, providing an incentive for activeparticipation. In discrete mathematics, these activities were not graded, which offers acomparison between voluntary engagement and incentivized participation.Experiment and ResultsWe have thoroughly examined existing tools, demonstrating our commitment to research andplanning. This process has allowed us to identify tools applicable to our project’s objectives anddiscern how we may effectively integrate those tools. Given our emphasis on automaticallygenerating microlearning components from recorded video lectures, our primary focus isexploring the functionalities offered by the OpenAI tools. Our project has achieved significantefficiency and time-saving benefits by developing a Python script integrating various
hidden curriculum,” Oxf Rev Educ, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 733–748, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1229664.[30] Z. Pavlovic, “Facilitating academic and social integration among first-year university students: is peer mentoring necessary or an additive measure?,” Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 29–48, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13611267.2023.2290731.[31] L. Pollara, “International graduate students’ involvement and overall International graduate students’ involvement and overall satisfaction with their college experience satisfaction with their college experience,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd
and design area, are from the University of Texas at Austin. Additionally, Dr. Austin Talley holds an undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Mechanical Engineering. His research is in engineering design theory and engineering education. He has published over 30 papers in engineering education journals and conference proceedings. He has worked to implement multiple National Science Foundation (NSF) grants focused on engineering education. He has been an instructor in more than ten week long summer K-12 teach Professional Development Institutes (PDI). He has received multiple teaching awards. He has developed design based curriculum for multiple K-12 teach PDIs and student summer camps.Logan Mallow
Paper ID #46084Characteristics and Discourses about Energy Transition: Insights from CrossdisciplinaryStudent Talk ¨Dr. Desen Sevi Ozkan, University of Connecticut Desen is an assistant professor at the University of Connecticut in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research focuses on sociotechnical engineering education and how people make sense of complex sociotechnical energy infrastructure and systems.Todd Campbell, University of Connecticut Todd Campbell is a Professor and Head of the Department of Curriculum and
Paper ID #48421Engaging Students on a Construction Execution Course by Applying a GamifiedFlipped classroomMs. Tathyana Moratti, University of Georgia PhD studentRicardo Juan Jos´e Oviedo-Haito, Universidade Federal De Santa CatarinaDr. Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia Beshoy Morkos is an associate professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia where he directs MODEL (Manufacturing Optimization, Design, and Engineering Education Lab) Group. His research group currently explores the areas of system design, manufacturing, and their respective education. His system design research focuses on developing
them for careers inthe energy industry.2. Project-based Experiential Teaching and Learning (PBTL)PBTL is an educational methodology that seamlessly integrates hands-on, real-world projects intothe curriculum, providing a dynamic and interactive alternative to traditional teaching methods[11]. Unlike conventional instruction, where students often passively absorb information throughlectures and textbooks, PBTL fosters active engagement, collaboration, and problem-solving. Thisapproach is built on the understanding that students learn most effectively when they are directlyinvolved in practical tasks that simulate real-world scenarios, allowing them to bridge the gapbetween theoretical concepts and their applications.Experiential learning
leadership positions for professional organizations such as ASME and ASEE. He is a past chair of the Engineering Ethics Division at ASEE and past chair of multiple groups in ASME. Dr. Barakat is also a program evaluator for ABET and a consultant for engineering programs development and evaluation under other systems. Dr. Barakat is an active consultant who is currently collaborating with international teams of professionals from academia and industry to build capacity and education programs in areas such as: Engineering Leadership, Engineering Ethics, Professionalism, Societal Impact of Technology, Curriculum Development, and Communication. Dr. Barakat expertise and interest include also the areas of Mechatronics, Control
Paper ID #47853Readying the Workforce: Engineering Veteran Graduate Student ExperiencesPivoting Towards ResearchDr. Bradley Joseph Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University Brad Sottile is Associate Teaching Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering in The Pennsylvania State University’s College of Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.Dr. Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Pennsylvania State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science
inrecent research from Corbi et al., [15]. Engineering students often experience heightened stressand anxiety due to the rigorous demands of their curriculum, which can negatively affect theirconfidence and performance [16]. A study by Olivera-Carhuaz et al., [17] emphasizes the role ofanxiety, dysthymia, and negative affect in shaping academic self-efficacy, particularly among 5engineering students. The findings from the study underscore the need for pedagogical approachesthat address these emotional challenges. Hands-on pedagogies, such as Experiment-CentricPedagogy which help to mitigate these negative states by fostering an engaging and
workshops to teach faculty about process safety.[11] Teaching learners to use theframework will help them to organize information learned, connect ideas, and identify areas forlearning growth. The process safety framework also has the potential to help departments definegoals for process safety by identifying which questions are addressed in their curriculum. Theframework also enables faculty to integrate content into their existing courses simply by askingthe questions. The framework can help faculty design new process safety courses by helpingthem identify what they are teaching and what they are missing.The Process Safety knowledge framework is composed of six key questions: 1. What are the hazards and how are they characterized? 2. How can
worked remotely on an inter-university team design project. Theproject was implemented in Spring 2023 and repeated in Spring 2024. At the end of theendeavor, the students completed an end-of-project survey and wrote a reflection about theexperience.Following the initial project offering, the authors employed Natural Language Processing (NLP)techniques to analyze the student reflections. Three unsupervised learning techniques (K-meansclustering, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and Non-Negative Matrix Factorization) wereutilized to identify key themes in the student responses and categorize the topics or themescommon among the responses. Preliminary findings based on the Spring 2023 data revealed a setof five common and distinctive themes or
engineering from Dartmouth College, a master’s in Architectural Acoustics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and a PhD in Education (Curriculum and Instruction) from the University of Maryland. Prior to his academic career, Stephen was an acoustical consultant for 5 years in both London, UK and Silicon Valley, CA. His research has focused on culture and equity in engineering education, particularly undergraduate contexts, pedagogy, and student support. Through his work he aims to use critical qualitative, video-based, participatory, and ethnographic methods to look at everyday educational settings in engineering and shift them towards equity and inclusion. He also leads the Equity Research Group where he mentors
” [12]. As such engineers are a primary stakeholder toinfluence product quality improvement. The design methods they employ greatly affect thequality of experience for the users of delivered apps globally.Culture is “An integrated pattern of human behavior that includes thoughts, communications,languages, practices, beliefs, values, customs, courtesies, rituals, manners of interacting, roles,relationships, and expected behaviors of a racial, ethnic, religious or social group; the ability totransmit the above to succeeding generations; is dynamic in nature.” [13]. The digital culture “isthe relationship between people and the use of technology. It describes how digital media andtechnology have shaped our everyday lives and interactions with
-aged children, and rescue dog.Chris Anderson, University of Colorado BoulderDr. Nick Stites, University of Colorado Boulder Nick Stites is the Director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at CU Boulder and an instructor with the Integrated Design Engineering program. Dr. Stites is the principal investigator (PI) of the Denver-Metro Engineering Consortium, which is a partnership between local community colleges and universities to support engineering pathways for transfer students. He is also involved with ASPIRE, an NSF Engineering Research Center that is focused on developing the technology and workforce for electrifying the nation’s transportation system. Dr. Stites earned degrees in Mechanical
Paper ID #46631Novice versus Experienced Near-Peer Mentors’ Facilitation of a Discussionwith a Student Avatar Facing Logistical Challenges on a Design TeamPamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has
opportunities for all students requires an extremely high level of professionalskill and judgment from teachers [1], [2], [3]. Fragmentation in teacher education, fieldexperiences, and university learning is common for future teachers learning professional practice[4]. Broader systemic issues of educational inequity disproportionately exclude students fromminoritized backgrounds from high-quality STEM learning environments [2], [5]. This demandfor rigorous and rich STEM teaching is occurring while teachers, teaching, and teacher educationhave come under intense scrutiny, thus providing a moment of opportunity for dramatic re-envisioning of how we support practicing teachers and the education of the next generation ofSTEM teachers. In this paper, we
qualitative methodstraining [6]. Additionally, more flexible and interdisciplinary PhD pathways in engineeringeducation have emerged, further expanding opportunities for doctoral study [7]. As engineeringincreasingly integrates knowledge from diverse disciplines, the demand for research andinnovation in engineering education continues to rise. This growing emphasis on engineeringeducation highlights its role as a critical and expanding field, making it an essential componentof the evolving academic landscape. 2. Background and Motivation Many students entering PhD programs in engineering education come from traditionalengineering backgrounds. While they often have strong quantitative skills, their experience withqualitative research methods
Paper ID #46181Middle School Preservice Teachers’ Discussion Prompts to Help a StudentAvatar Overcome Idea Fixation during Brainstorming (Fundamental)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has authored
reputation, accreditation, and the ability to secure fund-ing. These rates also have a broader socioeconomic implication as they impact an individual’spotential financial stability, as well as strengthen the general labor market by providing an influxof qualified professionals. However, many students fail to achieve graduation in a timely mannerdue to a multitude of factors that extend beyond repeating courses or poor academic performance.Although changes in curriculum and program requirements often require significant time to designand implement, this study adopts a more student-focused approach to provide immediate inter-ventions aimed at supporting successful student outcomes. Recognizing the importance of timelygraduation, this study aims to
researchprojects and other collaborations. The CER was used to engage with K12 students and also workto broaden participation in STEM, and STEM curriculum was integrated into local schools.Thus, the community engagement encompassed the research, teaching, and service missions ofhigher education. This thriving partnership grew to yield a number of grants for the interviewee,and the collaborations expanded beyond the initial core technical engineering expertise of thefaculty member into other topics, which then led to bringing in other collaborators from theuniversity. The community partnership led to improved quality of life in the community andpolicy changes in the local government. However, after a decade with a thriving partnership, theCER with that
Paper ID #48950Scaling Engineering Challenges for PK12 Outreach Programs (Other)Dr. Leah Bug, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Leah Bug has over 35 years of experience teaching both formal and informal K-20 STEM education, with over 20 years in designing and providing teacher professional development.Dr. Amy Isvik, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Amy Isvik has 6+ years of experience as an informal STEM educator working with learners in North Carolina, nationally, and abroad.Mrs. Susan Beth D’amico, NC State University College of Engineering - The Engineering Place Susan B. Dˆa C™Amico Coordinator of
or ways of talking about theirexperience of disability. The authors appreciate and welcome discussions about the nuance andcomplexity of language, which evolves over time to reflect changes in the preferences ofcommunities, attitudes across our broader society, and from new scientific research.Literature ReviewConsideration of disability is critical for creating an inclusive campus environment.Approximately a fifth of the global population is disabled [16], [26], [27], [28] and according tothe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 25% of all American adults reportedhaving a disability in 2022 [29]. Students in higher education experience similar rates ofdisability: in 2021, 21% of enrolled undergraduates and 11% of graduate
Teaching in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of British Columbia. She is also the Associate Dean, Academic, for the Faculty of Applied Science.Dr. Alireza Bagherzadeh, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Chemical and Biological Engineering Department, University of British ColumbiaDr. Jon Nakane, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Jon Nakane is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Materials Engineering at the University of British Columbia, ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Factors Affecting First-Year Engineering Student Well-being: A Six-YearStudy at a Large, Research-Intensive UniversityAbstractThis Complete
. ● International collaboration and innovation networks: Strengthening international collaboration between universities, governments and industries will be crucial. ● Integration of a Capability Maturity Model (CMM): The integration of a Capability Maturity Model (CMM) to measure the evolution of universities (through levels) in their capacity to generate advanced technologies and compete globally is also recommended. ● Training: Develop a specific curriculum or roadmap for universities to advance or consolidate in the different levels of maturity of the model. ● Reliability of the Capability Index: To ensure the reliability of the index, a review by experts is necessary, along with the test of internal consistency
Paper ID #47097The Engineering Professional Skills Assessment 2.0: Preparing EngineeringStudents for Global Workplace ComplexitiesDr. Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov is an adjunct associate professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University.Dr. Edwin R. Schmeckpeper P.E., Norwich University Edwin Schmeckpeper, P.E., Ph.D., was formerly Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Management at Norwich University, which is recognized by ASCE as the first private school in the United States to offer
required capstone design projects through the MDL whilecollaborating with the undergraduate researchers from chemical engineering. The project taskswere divided among students in different disciplines over an 18-month period (Fig. 1).Fig. 1. Project meline and workflow illustra ng synergism between Chemical Engineering and theMul disciplinary Design Laboratory. (ME = Mechanical Engineering; EE = Electrical Engineering; IE =Industrial Engineering; CSE= Computer & Systems Engineering). The timeline for the project spanned three academic semesters and a summer session.Chemical engineering personnel conducted initial modeling of material and energy balances forthe apple processing and dairy processing plants. Given estimates of production
utilized a Python script to process the data in the JSON file. For this purpose, itextracts text comments from the JSON file. To maintain the integrity of the comments asparagraphs, internal newlines within the text were removed. The cleaned text was then written tothe output file, with each comment followed by two newlines to ensure proper spacing. It thusenabled an efficient extraction and storage of the comments in a format suitable for thesubsequent analysis.For analysis of the comments in the comments JSON file, each comment was analyzed usingOpenAI GPT-3.5-turbo model. Through the use of the GPT LLM model, video comments werepre-processed to prepare the video comment data for the sentiment analysis. The comment datapre-processing includes
Paper ID #48235Design-Build Capstone Projects: Continuing the Poly Canyon Legacy of Learn-by-DoingDr. Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Anahid Behrouzi is an associate professor of architectural engineering at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo. She has been involved with STEM education beginning in 2003 as a volunteer and summer instructor with the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. She has been engaged with undergraduate/graduate course delivery in the topic areas of engineering problem-solving and structural engineering at North Carolina State