, Engineering and Mathematics) grant at a Northeastern USinstitution, is in its second year of a four-year plan. Grounded in Tinto’s conceptual model ofstudent motivation and persistence, the project emphasizes early interventions, which are criticalfor low-income students facing external challenges that may impact their decision to stay incollege or enter the workforce. We developed and integrated the SSTEM project aiming toincrease four key elements, which based on Tinto will also increase persistence. The SSTEM project includes scholarships, an Engineering Learning Community (ELC)that promotes cohort-based learning and living, mentorship, and participation in personal andprofessional development seminars. Additionally, inclusive practices
? Would you recommend integrating the CHE Calculator earlier in the curriculum? If the CHE Calculator were to be improved, what feature(s) would you prioritize? (Select all that apply) What do you perceive as the strengths and weaknesses of the CHE CALCULATOR®?The survey was distributed via an online platform accessible through the university's learningmanagement system. Participation was voluntary, and no direct incentives were provided forcompleting the survey.To analyze the responses, thematic analysis was conducted by identifying recurring themes acrossstudent feedback. The project team categorized responses into key themes such as usability,documentation, and problem-solving effectiveness.This study was reviewed by the institution's
engineering citizen/leader encompass reflection, self-assessment, self-confidence, qualifications, knowledge, skills, expertise, and cultural awareness. These valuesshould be demonstrated and promoted in educational institutions, especially in an environmentthat often prioritizes grades. Character development involves instilling honesty, integrity, fairness,trust, and respect in future engineering professionals. Responsibilities and roles should preparethem to be responsible engineering citizens and stewards of the profession. To enhance theireffectiveness as leaders and citizens, a focus on specific knowledge and skills is crucial, includingconsiderations for ethics, community involvement, societal impact, socioeconomic factors,environmental
ofcybersecurity professionals. The curriculum covered all GenCyber Cybersecurity Concepts: • Defense in Depth: A comprehensive strategy of including multiple layers of security within a system so that if one layer fails, another layer of security is already in place to stop the attack/unauthorized access. • Confidentiality: The property that information is not disclosed to individuals, devices, or processes unless they have been authorized to access the information. • Integrity: The property that information, an information system, or a component of a system has not been modified or destroyed in an unauthorized manner. • Availability: The property that information or information systems are accessible and
Paper ID #46702BOARD # 416: NSF S-STEM: Iron Range Engineering Academic Scholarshipsfor Co-Op Based Engineering EducationDr. Catherine Mcgough Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine Spence is an Associate Professor at Iron Range Engineering through Minnesota State University, Mankato Department of Integrated Engineering. She received her PhD in Engineering and Science Education in 2019 and a BS in Electrical Engineering in 2014 at Clemson University.Dr. Emilie A Siverling, Minnesota State University, Mankato Emilie A. Siverling is an Associate Professor of Integrated Engineering and the Iron Range Engineering
, hack, and make. In this paper, we explore theoretical andalternative design frameworks for integrating research into school and work, using a student-designed learning artifact called AlaskaCraft as an example of how the complexity of this historyand research has made its way into the classroom.Keywords: design, active learning, complexity, anthropology, Alaska, housing Research BackgroundThe learning activity presented in this paper – an education game called AlaskaCraft – is basedon a case study of the construction of home-building projects often referred to as cold climatehousing projects by the engineers, builders, and Alaska Native community members whocontributed to our research. These building
notation. Cline [25] showedstudents did not recognize the need for constants of integration in notation. Formula errors reported byLi [26] included frequent omission of required 𝑑𝑥 notation, as well as misuse of 𝑑𝑥, such as using 𝑑𝑥when the variable of integration was not 𝑥.The source of student struggle with calculus was identified by Li [26] as an overemphasis of proceduraltechniques over theory. Zehra [27] reports an adjusted curriculum with limits covered before derivativesand a focus on tutorials and instruction on the use of math software was reported to improve studentperformance in calculus.A study of student misconceptions in multivariable calculus using clickers to identify common problemswas reported by Cline [28]. The study
credit for Thermoand (2) Aerospace engineering majors need to take Fluid Mechanics in the fall of their 3rd year tograduate in 4 semesters. The faculty also decided to count an extra Intro to Engineering coursecredit toward one credit of their Computer Aided Design (CAD) course. They did this because acommon complaint from transfer students was that this aspect of the course was redundant forthem. To solve this issue, the Intro to Mech and Aero courses were split from 3 credits to a 2-credit Intro to major course and a 1-credit CAD lab course. Therefore, CC transfer students whofulfilled the pre-engineering curriculum also satisfied the CAD class.Beyond curriculum – integrating transfer students into the MAE community To address the post
” [9]. A “three theme” approach provides aframework for developing student understanding: 1) an introduction to basic principles isfollowed by 2) experience with mathematical solutions before 3) expanded exploration viamodern software solutions [5]. Similarly, a knowledge integration model calls for introduction,exploration, and reflection [7]. In one case study, teaching activities were scaffolded to matcheach of the six Bloom’s Taxonomy levels [12]. Homework questions at three Bloom’s levels(Understand, Analyze, Evaluate) effectively engaged students in another study [13]. When itcomes to content instruction, three stages of teaching/learning appear frequently in the literature.At the program level, engineering educators have also noted a
enables greater innovation in aircraft design and certification while maintaining safety.It is expected that the educational requirements for professionals in this field also need to adapt tomeet these new demands.Drones as Innovative Educational ToolDrones and Uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) serve as an effective educational tool to teachstudents the principles of electrical engineering by providing a hands-on and interdisciplinaryapproach. Using drones as a teaching tool can make electrical engineering concepts tangible andengaging for students. These devices integrate key electrical engineering concepts, such as circuitdesign, power systems, motor control, and signal processing, into a tangible, real-worldapplication. For instance, students
. Each NSTI program is unique in terms of the lengthand type of the program, curriculum, field trips, etc. We believe that this paper will be beneficialto the universities that wish to host the NSTI or any other similar pre-college summer programs.The organization of the rest of the paper is as follows: Section 2 discusses planning and recruitment;Section 3 presents program schedule; Section 4 showcases the curriculum activities; Section 5discusses the program evaluation and tips/lessons learned; finally, we conclude in Section 6.2. Planning and RecruitmentThe NSTI program at MTSU has a Program Director (PD) and a Program Assistant who are afaculty member and an academic coordinator in the Engineering Technology department,respectively. They
academicexperience, we also updated the Primary Traits of several criteria to ensure that thesource activity was explicit. Appendix B contains the details of which OutcomeCriteria were used to demonstrate each ABET Student Outcome.WorkloadWe willingly and intentionally chose to have 22 program student outcomes and 45student outcome criteria so that we could have granularity in our assessment datato inform curriculum change decisions. As an example, that granularity was helpfulas we decided curriculum changes to improve performance in our Program StudentOutcome 6. Experimental Methods and Data Analysis. Each quarter we met as adepartment for a half day to review the status of artifact gathering, assessment ofthe artifacts, and any proposed changes based on
Correspondence email: daniela.galatro@utoronto.caAbstractIndustry 5.0 (I.D. 5.0) envisions an efficient, productive industry with a strong societal role.Education 5.0 (E.D. 5.0) fosters human-centric, personalized, and collaborative learning,integrating advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML).Chemical Engineering (Chem Eng) courses like Process Design and Plant Design require studentsto integrate knowledge across disciplines to solve complex engineering problems. This workidentifies gaps in aligning I.D. 5.0 with E.D. 5.0 and present strategies for revamping CHE 334(Team Strategies for Engineering Design), a bridge course between Process Design and the PlantDesign capstone, emphasizing teamwork, leadership
ability to present content in a civil engineering context.Focus of this workThe focus of this work is to develop an approach to data science education for civil engineersthat addresses curricular restraints, the need for contextualization, and the need for specializedinstructor training. The proposed solution is to integrate data science directly into existing courseofferings through self-contained interactive modules. Rather than reorganize curriculum as wasdone for FEA, data science topics are taught alongside fundamental engineering topics in a waythat strengthens understanding of both.Presented here is one component of a larger initiative devoted to this effort, in the context of awidely offered undergraduate course, Mechanics of Materials
introduction of new programs. Yet, engineering technology programshave a lot to build upon the present achievements in curriculum adjustments. Forexample, the most recent National Academies report lists only one program each with thewords “control” and “robots” in the title (Pearson et al., 2017). The process of makingcontrol engineering an integral part of traditional STEM programs and introduction ofnew programs continues to this day. Moreover, the transformed nature of the newgeneration of potential students provides additional support for the need of curriculumadjustments (Rossiter et al., 2023).The knowledge of the basics of control engineering has a potential to shift STEAMstudents’ approaches in problem-solving towards more sustainable paths
seamlessly into diverse educational environments 10,11 .As IoT systems grow in complexity and ubiquity, understanding their security vulnerabilitiesbecomes crucial, especially given projections of cyberattack costs that reach $10. 5 trillion by2025 12,13 . It is vital that educational programs prepare future engineers and developers withrobust knowledge of these threats 14,15,16 .Several studies illustrate the integration of IoT into educational settings. Xia et al. describe an IoTarchitecture that facilitates the integration of objects from the real world into virtual academiccommunities (VAC), adapting existing architectural frameworks to educational needs 17 . Anotherstudy highlights the success of incorporating IoT into a humanities curriculum
itdifficult to offer an integrated curriculum.”One answer to this siloing of academics is the creation of interdisciplinary majors that span awide range of disciplines, such as Science, Technology, and Society (STS), which often bringstogether faculty research and teaching interests from vastly different disciplines and areas ofexpertise. As a field that traces its historical roots to roughly the mid-twentieth century, STSquite famously synthesizes, on the one hand, philosophical and theoretical approaches totechnoscience’s complex roles played in human cultures and societies with, on the other hand,rigorous hands-on applications of science and engineering methods and practices. In this context,STS represents a strong example of an inherently
include hardware, architecture, protocols, standards, andsecurity practices. The outcomes of the course are given as follows: • Describe, apply, and assess the performance of standard input and output components in industrial applications • Identify the power requirements for the operation of an IoT device • Define and describe standards, challenges, and best practices relating to security.The prerequisites of the course are Programming for Engineers and Applied Electricity andElectronics.2.2 Mixed Reality in ManufacturingThe coverage of this course is on MR applications in IIoT-based manufacturing systems,superimposing digital content onto physical systems, and integrating data from smart andconnected manufacturing production
Paper ID #48245A Case Study: Deploying a First-Year Engineering Course at a Sino-U.S.Joint Program AbroadNicholas Choi, University of California, Irvine Nicholas Choi is a master’s student in mechanical engineering at the University of California, Irvine. He is currently studying the impact of experiential learning in an engineering curriculum and the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in an engineering classroom.Dr. Kan Li, University of California, Irvine Dr. Kan Li is the Associate Director for the International Programs at the UCI’s Henry Samueli School of Engineering. With a strong background in
interventions to bridge the gap in programming self-efficacy. As programming is afoundational skill for engineering programs required by ABET General Criteria forBaccalaureate Level Programs, Criterion 5. Curriculum, which requires both computer scienceand “modern engineering tools” [11], programming is integrated into first year engineeringcourses. For students with high CPSES, these novice programming courses may feel like astepping stone. But for students with low CPSES, these introductory classes may become agatekeeper.Future WorkThis research aims to inform scalable, inclusive teaching practices in engineering education,addressing self-efficacy disparities and fostering persistence among diverse student populations.The next phase of the study will
research projects focused on energy storage and usage. As a teaching assistant, Michael has supported various courses, helping students bridge the gap between theory and application.Dr. Stacy K Firth, University of Utah Stacy K. Firth is an Assistant Professor (Lecturer) in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Utah. In her role, she focuses on Engineering education in grades K-12 and undergraduate education. She has developed an inclusive curriculum for a year-long Engineering exploration and projects course that is now taught in 57 Utah high schools. She also developed and provides professional development workshops for Elementary and Secondary science educators to support their teaching of
theoretical knowledge to real-world situations. This scenario integrates daily experiences, students' interests, and professional aspirations into the learning process.b. The authenticity of the social scenario reflects the complexities and interpersonal interactions students will face in real-world challenges. It emphasizes solving open-ended, interdisciplinary problems, thus mirroring the social dynamics of professional environments.c. The authenticity of the physical scenario ensures that students have access to professional equipment and tools used in actual engineering projects, as well as ample space for practical activities.By introducing real engineering scenarios into the curriculum, an interdisciplinary
served as the local arrangement chair for IEEE CLUSTER 2021. She was the guest editor for Special Issue on Integration of Cloud, IoT and Big Data Analytics, Software: Practice and Experience (Wiley Press). In addition, she has served on the technical program committee for a number of conferences, and as reviewer for various journals.Dr. Kristin Lesseig, Washington State University Kristin Lesseig is an Associate Professor of Mathematics Education and Academic Director for the College of Education at Washington State University Vancouver. She earned her PhD at Oregon State University and currently teaches elementary and secondary mathematics content and methods courses in addition to doctoral classes in mathematics and
college in 1995, and created an integrated freshman engineering curriculum in1998. Louisiana Tech has a long history of educational innovations in engineering education,with a hands-on project based approach implemented in 2004, and four other NSF fundedprograms to increase student success in engineering since 2007.The SUCCESS Scholars Program (SSP) is an NSF funded effort established in Fall of 2022 tobuild on these prior efforts by providing financial, academic, personal, and professional supportto engineering students starting in their first year of college through four years of academicstudy. Two cohorts of students have completed their first year of this program which includedthree to four additional days of supplemental instruction a week
intechnology introducing ethical challenges that extend beyond technical considerations. Forexample, artificial intelligence systems often perpetuate biases against marginalized groups, andhealthcare technologies risk exacerbating inequities in access and outcomes [5], [7]. Similarly,environmental sustainability initiatives, though widely recognized as an ethical imperative, oftenfail to address the disproportionate impacts of environmental degradation on underservedcommunities [12], [13]. These issues illustrate that ethical engineering cannot be limited totechnical problem-solving; it must also consider the broader social context and impacts oftechnological decisions.Despite growing awareness of DEI in engineering practice, its integration into
Paper ID #45604Harnessing Generative AI for Educators: Case Study of Accurate WildfireLocation MappingProf. Asif Ahmed, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute Asif Ahmed is an Assistant Professor at College of Engineering at SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Utica, New York. Dr. Ahmed is a strong advocate of STEM education, inclusion of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in curriculum. Primarily trained as a Geotechnial Engineer, Dr. Ahmed’s current research also focuses on engineering education. Currently, his interest is modification of the civil engineering curriculum to accomodate the infrastructure monitoring
Without Prerequisites and Open to Any Major. In 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference.19. Shlayan, N., Giglia, M., Mezhiborsky, D., Lu, J., & Quarantino, G. (2022, October). Moving towards a Student-Centered Curriculum with Hybrid Learning: Integrating an Extracurricular Autonomous Vehicles Project into the Electrical Engineering Program. In 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.20. Lau, E., Lei, C. U., Ng, J., Lui, K. S., Lam, K. H., Hew, T. K., & Tam, V. (2020, December). Designing an Autonomous Vehicle System Design Course for COVID-19 Remote Learning under First Principles of Instruction Framework. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for
[2]. Civil engineering is no exception.The following project describes a week-long training program run through the KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network’s (KEEN) Engineering Unleashed faculty developmentprogram focused on implementing an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) into the structures andmechanics courses of a civil engineering curriculum. The first two cohorts of participants havesuccessfully completed the workshop and begun to implement EML concepts into their courses.These participants were surveyed and the results demonstrate the gains made in their knowledgeand ability to teach EML topics. Included are a series of examples and lessons learned from thisproject.BackgroundMuch has been written about EM and its value to the economy, a
functionsthat facilitate comprehensive control and feedback from the robot.Using these blocks specific to MBot in conjunction with the Scratch default set of blocks, userscan create complex programs that manage robot behaviors and interactions within itsenvironment. This combination enhances not only the educational experience by making roboticsmore accessible but also the capabilities of developers without a thorough programmingexperience exploring robotics. An illustration of a program using the MBot Scratch Extension isshown in Figure 3.5 Curriculum Case StudiesTo demonstrate the effectiveness of the educational tools described in the previous section, wedescribe case studies consisting of courses developed at the University of Michigan which
IdentitiesWPI is a STEM institution that has an integrative curriculum incorporating humanities and socialscience exploration. Undergraduate students who engage in research are at a critical stage ofprofessional identity formation, as they transition from being a consumer to a producer ofknowledge (Dutta, Pashak, McCullough, Weaver & Heron, 2019). Approximately 30% of ourstudents opt into a first-year, project-based experience that is interdisciplinary, often outside oftheir major, and wicked problem-focused seminar. Thus, the first experience students have withresearch is typically outside of their major area and is a human-subjects research project. Yet, in our collective experiences, students do not tend to understand these projects