Lafayette (COE) Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer is Associate Director of the Women in Engineering Program and Associate Professor (by courtesy) in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue University. She conducts research around student success.Ing. Mayari I. Serrano, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Mayari Serrano Anazco is a visiting clinical assistant professor in the Honors College and College of Engineering at Purdue University. She has authored, co-authored, implemented, and assessed learning activities, outreach activities, and workshops focused on modifying negative attitudes towards technology and engineering and increasing knowledge of several topics of STEM (science
Paper ID #46672Investigating the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT to perform programmingassignments from an introductory R programming courseDr. Lucie Guertault, North Carolina State University at Raleigh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Investigating the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT to perform programming assignments from an introductory R programming course 1. IntroductionLarge language models (LLMs) are generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools capable ofperforming various natural language processing tasks such as generating text and engaging inconversations with
thatare produced by students. Traditionally, the emphasis in engineering education has been onproblem sets, exams, and reports (written artifacts). Non-written artifacts were limited to livepresentations/demonstrations. With the ubiquity of video recording and editing technology,students are now producing more non-written work such as videos demonstrations, recordedpresentations, podcasts, etc. In addition, students are producing digital artifacts that areinherently non-written like solid models, visual simulations, and animations.In many cases, instructors apply the traditional modes of feedback to non-written work. Theutility of this is unclear [10]. In particular, the precision and specificity of feedback is reducedsince there is not a
computational thinking, engineering design, technology, and systems thinkingthrough hands-on, collaborative, student-driven projects. Camp sessions are co-facilitated by localK-12 teachers and undergraduate student mentors from the University of Florida. The GGEEprogram prioritized the hiring of undergraduate student mentors who were from the school districtshosting the camps.In this exploratory mixed methods study, undergraduate student mentor perceptions of near-peermentorship are used to assess the GGEE program’s impact on participant STEM identity andexplore the personal benefits of participation. This paper reports on the following researchquestions: 1) How does serving as near-peer mentors to K-12 student mentees in an educationalSTEM summer
Southeast Section Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2007. [7] J. Prasad, A. Goswami, B. Kumbhani, C. Mishra, H. Tyagi, J. H. Jun, K. K. Choudhary, M. Kumar, N. James, V. R. S. Reddy et al., “Engineering curriculum development based on education theories,” Current Science, pp. 1829–1834, 2018. [8] S. R. Patil and P. S. Ghatage, “Curriculum development of an engineering pg program at an autonomous institute–a case study,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, vol. 32, no. 4, 2019. [9] R. Molontay, N. Horv´ath, J. Bergmann, D. Szekr´enyes, and M. Szab´o, “Characterizing curriculum prerequisite networks by a student flow approach,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 491–501, 2020.[10] S. M
, institutional support, funding pressures, and access tomentorship [9], [10], [11]. Of these factors, psychological barriers have been found to becommon experience amongst higher education’s faculty, students and postdocs [12], [13], [14],[15], [16], [17]. In MIRNs, where participants must navigate complex structures, diverseinstitutional cultures, and the demands of collaboration across disciplines and geographies, thesefactors and barriers may be exacerbated–especially for participants from historicallyunderrepresented groups in science and engineering.Historically, the culture of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields has beencharacterized by rigid hierarchies, intense competition, and an emphasis on individualachievement over
Vignesh Kumar Karuppasamy is a master’s student in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Ottawa. He holds a Bachelor of Technology in Computer Science and Engineering from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham. Prior to his graduate studies, he worked as a Software Engineer at NortonLifeLock Inc. (formerly Symantec) for over three years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Motivation and Learning Strategies - What Can University Engineering Design Courses Do to Help Students and What Must Students Do?AbstractEngineering design courses attempt to teach students how to design products and services thataddress problems
several premier journals, including the Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Higher Education, and Science and Engineering and Ethics. She is a contributing author to several books published by Oxford University Press, Teachers College Press, and University of California Press. She served as President for the Korean American Educational Researchers Association, including President in 2013-2014, and Chair of the KAERA Board of Directors in 2019-2020.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of Tennessee Space Institute Jerry Dahlberg is the Senior Director of Research at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. Prior to joining UTSI, he was an Assistant Teaching Professor and Senior Design Committee Chair at the
, 2023, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2023043053.[14] R. Atkinson and M. Mayo, “Refueling the US innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education,” 2010.[15] J. C. Weidman, “Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach,” in Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol. 5, J. C. Smart, Ed., Agathon, 1989, pp. 289–322.[16] J. C. Weidman and L. T. DeAngelo, Eds., Socialization in higher education and the early career: theory, research and application. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020.[17] E. Godfrey, “Understanding disciplinary cultures: The first step to cultural change,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st
scientific computing in Python,” Nat. Methods, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 261–272, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.[20] R. Bijker, S. S. Merkouris, N. A. Dowling, and S. N. Rodda, “ChatGPT for Automated Qualitative Research: Content Analysis,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, p. e59050, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.2196/59050.[21] J. Roy, C. Wilson, A. Erdiaw-Kwasie, and C. Stuppard, “Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers 2019,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2020.[22] R. C. Slotnick and J. Z. Boeing, “Enhancing qualitative research in higher education assessment through generative AI integration: A path toward meaningful insights and a cautionary tale,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., p. tl.20631, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1002/tl.20631
Paper ID #46323The Effects of Course Goals on Student Motivation in Computer-Aided DesignCoursesDr. Tyler Carter Kreipke CSC, University of Portland Tyler Kreipke, CSC, received his Bachelor of Science from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2011, majoring in Biomedical Engineering with a concentration in Biomaterials and minoring in German. He completed his doctorate in Bioengineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017, where his dissertation focused on bone mechanobiology. He completed his Master of Divinity at the University of Notre Dame in 2023, and was ordained to the Catholic priesthood as a member of the
students in focus in the United States higher education institutions. In addition, Mr. Halkiyo is interested in broadening the participation of engineering education in Ethiopian universities to increase the diversity, inclusivity, equity, and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student groups such as women and men, rich and poor, students from rural and urban, and technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences and thrive in their performances. In doing so, he focuses on engineering education policies and practices in teaching and learning processes, assessments, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo has been teaching different Civil
Associate in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University.Julian Rodrigo Sosa-Molano, Florida International University Julian is a graduate research assistant at Florida International University. He holds a BSc in Electronics Engineering from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia and a MSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The University of Arizona. He is pursuing his PhD degree in Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has professional experience in Information Technology, Semiconductors, and Telecommunications in international companies such as Ecopetrol, Texas Instruments, and Ericsson. His
Paper ID #45906WIP: Assessing Quality of Interview Protocol for Capturing Students’ Senseof Belonging and Wellbeing in a Practice-Based Engineering Education ModelDr. Catherine McGough Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine Spence is an Associate Professor at Iron Range Engineering in the Integrated Engineering Department at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She received her PhD in Engineering and Science Education in 2019 and a BS in Electrical Engineering in 2014 at Clemson University.Neeko Bochkarev, Minnesota State University, Mankato Neeko Bochkarev is an undergraduate researcher pursuing a B.S. in
NationalScience Foundation. Special thanks to Shane Gavney, Maya Leizerovich, and AnvieGowrishankar, undergraduate contributors to the reflective memo analysis, all from theUniversity of Colorado Boulder.References[1] The Engineering Mindset Report: A Vision for Change in Undergraduate Engineering andEngineering Technology Education. May 14, 2024. American Society for EngineeringEducation, Washington DC. Downloaded from: https://mindset.asee.org/ 18 Jan 2025.[2] J.H. Dyer, H. B. Gregersen, and C.M. Christensen, “Entrepreneur Behaviors, OpportunityRecognition, and the Origins of Innovative Ventures,” Strateg. Entrepreneurship J, 2 (4): pp.317–38, 2008.[3] J. H. Dyer, H. B. Gregersen, and C. M. Christensen, The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering theFive Skills of
BlackColleges and Universities (HBCUs) are uniquely positioned to play a pivotal role in bridging thesegaps. With their long-standing commitment to fostering academic success among AfricanAmerican students, HBCUs graduate a disproportionately high percentage of African Americanprofessionals, including in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) and construction-related fields. By examining the root causes of underrepresentation and leveraging the strengths ofHBCUs, this study aims to propose actionable strategies to diversify the construction managementworkforce and foster greater equity within the industry.Literature Review Data from 2023 shows that African Americans make up only 4.8% of constructionmanagers, despite comprising 14.4% the
program at (WSU), teaching several first-year engineering courses designed for students from disadvantaged backgrounds pursuing engineering degrees. She also earned her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Washington State University with research on soft robotic mechanisms.Dr. Jonathan Steffens, Washington State University Jonathan received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rochester Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University. He worked at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a post-doctoral fellow. He was a visiting professor at Lafayette College. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department
, Liliana Ahumada1 y Fidel Ramirez1 1 Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia 2 Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia 3 Georgia Tech, Atlanta, United StatesAbstractSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) is an interdisciplinaryeducational approach developed by the U.S. National Science Foundation to foster research,innovation, and learning. By integrating these fields, STEM education aims to developtheoretical understanding and practical application in real-world contexts. Despite itswidespread adoption in developed countries, some initiatives
Safety Engineering and Education. With over 10 years of expertise in training professionals across companies, educational institutions, and industries, they possess strong skills in processing, analyzing, and synthesizing large data sets. Their ability to thrive in collaborative, team-oriented environments complements their technical expertise. Currently, he is pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where they serve as a Graduate Research Assistant. Additionally, he contribute as a visiting professor at Federal Institute of Science and Technology of Minas Gerais (IFMG-Bambu´ı) in Brazil. His research is centered on innovative methodologies for Engineering Education, with a
secured multiple grants for innovative projects. A senior member of IEEE, he actively contributes to the field through publications and conference presentations. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Case Studies of ChatGPT for Embedded Systems TeachingAbstractThe rise of AI technology, particularly Generative AI, has significantly transformed the landscapeof higher education. Generative AI, such as ChatGPT, has been extensively studied in fields likeComputer Science to assess its effectiveness in enhancing learning. However, its impact on morespecialized areas, such as bare-metal embedded systems, remains underexplored. Bare-metalembedded systems, which include hardware (e.g
). Mechanisticreasoning (Machamer, Darden, & Craver, 2000; Russ et al., 2008) also plays a central role insensemaking about an engineering design’s functionality.Reflective decision-making. Also central to the work of engineering design is decision-makingdiscourse, particularly decision-making that is informed by evidence from and reflection onstakeholders, criteria, previous design solutions, and test results (Crismond & Adams, 2012). TheFramework for K-12 Science Education reminds us that “Engineers, too, make decisions basedon evidence that a given design will work” (NRC, 2012, p. 62). Ethnographic studies ofprofessional engineering practice show how iterative cycles of decision making are crucial forthe design of working technologies (Atman et al
the United States to maintain technological growth, it is imperative that gaps in theengineering workforce are filled to meet the needs of all individuals. Due to employment growthand some professionals leaving the engineering profession each year, the United States Bureau of*The following authors share first authorship.Labor Statistics estimates that 195,000 engineering and architecture job openings are projectedannually [1]. The American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) reported that in 2023, alittle over 134,00 engineering bachelor degrees were awarded with 17.2% of those degreesawarded to minority students [2]. Among the various ethnic groups reported (African Americanor Black, Hispanic, White, Asian American, American Indian
engineering education, Dr. Gonzalez has received the American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Teaching Award, the Minnie Stevens Piper Foundation Award, and LeTourneau University’s top research and scholarship award. He was also a Finalist for the IEEE Global Humanitarian Engineer of the Year award in 2013. He serves as an engineering program evaluator for the Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Dr. Gonzalez was awarded a faculty fellowship by UTEP and the University College London (UCL), where he served as a Visiting Professor, to spend the 22-23 academic year traveling throughout the United Kingdom visiting over 25 universities in England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, and The Netherlands
preparedness levels while promoting skill development, confidence, andacademic success. The techniques described here represent the ground-up efforts of facultymembers in the engineering and technology areas to meet the needs of our students. Thesefaculty-driven efforts are independent of, yet consistent with, University policies as well as acampus-wide initiative (since Fall 2023) to promote the use of high-impact practices [20].Engineering faculty, in particular, are continually looking to improve upon these techniques tofurther student success, which serves as our lodestar.Expanded accessibility through office hoursRecognizing that underprepared students often require additional one-on-one support, eachfaculty member is required to hold ten office
Paper ID #49454Engineering Communication as an Area of Specialization and a FundamentallyInterdisciplinary Domain: What We Can Learn from Fred Newton ScottDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engineering Communication as an Area of Specialization and a
Paper ID #47204Developing qualitative method for detecting evident of design fixation duringengineering design challenge activities for pre-college students (other)Mr. Sopheak Seng, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Graduate Student in Science Education, College of Education, Purdue UniversityWilliam Samuel Walker ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Developing qualitative methods for detecting evidence of design fixation during engineering design challenge activities for pre-college students (other)Engineering has become a major component in science classrooms as the NGSS is continuing
Paper ID #46677Student perspectives on attendance and instructional methods in a combinedlecture and laboratory courseKara Bocan, University of Pittsburgh Kara Bocan is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2017, and her BSE in Electrical Engineering and Bioengineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2012. She currently teaches courses on data structures and algorithms, introductory programming, software architecture, and simulation and modeling. Her engineering
Paper ID #45954Association between fundamental skills on physics pre-course assessment andpost-course test performanceCherish Bauer-Reich, University of Jamestown Cherish Bauer-Reich is an Associate Professor at the University of Jamestown in Jamestown, ND. She is also a senior member of IEEE.Jakob DeLong, University of Jamestown Jakob DeLong is currently an assistant teaching professor in the Electrical Engineering department at Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received a BS in Electrical Engineering from West Virginia University and a PhD in Electrical Engineering from The Ohio State University, while
needs of students from different demographicbackgrounds in Engineering schools.In order to identify the students’ needs for improved accessibility to Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) content that include equations and diagrams, we surveyeda large number of Engineering students (predominantly undergraduate students) regarding theirexperience with equations and diagrams in six Engineering courses of Fall 2024 at the Universityof Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC).We ask all students to respond to their experience and preferences in multiple elements in Mathdelivery, specific preferences in equation formats, diagram formats, equations and diagrams’captioning, and explanation styles. The surveys allow students with physical
,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1121–1142, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09759-w.[20] P. Van den Bossche, W. H. Gijselaers, M. Segers, and P. A. Kirschner, “Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments,” Small Group Research, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 490–521, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1046496406292938.[21] “Facts and Figures,” Northeastern University, 2019. https://facts.northeastern.edu/[22] “Annual Report 2023-24,” Northeastern University College of Engineering, Oct. 24, 2024. https://coe.northeastern.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/coe/print/coe_2024_issuu.pdf (accessed Jan. 15, 2025).