and the fourth-year students attend classes atanother campus. The campuses are approximately 15 miles apart. The first-year engineeringstudents may go on to earn an engineering degree in any of the more than 25 engineeringdisciplines offered by the University. The fourth-year students are all enrolled in the B. S. inMultidisciplinary Engineering Design (MDE) program, a four-year degree that incorporatescoursework and practical experience in mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering with anoverarching emphasis on engineering design.The first-year students are taking a Cornerstone Engineering Design course, EDSGN 100. This isa required course for most engineering majors that introduces students to engineeringfundamentals. The course
, 2011.[6] S. Lindblom‐Ylänne, K. Trigwell, A. Nevgi and P. Ashwin, “How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context,” Studies in Higher education, vol. 31, no. 03, pp. 285-298, 2006.[7] E. K. Lefler, G. M. Sacchetti and D. I. Del Carlo, "ADHD in college: A qualitative analysis," ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, vol. 8, pp. 79-93, 2016.[8] S. N. Perry and K. K. Franklin, “I'm Not the Gingerbread Man! Exploring the Experiences of College Students Diagnosed with ADHD,” Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 94-109, 2006.[9] M. Prince and R. M. Felder, “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases,” Journal
-Mitchener, “A call to action to address rural mental health disparities,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.42. [7] “CDC - 2023 BRFSS Survey Data and Documentation,” 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual data/annual 2023.html [8] N. C. Coombs, W. E. Meriwether, J. Caringi, and S. R. Newcomer, “Barriers to healthcare access among U.S. adults with mental health challenges: A population- based study,” SSM - Population Health, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 100847, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100847. [9] Md. M. Islam, S. Hassan, S. Akter, F. A. Jibon, and Md. Sahidullah, “A com- prehensive
. A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge, 2017.4. B. Hartmann, S. Doorley, and S. R. Klemmer, “Hacking, mashing, gluing: Understanding opportunistic design,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 46–54, 2008.5. M. Lande and L. Leifer, “Prototyping to learn: Characterizing engineering students’ prototyping activities and prototypes,” in DS 58-1: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Design Processes, Palo Alto, CA, USA, Aug. 24–27, 2009.6. V. K. Viswanathan and J. S. Linsey, “Design fixation and its mitigation: A study on the role of expertise,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 135, no. 5, p. 051008, 2013.
TX RX The prestige and recognition associated with engineering was an important factor in my 56% 76% enrolling in engineering. Selecting engineering was influenced by my parents or close relatives. 33% 24% Selecting engineering was influenced by my high school teacher(s) and/or school counsellor. 11% 29% The friendships I have made during my studies within engineering at [post-secondary 67% 53% institution] have been important factors for
. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaBurnett, C., Smith, R., & Choudhury, A. (2022). Industry-academic partnerships in biomanufacturing education: A case study. Bioengineering & Biotechnology Journal, 8(1), 24-35.Champely, S., Ekstrom, C., Dalgaard, P., Gill, J., Weibelzahl, S., Anandkumar, A., Ford, C., Volcic, R., & De Rosario, H. (2022). Pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/pwr.pdfCiarocco, N. J., & Strohmetz, D. B. (2018). Developing employability skills: The role of self- efficacy in student career preparation. Journal of Career Assessment
, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z.[2] H. Arksey and L. O’Malley, “Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.[3] Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C. M., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E. v., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K. K., Tunçalp, Ӧzge, Wilson, M. G., Zarin, W., & Tricco, A. C. (2021). Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. In Systematic Reviews (Vol. 10, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643- 021-01821-3[4] M. J
solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, 2006.[2] A. D. Patrick and M. Boreggo, “A review of the literature relevant to engineering identity,” in Proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA: American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.[3] A. H. El-Zein and C. Hedemann, “Engineers as Problem Solvers: a deficient self-definition for the 21st century,” in Proceedings of the 2013 Engineering for Sustainable Development, Cambridge, United Kingdom: EESD13, 2013, pp. 1–8.[4] S. Haase, H. L. Chen, S. Sheppard, A. Kolmos, and N. Mejlgaard, “What does it take to become a good engineer
themission of serving Black and Native students especially (i.e., HBCUs and TCUs).References[1] “The Data Buddies Project,” CERP. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://cra.org/cerp/data-buddies/[2] A. N. Washington, “When Twice as Good Isn’t Enough: The Case for Cultural Competence in Computing,” in Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, in SIGCSE ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Feb. 2020, pp. 213–219. doi: 10.1145/3328778.3366792.[3] A. N. Washington, S. B. Daily, and C. Sadler, “Identity-Inclusive Computing: Learning from the Past; Preparing for the Future,” presented at the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
. 259–289, 2024, doi: 10.46328/ijte.691.[18] U. Farooq and S. Anwar, “ChatGPT Performance on Standardized Testing Exam -- A Proposed Strategy for Learners,” 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14519[19] S. J. Bang and S. Anwar, “Utilizing Natural Language Processing for Assisting in Writing English Sentences,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2024, doi: 10.18260/1-2--48249.[20] A. J. Rojas, “An Investigation into ChatGPT’s Application for a Scientific Writing Assignment,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1959–1965, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00034.[21] J. K. West et al., “An Analysis of AI-Generated Laboratory Reports across the Chemistry Curriculum and Student
of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] S. Stewart, D. H. Lim, and J. Kim, “Factors Influencing College Persistence for First-Time Students,” Journal of Developmental Education, vol. 38, no. 3, 2015.[2] S. L. Fletcher, D. Newell, L. Newton, and M. Anderson-Rowland, “The Wise Summer Bridge Program: Assessing Student Attrition, Retention, And Program Effectiveness,” presented at the 2001 Annual Conference, Jun. 2001, p. 6.1053.1-6.1053.7. Accessed: Jul. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-wise-summer-bridge- program-assessing-student-attrition-retention-and-program-effectiveness[3] R. A. M. Hensel, J. Dygert, and M. L. Morris
alignment with the course learning outcomes, the KEEN EMLOs,and ABET learning outcomes. An example of the curricular mapping of the aforementionedproblem-focused activities and assignments is demonstrated in Table 1. Table 2 demonstrateshow all assignments in the course have been aligned with the EMLOs. The major writtendeliverable included a report that included four chapters (Ch. 1 Problem Identification, Ch. 2Systems Design, Ch. 3 Detail Design, Ch. 4 Final Design). The chapters were assignedthroughout the 2-semester course with the previous revised chapter(s) being submitted withthe current chapter (e.g. Ch. 1 & 2 would be resubmitted with revisions along with Ch. 3submission). Table 1: Curricular Crosswalk for Problem-Focused
resources and deliver quality programs while meeting the demand for engineeringprofessionals. References[1] L. Gardner, “This is Why Some Regional Public Colleges are in So Much Trouble,”September 17, 2024. [Online] Available: https://www.chronicle.com/article/this-is-why-some-regional-public-colleges-are-in-so-much-trouble [Accessed Jan. 12, 2025][2] S. Quinton, “Why Universities Charge Extra for Engineering, Business and NursingDegrees,” June 1, 2017. [Online] Available: https://stateline.org/2017/06/01/why-universities-charge-extra-for-engineering-business-and-nursing-degrees/ [Accessed Jan. 12, 2025][3] K.A. Rosentrater and R. Balamuralikrishna, “Essential Highlights of the History of FluidMechanics
instructional modules with pre-and post-game activities. The ongoing development of this digital game underscores its capacityto foster critical thinking, cooperative decision-making, and stakeholder engagement, preparingstudents to navigate complex real-world infrastructure challenges in their professional careers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the Kern Family Foundation. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Kern Family Foundation.References[1] College Factual, “2023 Structural Engineering Degree Guide.” Accessed: Feb. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.collegefactual.com
, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20107 [3] Anon. “TOM Communities”. tomglobal.org. Accessed Jan 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://tomglobal.org/communities [4] Anon. “Volunteer Chapters”. makersmakingchange.com. Accessed Jan 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.makersmakingchange.com/s/chapters [5] S. Logan, H. Feldner, K. Bogart, B. Goodwin, S. Ross, M. Catenaet al., "Toy-based technologies for children with disabilities simultaneously supporting self-directed mobility, participation, and function: a tech report", Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 4, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00007 [6] Anon. “GoBabyGo!”. udel.edu. Accessed Apr 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://sites. udel.edu/gobabygo
spaces lack, this means of redefinition allows forinformed choices regarding the ways to invoke different epistemologies based on theirunderstanding of their sexual orientation and gender identity, comprehension of engineering, andwho they are as an individual.References [1] D. Riley, “Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit,” Eng. Stud., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 2017. [2] S. Stryker and P. J. Burke, “The past, present, and future of identity theory,” Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 284–297, Dec. 2000. [3] T. W. Smith, “Social identity and socio-demographic structure,” Int. J. Public Opin. Res., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 380–390, 2007. [4] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas
undergraduate students who have engaged in engineering research.The ultimate goal of our work, after multiple rounds of revisions, is to develop a surveyinstrument to measure undergraduate engineering students’ researcher identities, with the aim ofproviding faculty mentors with a tool that can help inform and shape students’ researchexperiences. AcknowledgementsWe would like to express gratitude to Dr. Samantha Brunhaver who met with us to discuss thiswork and offered valuable guidance. We thank the participants and researchers who were part ofthe original study.References[1] A. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduateresearch in students’ cognitive, personal, and
reflective essays.References1 Atkins, L., Martinez Moreno, J. E., Patil, L., Andrews, K. J., Wu, M. S., Dutta, D., Hug, B., and Bresler, L., “Fostering Innovative Skills Within the Classroom: A Qualitative Analysis from Interviews with 60 Innovators,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WA, 20152 Froehle, K., Dickman, L., Phillips, A. R., Murzi, H., and Paretti, M., “Understanding Lifelong Learning and Skills Development: Lessons Learned from Practicing Civil Engineers,” Journal of Civil Engineering Education, ASCE, June 20223 Spearman, L., “Keeping It Real: Using Interviews with Professionals as Realistic Previews of the Sports Industry,” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism
persistence and success," J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 206–245, 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21417.[4] K. C. Thiem and N. Dasgupta, "From Precollege to Career: Barriers Facing Historically Marginalized Students and Evidence-Based Solutions," Soc. Issues Policy Rev., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 212–251, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1111/sipr.12085.[5] S. C. Davis, S. B. Nolen, N. Cheon, E. Moise, and E. W. Hamilton, "Engineering climate for marginalized groups: Connections to peer relations and engineering identity," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 284–315, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20515.[6] M. G. Eastman, M. L. Miles, and R. Yerrick, "Exploring the White and male culture: Investigating individual perspectives of equity and privilege in
team-based, first-year engineering design course associated with improved teaming skills during senior capstone engineering design,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 11, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.18260/3-1-1153-36046.[6] C. Pfluger, S. Rivera-Jimenez, and A. Hauser, “A Comparative Study of Collaborative and Inclusive Skills Development in Capstone Design Teams at Three Different Engineering Institutions,” 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, doi: 10.18260/1-2--41585.[7] K. L. Tonso, “Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 25–37, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x.[8
as final grades, this toolhas proven to be an invaluable educational resource for this course.References[1] L. Rubin and C. Hebert, “Model for Active Learning: Collaborative Peer Teaching,” College Teaching, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 26–30, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1080/87567559809596229.[2] M. Hernández-de-Menéndez, A. Vallejo Guevara, J. C. Tudón Martínez, D. Hernández Alcántara, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 909–922, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/S12008-019-00557-8/FIGURES/2.[3] S. Senthamarai, “Interactive teaching strategies,” Journal of
, US Army Headquarters, Washington DC, and as the Operations Officer in the 420th Engineer Brigade in Bryan, TX.Dr. James Ledlie Klosky P.E., United States Military Academy Led Klosky is a Professor of Civil Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point and a past winner of ASEE’s National Teaching Medal. He is a licensed professional engineer and the Dean’s Executive Agent for Design and Construction at WeMatthew Glavin, United States Military Academy Matthew T. Glavin is an Instructor of Civil Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point and an active duty Army Engineer Officer. He is a graduate of West Point (B.S. in Civil Engineering), Missouri S&T (M.S. in Engineering
could apply to manycommunities. Figure 1 shows their conversation centering on requirements related to funding andinfrastructure beginning 42 minutes into the session.Figure 1: Team 1’s talk during their initial discussion of requirements, with color coding todraw attention to how they use, share, and distribute their agency in framing the problem.This discussion is characterized by both its tentativeness, with abundant use of modal verbsshowing possibility and potential control, but also some caution, marked by lower agencyconstruction using modal verbs of obligation. The students consistently share their agencythrough common use of the first person plural pronoun, “we,” and by referencing thecommunity, problem context, and stakeholders (“they
procedures for reference.To this end, the theoretical community of engineering education has conductedcontinuous exploration of the topic, trying to summarize and refine the continuousimprovement models. Mary Besterfield-SACRE and Larry J. Shuman were supportedby NSF to conduct a study [7]. They have developed a theoretical framework thathelps to better understand educational outcome based on Bloom’s Taxonomy.Through this framework, each educational outcome is refined into a series ofattributes, and engineering faculty can integrate educational outcome into engineeringprogram through these attributes. Sarapin M I proposed the five-stage programassessment model [8]. Strong S, etc., proposed the eight-stage program assessmentmodel [9]. According to
applicabilityAcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant #2308531and #2308532 titled “Collaborative Research: Track 4: Developing Equity-Minded EngineeringPractitioners (DEEP)”. We acknowledge the UIUC DEEP research team for their development ofthe COI instrument and for training Morgan State University coders in its application. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. D. Castle et al., "Systemic advantage has a meaningful relationship with grade outcomes instudents’ early STEM courses at six research universities," in Proc. Int. J. STEM Educ. Conf., vol
forsatisfactory work equivalent to a “high 80’s” grade in a traditional grading system. Full credit isawarded for “satisfactory” work and no credit is given for work that does not meet that standard.Students are allowed unlimited revision to the first of each type of deliverable, but the timeframe is limited to one week. To encourage quality, timely work, students are only allowed torevise two subsequent deliverables.The impact of specifications grading on learning is measured both qualitatively andquantitatively. Student attitudes and behaviors are documented to determine whether the use ofspecifications grading improves teamwork and yields a shift from grade-centric to learning-centric behaviors. The quality of major deliverables is measured using
, while Cortez & Schmelzenbach[9] shows their potential in MATLAB coding assistance. Further educational applications includeAI's integration into academic advising [10], engineering education [11], and cognitive flexibilitydevelopment for smart city initiatives [12]. While some industry applications, such as Fernandeset al.'s [13] DAVE system, demonstrate custom GPT-powered solutions for BIM environments,our study uniquely focuses on teaching students to develop and deploy their own custom AIchatbots. Through our approach, students learn to create chatbots that can be deployed on theirown websites and easily shared with stakeholders, without requiring extensive programmingknowledge. By emphasizing tailored prompt engineering and leveraging
students’ EM three Cs, and students’ increased appreciation of multiculturalism through in-person cultural immersion experiences.Introduction s engineering demand rises and globalization intensifies, fostering multiculturalism is vital forAglobal solutions. Transformative learning theory (TLT), developed by Dr. Jack Mezirow in the 1970s, explains how adult learners shift perspectives when confronted with challenging experiences[1,2]. While TLT guides culturally responsive teaching in international teacher training, it remains underutilized in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) contexts [1]. This research study explores the impact of international experiences on the development
learning. the dynamic and flexibleformat of the Open Educational Resource allows for continuous updates and the integration of newchapters and content ensuring that the material remains current.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Stephanie Fletcher, Head of Discovery, Metadata, and Technical Servicesat the Galvin Library, and Muhammad S. Khan, Instructional Designer at Illinois Tech’s Center forLeaning Innovation, for their invaluable support in developing this educational material. The authors arealso especially grateful to Sean Murphy, Systems and Open Infrastructure Librarian, and his team at theGalvin Library’s Exploration Space for supporting students with 3D printing and creating a supplementallearning module focused on