with anexternal consultant, 20+ faculty members reflected on and identified a plan to enact equity-minded and inclusive teaching and learning practices. Specifically, they identified deficit-mindedand equity-minded statements on teaching documents, self-assessed their teaching philosophystatement and course syllabus, and designed a feedback/assessment component.Jumpstart boostcamp & Facilitator Training: The Jumpstart Boostcamp is a one-week longonboarding experience for incoming freshman CECS students. This program ameliorated thelack of high school rigor that inhibits academic success for some of our students, many of whomare first-generation college students. Jumpstart Bootcamps were offered right before the Fallsemesters. CBP also
students in STEM majors were recruited for this study, which encompasses twointerviews over the 2024-25 academic year. To date, 29 students, 13 of whom are engineeringmajors, have participated in their first interview, which focused on their science or engineeringidentities. We plan to conduct second round interviews with these participants in the comingspring, which will focus on possible selves [18]. Open-ended, semi-structured interviews lasted approximately 30-60 minutes in lengthand were transcribed, with one exception for a participant who wished not to be recorded. Thetranscripts were summarized and then analyzed using a combination of deductive and inductiveapproaches [19]. Transcript data was first categorized according to Godwin’s
academic performance in a large field study," PLOS ONE, vol. 12, 02/04 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187078.[5] S. E. Carrell, T. Maghakian, and J. E. West, "A's from Zzzz's? The Causal Effect of School Start Time on the Academic Achievement of Adolescents," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 62-81, 2011, doi: 10.1257/pol.3.3.62.[6] J. Klein, "Planning middle school schedules for improved attention and achievement," Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research - SCAND J EDUC RES, vol. 48, pp. 441-450, 09/01 2004, doi: 10.1080/0031383042000245825.[7] R. A. d. Cruz, "Class Schedule and Performance: Does Time of the Day Affect Students’ Learning?," ed. Laguna State
and applicability for the students. Whether the game activities improved studentperformance on other course deliverables is more difficult to assess. In general, students whowon in the investment game received high grades in the course relative to the mean, but causalitycannot be established from the data collected, partially because there is an element of luckinvolved in the game. A continued effort to improve the implementation these game-basedactivities is ongoing. In the future, the instructor-of-record plans to make the game component asmandatory for students and collect more data at the end of the semester to further correlate withthe measurable course outcomes. Logistically, the activities were implemented within the Canvaslearning
educators can significantly improvestudents’ understanding of disaster resilience, proactive planning, and the ethical use oftechnology in civil engineering contexts.IntroductionThe frequency of wildfires in California has markedly increased in recent years, driven by acombination of climatic and anthropogenic factors. Rising temperatures, prolonged droughts, andshifting precipitation patterns, all exacerbated by climate change, have created more favorableconditions for wildfires (Lee and Banerjee 2021, Keelay, J. et al. 2009). Additionally, increaseddevelopment in fire-prone areas and accumulated vegetation due to past fire suppression effortshave further heightened the risk. As a result, the state has seen a surge in both the number andintensity
.2022.05.008[5] Oberski, D. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In J. Robertson & M. Kaptein (Eds.), Modern Statistical Methods for HCI (pp. 275–287). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_12[6] Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932[7] D. E. Montaño and D. Kasprzyk, "Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model," in Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice 5 ed., San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2015, pp. 95-124.[8] Wilson, S., Huth, A., Lamer, S., Hammer, J
the national codes andadding 7th and 8th digits when more detail is required in the definitions. In the 2020 Texas CIPcode structure [16], the construction programs may be classified under one of the followingcodes, including two and four-year programs: • 14 – Engineering o 14.3301.00 – Construction Engineering • 15 –Engineering/Engineering Technologies/Technicians o 15.1001.00 – Construction Engineering Technology/Technician • 19 –Family and Consumer Sciences/Human Sciences o 19.0604.00 – Facilities Planning and Management • 46 – Construction Trades o 46.0000.00 – Construction Trades, General o 46.0412.00 – Building/Construction Site Management/Manager • 52 – Business
Framework and video-recorded her classroom implementation. The design task was taught over the course of 7sessions, lasting a total of 3.5 hours. After teaching the design task, Serena participated in a 20-minute-long semi-structured interview during which she described her community and classroomcontexts. This interview data was used to provide a rich description of Serena and her classroomenvironment but was not analyzed for use in supporting the classroom video coding due to thepurpose of the interview. Thus, data sources for the case study included Serena's lesson plan andclassroom video footage.4.4. Data AnalysisWe used a multileveled coding approach inspired by the COPED [34]. First, we coded all databased on the CRED Framework. To do this we
plan. These proposals have been part of the course where instructor experience isused to provide feedback on how challenging their proposed work is. In many cases, students tendto be overambitious, and we use the proposal to describe a spiral-like design approach where theover-ambitious ideas can be promised as additional features instead of promised deliverables.4 Results and Discussion of the ActivityThe constraint-based pinball project yielded an array of designs from our student teams. Figure 2showcases 10 of the 13 completed projects (where 3 of them were not properly documented by theauthor), where each design demonstrates different approaches to the challenges posed by the card-board pinball framework. Also, the quality of the final
. Tehranipoor. Hardware security: a hands-on learning approach.Morgan Kaufmann, 2018.[6] V. A. DeCoster, "The needs of military veterans returning to college after service,"International Journal of Arts & Sciences, vol. 11. no. 1, pp. 11-19, 2018.[7] Intergragency Working Group on Veterans and Military Spouses in STEM FederalCoornidation in STEM Education Subcommittee Committee on STEM Education of the NationalScience and Technology Council, “STRATEGIC PLAN TO IMPROVE REPRESENTATIONOF VETERANS AND MILITARY SPOUSES IN STEM CAREERS,”https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-03/12-21_CoSTEM-STEM-Vets-Plan.pdf(accessed May 2, 2025).`[8] A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman, “Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts ofreading, writing
askedabout their motivations for enrolling in non-credit-bearing online courses, the perceived value ofthese courses, and the challenges associated with balancing them alongside formal education. (3)Future Academic and Career Plans: Discussions included students’ aspirations for graduateeducation, industry roles, and the factors influencing their decision-making processes. A visualof these three key areas can be seen in Figure 2. below.Figure 2. Three Key AreasThe interviews lasted 30–45 minutes on average and were audio-recorded with participants'consent. The recordings were transcribed verbatim for analysis, and identifying information wasremoved to ensure confidentiality.Data AnalysisA thematic analysis was performed on the interview transcripts
AMPLIFY InstitutePilot Implementation and EvaluationThis activity has been refined over three offerings of the AMPLIFY Institute during the fallterms of 2022, 2023, and 2024. To date, 66 EIF from 32 HSIs across the USA have completedthe ICVF reflection activity. It evolved from a broad exploration of leadership in the 2022 cohortto a more targeted, project-focused approach to leadership in the 2023 and 2024 offerings. Theinitial 2022 Institute explored three leadership frameworks centered around beliefs [39], [40],identity [40], and styles [4]. In practice, time constraints and participant feedback led to theomission of several planned activities associated with the leadership frameworks, shifting from amultifaceted approach to focusing solely on
content delivery, forprompting discussions and immersing students better in the content, but noted that AI cannotreplicate the empathy humans share.AI literacy influenced instructor’s technological knowledge (TK) by enabling them toexperiment with AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, for tasks such as lesson planning andcontent generation. However, skepticism remained about the effectiveness of these tools intechnical fields, with Michael stating, “I tried using AI to generate slides, but it wasn’t fruitful”.Pedagogical knowledge (PK) was adapted to mitigate AI misuse by students, with instructorsincorporating probing techniques to elicit genuine responses and deeper engagement. Some hadintentionally utilized AI to generate incorrect answers to
includes: transportation infrastructure planning and design, infrastruct ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engagement in Practice: A Case Study in Construction Engineering Practicum Course at The CitadelIntroductionSuccessful Construction Engineering programs engage students in meaningful projects thatmotivate them to exceed minimum expectations. Undergraduate capstone projects, ofteninvolving real clients, site visits, and milestone briefings, prepare students for professional roles.However, students sometimes overlook the community impact of their work. Beyond estimates,schedules, analyses, and design, hands-on construction experience is essential. While
data between institutions, and promotion ofa sense of belonging in students [3], [13], [14], [16], [17], [18]. Additionally, GE@SF includesshared investment in student support services, physical collaboration and laboratory spaces onthe SF campus; UF faculty engagement and instruction at SF; and high-impact experientiallearning [19], [20]. Details of program structures are discussed below. These structures, whichrequired 4 years of careful collaborative planning between the two institutions, allow SF and UFto establish meaningful relationships, guidance, and support of students two or more years beforematriculation on the UF campus.Academic Transition and Support StructuresTo assist with the academic transition from high school to SF and from
strengthenaerospace engineering education and research, leveraging advanced infrastructure andinstitutional support. Three strategic directions guide these efforts: 1. Partnership Expansion: Building on the success of BP-AE, we secured funding through NSF grants to expand best practices to five additional institutions and enhance mentorship structures. Plans include applying for additional NSF funding to develop innovative strategies and expand collaborations. Ultimately, the goal is to establish a regional consortium to promote sustainable and transformative efforts. 2. Sustained Engagement: We pursued additional funding to ensure lasting impact. Successful proposals include the University of South Florida’s Hy
panel approval of any updates following the pilot testing. Followingthis, we plan to disseminate our definition and framework more broadly to our education andindustry partners, as stated in the NSF proposal. This dissemination will occur in the form ofeducational/professional development modules and seminars/information sessions with thesepartners. This will naturally result in further “testing” and validation of the framework anddefinition. We will recruit additional industry partners (beyond the panel members) atconferences and through our professional contacts to assist in dissemination and validation.References 1. Cleland, D. (1990). Project management: Strategic design and implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 333-334. 2
camp, researchers’ fieldnotes, and pictures of students’work and final projects. In this paper, we focused on the video piece of the planning/scopingsession, which included 5 kids who came from different subteams and reorganized a new groupto construct tasks for all of the other groups to complete. We applied an inductive codingapproach. (Thomas, 2006) We went through the classroom observation transcripts, field notes,teacher reflections, and student post-interview transcripts, and assigned codes based on what wesaw. The initial rough codes included "student engagement", "negotiation", "collaboration","assign duties", "leadership" and so on. Then we refined and grouped codes and we focused thecode and signal moments that evidenced 1) students
paper presents two frameworks for practicing troubleshooting skills in the classroom. We have developed andpiloted these in circuits courses, but expect that they can generalize to laboratory courses in other disciplines. Theuniformity in faults in both frameworks allows for comparison of student approaches and success, making theseframeworks promising for student assessment and research purposes. Work is ongoing to study how effective theseframeworks are at teaching and assessing troubleshooting. For future work, we plan to report results measuring howconsistently students fill in the observation worksheet, using the pre-class troubleshooting observation as a controlfor all students. We also will consider how students’ knowledge of both
spatial ability for blind and low-vision populations. His research has helped inform teaching methods and develop strategies for improving STEM education accessibility. Currently, he is studying how AI tools are utilized by students across USU’s colleges to optimize their educational value. Daniel has also served as president of the ASEE student chapter at USU where he initiated outreach activities at local K-12 schools and promoted student engagement in research.Rosemary Yahne, Utah State University Rosemary Yahne is an undergraduate student at Utah State University. She plans to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in civil engineering with a minor in geology. Her research interests include spatial ability impact on
discrimination as it requires a level of boldness that is not easily measured inLikert-scaled items. Also, differences in HEP experiences are not included in this quantitative analysis.Lastly, the quantitative analysis, though separated by participation in HEPs for comparison, does notprovide insight on how the HEPs might have impacted these attitudes and behaviors toward professionalresponsibility or inclusive behaviors.Note that alongside this analysis, the research team has performed interviews to complement and betterexplain the quantitative results. The qualitative results from the interviews are planned for publicationelsewhere with thorough analysis and reference to conclusions from the survey. Many dimensions in thesurvey were excluded from this
courseimplementation to further build trust and manage hierarchies that can sometimes develop inprofessional development learning spaces. Managing trust is particularly vital to programs withshared leadership, such as our FLC. In effect, FLC leaders are responsible for promoting thework of the FLC locally, which can expand participation and can deepen faculty involvement,improving the ownership of the SRC approach at each site, while simultaneously sharing theworkload of developing and facilitating FLC lesson plans and sessions.DiscussionOverall, as the FLC group expands and includes more faculty in its leadership and learning roles,expansions and adaptations become more refined across multiple institutional and departmentalcontexts, and student response
. Felder, R. Brent, and M. Prince, "Engineering instructional development: Programs, bestpractices, and recommendations," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 89–122,2011.[7] C. Finelli, S. Daly, and K. Richardson, "Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Designing aninstitutional change plan using local evidence," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no.2, pp. 331–361, 2014.[8] S. Ma, G. Herman, M. West, J. Tomkin, and J. Mestre, "Studying STEM faculty communitiesof practice through social network analysis," The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 90, no. 5, pp.773–799, 2019.[9] E. Wenger, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge UniversityPress, 1988.[10] J. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and
built into ROS), though CoppeliaSim (16%) and WebBots (2%),continue to exist. Meanwhile Microsoft canceled its MS Robotics Developer Studio project, aspart of its 2015 restructuring plan. We also see that the relative adoption of Python vs C / C++has essentially flip-flopped, with Python growing from 31% to 51% and C/C++ shrinking from52% to 32%.When asked why they choose ROS for their classes, over half of the comments refer to it being astandard in industry and an expectation for their graduates rather than citing any superiortechnical feature of the language. As we shape our programs, one of our responsibilities is toprepare students for the workforce by arming them with in-demand skills and tools. While this islaudable, history suggests
sustainability strategy, energy usage plans, and environmental impactassessments for their projects. LEED provides a comprehensive scoring rubric that covers a widerange of criteria—including site feasibility, energy efficiency, water conservation, materials andresources, and indoor environmental quality—making the evaluation process systematic yetchallenging. Compared to more generalized writing tasks, LEED Narratives demand bothtechnical precision and effective communication skills. Because LEED already has clearevaluation frameworks, instructors theoretically have a strong foundation for offering specificand actionable feedback.Nevertheless, in practice, delivering timely and personalized feedback faces several obstacles.First, many students lack
engineer.Capstone I Course (ECE 4900)Capstone I is the first course in the two-part senior design sequence. In this course, studentscomplete several key milestones: 1. Team formation 2. Project proposal and approval 3. Project planning 4. Procurement of hardware components 5. Proof of concept for critical circuits 6. Preliminary Design Review (PDR)Topics covered include: Engineering design methodology Project selection and need Identification Requirement specification development Concept generation and evaluation Team dynamics and collaboration Ethics and legal considerations in engineering Basics of Engineering EconomicsEach team meets weekly with a faculty advisor to review progress
Pig, Feed Pig, Weigh Pig," Occasional Paper #23, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, 2014.6. M. Davis, "Outcomes-based education: History, philosophy, and practice," Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 21-30, Mar. 2003.7. S. R. Smith, "AMEE Guide No. 14 Outcome-Based Education Part 2-Planning, Implementing and Evaluating a Competency-Based Curriculum," Medical Teacher, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 164-170, 1999.8. B. Frank, K. Moozeh, and S. Maw, "A systematic Review of Drivers and Barriers to Competency-Based Undergraduate Engineering Education," Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA-ACEE) Conference, June 19-2022, 2023, Kelowna, BC. 2023, Paper 155.9. H. Lurie and R. Garrett
through the establishment of this competition: (i) exposing students fromdiverse groups to career opportunities in pavement and asphalt materials engineering and (ii)exposing students from diverse groups to opportunities for graduate studies and research overall.This work-in-progress paper presents a brief literature review, which encouraged the furtherdevelopment of this competition, and a summary of the project’s planning and structure. Futureresults of surveys and outcomes of the project will be presented in a future paper based on thefindings presented herein and the results of the first competition held at the University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign.Literature ReviewPrevious studies have demonstrated student competitions as an effective
. The research shows that using AR and gamificationimproves young children's learning, especially in alphabet writing [14]. Also,Thompson et al. conducted a comprehensive, multi-year study to identify andcharacterize educational Augmented Reality environments suitable for students ofvarious ages and skill levels. Throughout the research, the students, parents, andteachers actively collaborated to plan, construct, and enhance six AR prototypes. Basedon their student’s positive outcomes, these kinds of software can be used in classrooms.[15]. Students need to be active participants in their learning, fully engaged inexploring the various aspects of 21st-century education. Moreover, there is a necessityto enhance the demanded qualifications