, Economics and Ethics, Engineering Thermodynamics,Electrical Circuits, Fluid Mechanics, and Material and Energy Balances. Students are madeaware of SI sessions by the class instructor. SIs often attend classes and make an effort to bevisible. The SI program has contributed to the increased 4-year graduation rate of 22% andincreased 6-year graduation rates of 17% over the past 10 years. The persistence from first yearto second year in the College has increased 11% over the past 12 years. Upon further studies,there were increased concerns in correlating students' academic performance to SI sessionattendance. Research links students’ success to their science identity and self-efficacy [10].Science identity pertains to a dynamic perspective of oneself
.[18] B. Reynante, “Learning to design for social justice in community‐engaged engineering,”Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 338–356, 2022, doi:10.1002/jee.20444.[19] N. W. Sochacka, J. Walther, and A. L. Pawley, “Ethical Validation: Reframing ResearchEthics in Engineering Education Research To Improve Research Quality,” Journal ofengineering education (Washington, D.C.), vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 362–379, 2018, doi:10.1002/jee.20222.[20] L. T. Smith, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples, 3rd ed. ZedBooks, 2021.[21] J. Holly and S. Masta, “Making whiteness visible: The promise of critical race theory inengineering education,” Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), vol
Institute of Technology Jill Fennell, the Frank K. Webb Chair in Communication Skills at the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech, focuses on advancing written, visual, and verbal communication skills. Her research centers on affect theory and its application to technical communication, specifically information design. Jill studies how to enhance the effectiveness of pedagogical documents by incorporating principles from affect theory. Through her work, she aims to empower students, fostering an environment where they actively shape their communication interactions, including teamwork and ethical discussions. By integrating these principles, she goes beyond traditional methods
integral part of the program's focus on maximizingstudent success as they define it.Tutoring & Mentoring Students in Professionalism & DesignProfessionalism and Design are the primary curricular zones where facilitators perform theirmentoring duties. Professionalism, as used by IRE, is a broad term for nearly all social aspects ofprofessional life and includes ethical, anthropological, leadership, well-being, learning, andpersonal and professional development instruction. The Design zone includes instruction increativity, application of technical learning, the design process, teamwork, communication, andmanaging interpersonal conflict.This tutoring and mentoring role for facilitators is similar to apprenticeship models in other fieldswhere
, and exploring alternative approaches through AI-powered suggestions, which encourage independent learning. By integrating these tools, the labs aim to enhance technical skill development while promoting the ethical and effective use of AI in engineering problem-solving. • To improve consistency and efficiency in project evaluation, auto-grading mechanisms will be integrated for coding tasks with defined outputs or algorithm correctness, utilizing platforms like MATLAB Grader or custom scripts. Manual grading will be reserved for open-ended components, allowing instructors to provide detailed feedback on creativity, innovation, and problem-solving approaches. This balanced approach ensures both
like the RISE Inquiry Model to analyze problems, assess evidence, and formulate reasoned conclusions. 2. Collaboration and Communication: Engaging in civil discourse, deliberation, and community-based problem-solving. 3. Engineering Design Thinking: Using structured methodologies to define civic problems, develop creative solutions, and evaluate the feasibility and impact of interventions Civic 1. Commitment to ethical responsibility, civic agency, and democratic Dispositions participation. and Actions 2. Engagement in authentic civic actions, such as community organizing
philosophical, theoretical, and methodologicalfoundations needed to ethically render trustworthy accounts of human experience. The field ofengineering education can, perhaps, benefit most from the promise of narrative research througha community approach to innovate new narrative methodologies and methods that cohere withbroader narrative research traditions while, at the same time, uniquely support inquiries ofexperience in the engineering education context.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant2045634. All findings, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] S. E. Chase. “Narrative inquiry
engineering operations on the waterfront. Next to it, a blog from 2007 shares what the paper mill meant to the people who worked there and why many felt “bittersweet” about its closure.In Figure 2, a student frames engineering within ethical, societal, and cultural tensions.Identifying how engineers have shaped land and resource use in the region brought upuncertainties about how a community navigates sociotechnical conflicts and how to definetechnological progress. This reflective approach fosters technical proficiency and the criticalityto decide when not to create, emphasizing responsible engineering practices as described in [5].CommunicationBrainstorming for the design component of the HMP begins in Week 7. By this
thatask for a specialty in one area or the other (i.e., UI designer, UX researcher), studentsdemonstrating the ability to do both will make them more marketable and competitive in the job,especially if they are able to do so in an accessibility-first approach. Students were pleased withlearning how to conduct ethical and responsible research while also acquiring skills to translateresearch findings to design solutions. Similar to our findings through the data we collected,Letaw et al. (2022) assert that embedded inclusive design throughout a multi-year studyimproves student retention of inclusive practices and normalizes accessibility within the designprocess. The authors argue that this integration is especially effective when educators
interesting to see how much it the impacts, processes, or ethical [mineral extraction] impacted the area considerations inherent in the field. when we mined. Table 5 Themes and sample reflection from the participants These five themes show how participants engaged with the summer program activities. Itleads us to inquire about the alignment of these engagements with that of the program designers'engineering workforce development intentions.Aligning engagement with workforce development goals: To investigate the second research question, we adopt a frequency analysis approach toevaluate participant reflections across all activities. This approach allows us to gauge thecollective
Paper ID #45835Tracking the Evolution of Interdisciplinary Identity-Based Motivation in EngineeringGraduate Students: A Longitudinal StudyDr. Margaret Webb, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Margaret (Maggie) Webb is holds a PhD in Engineering Education and an M.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, as well as a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rice University. Her research focuses on interdisciplinary identities and motivation in engineering education, examining interdisciplinary graduate education, convergent research approaches, and applying organizational systems theories to develop ethical
], [18], [19]. PBL not onlyenhances students' technical skills but also cultivates soft skills such as teamwork, leadership,and ethical reasoning, thereby preparing graduates to be more adaptable and responsive to theneeds of a rapidly changing world and the workplace [20], [21].PBL has been criticized because students rarely get to see the proper solution, which wouldallow students to identify their errors in thinking [22]. This is especially important for students todo if they have not truly mastered the fundamentals [22]. PBL has been noted for impartingcooperative skills to students while obtaining the same learning outcomes as those obtained fromtraditional pedagogies [23]. PBL has also been praised for being more effective than
professional ethics curriculum. Karl received his Ph.D. in Applied Electromagnetics from the University of Michigan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Tuition Equity: A study of the disparate impact of different forms of block tuition based on raceAbstractThis full empirical research paper explores the impact of block tuition across differentdemographics. While much attention has been paid to college accessibility, particularly regardingelite school admissions and overall affordability, less focus has been given to how institutionalpolicies—such as tuition and fee structures—affect different degrees and studentsdisproportionately. These structures not only make certain
lecturer in engineering education. Her work explores the psychological dimensions of engineering mindsets, with a focus on perfectionism and personal values. She bridges behavioural science and human-centred design in engineering problem-solving to foster reflective, ethical, and innovative practices, shaping the next generation of engineers into sustainability driven, responsible changemakers. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-611XDr. Karen A High, Clemson University Dr. Karen High holds an academic appointment in the Engineering Science and Education department and joint appointments in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering department as well as the Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences department. Prior
securemounting strategy, utilizing strong screws anchored into the frame or spacers affixed to the table, is essential toprovide sufficient standoff space to accommodate the hooks and facilitate ease of insertion and removal ofcomponents. Systematically organizing the mounted components based on their size and frequency of usage iscrucial, ensuring that heavier tools are positioned at the lower sections of the pegboard to mitigate the risk ofaccidents or unanticipated falloffs.Human Factor ConsiderationsThe design of the interactive screen is of paramount importance, as it must be intuitive and user-friendly tominimize the likelihood of operator errors or confusion. Ethically, a well-crafted interface should recognize thediverse skills and capabilities
need to be properlyaddressed to keep everyone safe. The Engineering Directors cannot know every detail aboutwhat each team is doing at all times. Therefore, it is your ethical responsibility to provide thecritical information in this deliverable that will help us and your team develop a plan to worksafely. You are also encouraged to seek advice from your Team Mentor as you work on thisdeliverable.Each of you individually plays a critical role in ensuring that work gets done safely so that you,your teammates, and others are protected. As you go about the work of building and testing yourprototype, you should always feel free to raise concerns or ask questions about safety. TheEngineering Directors, Studio staff, and other campus staff are
ancient Hindu texts such as the Manusmriti, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Vedas, andUpanishads, provide moral and ethical justifications for the caste system through the concept ofreincarnation and spiritual purity/pollution [8], [10], [11]. These religious affiliations have madethe caste system difficult to challenge because it is perceived as divinely ordained [7], [9].Historically, the caste system legitimized the oppression of Dalit communities, relegating them tothe lowest social roles and subjecting them to severe discrimination and exclusion, such as beingdenied access to education [8], [11]. One prominent outcome of the caste system isuntouchability, a practice that prohibits social interactions, resource sharing, and even physicalcontact with
Paper ID #49099Beyond Swipe and Tap: Cultivating Mobile Accessibility Awareness and Knowledgein Computing DisciplinesDr. Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou, University of Texas at San Antonio Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Information Systems and Cyber Security at the University of Texas at San Antonio. His research interests are broadly in Human-centered AI, AI Ethics, Computer Accessibility, and Human-Computer Interaction. He aspires to promote software and AI experience of vulnerable populations through a situated understanding as well as design, education, and governance interventions.Chunyu Liu
, Jun. 2011, p. 22.1563.1-22.1563.15. doi: 10.18260/1-2--18519.[18] J. Howcroft, K. Mercer, and J. Boger, “Developing ethical engineers with empathy,” presented at the CEEA 2021, Jun. 2021.[19] J. Howcroft and K. Mercer, “Developing a Biomedical Stakeholder Cafe: Process, development, implementation, and lessons learned,” presented at the 2024 Canadian Engineering Education Association, Edmonton, AB, 2024.[20] K. Mercer and J. Howcroft, “Biomedical Stakeholder Café: A People-Centered Approach for the Future of Design Engineering Education,” in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Portland, OR, Jun. 2024.[21] M. Lewrick, P. Link, and L. Leifer, The Design Thinking Toolbox: A Guide to Mastering the
, debugging assistance, and guidance inunderstanding fundamental programming concepts, complex data structures, and algorithms. Forexample, students can use ChatGPT to clarify doubts about pieces of code, generate sample code,or troubleshoot errors in their assignments. This self-paced, interactive learning approach enablesstudents to explore alternative solutions and deepen their understanding. However, instructorsshould guide students on the ethical and effective use of such tools, emphasizing that ChatGPTshould supplement learning rather than replace critical thinking and original problem-solving. Toensure academic integrity, instructors can design assessments that require personalized andinnovative application of concepts, making it harder to
two-week pilot in late-spring of 2025. Pilot Curriculum The first two units of the e4usa™ curriculum are being redesigned to fit the pilot's time constraintswhile remaining responsive to autistic individuals. Units 1 and 2 are being updated to integrate keylearning objectives and provide opportunities for participants to explore engineering ethics, the designprocess, stakeholder roles, and teamwork. The 5E Instructional Model (Engagement, Exploration,Explanation, Elaboration, and Evaluation) is being applied to structure content delivery. Revisions are alsoincorporating the UDL Guidelines 3.0, along with recommendations for Individualized Education Program(IEP) accommodations and
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has diverse interests in structural mechanics, sustainable construction materials (with emphasis in bamboo), engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis, and after many years, he has finally (maybe) learned how to teach Statics, using an experiential and peer-based learning ”studio” model. As part of the UPRM Sustainability Engineering initiative to develop a new bachelor’s degree and curricular sequence, Papadopoulos is PI of A New Paradigm for Sustainability Engineering: A Transdisciplinary, Learner-Centered, and Diversity-Focused Approach, funded by the NSF HSI program, and he is also a
place in a ‘circle’, where all participants are equal, ensuring that ‘voice’ isgiven to everyone, and that everyone is listened to. Anonymity is ensured. The researchershave access only to whatever each group chooses to subsequently report back.4.2 EthicsOur project received approval from university ethics committees both at IUG and NU. Aparticipant information form was sent to prospective participants (in both Arabic andEnglish) and those who agreed to take part were required to complete a consent form beforethe event, with anonymity guaranteed (pseudonyms are used throughout this paper). Thiswarned participants that the conversation might touch upon potentially sensitive issues withintheir personal experience, and that they were free to leave
introduced to both teamwork and CATME as they work on a semester-long team-based design project. The fall curriculum for English is individually based, equipping studentswith composition skills necessary for academic English, including writing with specificity forclarity and credibility, integrating sources, paragraphing, connecting sentences and sections, andrevising. These skills are taught in the context of individual assignments designed to support theadvising curriculum about why they chose University X, what kind of engineer they mightbecome, and how to work through ethical dilemmas.During the spring semester, both classes work extensively in the context of a three-person teamfor both classes. In the ENGR YYY class, students sit with their
Paper ID #45952”I cannot relate”: The Importance Socioeconomic Status in the Journeys ofWomen of Color in Academia (Research)Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Education program. She researches topics such as engineering ethics, sustainability, social responsibility, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is a Fellow of the ASEE and a licensed P.E. in Colorado.Sheila Davis, University of Colorado Boulder
’ effects, a convergent parallel mixed methods research design 3was employed based upon Lent and colleagues’ Social Cognitive Career Theory [24]. Theguiding research questions were: • RQ1: What effect does program participation have on math proficiency, as indicated by mastery of the algebra I benchmark skills targeted? • RQ2: What effect does BOAST have on students’ math self-efficacy? • RQ3: What effect does BOAST have on students’ STEM choice goals? • RQ4: What are the effects of math self-efficacy on change in STEM career goals?3 Randomization of students and schools was infeasible, due to school leaders’ ethical concerns about encouragingstudents to apply to the program without knowing ahead of time what
“strongly agree,” which eventually helped in measuring teachers’ attitudes in the role of being computer science teachers.Lastly, the survey incorporated items from Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Computational Thinking(TSECT), which is meant to capture a sense of students’ self-efficacy in utilizing programmingand Computational Thinking [4]. All of these instruments were put together to providea comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the teacher training program in expandingComputer Science Education.3.4 Ethical ConsiderationsParticipants in the study were informed prior to the commencement of the program aboutthe purpose of the study, what it entails and their right to opt out at any time.Identifiable information was collected for the purpose of
of McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University, Washington, DC. She is involved in projects in the intersection of education, data mining, machine learning, ethics, and fairness. Her research interests include data mining, recommender systems, predictive models within educational contexts, and the fairness concerns that arise from their use. Her goal is to help students succeed using data and machine learning models.Dr. Peter J Clarke, Florida International University Peter J. Clarke received his B.Sc. degree in Computer Science and Mathematics from the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill) in 1987, M.S. degree from SUNY Binghamton University in 1996 and Ph.D. in Computer Science from Clemson
: Engineering Design: Problem Framing, Project Management, Ideation, Engineering Prototyping, Decision Making, Design Methods, Engineering Graphics, Design Practices Communication Material Processing: Manufacturing, Management & Precision, Fabrication, Classification, Casting, Molding & Forming, Separating & Machining, Joining, Conditioning & Finishing, Safety Quantitative Analysis: Computational Thinking, Data Collection, Analysis & Communication, System Analytics, Modeling & Simulation Professionalism: Ethics, Workplace Behavior & Operations, Intellectual Property, Technological Impacts, Role