Among Underrepresented Engineering Students: The Impact of University Academic SystemsThis full-length Empirical Research Paper reports the protective mechanisms and risk factors thatinfluence academic resiliency among underrepresented engineering students. Academicresiliency, characterized by students' ability to effectively manage stress, overcome challenges,and persist through difficulties in their academic pursuits, is a crucial factor for success in highereducation [1], [2], [3], [4]. A need exists to identify and analyze strategies and programs thatstrengthen and support student abilities to develop academic resiliency.The study explores support systems and educational practices universities may use to enhanceacademic resilience
Mission for a Holistic Education: Pilot ImplementationAbstractThe evolution of engineering education over the past few decades reflects the growingcomplexity of the challenges engineers encounter in today’s world. Where once technicalproficiency was the primary emphasis of engineering education, there is now a growingrecognition of the distinct but complementary role that professional formation plays in shapingwell-rounded engineers [1] [2] [3]. A holistic approach to engineering education will help usshape future engineers who possess the foundational knowledge and applied skills in theirdiscipline, as well as across disciplinary boundaries, along with global and cultural awareness,social responsibility, ethical leadership, and sustainability
making connected to technical knowledge. By incorporating modern case studiesand speculative design, this course provides biomedical engineers with the critical thinking andethical reasoning skills necessary to navigate the challenges of emergent technologies inprofessional practice and can be adapted to any engineering discipline.Introduction At the core of the National Society for Professional Engineers Code of Ethics is that“Engineering is an important and learned profession” [1]. Thus, it logically follows that the canons,values, and professional obligations of engineers are formally and informally taught to studentengineers during their education. However, recent meta-analyses by [2] and [3] of current practicesin engineering ethics
that improve the educational experience. Data were collected through quantitativesurveys (n=59) and qualitative, semi-structured interviews (n=4) to investigate students'experiences, strategies, and obstacles to time management in online learning environments. Thestudy identified six factors that significantly affect online students' time management skills: (1)lack of sufficient time management training, (2) challenges in balancing school, work, andpersonal life, (3) limited knowledge of effective time management strategies, (4) inadequateplanning, (5) insufficient self-assessment or self-reflection, and (6) a tendency towardprocrastination. Results reveal significant variations in time management practices acrossdemographic groups of students
itsestablishment in 1932, ABET has accredited approximately 4,773 programs across 930 collegesand universities in 42 countries and regions [1, 2]. While ABET provides a detailed andcomprehensive set of requirements for accrediting programs, it does not prescribe a specificapproach to measuring the attainment of learning outcomes. Instead, programs are required to usea personalized approach for their programs and describe their assessment process. Creating a newprogram that meets ABET’s standards is a significant task for both the administration and faculty,as it involves developing the curriculum and assessment tools needed to align with bothprogrammatic and institutional goals. This paper will explore the implementation of the assessmentprocess and the
-depth scale (0-3).The results indicate that while there is no significant pre- to post-assessment change in the factorscores derived from the 28-item questionnaire, students demonstrated a significant increase in thedepth of their responses to the open-ended essay questions, with theme depth increasing froman average of 1.4 to 1.6. These are discussed alongside recommendations for future AI ethicscurriculum design for computer science graduate students.Keywords: Ethical AI, Ethical decision-making, Curriculum Development, Machine learning Cur-riculum, AI Fairness, Privacy, Explainability, Transparency.1 IntroductionWhile artificial intelligence (AI) promises to improve our quality of life by automating tasks, ad-vancing healthcare, and
computational thinking, engineering design, technology, and systems thinkingthrough hands-on, collaborative, student-driven projects. Camp sessions are co-facilitated by localK-12 teachers and undergraduate student mentors from the University of Florida. The GGEEprogram prioritized the hiring of undergraduate student mentors who were from the school districtshosting the camps.In this exploratory mixed methods study, undergraduate student mentor perceptions of near-peermentorship are used to assess the GGEE program’s impact on participant STEM identity andexplore the personal benefits of participation. This paper reports on the following researchquestions: 1) How does serving as near-peer mentors to K-12 student mentees in an educationalSTEM summer
empathy-focused instruction by investigating (1) how instructors define, view, and valueempathy, and (2) advantages and challenges to teaching empathy in engineering courses. A surveywas distributed to instructors teaching engineering courses at one institution. This paper presentsa qualitative analysis of open-ended questions. Instructors described different understandings ofempathy and opinions regarding empathy-focused instruction. Some described teaching empathyas essential, while others considered it “ridiculous.” Key advantages were interpersonal skills,improved professionalism and ethics, and improved learning environment. A lack of knowledgebase, practical challenges, and confronting traditional practices were identified as key barriers
evaluating models of hopeful attitudes leading to motivation to take political action, andconcluding that utopian visioning – imagining a better society – has a positive effect onmotivational attitudes [1, 4, 5]. One major attitude that factors into approach emotions, the subject of this study, is hope.Discussions of hope are common among leading figures in social change. Macy, in her workActive Hope, describes hope as both involving believing in an outcome and desiring a betterfuture, but also as a practice and process [19]. West, in Democracy Matters, discusses what hecalls “tragicomic hope” as preserving the belief in better futures while “staring into the face ofhate and hypocrisy,” countering nihilism [29]. Kaba shares her view of hope
research team implemented the full collaboration model and had every member beinvolved in all aspects of the research process: data collection, data analysis, and publicationwriting.Table 1. Research team member demographics. Pronouns Race Department Position Years taught at Type of courses current institution taught (total years teaching)She/her White Bioengineering Teaching 5 (10) Senior Design, Assistant technical
behavior. However, limitedresearch has examined how the language differences of cross-disciplinary students influencedenergy discourses. Understanding these language differences will improve communication andcollaboration between interdisciplinary students for effective energy literacy solutions.Keywords: Latent Dirichlet Allocation, Mixed Methods, Energy Discourses, Energy Literacy1. IntroductionEnergy has become an important part of our daily life, which helps in powering our homeappliances, driving hybrid cars, charging laptops/mobile phones, etc. Energy usage has beenincreased by the growth of population and technological advancements. The increase in energyusage could negatively impact our access to clean, affordable, and renewable energy [1
Joanne K. Beckwith Maddock is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 “People-Oriented Recitation Problems”: Assessing the Impact of a Contextualized Recitation Intervention on First-Year Student Interest in Chemical EngineeringIntroductionEngineering programs in the U.S. face persistent retention challenges, with 40-60% of allengineering students changing majors or leaving college before completing their degrees [1]. InChemical Engineering (ChemE), enrollment has been declining since 2020 and is expected tocontinue dropping in the coming years [2]. Engineering attrition is
andmotivation in UGR can aid in the design of improved workshops and courses for UG researchers,as well as provide direction for individual faculty who are interested in leveraging EM in theirmentorship of UG students.Introduction:Undergraduate research (UGR) is widely recognized as a high-impact practice that enhancesstudents’ academic productivity. The engagement in learning, retention in college, and careerpreparedness of students can be positively affected by participating in UGR. Studies show thatUGR helps students clarify career goals [1], foster a sense of identity as scientists or engineers[2], and build resilience [3]. Additionally, UGR serves as a valuable ecosystem for preparingfuture graduate students and enhancing research lab productivity
suggests that while GenAI tools can improve problem-solving and technical efficiency, engineering education must also address ethical, human-centered, and societal impacts. The dVC framework pro- vides a structured lens for assessing how GenAI tools are integrated into curricula and research, encouraging a more holistic, reflective approach. Ultimately, this paper aims to provoke dialogue on the future of engineering education and to challenge the prevail- ing assumption that technical skill development alone is sufficient in an AI-mediated world.1 IntroductionWe take as our starting premise that engineers have a responsibility to society, and conse-quently, that engineering educators have a responsibility to convey
undergraduates to beknowledgeable about basic principles of STEM concepts to be successful in the increasinglytechnological and global economy [1]. While there has been a rise in the number of non-computerscience majors interested in learning programming and other computational skills in recent years[2], an emphasis on fostering non-STEM student interest in STEM concepts is still needed tomeet the increasing demand of technical knowledge [3].To better understand programming course offerings for computing and non-computing majors, wecollected data on the curriculum of fundamental programming courses at the top 50 largest publicuniversities of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Online surveys weredistributed to instructors through email
Paper ID #48307Changing the Grading Narrative in a Sophomore Biomechanics CourseDr. Jennifer Currey, Union College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Changing the Grading Narrative in a Sophomore Biomechanics CourseIntroductionThe history of grades in education can feel a bit mythical. Some sources state that grades cameabout with the industrialization of education in the US. Assessment of student learning movedfrom oral or written assessments in the era of one room school houses to more systematic waysof communicating students’ learning with the advent of larger school systems [1]. Our currentsystem of ABCDF was
cohorttaking the class versus those who have not taken the class has shown the benefit of the course.Furthermore, a culture survey has shown the benefit that the course has for the students to developa sense of belonging to the school and their major early in their academic journey.Introduction Student retention has been an ongoing challenge within higher education for many years,particularly within STEM fields such as engineering [1]. For programs in which first-yearundergraduate students are required to select a specific major during the application process theyoftentimes have a poor understanding of the topics and the breadth of possible career paths withintheir selected major and may make uninformed decisions to change prior to any
Professional Development, StudentOrganizationsIntroductionStudent chapters established by professional societies, like the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE), provide opportunities for students to network with industry professionals,gain exposure to various career options, develop leadership skills, and enhance their professionaldevelopment beyond the academic experience. These activities collectively prepare students for asmoother transition into their professional careers after graduation. ASCE, established in 1852, isthe oldest professional engineering society in the United States [1]. ASCE operates under acollection of volunteers associated with local or regional professional younger membergroups/forums, branches, and sections that oversee
reactivepower output [1]. Full converter interfaced IBRs, such as type 4 wind turbines and PV inverters,limit the fault currents to 1.1-1.2 pu within a few power frequency cycles. These fault currentcharacteristics introduce challenges in setting protection schemes in IBR dominated systems [2].The lack of negative sequence fault current contribution from the inverter may cause misoperationof protection system during certain unbalanced fault conditions [3], [4]. These responsecharacteristics present new challenges for the reliable and secure operation of the grid,particularly with respect to transmission protection schemes.Phasor-based transmission protection schemes, such as line differential protection and distanceprotection, were designed based on
students from varied backgrounds to thrive in thisessential field [1], [2].Background and Strategic VisionApproved by the Illinois Board of Higher Education in 2022, the creation of the College ofEngineering aligns with ISU's strategic vision to expand academic offerings and contribute directlyto regional and national workforce development [3]. This initiative addresses a critical need forengineering talent in central Illinois, providing new opportunities for students and fosteringpartnerships with key industries, including Rivian, Caterpillar, and GE Vernova. The college willbe housed in state-of-the-art facilities at 1709 General Electric Road in Bloomington, IL, servingas hubs for research and learning [4], [5], [6].The College of Engineering's
in time and direction. To assess the efficacy of the proposedassessment modality, the author examines the tool’s fairness and its ability to test knowledge. Thefindings demonstrate that this is a viable tool for assessment.1 IntroductionIntroductory classes are hard to get right. On the one hand, students should become excited aboutthe major. On the other, they should walk out prepared for the rest of the curriculum. These areoften at odds with each other. An instructor can get students excited by showing the cutting edge,but there is nowhere near enough time to properly formulate how to get from the students’ currentknowledge to that point. An instructor can introduce proper rigor, but then the class can onlyexplore the most foundational
Paper ID #46099Student Understandings of Race and Racial Bias in Computing EnvironmentsJabari Kwesi, Duke UniversityMorgan bernstein, Duke UniversityReagan Lenora Razon, Duke UniversityAndre Luis Barajas, Duke UniversityDr. Brean Elizabeth Prefontaine, Duke University Dr. Brean Prefontaine is a postdoctoral researcher at Duke University working with the Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). Her research currently focuses on (1) the policies and practices impacting computer science students from marginalized identities and (2) how informal STEM environments can provide a space for students to develop
Reimagining Faculty Development with an Entrepreneurial Approach Using the Harvard Business Review Framework and a Corporate Brand Identity MatrixIntroductionFaculty development programs, particularly in engineering, are essential tools for disseminatingproven educational and pedagogical innovations through training, mentoring, and ongoingsupport or coaching [1]. These programs play a crucial role in providing the tools andinformation to newly recruited faculty, which contributes to faculty retention and fosters anenvironment that encourages continuous learning and skill development [2]. However, facultydevelopment can be defined differently depending on faculty responsibilities
wrong. They influence what someone considers to be ethical andvirtuous. While many attempts have been made to define what is ethical, virtuous, and moral,there is no universal agreement, which is one reason why this is a challenging subject. Studentslearn how to calculate many things using formulas, but there are no formulas for virtuousbehavior.Some might argue that engineering is morally neutral, that it is strictly guided by well-acceptedmathematics, science, and engineering principles. However, that is a somewhat naïve viewbecause there may be considerable gray areas. Busby and Coeckelbergh (2003) [1] wrote, “. . .the picture of engineering as morally neutral is misleading. . . . Telling someone to develop adesign for a hazardous
companies. In summary, this projectwill enhance the institution’s curricula and contribute to building a more diverse and skilledworkforce in the semiconductor industry.1. IntroductionThe new era of advanced computing has not only transformed our daily lives but also introducednew challenges. The demand for faster, smaller, and more efficient electronic devices continuesto grow, making semiconductor research and development (R&D) critical to meeting thisdemand. The CHIPS and Science Act has set a national vision to maintain the United States'leadership in the semiconductor industry [1, 2, 3]. In response, academia and industry arecollaborating through innovative efforts to support this vital initiative [4, 5, 6].Prairie View A&M University
structured learning withreal-time problem-solving on the job [4].Organizational SocializationOrganizational socialization is the process where newcomers learn the skills and behaviors theyneed to succeed as members of their workplace. Van Maanen and Schein highlighted theimportance of socialization in helping employees integrate into the organization [12]. Benzingeradded that structured onboarding programs, like mentorship or peer support, make a significantdifference in how quickly newcomers adjust [1].Supervisors also play a major role in this process. Nifadkar explained that newcomers often formimpressions, or schemas, of their supervisors during their early days on the job. Theseimpressions shape how much information they seek from their
, 2015). However, many engineering education programs fail to adequately integratesustainability principles into their curricula, leaving graduates unprepared to address the complex,multifaceted challenges of the modern world [1].Traditional approaches often relegate sustainability to peripheral courses or theoreticaldiscussions, lacking the depth and integration required for students to develop practical, systems-oriented solutions [2]. This gap necessitates new frameworks to ensure future engineers areequipped with the skills to address environmental and social challenges holistically. TheEngineering for One Planet (EOP) framework provides a structured approach to embeddingsustainability into engineering education. It emphasizes core
innovative pedagogicalapproaches that foster cross-cultural collaboration and equip students with skills for a globalizedworkforce. Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) has emerged as a transformativeeducational approach that includes the required intercultural competency, enhances collaborativeskills, and promotes global engagement among students [1]. This paper introduces a practical andconcise guide tailored specifically for engineering educators aiming to integrate COILmethodologies into their curricula.The foundation of COIL lies in its structured, cross-institutional collaboration, which involveseducators co-designing and co-facilitating online learning assignments across different countries.Unlike broader Virtual Exchange (VE
break free from theconstraints of traditional, costly commercial textbooks. The financial impact of commercialtextbooks often causes students undue stress [1]. Beyond cost-saving, OER allow instructors totailor content to their courses, rather than the course adapting to the textbook. This creates a moredynamic and relevant learning environment, with no negative impact on learning outcomes[2].The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) recognizes the need for engineeringstudents to develop skills desirable by employers beyond the analytical capabilities taught in astandard engineering curriculum, such as communication and interdisciplinary thinking. TheEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM) emphasizes the importance of these skills through the
holistic transfer pathway through the following keyinterventions: 1) establishing clear transfer pathways and roadmaps and updating articulationagreements, 2) providing adaptive and consistent advisement, incorporating new pathways information,3) aligning the CS1 courses between the 4-year and 2-year institutions, embedding socially responsiblecomponents (SRC) to encourage retention, especially among Hispanic and female students, 4) offeringacademic support, including boot camps for post-transfer students and tutoring for both pre-andpost-transfer students, and 5) building transfer student communities and facilitating resource sharing,managed by student ambassadors, via Discord and in-person social events.The joint team began implementing these