students. By using a mixed-methods approach that integrates quantitative and qualitative analyses, it gave proper investigationof how hands-on preparation enhances students’ academic performance, engagement, and careerreadiness. The research aims to provide perceptions into curriculum development and pedagogicalstrategies that address fundamental gaps and provide support for the HBCU's wider mission tocultivate a diverse and skilled engineering workforce.2.0 Literature ReviewRecent research has highlighted the critical role that hands-on learning plays in enhancing STEMeducation at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Hands-on approaches,including laboratory experiments, project-based learning, and simulation activities, have
instructors for the trade coursestaught at the vocational school. The CoPs goals have expanded and the core curriculum has has transitioned from thefocus on Engineering Design Process to a Localised Engineering Education (LEE) which not only focuses onsolving problems using locally available resources but has also begun to integrate local knowledge into thecurriculum through Culturally Sustaining and Revitalizing Pedagogy principles.Community engagement for our context is the direct involvement of the CoP members, the school staff and students,academic researchers and the local community in decision-making and implementation of policies and projects.The CoP has evolved over the past eight years, shifting from just focusing on teaching engineering and
extensive expertise to her role. Maintaining an active research agenda, her work primarily revolves around enhancing the efficiency, safety, and eco-friendliness of the construction industry. Additionally, she is dedicated to integrating cutting-edge technologies into her teaching methods to elevate the overall educational experience. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025AI-Driven Innovations in Green Building Education: A Literature Review on Transforming the Future of Sustainable Construction Shahrooz Ghorbani 1 & Tianjiao Zhao2 East Carolina UniversityAbstractThis study systematically reviews AI
engagement with interactive entertainment in education. The project integrates digital game-based learning to develop a virtual measure of time preferences while exploring how virtual platforms and games influence learning outcomes, economic behavior, and market formation.Ms. Yanwen Chen, Texas A&M UniversityAlex Gonce, Texas A&M University Alex Gonce is an undergraduate researcher at the LIVE Lab at Texas A&M University, where they study Computer Engineering with a minor in Neuroscience. They have worked at the lab for over a year, leading a research team and collaborating on multiple projects focused on gamification in education. In addition to their research, they serve as a Peer Teacher for the College of
interests focus on the integration of human factors engineering with the development of health information technology (HIT). His research also focuses on provider-patient interaction with respect to exam room computing, as well as virtual care tools and applications. Dr. Saleem also maintains an engineering education research portfolio and in 2024 was awarded a grant by the National Science Foundation (NSF) entitled, ’Introducing a Mixed-Methods Approach to Engineering Students through Human-Centered Design’.Edward James Isoghie, University of Louisville Edward Isoghie is a PhD candidate with a research focus on human factors and engineering education leveraging emerging technologies such as AI, digital twin, and virtual
Rishi Sunak. Similarly, onestudent group tested ChatGPT’s ability to solve an integral by simply asking it, “Can you takethe integral of a function?” and trusting it when it responded that it could. Some students didparticipate in more thorough fact checking, but a lack of fact checking was more widespread inthe student group than in the other groups. Industry professionals, on the other hand, seemedmore likely to verify their evaluation using primary sources such as Wolfram Alpha to check theintegral and Google to fact check information.3. Hallucinations, especially in the context of citations - Overall, participants from all groupswere more skeptical about the citations ChatGPT was providing – with a handful of students andindustry
Director of the Engineering Communication Program, and an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Washington.David James Kelaita, University of Colorado BoulderTanya Ivanov ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Work in Progress: A Novel Project-Based Molecular Biology Experimentation and Design Lab Course Using Participatory Design to Promote Student EngagementIntroductionTraditionally, instructors have designed courses without substantial input from undergraduatestudents. However, recent work has shown that participatory design of curriculum results inmore engaging, effective courses [1] and that students who engage in participatory design reporta
) [32] Methods in Construction Engineering Smart and Sustainable 29 (Seyman Guray & Kismet, 2023) [33] Construction Built Environment 30 (Panya, Kim, & Choo, 2023) [34] Building Engineering ConstructionBased on a thorough literature review assessment, an overview of the VR and BIM relationshipand how VR integrates with BIM was developed. Key questions were drafted to guide theresearch, focusing on the applications of VR headsets for design review and constructionprocesses, the applications of VR in
comprehensive evaluation of both the measurableoutcomes and subjective perceptions of AI-generated rubrics3.2. Data Collection3.2.1. Rubric DevelopmentThree leading generative AI tools—ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity were employed to generategrading rubrics for four engineering course assignments. The assignments were selected fromtwo lower-level and two upper-level courses to provide a representative sample of undergraduateengineering curricula.Assignment 1 was an integral component of a term project in Engineering Economic Analysiscourse, designed to apply economic decision-making principles to real-world engineeringchallenges while strengthening students' communication skills in both presentation and reportwriting. Students voluntarily formed
Illinois Urbana-Champaign and an Associate in the John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Harvard University. She holds an appointment at the Carle-Illinois College of Medicine in the Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences. She is also a core faculty member at the Institute for Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access in the College of Engineering. Holly studies biomaterials and soft robotics and their applications in the university classroom, in undergraduate research and in engaging K12 students in STEM. Holly received her BS/MS in Materials Science and Engineering from Drexel University and her PhD in Engineering Sciences from Harvard University. ©American
strongcharacter, inspired by quality education, driven by an entrepreneurial mindset, and guided by thedesire to create value for others [2]. One such effort launched in 2005 is the Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN), which aims “to reach all undergraduate engineering students withan entrepreneurial mindset (EM) so they can create personal, economic, and societal valuethrough a lifetime of meaningful work [3].” Faculty at nearly 70 institutions across the UnitedStates emphasize the “3Cs” of an entrepreneurial mindset as defined by KEEN: empoweringstudents with an insatiable curiosity to investigate a rapidly changing world, fosteringconnections to integrate the pursuit of knowledge as a means for revealing innovative solutions,and championing
presenting technical results clearly and concisely. This paper describes thecombined approach, which can serve as a model for future courses aiming to developtechnical and writing proficiency in undergraduate engineering courses.IntroductionLaboratory courses have been a part of the engineering curriculum for the last two centuriesto provide students with a practical experience of applying the engineering concepts taught inlectures [1]. Generally, laboratory courses have been designed to address ABET studentoutcomes 3, 4, and 6. The ABET outcomes are: • Outcome 3 - "an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences" [2]. • Outcome 4 - "an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering
Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Learning. Dr. Hammack’s research focuses on the connection of local contexts to STEM interest and identity development in youth, particularly rural youth in elementary and middle grades, as well as how elementary teachers develop teaching efficacy and identity as STEM educators. Through her research, Dr. Hammack aims to advance understanding of how to enhance STEM education in rural schools and communities, providing opportunities to meet the unique needs of rural students.Dr. Nick Lux Lux, Montana State University Nick Lux is a Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education and is an affiliate of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center. He
practical pedagogical implications, showing that intentionallyintroducing CD while providing structured support strengthens students’ problem-solving,adaptability, and confidence in generating innovative solutions, ensuring students are betterequipped to tackle complex, real-world STEM challenges. Introduction Innovation-based learning (IBL) signifies a transformative change in engineeringeducation, focusing on using engineering principles to address real-world issues in ways thatextend past conventional project-based learning. IBL is an overall broad curriculum that includesmany courses that are designed to equip students to confront intricate, open-ended challengesthat demand innovative answers by promoting creativity, critical thinking
. Saleem is an Associate Professor with the Department of Industrial Engineering at the J.B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. He is also a Co-Director of the Center for Human Systems Engineering (CHSE). Dr. Saleem received his Ph.D. from the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech in 2003, specializing in human factors engineering and ergonomics. Dr. Saleem’s research interests focus on the integration of human factors engineering with the development of health information technology (HIT). His research also focuses on provider-patient interaction with respect to exam room computing, as well as virtual care tools and applications. Dr. Saleem also maintains an
Engineering at Iron Range Engineering in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, MankatoDr. Justine Chasmar, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Chasmar is a professor for Iron Range Engineering’s Bell Program through Minnesota State University, Mankato. She teaches self-directed learning classes for the professionalism curriculum, one of the three pillars of the Bell Program. Dr. Chasmar earned a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education and M.S. and B.S. in Mathematical Sciences from Clemson University. She is a STEM educator, practitioner, and scholar. Dr. Chasmar spent the last decade serving in and directing learning centers. Most recently, Dr. Chasmar served as an Assistant
: Agile Methods Coupled with Project Based Learning to Train Mechanical Engineers in the Era of Industry 4.0AbstractAs the Industry 4.0 revolution reshapes manufacturing, design, and engineering processes, therole of mechanical engineers is expanding beyond traditional boundaries. Since mechanicalsystems are increasingly interconnected with digital technologies, training the next-generationmechanical engineers in Internet-of Things (IoT) programming and software engineeringmethodology is critical for meeting industry demands. However, these critical skills are oftenmissing in traditional mechanical engineering curriculum. To address this challenge, we havemodernized our curriculum by integrating IoT technologies and software
to engineering students innovativelyand entertainingly. It also fosters an entrepreneurial mindset by infusing curiosity,creativity, and connection-making into the curriculum. Emerging evidence of thecase study's effectiveness is based on student perceptions and teaching reflectionsof instructors who implemented the activity. By introducing the activity andlessons learned, this paper significantly contributes to promoting economicliteracy in engineering education.Keywords: Principles of economics, economic literacy, entrepreneurial mindset,teamwork.Background and MotivationEconomics can often feel foreign to non-majoring students, particularly engineering students.Yet, economics, society, and engineering are intertwined. In engineering
, and engineering design, with particular attention to cognitive stress, cognitive load, and STEM accessibility. He also focuses on the professional development of K-12 teachers for teaching engineering design. By integrating these strategies into a holistic framework, Dr. Raju enhances workforce development, strengthens engineering pathways, and broadens participation in STEM fields. His work equips educators with tools to personalize instruction and foster professional identity, ultimately preparing future engineers to thrive in a rapidly evolving global landscape.Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is the Frank and Jean Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in
discussed inthe documents and how the findings can be used to integrate AI ethics into engineering education.3 Overview of AI Policy Documents3.1 US’s Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American PeopleThe ”Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American People” [23],hereafter mentioned as the AI Bill of Rights, is a white paper published by the White House Office ofScience and Technology Policy (OSTP) in October 2022, outlines five principles intended to guide theethical and responsible development and use of automated systems in the United States. While it is not anofficial policy document, it seeks to protect the American public from potential harms arising
ChatGPT to be very helpful. A clearexception to this was a single student who did not use it much and provided the most negativereviews. During lab sessions in the first half of the semester, students used ChatGPT to resolvemost syntax issues. For comparison, in previous years students struggled a lot more with theseissues early in the semester. Additionally, a few students developed a strong interest in the topic.One student stated that this was the most interesting course in the entire curriculum due in largepart to this use of AI. The instructor also noted much less frustration with syntax issues withinthe classroom.Misuse of AI ToolsWhile ChatGPT can be an excellent resource for learning and debugging VHDL code, it issometimes misused by
] Mondisa, Joi-Lynn, Becky Wai-Ling Packard, and Beronda L. Montgomery. "Understanding what STEM mentoring ecosystems need to thrive: A STEM-ME framework." Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 29.1 (2021): 110-135.[2] Lisberg, Anneke, and Brett Woods. "Mentorship, mindset and learning strategies: An integrative approach to increasing underrepresented minority student retention in a STEM undergraduate program."Journal of STEM education 19.3 (2018).[3] Kumar, Amruth, M. Doyle, V. Hong, A. Joshi, S. Kurkovsky and S. Rollins, "Helping Academically Talented STEM Students with Financial Need Succeed," 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Lincoln, NE, USA, 2021.[4] Cabrera, A. F
,in laying the groundwork for engineering interest. While early exposure often occurs throughengaging, hands-on activities, they are rarely framed as part of the engineering discipline. Withsupport from curriculum designers and educational leaders, elementary teachers can enhancestudents’ STEM learning by integrating basic engineering vocabulary and explaining whatengineers do in developmentally appropriate ways. As prior studies suggest, elementary school isa critical time for developing students’ interests [10], making it an ideal time to introduceengineering as a subject and a future career pathway. Empowering teachers with simple languagecues, accurate career context, and institutional support can help students develop theirengineering
Paper ID #45827Advancing Engineering Economics Instruction Through Open EducationalResources: Implementation, Instructor Feedback, and Student OutcomesDr. Tamara R Etmannski, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Tamara Etmannski is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada. She is also the Co-director of the Environmental Engineering program. Her role centers on curriculum development and teaching, with a focus on topics related to engineering impacts, including sustainability, leadership, economics, and entrepreneurship. Her
the Department of Learning and Instruction at the University at Buffalo. Her research lies at the intersection of language and STEM education, with a focus on equity, bi/multilingualism, and identity in community-based learning environments. She studies the linguistic practices of youth in STEM learning contexts, examining how their participation, meaning-making, and identities are represented through their languaging. Fatemeh brings to this work an academic background in language and literature, along with over a decade of teaching experience.Stacy M Scheuneman, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Stacy is a doctoral student in Curriculum, Instruction and the Science of Learning at the UB Graduate
Florida Dr. Harrison N Oonge is an assistant dean for academic planning in the College of Undergraduate Studies at the University of Central Florida (UCF). Harrison leads articulation and the curriculum alignment effort of 53 gateway courses between UCF and DirectConnect partner institutions. Prior to joining UCF, Harrison worked for three years at West Virginia University (WVU) as a project specialist in Undergraduate Academic Affairs and an adjunct professor in WVU’s College of Education and Human Services where he taught undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Harrison holds a B.A. in Education (Kenyatta University, Kenya), a M.A. in Special Education (WVU), and Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction (WVU). His
educational programming. Her research and evaluation has focused on educational programs, outreach and collective impact activities that foster inclusion and equity in computing and engineering. College student development and faculty career development are central themes across her body of work, which focuses on focus on capacity building in research and evaluation, organizational change in STEM education, and integration of computing into pedagogy.Dr. Praveen Ramaprabhu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Charlotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics (LMCFD). Starting with his
pursuing a B.S. in Chemical Engineering with a minor in Humanitarian Engineering at The Ohio State University. Involvement includes working as an Undergraduate Research Associate and Lead Undergraduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering Program within the Department of Engineering Education. Research interests focus on sense of belonging, concept mapping, instrument content validation, and metacognition.Sydney Cooper, The Ohio State University Sydney Cooper is pursuing her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is involved in the Department of Engineering Education as an Undergraduate Research Associate. Her research interests include inclusion in engineering.Dr. Krista M
Paper ID #48073Exploring Engineering Perceptions Among First-Year Undergraduate Studentsfrom Low-Income Schools: A Mixed Methods StudyJames Finn Morton, University of Georgia Finn Morton is an undergradute student at The University of Georgia. He wrote this paper because of his past experiences with his high school. Finn loves to swim, go to the gym, and take naps in his free time.Taiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia Taiwo is a highly skilled AI Engineer, Researcher, and Doctoral Student at the University of Georgia who completed his MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering in the College of Engineering. He is
results from our National Science Foundation (NSF) grantentitled Elementary Teacher Professional Learning in Equitable Engineering Pedagogies forMultilingual Students. This project works with third grade teachers of emerging multilingualstudents to integrate translanguaging practices into their classrooms as well as engineeringlessons. Preliminary results of our teachers' learning and growth as teachers of engineering canbe found in other papers [1], [2], [3]; this paper focuses on a major goal of our project, asustained professional learning experience model for elementary school teachers.IntroductionThe United States has and will continue to have an increase of English language learners, oremerging multilingual students, in elementary school