robotics curriculum toprepare students for the many robotics industry positions and research careers that utilize thismiddleware [5]. Learning ROS can at times be non-intuitive and overwhelming for students[1].Limited online resources exist to help students learn ROS asynchronously[6], and none havestudied how students perceived self-efficacy in tackling future robotics project challenges.Asynchronous tutorials help students learn material that would take too much time to step throughin class, enhancing the principles taught. They can help students troubleshoot specific issues theyrun into, allow students to go at their own pace, and allow flexibility in how students approachdifferent challenges. In this Introduction to Robotics course, over three
effectiveness of these methods wasdemonstrated in accurately calculating velocity, displacement, and higher-order derivatives likejerk. The study underscores the importance of proper noise handling and drift correction forachieving precise results when using sensor data to predictive analysis. Overall, incorporatingaccelerometer data into numerical methods education equips students with valuable analyticalskills and technical proficiency, preparing them for future careers in various engineeringdisciplines.References[1] Pendrill, A. M., & Eager, D. (2020). Velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap and vibration: Forces in our bodies during a roller coaster ride. Physics Education, 55(6), 065012.[2] Musto, J. C. (2002). A project-based approach
career paths for students with faculty in order to highlight the value of thePDEP program. Gaining program and school buy-in was an iterative process. Each school’scurriculum committee had to approve the proposal. The university does not have a process inplace for simultaneous review of interdisciplinary programs by these committees, so we receivedfeedback one by one. If any committee raised questions or requested modifications, there was achance it would need to be revisited by another committee that had already approved theproposal. For example, the business school felt strongly that the second course in the capstonesequence should be an existing course, Entrepreneurial Management Practicum, rather than anew course as originally proposed. They
the convergent approach known as the nurse+engineer to improve theunderstanding of the link between human and planetary health among students of civilengineering.References. 1. ASCE, Code of Ethics. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2020. [Online] Available: https://www.asce.org/career-growth/ethics/code-of-ethics. 2. ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023. Baltimore, MD: ABET Inc, 2022. [Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/. 3. D.B. Oerther, S. Oerther, L.A. McCauley, “Environmental engineering 3.0: Faced with planetary problems, solutions must scale-up caring,” J. Environ. Eng
local actors. As instructors in engineering and anthropology programs, we were alsoconcurrently developing curricular approaches to guide students and design participants tocomparatively examine, map, and reflect on the relationships between the building projects, withan emphasis on collaborative design and incorporation of alternative perspectives. We see theselearning goals to be important for graduates who will engage with increasingly complexchallenges in their careers. Our curricular design addresses learning outcomes for students to beable to describe and compare different forms of “sociability” in cold climate housing projects,analyze challenges of building affordable, quality homes in communities impacted by climatechange, and explore
active student engagement through exploration, questioning, and practicalapplication of knowledge to address real-world challenges. It introduces a new pedagogy that isbeing used to deliver engineering fundamental concepts while providing students with the skillsand experience necessary for success in future careers. Students engage in collaborativeteamwork on an engineering innovation project and apply concepts learned in their classes.Project team members are students from different BME courses comprising of a combination ofundergraduate, graduate, on campus, or remote students.This article highlights the experience and outcomes of students participating in an internationalIBL design engineering project, conducted across multiple continents to
program where students work with a mentor in aconventional academic or professional setting. Implementing a controlled study with a non-IBLmentorship group as a control would help determine whether the structured, innovation-drivenapproach of IBL coaching yields distinct advantages over more general mentorship strategies.This comparison could provide valuable insights into whether IBL-specific techniques enhanceinnovation self-efficacy beyond what is achieved through general mentoring relationships thatemphasize guidance, career development, or academic support.Given the importance of scalability in expanding IBL mentorship models, ongoing efforts tosecure NSF funding aim to address these challenges and develop frameworks for large
their academic engineering career?,” in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Meeting, Jun. 2021.[5] D. A. Delaine et al., “A systematic literature review of reciprocity in engineering service‐ learning/community engagement,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 838–871, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1002/jee.20561.[6] M. Natarajarathinam, S. Qiu, and W. Lu, “Community engagement in engineering education: A systematic literature review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1049–1077, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20424.[7] J. Lucena, J. Schneider, and J. A. Leydens, Engineering and Sustainable Community Development. in Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, & Society. Cham: Springer International
and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. He coordinates two undergraduate programs – B. S. Mechanical Engineering and B. S. Aerospace Engineering. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal and proceeding papers. He has 12 and 6 patents granted in the U.S. and Korea, respectively, in the areas of sensors, microfluidic devices, and micro/nanofabrication. His current research focus is on miniaturized environmental sensors and sample handling devices. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2002. He worked as Research Engineer at Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI) from 1993 to 1997. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2004 and was given
Paper ID #46043Expanding the Pool: Recognizing the Potential in Underprepared Students(Experience)Dr. Cameron Robert Rusnak, Lincoln University - Missouri Dr. Cameron R. Rusnak is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Lincoln University. Throughout his academic career, he has been dedicated to enhancing undergraduate education by continuously refining his teaching methods to improve student learning outcomes. His efforts focus on creating an engaging, supportive, and effective learning environment that fosters both academic growth and practical understanding.Dr. David Heise, Lincoln University
study of a student-producedpodcast surveyed for skill development, education and community, finding ‘community’ was thehighest outcome from the project [17]. For students using podcasts in technical courses, theReduced Instructional Material Motivation Survey has been used to understand motivation levelsfor engaging with podcast-based material [18]. One study found that motivation was highindependent of learning style [19]. Therefore, podcasts have the potential to bring many favorableoutcomes to engineering educators: • to enable faculty to develop curiosity in each other’s work • to allow students to develop curiosity about disciplinary work that informs their education • to promote the pursuit of educational careers to engineering
students who were introduced to the purpose and importance ofengineering ethics during the prior semester. Each group contained three to fiveself-selected members, chosen after being given instructions that they should not havepreviously worked with each other.3.4 Data CollectionData included sets of “moral hierarchy” diagrams, co-created for a hypotheticalengineering company where the team would need to spend their entire careers. Thesediagrams were supported by brief reflection questions collected from each student at theend of class, asking about disagreements in the team, how they were negotiated, and whatmoral compromises the students expected to make in their future careers.We used our learning management system to collect each group’s moral
functions of cells. The course alsodiscusses dysfunctions in different parts of the cells and their relations to various diseases (e.g.,cancer, neurological disorders, etc.), and the basics of tissue engineering. It is generally taken byundergraduate ChemBE students of different levels (e.g., sophomores, juniors, and seniors) whoare interested in future careers related to biotechnology or medicine. The interventions that weapplied in the classroom were inspired by various theoretical frameworks. A qualitative analysisof students’ reflections about the course, obtained from the course offered in two Spring semestersin 2023 and 2024, helped us to identify the factors that positively influenced students’ learningexperiences and mostly answered our
success in subsequent courses andprepares them for professional careers in power systems engineering.2 BackgroundComputer modeling of electric power systems has been the cornerstone of power system analysissince the 1970s. Accurate models and algorithms are essential for enabling quick and precisesolutions in power systems engineering 1 . Power system simulators, such as PowerWorld, arewidely used for solving complex power system analysis problems and for educational purposes 2 .The textbook used in this course 3 provides a student version of PowerWorld. However, severalanalytical calculations must be performed to parameterize a system in PowerWorld. Computerprogramming is an effective method for performing these analyses 4 , benefiting both
. are exposing students to the benefits of PLM software integration in a team-based,undergraduate design course where students develop a digital twin for a scaled, tracked, roboticvehicle. The team integrated NX and Teamcenter into their guided and student-led projects tofacilitate their digital twin design and improve collaboration as a team, while surveys were usedto measure the student’s understanding and career preparedness of PLM topics.PLM integration into engineering education can effectively prepare students for their futurecareers; however, PLM integration into engineering programs is limited [13]. This research aimsto identify an area of the curriculum where PLM tools can be integrated and tested foreffectiveness. A case study
interested in construction management careers. It isimportant for construction managers to understand the design aspects, and for design engineersto understand the construction process for a smooth project delivery. EML content was newlyintroduced in CVET-434, whereas in previous offerings of CVET-464, it had been brieflyincorporated. In addition, the connection between design and construction was emphasized inboth courses to promote students’ whole-system awareness. The research approach is presentedin Figure 1. Learning Outcomes EML Content Implementation Student Defined Developed Feedback •CVET-434 •Video
reinforced concrete design course. The basic idea is to develop a dramatic story plotto parallel the technical and historical content of reinforced concrete design. Much like a fictionalnovel, action movie, or television series, the element of drama is meant to maintain student interestand curiosity in the content. The goal is for students to be self-motivated to attend class, to solveengineering problems, and to read the textbook and other technical literature because they not onlywant to be able to apply these skills in their future careers, but they are interested to learn whathappens next in the story. Thus, the story aims to increase both the interest value and attainmentvalue with respect to subjective task values as motivators for activity
many honors, including the NSF CAREER Award. He has published over a hundred peer-reviewed journal and conference papers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engagement in Virtual Learning Environments with a Pursuit of In-Person CollaborationsAbstractAs virtual learning continues to evolve following the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding howstudents collaborate in these environments has become increasingly critical for educators.Research underscores a significant link between peer interactions and collaborative learningoutcomes, emphasizing the need for effective virtual collaboration strategies in engineeringeducation. This study examines student learning patterns
Community ServiceI. INTRODUCTION Volunteering means any activity in which time is given freely to benefit another person,group or organization [1]. Engaging in volunteering, among adolescents, has been shown tocorrelate with enhanced social skills which enables them to connect with students of allbackgrounds and interests [2]. Volunteerism has also been linked to increased civic engagement[2], improved academic aptitude [3], as well as enhanced self-esteem and happiness in adults [4].Additionally, participating in volunteering activities related to one’s degree has shown to giveparticipants practical and applicable experiences that can benefit their career prospects [5].Persistence in and completion of baccalaureate STEM degrees has been shown to
distributed loads on an object. The majority of students did not initially discussdistributed loads as being related to centroids before being prompted with this additionalquestion, however.Another significant observation was that student conceptions of centroids clearly did not accountfor objects that had a non-uniform density - likely due to the fact that these kinds of objects arenot covered in introductory engineering courses. While this lack of conceptual understandingdoes not hold students back in undergraduate courses where objects of uniform density are thenorm, if students are faced with (more authentic) non-uniform density objects in later courses ortheir careers there could be cause for concern.Only half (4/8) of the participants
, Biomedical Engineering at Penn State, and is affiliated with Penn State Cancer Institute (PSCI), Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI), Institute for Computational and Data Sciences (ICDS), CIMP-3D. He is a recipient of the prestigious NSF CAREER award and Fulbright Award. Currently, he serves as the director of NSF Center for Health Organization Transformation (CHOT).Dr. Richard Zhao, University of Calgary Dr. Richard Zhao is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Calgary. He leads the Serious Games Research Group, focusing on games for training and education, including artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and eye-tracking technologies. Dr. Zhao has
comparisons to validate these findings across different contexts. Investigation ofspecific intervention strategies could help identify the most effective approaches for developingboth team skills and intercultural competence. Development of standardized assessment toolsand examination of industry outcomes would also provide valuable insights for improving STEMeducation practices.References[1] S. Majid, Z. Liming, S. Tong, and S. Raihana, “Importance of Soft Skills for Education and Career Success,” Int. J. Cross-Discip. Subj. Educ., vol. 2, no. Special 2, pp. 1036–1042, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2012.0147.[2] P. Bahrami, Y. Kim, A. Jaiswal, D. Patel, S. Aggrawal, and A. J. Magana, “Information Technology Undergraduate
-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–58, 2009.[11] IEEE, “IEEE code of Ethics,” [Online]. Available: https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html (accessed Jan. 26, 2026).[12] National Society of Porfessional Engineerings, "NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers",. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/career-growth/nspe-code-ethics-engineers (accessed Feb. 25, 2025)[13] L. Shuman, M Besterfield-Sacre, H. Wolfe, M. Sindelar, R. Pinkus, B. Olds, R. Miller, “Using rubrics to assess students’ ability to resolve ethical dilemmas,” IIE Annu. Conf. Proc., pp. 1–7, 2005.[14] L.J. Shuman, M.F. Sindelar, M. Besterfield-Sacre, H. Wolfe
Paper ID #46681Future-Ready Students: Validating the Use of Natural Language Processingto Analyze Student Reflections on a Remote Learning Group ProjectMajd Khalaf, Norwich University Majd Khalaf recently graduated from Norwich University with a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering, along with minors in Mathematics and Computer Science. He is passionate about DevOps, embedded systems, and machine learning. Throughout his academic career, Majd contributed to various projects and research in natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision. He served as a Senior AI Researcher at Norwich University’s
Professor of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana in Evansville, Indiana. He received his PhD in 2007 from Virginia Tech in Engineering Mechanics where he studied the vestibular organs in the inner ear using finite element models and vibration analyses. After graduating, he spent a semester teaching at a local community college and then two years at University of Massachusetts (Amherst) studying the biomechanics of biting in bats and monkeys, also using finite element modeling techniques. In 2010, he started his career teaching in all areas of mechanical engineering at the University of Southern Indiana. He loves teaching all of the basic mechanics courses, and of course his Vibrations and Finite Element
for careers in robotics, automation, and mechatronics by equippingthem with both the theoretical knowledge and practical skills needed to succeed in the field.6. ConclusionThis paper introduces a novel, low-cost testbench and controller designed to teach Pythonprogramming with applications in robotics for mechatronics education. The testbench andaccompanying experiments allow students to grasp Python fundamentals while interacting with avariety of actuators and sensors. Designed, built, and tested for a hands-on robotics course aimedat sophomore engineering students, the testbench supports extensive prototyping of roboticmechanisms. During the Python programming laboratory sessions, students learn how to controlvarious DC motors and servo
appropriate balance between macroethical and technical content. Throughfacilitation experience in this and other technical courses, the research team is working toidentify a key set of skills that are particularly valuable to teach students so that they areprepared to navigate macroethical issues in their future careers. Further work will formalize thesedesired learning outcomes and the teaching methods that can be used to accomplish themthrough a conjecture mapping framework, with aims to publish these findings in the future.ReferencesABET. (2024). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2025—2026. Retrieved May 1,2025, fromhttps://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2025-2026/Martin
a student'schoice of pursuing computer science in their career. Research shows that breaking downprogramming concepts to simpler and smaller pieces decreases the cognitive load and strugglefor students thereby increasing student interest and retention.This paper analyzes data from four online, interactive introductory programming textbooks withactivities that use a scaffolded approach to teach students programming concepts. The textbooksused are Programming in C++, in Java, in Python, and in C, respectively. The textbooks cover avariety of programming concepts from basic topics such as variables and branches to moreadvanced concepts such as recursion, across multiple languages. The textbooks have a series ofrandomized, auto-graded
competencies and seeing an example four-year student plan particularly helpful.Background and MotivationThe Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) at Arizona State University (ASU) is a co-curricular program that typically spans a student’s entire undergraduate career. Majority of thestudents join the program either before their first semester or during their first year at theuniversity. Throughout their time in the program, each student engages in a personalizedcombination of courses and/or experiences, all focused on an overarching theme of their choice(Sustainability, Health, Security, Joy of Living), to achieve five program competencies: Talent,Multidisciplinary, Viable Business/Entrepreneurship, Multicultural, and Social Consciousness[1]. Each
, “Learning two programming languages in one semester does not adversely affect undergraduate biomedical engineering student performance,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Jul. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/learning-two- programming-languages-in-one-semester-does-not-adversely-affect-undergraduate-biomedical-engineering- student-performance[12] R. Rybarczyk and L. Acheson, “Integrating A Career Preparedness Module into CS2 Curricula Through The Teaching C++ and Java Side-by-Side,” in Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Baltimore Maryland USA: ACM, Feb. 2018, pp. 592–597. doi: 10.1145/3159450.3159552.[13] C. L. Resch