and Education: A Review of Current Trends and Future DirectionsAbstractThe construction sector has experienced significant technological advancements in recent years,with Building Information Modeling (BIM) playing a crucial role in enhancing project efficiencyand collaboration. This study investigates the integration of Virtual Reality (VR) in construction,emphasizing its potential to revolutionize various aspects of the building process, includingdesign, planning, project management, and stakeholder collaboration. VR empowersstakeholders by enabling informed decision-making, issue detection, and operationaloptimization through real-time visualization and simulation in immersive 3D environments.Meanwhile, BIM provides a
RobotAbstractThe abundance of connections between art and engineering are opportunities to engageartistically inclined students who may not think of themselves as interested in robotics, and toinspire engineering-inclined students to express themselves artistically. This work presents a toolkit and lesson plan for a hands-on introductory robotics activity centering how art and engineeringinfluence each other. The Artistic Non-Inertial Tracer (ANT) is a three-link robot made oforigami, which contacts the ground through markers that trace patterns as it slithers around. Thedesign is capable of forward, turning, backward, and diagonal motion. Using origami for the bodyhighlights the influence of art on engineering, and the gait traces are a visually
students’ perceptions of what affected their application to a specific engineeringmajor and how these perceptions related to their motivation to persist in engineering. Previousresearch has examined how students learn about, select, and apply to engineering majors acrossvarious universities and disciplines, but not all students get into their first-choice major,disrupting their academic plan. Understanding how this disruption affects student motivation isimportant in the continued work in attracting a diverse range of students to engineering andcreating an inclusive and supportive environment to promote student success, retention, andgraduation. An academic plan disruption, such as not being admitted into their major or programof choice, may
situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Characterizing Design Activity engagement: Summary of Insights from Year Three – NSF RFEAbstract:In this paper, we aim to highlight how understanding the factors influencing civil and mechanicalengineering students’ engagement in capstone design activities can affect course planning andtranslate to increased student engagement with capstone design activities. We build uponfindings from previous studies as well as current work funded through the NSF RFE programexploring engineering students' engagement and motivation in capstone design activities.Introduction:Capstone design courses
? Professional Organizations Week 2 Student Success Resources Advising Activity 1 Major Exploration Wix E-Portfolio Setup Goals/Organization/Time Management Cybersecurity and Password Management Week 3 Engineering Tactics to Project Management for Individuals Semester Planning Activity Team Management Weekly Outline (self-care, course Engineering Design Process work, work/life) My Academic Success Plan Week 4 Wellbeing
grants.project design and execution Singing-Dancing Toy Modification ScheduleBeginning in 2022, BME added two Week 1: Structure of the Design Report Week 2: Background/ Problem Definition/Document toy operationservice-learning projects, one to the Week 3: Learn basic lab skills and safety protocolssophomore lab and one to junior lab, Week 4: Plan and circuit diagramspecifically to incorporate more Week 5: Work timeindustry-style design report writing. Week 6: Design evaluation and recommendations
progress made in implementing FYE2.0 to date and discusses plans for the future.1.0 BackgroundFirst-year engineering programs (FYE) are a common way for students to be introduced to theengineering profession. [1]. FYE programs typically include one or two introductory courses on avariety of topics. The content of FYE courses can include any combination of topics such as design,communication, professional skills (e.g., teamwork, leadership), and engineering specifictechnology/tools (e.g., MATLAB, CAD) [2]. Fostering interactions between first-year studentsand faculty/upper division engineering students have been shown to aid in the retention ofengineering students. The goals of FYE programs are typically: • Provide FYE students with
project along with the plan for the second and third year of the project, with thegoal of having a completely modularized first-year engineering course structure by the start ofthe third year.Background:A First Year Engineering (FYE) 1.0 program is one of the more popular models used byinstitutions of higher education around the U.S. for introducing students to the field ofengineering and facilitating the transition into their chosen discipline [1]. The primarycomponent of most of these programs is an introductory engineering course or sequence thatcontains a variety of topics important for general engineering practice and matriculation in anengineering degree program, such as design, communication (i.e., written, oral, and visual),global
Erten-Unal, Old Dominion University Mujde Erten-Unal is a Professor and the Graduate Program Director in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Old Dominion University. She has a Master of Engineering in Environmental & Planning Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the Science and Technology University of Missouri-Rolla. She has worked in industry as a project engineer before joining ODU. Her research interests include adaptive design to climate change and sea level rise (SLR), sustainable development, pollution prevention and wastewater treatment. She has been involved in trans-disciplinary collaboration among students from ODU civil engineering and Hampton University architecture
of frustrations experienced by children—difficulties in solutionplanning, material handling, achieving desired outcomes, and time constraints—as well ascaregivers’ frustrations that stemmed from planning and collaborating during the makingchallenge with the child. Findings highlight different strategies that caregivers used to mitigatetheir frustrations, such as providing suggestions, assistance, and emotional support, which helpedmaintain the child’s engagement and motivation to complete the engineering challenge. Ourfindings provide insights on how to effectively design online engineering programs that guideand support rural families to develop positive attitudes toward engineering.IntroductionSTEM programs offered by public libraries hold
. Part 0: Project Planning: Students begin by creating aGantt chart outlining project tasks, timelines, and dependencies. Part 1: Requirement Analysis:Next, students study the MRTD specification 2 and project requirements, identifying ambiguitiessuch as unclear performance metrics. Part 2: Implementation and Unit Testing: students developand test the encoding and decoding algorithms. They adopt test-driven design, mocking forhardware and database components, and apply mutation testing to gauge how thoroughly their testsuite detects potential errors. Part 3: Performance Measurement: The students then measured howefficiently their algorithms handle large inputs containing 10,000 MRTD records, one encodedand one decoded. They record execution times
STEM education. Teachers were recruitedfrom diverse school districts and regions, provided with room, board, and a stipend, and engagedin research, training, and curriculum development activities. They received instruction on anddiscussed topics of ethics, with an emphasis on science, technology, and engineering, developedlesson plans, and created posters showcasing their integration strategies. The participants alsointeracted with other E3 groups to explore best practices in engineering education. This paperdescribes the teacher selection process, program structure, and key outcomes, including ongoingdiscussions to assess the integration of ethics into their curricula. Lessons learned from thisexperience will inform future efforts to enhance
program or from an undergraduate to a graduate program, by providing multiple curricular pathways and developing new bridge courses. ● Ensuring successful completion of S-STEM scholar's academic degrees by developing a holistic S-STEM scholar recruitment plan with academic support, faculty mentoring, learning communities, and various enrichment programs towards successful completion.Offering Multiple Curricular Pathways for Higher Degree Attainment: The singularlydistinctive feature of this project is the development of a multi-tier curriculum plan, whichextends from recruitment to new A.A.S- CIT A.A.S- METpathways for selected scholars fromAssociate Degree level to a Master's
use of their own metacognitive skillsthrough self-reporting and intends to expand on instructor-guided future implementation ofpedagogical interventions that support student’s metacognitive skills.Theoretical Framework This study is grounded in the theoretical framework presented in Fostering Metacognitionto Support Student Learning and Performance [4], which defines metacognition as an individual'sawareness and understanding of their own cognitive processes. Metacognition is conceptualized intwo interrelated domains: (1) metacognitive knowledge, which encompasses declarative,procedural, and conditional knowledge, and (2) metacognitive regulation, which involves theprocesses of planning, monitoring, and evaluating one’s cognitive
activity were broken into 4 milestones throughout the semester which include: 1) Sketch and Initial Plan for Design (25 pt Homework) 2) 3D Model of Design (25 pt Homework) 3) Initial 3D printed item (25 pt Homework) 4) Final object with painted detail (100 pt Project Deliverable)They are first asked to submit an initial plan for their design. This plan had to include: (1) A sketchof the design that shows three views including an isometric view, (2) dimensions must be providedon the sketch, and (3) Plan for materials used for completed object such as: which parts will be 3Dprinted and how details will be added. This was then reviewed by the professor who providedexpert feedback related to suggestions in how to 3D model it, and any
the Monarch Accelerator Program to Engineering(MAP2E) program. The MAP2E Program was developed to assist students who desire to becomeengineers but may need additional assistance in math and science. and it allows students todevelop their math and science skills while creating a pathway to personal or professionalenriching skills. Furthermore, the MAP2E program allows students to develop their math andscience skills and create parallel pathways to personal or professionally enriching skills. Forinstance, a student may hope to one day start their own engineering firm. A businessadministration pathway would allow students to become engineers while learning accounting,economics, and financial planning skills, enhancing their career prospects.As
, 2025 Work in Progress: Preparing an Interdisciplinary Cohort of Postdoctoral Scholars for Convergent Quantum Education ResearchBackgroundThis Work-in-Progress paper describes the professional development efforts planned for a cohortof three postdoctoral scholars who will engage in convergence research to advance equity andinclusion in the emerging field of quantum information science and engineering (QISE). Theoverall project is funded by an NSF Organizational Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. Thefellows will be drawn from a diverse set of fields, including physics, engineering, STEMeducation, psychology, sociology, and cultural studies. Together, they will explore researchquestions that build an understanding of how quantum
Paper ID #46064BOARD # 214: Project Drider - Teaching Students about the Dangers ofTicks the Fun Way (Work in Progress)Joshua Dahl, University of Nevada, Reno Joshua Dahl is currently a student at the University of Nevada, Reno. He is pursuing a Masters with an emphasis Computer Science and Engineering but more specifically Compiler Design and Developer Experience. When he graduates he is planning on pursuing a Ph.D. in Computer Science where he hopes to continue to make contributions to both the fields of Computer Graphics and Programming Languages.Erik Marsh, University of Nevada, RenoLandon Wright, University of IdahoQuinn
Instructional Benefits of a Web-Based Students’ Concurrent Course Registration ToolAbstractData-driven approaches have the potential to reshape course design and lesson planning inmodern education by providing instructors with actionable insights into student learningenvironments. A web-based tool has recently been developed to offer instructors real-time accessto students’ concurrent course registration data. Initially developed to help instructors highlightinterdisciplinary connections between courses, the tool has shown broader potential for enhancingcourse design and instructional strategies. By revealing key information, such as how manystudents are concurrently enrolled in prerequisites or are taking high-demand
particularly rich sitefor examining AI integration because it combines my deep familiarity with the course's coreacademic functions with active pedagogical experimentation, allowing for consideration of howAI might support both established practices and innovative approaches.Data. Autoethnography, as a form of ethnography, involves both participation in events of thespace being studied and observation of that space as well. In the context of autoethnography,participation involves the researcher doing what they are already doing, while observation cantake many forms. In this case, traces of the participation represented the core of the datacollection. These traces included educator planning and reflection documents, conversations withthe generative AI
, academic advisorsjoin the class and the instructor-of-record to help students understand their degree plans, selectappropriate courses for the following semester, and plan their academic trajectory. The activeinvolvement of academic advisors ensures that students receive timely and relevant guidance,which is particularly important for those still uncertain about their major.One of the course’s unique features is its integration of faculty presentations from across the sixdepartments within the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology without an increase in the effective workload of any faculty member. During theremaining twelve weeks of the course, students see presentations about the programs offeredwithin the
larger project (not just the subpart they were working on). Figure 1. The cyclical “wheel” conceptualization of the research process domains presented to CURE implementers.Separate survey data on CURE implementation was collected over two academic years (2022and 2023). Prior to starting their CUREs, faculty completed a pre-survey where they were askedto provide demographic information and basic plans for their courses. Following completion oftheir CURE, the faculty members answered a mix of Likert-type and open-ended survey 2questions to provide a more detailed picture of each faculty’s CURE, including
. Data Collection Multi-faceted data were collected: students’ demographics (gender, First-generationcollege student or not, URM or not), course assignments and assessment grades (two quizzes andfinal exam), overall course grade, learning strategies completion status, and responses to weeklyLearning Journal surveys. In addition, a Beginning-of-Quarter survey and an End-of-Quartersurvey (Appendix 1) were used to gather information on students’ familiarity with variouslearning techniques. Learning Journals then serve as a weekly reflection and planning method forstudents’ learning. In particular, the weekly learning journals asked students to indicate their timespent on learning activities in the past week and to rate the confidence level
characteristics of the community before highway construction. o The planning and decision-making processes, including public engagement or resistance. o The immediate and long-term impacts of the project on the affected community. c) Critical Analysis and Reflection: Students were instructed to analyze the disproportionate effects of these projects on low-income and marginalized communities, reflected on the lessons for contemporary civil engineering practices, and proposed frameworks for integrating DEI principles into modern infrastructure planning. d) Presentation Requirements: Students were tasked with creating a 15-minute equivalent PowerPoint presentation to convey their findings
. By all accounts, the program was a success, and plans to double enrollment for summer2025 are in progress (applications increased fourfold for summer 2025). The sections belowprovide additional background information about the program, an overview of curriculumdevelopment, and a discussion of initial outcomes (including student perspectives), conclusions,and plans for future work.BackgroundThis summer academy was many years in the making, originating as the dream of Jeff Harper, anexecutive from X-energy engineering firm and a veteran in the field. As an underrepresentedminority, Dr. Harper is keenly interested in making nuclear engineering more inviting andengaging to a wide range of workers. Notably, most students in the
completed—a 42% response rate,based on the total number of participating students who received the email invite (n = 50). Afterreviewing all responses, we analyzed the survey data and presented the results to the EMleadership team at the lead institution, along with college-based staff associated with EM. Basedon the survey responses, student demographics revealed a high percentage of students whoidentified as Black (38%), first-generation (81%), low-income (62%), and having a disability(43%), which underscores the program’ success in reaching underserved populations.ResultsAcademic backgroundsWe asked students about their academic background—i.e., questions about their academic plans,how they learned about the program, and why they chose to join
questions reported by Frisbie and Becker [1].A total of 45 true-false questions were written for four tests. The Operations, Design I, and Design II testseach had ten true-false questions while the Planning test had fifteen. The number of true-false questionsincluded on each version of each test is detailed on Table 1. The numbers shown in parentheses representtrue only and false only questions. A true only question was only written as a true statement, and a falseonly question was only written as a false statement. The true only and false only questions appeared oneach version of a test. The numbers outside of the parentheses represent the true and false variants. Thesewere the questions that were written as a true statement and as a corresponding
, How, When? Wentworth Institute of TechnologyAbstractAs the construction industry increasingly adopts advanced sensing and mapping technologies,such as GPS, LiDAR, and 3D scanning, there is a growing imperative to integrate these toolsinto undergraduate Construction Management curricula. This study explores three key questions:(1) What are the justifications for incorporating these technologies? (2) What are the mosteffective methods for teaching them through experiential and virtual learning approaches? and(3) At what stage in undergraduate education is it optimal to introduce these technologies?A survey conducted among 121 undergraduate students enrolled in Estimating and Plan Readingcourses and insights gathered
our university. The two-week-long program, modeled after college-level courses, had a mix of rising juniors and seniors.The students resided on campus and attended laboratory sessions four days a week, in two three-hour periods each day. The topics covered included the basics of robotics and key componentssuch as sensors, actuators, kinematics, obstacle avoidance, and trajectory planning. Each sessionstarted with a short lecture providing an overview of the activities and relevant theory. Studentsthen worked on several platforms over the two-week camp, including robotic arm manipulators,mobile robots, and a four-legged robot. Simultaneously, students worked in groups on a researchproject that focused on proposing a robotic design to address a
, with specific interest in careers such as civil engineering, urban planning, andtraffic management. The camp also fostered increased enthusiasm for other STEM fields. 55% ofparticipants reported heightened interest in engineering, while 35% expressed increased curiosityabout environmental science. The camp's combination of interactive learning sessions, exposureto real-world transportation challenges, and direct engagement with industry experts played a keyrole in these outcomes. Furthermore, the program positively influenced career exploration, with30% of students considering roles in civil engineering, 25% in robotics, and 20% in constructionmanagement as a result of their camp experience. The field trips and hands-on activities, such