EngineeringAbstractThe Engineering in Context learning community at Whatcom Community College seeks towelcome and onboard new engineering students with an integrated two-quarter cohort learningexperience. This collaboration between engineering, mathematics, history, English, and physicsfaculty consists of a six-course curriculum that integrates contextualized precalculus, Englishcomposition, Pacific Northwest history, engineering orientation, and introductory problem-solving and computing skills. The program employs high-impact practices including place-basedlearning, community-engaged projects, and undergraduate research to motivate foundational skilldevelopment, emphasize social relevance, and develop students' engineering identity, sense ofbelonging, and
. Lyle Endowed Professor of Engineering Innovation Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and a faculty Fellow, with Los Alamos National Laboratory. Before joining Southern Methodist University, Ben spent 37 years at Texas A&M University as an educator, researcher, and administrator. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Using Generative AI to Assist a Smooth Transition from Industry Expert to College Professor Abstract In the last decade, there has been an increasing trend in higher education to collaboratewith industry professionals to develop curriculum and teach at
, recognize professional responsibilities,function effectively on a team, develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, and analyzeand interpret data [2]. An engineer must proficiently demonstrate these skills upon graduation,and it is necessary to equip the student with resources and a curriculum to learn practicalcommunication skills.The typical engineer will spend one-third to one-half of their working day writing reports, andthe engineering curriculum should prepare students for such tasks [3, 4]. Despite the recognizedimportance of technical writing, students often struggle due to a disconnect between academicinstruction and industry expectations. This research project collaborates with industry partnerswho are members of the advisory board
]. These factors are inherently integrated into the activities offered throughREU programs. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of REU training experiences onparticipants' STEM identities and their subsequent career paths.MethodsA total of 38 undergraduate students were recruited and trained in robotics for 10 weeks with thesupport of an NSF REU site at the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) during 2021-2024. REU activities were organized to provide technical and soft skills for REU participants'career development and to enhance their belongings at the REU site and professional societies.Authentic learning experiencesREU project training: Faculty members and graduate research assistants (GRAs) developedshort courses and
communities at every level—from P–12 to post-graduate studies. Her work spans engineering identity and mindsets, global and entrepreneurial competencies, failure culture, first-year experiences in engineering, capstone design thinking, and the integration of service and authentic learning into the classroom and developing future faculty. In addition, she is committed to implementing innovative instructional methodologies and optimizing design through both traditional and non-traditional manufacturing techniques.Dr. Yashin Brijmohan, Utah State University Yashin Brijmohan is a registered professional engineer and Assistant Professor Engineering Education at Utah State University. He is also an Executive committee member of
. Teach., vol. 55, n. 4, pp. 151-156, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.55.4.151-156. [5] J. M. Scaramozzino, “Integrating STEM information competencies into an undergraduate curriculum”, J. Libr. Adm., vol. 50, n. 4, pp. 315-333, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930821003666981. [6] L. D. Feisel, A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education”, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, n. 1, pp. 121-130, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00833.x. [7] N. S. Edward, “The role of laboratory work in engineering education: student and staff perceptions”, Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ., vol. 39, n. 1, pp. 11-19, 2002. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.39.1.2. [8] L. D. Feisel, G. D. Peterson, “A
, 3. To document effective methods for integrating bioengineering into middle school curricula, thus providing a replicable model for STEM outreach in diverse educational settings, and 4. To explore how exposure to university students as mentors affects students' perceptions of higher education and STEM careers.Study PopulationThe Mobile Bioengineering Lab collaborated with an 8th-grade science teacher at a localbilingual school in the community surrounding the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.The prescribed curriculum focuses on a genetics-centered core biology course. In total, therewere 47 students across three 45-minute class periods, ranging from 16-18 students per classperiod. The workshops chosen and
whoengaged in the process willingly participated in the critical conversation. This may not be the casein all scenarios based on an individual’s disposition towards being conflict-averse or not. Thesecond limitation is the nature of the existing mentoring relationship. The first three authors thatengaged in this process have a respectful and positive relationship. Not all research groups operatein this manner, nor have the same level of trust built. The third limitation is the small sample sizewhich limits its transferability. However, the researchers hope to introduce a participatory,collaborative process tested on themselves first to showcase what can be possible with a STEM-ME and pro-Black approach [13], [14], from a hidden curriculum lens [6
, students must present the findings clearlyand with sufficient support and successfully integrate written and visual representations. In theconclusion section, students need to provide the main findings and state whether the resultssupport or contradict the hypothesis being tested.In this paper, we will demonstrate the program's experience with lab reports writing and rubricdevelopment over the last ten years, which includes three different phases. The first is when therewas no standard lab report rubric with guidelines (before 2018), the second is when the firstgeneration of standard lab report rubric and guidelines was introduced (2018-2022), and the thirdone is when an augmented versions of the standard lab report rubric were used (2023-2024
engineering suggest thatstudents should be cognizant of and prepared to act upon these issues concerningmacroethics—the social responsibility of the engineering profession [1]. For example, ABETStudent Outcome 2 notes that students must develop an understanding of engineering designincluding “consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors.” [2]. Additionally, the American Institute for Aeronauticsand Astronautics’ Code of Ethics says that engineers are expected to “hold paramount the safety,health, and welfare of the public in the performance of their duties” [3]. These statements leavegreat latitude to the curriculum and the instructor in interpreting who counts as the
criticalskills such as adaptability, interdisciplinary thinking, and ethical decision-making—qualities thatwill be invaluable as AI continues to disrupt traditional industries and redefine professional roles.Moreover, with the education system itself grappling with how to integrate AI into teaching andevaluation, student-led discussions ensure that the curriculum evolves to meet the needs of thoseit serves. By exploring AI's potential and its limitations, students not only prepare themselves forthe challenges and opportunities of an AI-driven job market but also contribute to shaping aneducational framework that equips their peers to thrive in this dynamic landscape.Eight students were selected among the members of the college’s tech club, who
Information Engineering from Beihang University, Beijing, China, in 2006 and his M.S. and Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering from the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. He worked as an analog IC designer at Texas Instruments, Dallas, between 2011 and 2012. He was a Member of Technical Staff, IC Design at Maxim Integrated, San Diego, CA, between 2012 and 2016, and a Staff Engineer at Qualcomm, Tempe, AZ, between 2016 and 2019. In 2019, he joined the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Oklahoma State University, where he is currently an assistant professor and Jack H. Graham Endowed Fellow of Engineering. His research interests include power management IC design
advocates propose that teachers should build aclassroom environment that facilitates and encourages use of all language repertoires fromlearners. Research in multilingual settings has shown that translanguaging can be an integralcomponent of fostering a multilingual ecology during engineering lessons [16]. This ecology iscomprised the many languages spoken by students, but can also include vocabulary [17] andvarious modalities of communication. Multimodal communication (e.g., gesture, artifactmanipulation, gaze) has been documented as an integral part of the communicative process formultilingual students and young learners in elementary classrooms [2], [18].Consequently, we take up the challenge to teach translanguaging as a strategy, stance
multiplicity of BPC efforts occurred within and outside the formal curriculum, and touchedupon all aspects of teaching, research, and service. A recent curricular innovation to promotegreater equity resulted in summer faculty professional development and trainings for hundreds ofgraduate teaching assistants. An interviewee stated, “The department chairs bought into the ideawe need to train faculty so that our students are better educated.” Departmental efforts may fosterthe most widespread engagement when they are distributed across all aspects of the departmentand when they align with the values and mission of their university.SignificanceWe conclude that where BPC efforts are located in the structure of the department influence theculture and norms
]. Guo and Ottenbreit-Leftwich explored state CS standards via acontent analysis [7]. Their analysis found that many states followed CSTA’s lead in organizingstandards, but that there were some significant divergences, especially in terms of where withinthe overall curriculum CS was housed (e.g., in career and technical education) and what topicswere added (e.g., digital literacy). Oda et al. conducted an international comparison of CSinstruction in ten countries by performing a content analysis on national curricula documents; theyfound that, for the countries they studied, most initially focus on instruction related to impacts ofcomputing, programming, and algorithms and then, in subsequent grades, expand instruction totopics related to
Chile.Dr. Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Isabel Hilliger is Assistant Professor of Practice and Associate Director for Assessment and Evaluation at the Engineering Education Unit in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC-Chile). Isabel received a BEng and PhD in Engineering Sciences from PUC-Chile, and an MA in Policy Organizations and Leadership Studies.Luis Eduardo Vargas-Vidal, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Luis Vargas-Vidal is the for Teaching Development Coordinator at the Engineering School of the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC-Chile). He is also a Spanish and Communication Professor at PUCV-Chile and obtained his master’s degree in Curriculum
other commitments with other programs that overlap with our program in June 2023.In order to minimize the ‘competition’ with other summer programs, in summer 2024, the secondcohort of 8 PSTs participated from May 13 to June 21, 2024. In both summers, the first one and a half days were the orientation in which PSTs weregiven an introduction to the program, introduction to faculty research topics, lab safety,curriculum development expectation, and teachengineering.org website. The PSTs signed anagreement for payment and IRB review purposes. A special 3-hour lab safety session was givenby UH Environment, Health and Safety Program Managers. At the end of the first day, each PSTspent about two to three hours assembling a 3D printer with
curriculum infused with Systems Thinking princi-ples might have equipped professionals with the skills to foresee the cascadingeffects of infrastructure changes. For instance, a deeper understanding of socio-technical interfaces could have led to better risk assessment and stakeholder 2communication, potentially averting the crisis altogether. The integration of Systems Thinking into engineering education has gainedtraction in recent years, particularly in response to calls for curricular reformsaimed at addressing global challenges [10]. Courses like TEP 448 at the Uni-versity of Toronto serve as an example of this integration and are discussed inmore detail in Section 2.3. [11]. One widely used model to
molding. • The role of pressure regulation in ensuring uniform expansion. • Practical applications of 3D printing in manufacturing process optimization.By refining the lab procedure, this experiment enhances engineering education by providinghands-on experience with real-world manufacturing challenges. Future iterations will incorporateadditional assessment metrics to quantify student knowledge gains more effectively.Ansys Polyflow SimulationsThe integration of Ansys Polyflow simulations [11] into the lab curriculum provides studentswith an opportunity to apply theoretical knowledge in computational fluid dynamics to apractical engineering problem. This simulation-based approach helps students visualize materialbehavior during the blow
securityEach pathway is designed to align with industry-recognized certifications, such as Amazon WebServices (AWS) and CompTIA. The program includes two certification examination voucherswithin the laboratory fees, subject to program modifications.Admission Requirements and Academic StandardsThe prescreening admission to the certificate program requires that candidates: • Demonstrate proficiency in college-level algebra • Successfully complete of a behavioral interview • Demonstrate professional and academic IntegrationThe curriculum design serves dual purposes:(1) Development of workforce-ready technical competencies(2) Establishment of foundational knowledge for continued academic pursuitThe program's integration with an ABET-accredited
) (COE) Robin S. Adams is Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, ac ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Creating a Course Dashboard to Continually Assess and Improve the Quality of EducationAbstractThis paper develops a program dashboard designed to continuously assess and improve thequality of education. Continuous assessment and improvement of education are essential formaintaining the quality and integrity of educational excellence and achieving effective
Paper ID #48636Coding Competency and Confidence to Prepare for OpportunityDr. Jonathan Weaver-Rosen, Texas A&M University Jonathan Weaver-Rosen is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. His research has focused largely on design automation and methodologies – specifically parametric optimization and the design of morphing or otherwise adaptive systems. His passion for teaching lies in preparing future design engineers to properly utilize analysis tools and work effectively as part of a team.Dr. Arkasama Bandyopadhyay, Texas A&M University Dr
course activities, but did not integrate the IDP into their personal approach toprofessional development. Only one student in cohort one described updating their IDP. Asdescribed earlier, the instructor revised course activities and lectures/lesson plans for the secondcohort to emphasize the value of periodically reviewing and updating IDPs. We hoped to seemore statements in the course reflections that described an intent to review and update IDPsoutside of the course. Ideally this commitment would expand beyond graduation. In fact, severalstudents in the second cohort mentioned updating their IDP. They indicated that updating theirIDP was a helpful and/or planned activity, like the single student in cohort one. Each studentwho described an
awardee, she has led multiple pioneering efforts in engineering education including multimodal methods in engineering education using sensor technologies and biophysiological tools, hidden curriculum, mentoring, active learning, professional identity, among others. She is a renowned national and international leader in engineering education earning her multiple accolades and honors through professional organizations such as the National Academy of Engineering, IEEE, and ASEE. She integrates her multiple experiences as a Chemical Engineering, Biological Engineer, Analytical Cell Biologist, and Engineering Education Researcher to tackle complex engineering education problems across the learner life span
of clients in the Media, Insurance, and Telecommunication sectors. In addition to his industrial consulting activities, Sriram maintains an active research profile in data science and education research that has led to over 30 publications or presentations. At Rose-Hulman, Sriram has focused on incorporating reflection, and problem based learning activities in the Software Engineering curriculum. Sriram has been fundamental to the revamp of the entire software engineering program at Rose-Hulman. Sriram is a founding member of the Engineering Design program and continues to serve on the leadership team that has developed innovative ways to integrate Humanities, Science, Math, and Engineering curriculum into a
generative artificial intelligence that excel atgenerating natural language responses to user queries/demands. LLMs have seen an explosion ofboth interest and applications in recent years. From writing fictional works to synthesizingfunctional code, LLMs have demonstrated versatility and effectiveness in written language-basedtasks [1, 2]. We are currently at a crossroads of sorts, akin to the release and popularization ofsearch engines, where we do not know the limits of this technology, but we believe it has greatpotential [3, 4, 5]. Students have begun to take advantage of this technology [6], with manyturning to popular LLMs if they are stuck on a homework problem or have a class-relatedquestion. Also, there has been interest in integrating LLM
] acquisition of more knowledge and skills. Some variables, causal arrows, and symbols are black; this indicates that the element ispart of more than one feedback loop. This is important to highlight in the diagrams as it indicatedvariables and interactions that are integral to the system. Integral elements are important to knowas they may require additional protection and support; if an issue were to arise in one of theseareas, large portions of the system may collapse. Additionally, if changes need to be made to the system, identifying ways to implementthem in these areas would impact larger portions of the system. Finally, for the purposes of thisstudy, identifying integral elements is important for comparison of lifelong learning to
Riley, Texas A&M University - Kingsville Dr. Celeste Riley is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Psychology and Sociology at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, RELLIS Campus. She earned her bachelor’s degree in Psychology and Biology from Southwestern University and her doctorate in Clinical Health Psychology/Behavioral Medicine from the University of North Texas. Her research explores interdisciplinary curriculum development in collaboration with STEM fields such as computer science, health science, and engineering.Virginia PedersonPierre Atieh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 By-Design: Ethical Safeguards and Behavioral PsychologyCompetencies, A
Paper ID #46227Knowledge Transfer from a First-Year, Stand-Alone Technical CommunicationsCourse into Second-Year Laboratory and Design-Focused CoursesProf. Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware Dr. Jenni Buckley is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware. Her teaching practice is focused on product design, (bio)mechanics, CAD, and technical communications; and her recent research work is centered on DEI and curriculum development related to hands-on design and laboratory experiences.Dr. Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware Alexander De Rosa is an Associate Professor in Mechanical
applications, material corrosion mechanisms, and electrochemical degradation. She is a strong advocate for integrating high-impact practices, such as problem-based learning, into lectures, laboratories, and outreach initiatives to enhance student and community engagement in STEM education.Elizabeth Generas, Wright State University Elizabeth Generas is an external evaluator for education and social justice projects. She completed a graduate certificate in Program Evaluation from Wright State University, where she is also a doctoral candidate in the Doctor of Organization Studies program.Dr. Amy Anderson Amy Anderson is the Associate Provost for Global and Intercultural Affairs and Executive Director of the Center for