed extraction, timing, and power analyses
engineering program have used this rubric in various courses formany years up to this point, they have never received direct instruction in interpersonalcommunication. To encourage students to find solutions to their own problems within their team,the course includes a “dismissal protocol” to address behaviors that violate established teamrules. Designed to be used after other approaches have failed, this protocol requires that teammembers prepare a written statement, deliver it to the course instructors, engage in a meeting tohear concerns and develop plans to remedy them, and, if the behavior is not corrected, a studentcan be removed from the course so long as the department chair approves. This requires thestudent to enroll in the course sequence
). The plan wasstructured around the best retention practices at the time, with the following major initiatives: 1.) Development of a new 2-semester “Intro to Engineering” course sequence to replace the beginning “Engineering Graphics” course that was standard in all disciplines at the time. These courses would contain multidisciplinary projects to provide students with hands-on activities as well as answer the question “What do engineers do?” 2.) Development of the “Cornerstones” transition to college course utilizing engineering faculty to teach the course and mentor new students. 3.) Development of peer mentors to work with FTIC students by creating discipline specific first-year interest groups (FIG’s
andintegrate criticism into improved product outcomes.Additionally, following each studio, students wereasked to submit a 1–2-page reflection detailing theirexperience, as outlined below.Data Collection: Student Reflections. Studentsreflected on their studio experience through twosections: Observations of Other Teams' Work andPersonal Reflections (Appendix List 1). The firstsection encouraged students to critically evaluateothers' work, identifying best practices to enhancetheir own team's performance. In the secondsection, students reflected on their personalexperiences, exploring what they found mostinteresting, challenges faced, and how they plan toapply their learnings. The assignment was graded for Figure 1. Conceptual framework usedcompletion
. Maria Isabel Doval, Universidade de Vigo PHD in Psychopedagogy. Associate Professor at Faculty of Education Sciences (University of Vigo, Spain)Breixo Martins-Rodal Breixo Martins Rodal holds a PhD in Geography and Territorial Planning from the University of Santiago de Compostela. He has taught tourism, geography and international relations at the University of Vigo. His career is developed as coordinator and director of international research and education projects in both public and private entities. He has extensive experience in international cooperation projects, cross-border research development and cooperation for higher education management. He is currently a researcher in projects for the development of
projects that students areintegrated into the team and experientially learn project planning, project execution, and professionalskills necessary to be a key contributor in the biomedical and healthcare fields.Biomedical engineering and clinical experts utilize 3D printing and other traditional manufacturingmethods to assist clinicians, faculty, and industry innovators in translating their needs into models anddevices that enhance patient care. The team of biomedical, mechanical, electrical, software, and qualityengineers support the design, testing, and fabrication of a breadth of medical products. The M4 teamdesigns with the medical device product development regulatory pathway in mind, thus leading tooutcomes that take innovations from “bench-to
professionals, providing students with the opportunity to practice ethical decision-making in realistic scenarios.Table 2. Proposed Strategies for Improvement in Ethics Education Ethics education should be seamlessly integrated throughout the CEM curriculum, rather than treated as an isolated module. This integration can be achieved by Integration of Ethics as a embedding ethical discussions with core courses such as project planning, cost Core Component estimating, safety, and project management. Additionally, a dedicated course on construction ethics should be included to provide a strong
judging by the slightly larger A-grade EIvalue, they were at the same or better proficiency levels than the white male subgroup.Similarly, in the theory section of the untimed exams, the scores in the high context questions wereconsistently higher than the rest of the theoretical questions. The average scores for the regulartheory questions were 79.68% and 77.34% while the average score for the high context questionswas 87.19% and 93.61% for exams 1 and 3, respectively. Given the small sample numbers, nostatistical analyses were performed. However, the same intervention is planned to be repeated inthe spring 2025 and fall 2025 semesters to combine the three-semester data and ensure minimumsubgroup samples of 10 students, the minimum size
, opticalsciences and engineering, software engineering, systems and industrial engineering, and ourinterdisciplinary first-year and capstone design courses. The teaching assistants were fromengineering and mathematics departments. The courses where innovations were implementedspanned from first-year undergraduate courses to fourth-year and master’s level courses. Many,but not all, of these courses, included a focus on engineering design and team-based projects.After the initial professional development retreat, we analyzed the resulting innovation plans andnotes from debriefing and/or check-in sessions with participants and compiled an inventory ofpractical asset-based strategies that were designed or adapted by instructors, which is the focusof this
. This profile may be updated, allowing the LLM to incorporate changes inpreferences over time. We conclude the paper with a brief discussion of middle school students’perceptions of this framework and its potential implications for engineering education.A Framework for Implementing Personalized Learning Using Large Language ModelsIn this section, we present a two-agent framework designed to leverage LLMs for PL. As pastresearch has shown, LLMs often exhibit enhanced performance when multi-step reasoning tasksare addressed through a structured sequence of sub-tasks. For instance, Luan et al. [10] achievedenhanced performance in robot task planning using LLMs when one agent first decomposedcomplex requests into single-objective actions before a
(anxiety etc.).There have been many studies on gender differences. Jones [5] studied how gender differencesaffect student motivation constructs, achievement, and career plans, along with the interactionsamong them. Jones found that female students did have lower self-efficacy, but not necessarilyto a statistically significant level. In Hutchison et.al. [4], it was found that females who persist inSTEM have lower self- efficacy perceptions than their male colleagues. These were also brokendown by race and ethnicity. Fraley et.al. [3] assessed confidence and competency of first yearengineering students. It was found that many students enter class with a pre-conceived notion ofalready knowing the material. It was also found that female students
engineeringeducation [3]. Two of those outcomes are the EOP Systems Thinking 1 and 3, quoted in theAbstract.Before obtaining this grant, our university community began a five-year strategic plan “Reigningour Strategic Directions 2022-2027,” which includes an effort to reimagine and revise ourcurriculum [4]. The campus is also strongly committed to sustainability, evidenced in decades ofenvironmentally-conscious initiatives by the university facilities departments and the support forthe decade-old Center for Environmental Justice and Sustainability [5,6].This grant was awarded to three engineering departments: Civil and Environmental, Electricaland Computer, and Mechanical Engineering. It now involves six engineering faculty members,four faculty members from
capabilities. Drones and Unmanned AerialVehicles (UAVs) offer flexible and high-resolution data collection for various applications, suchas agriculture, disaster response, and urban planning. Internet of Things (IoT) sensors deployed invarious environments collect real-time data on weather, air quality, soil moisture, and more.Smartphones and other portable devices with GPS and various sensors provide vast amounts oflocation-based data. CI supports the entire cycle of data acquisition, transfer, storage, processing,and visualization of large-scale data 1 . It has become a critical resource for many applications andscientific discovery 2,3 . While the importance of CI is well recognized in the scientific communityand industry, the education and
C Creating Figure Plans Week 6 Identifying Research Gaps CDE Communicating Week 7 CDE Research Gaps Scientific Writing, Broader Week 8 EF Impacts and Intellectual Merit Week 9 Research Ethics CLaboratory reports were replaced with three formative assessments that prepared students toaccomplish expert-level cognitive tasks that ultimately allow