on engineering identity development, career pathways, and integrating computational and AI-based methods in engineering education. He has been actively involved in developing and assessing engineering courses, including project-based learning initiatives.Chanyee HongHyeyeon Lim ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Work in Progress: Exploring Biomedical Engineering Students’ Perceptionsof Large Language Model in Academic SettingsIntroductionIn Work in Progress (WIP) study, we are particularly interested in how engineering studentsperceive utility value and self-efficacy in using LLM for their engineering studies. Previousresearch has shown that self-efficacy is closely linked to academic
Paper ID #48491WIP: A Call to Action: Developing A Leadership Program that SupportsAcademic Caregivers Using the Kotter Change ModelDr. Megan Morin, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Megan Morin, Ph.D. (she/her) is the Associate Director in the Office of Faculty Development and Success at North Carolina State University’s College of Engineering. Her career began as a middle school teacher in the North Carolina Wake County Public School System. Following that, she took on roles such as the KEEN Program Coordinator at UNC-Chapel Hill and Senior Project Specialist at ASHLIN Management Group. In her current position
collected from both the controlled and experimental (VR) groups: 1. The build speed and quality of physical circuits using the 7408 IC in step 5. 2. The knowledge retention of IC 7408 six weeks after the VR exercise. 3. Self-reported survey with quantitative and qualitative feedback and comments.Project OutlookThe student-inspired project is currently at the minimum viable product (MVP) stage, meaningthe key assets (e.g., the AND Gate, the switches, the room) and scripts (e.g., how the assets willbehave according to event triggers) are functional but not perfect. Before putting the VRenvironment to the field test, iterative pilot tests will be necessary for debugging and usabilityimprovement. We also plan to make the environment tetherless
and expansion of students' Funds of Identity.Participants were not typically enrolled in formal coursework. Their acquisition of technicalknowledge was thus dependent on informal learning structures: advisor interactions, self-directedstudy, and peer mentorship. This independence produced both growth and anxiety. Elizabethnoted, “I was working on two different projects. My advisor would give me goals, but not how toget there. It took me weeks to feel like I had any control over my actions.” This absence ofscaffolding mirrored American expectations of research maturity but clashed with the guidedinstruction more common in Colombian undergraduate settings. Consequently, students’ abilityto adapt was linked to their capacity to interpret
engineering students. Currently, Zain’s research focuses on his Ph.D. dissertation, where he investigates the role of cognitive and motivational factors in problem-solving and cognitive engagement among engineering students. His work aims to enhance understanding of how these factors impact student learning and success in engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Routine vs. Non-Adaptive Learning: Examining the Impact of Metacognitive Knowledge and Self-Regulation on Problem-SolvingAbstractThis study presents findings from a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project aimedat exploring how students apply monitoring and evaluation (ME) processes in
researchers to lead technological projects that can be transferred and applied in the industrialfield. The quality of its professors and researchers is fundamental to the success of a high-impacttechnological transfer, as highlighted by Lall [11] in his analysis of the development of technologicalcapabilities in countries.Finally, entrepreneurship indicators measure the university's capacity to generate technologicalcompanies. This includes institutional support for the creation of startups and spin-offs throughincubators. Therefore, we evaluate the number of startups and spin-offs created, which reflects thecapacity to commercialize technologies and innovations. These indicators are key to promotinginnovation, as described by Powers [12].Analysis of
formation. Highschool teachers were the most frequently identified sources of engineering-related support withinstudents’ K-12 social networks. These supports often included advising on academic choices orencouraging persistence in STEM coursework.In contrast, elementary teachers were less likely to be associated with direct career guidance.However, they were frequently remembered for engaging students in hands-on, project-basedactivities such as building, designing, or coding. However, these activities were rarely presentedusing the language of engineering, suggesting a potential disconnect between early engagementand professional identity formation.Interestingly, students whose networks were composed of more than 50% of educators appearedto
Education, 2025 Undergraduate Research in Chemical Engineering: Benefits and Barriers for FacultyIntroductionNot too long ago, including undergraduate students in faculty research projects was uncommonand often limited to students in small honors programs. Then, in 1998, the Boyer Commissionreport offered recommendations on rethinking undergraduate education with a focus on inquiry-based learning.[1] Because of its positive effects on recruitment and retention of students,undergraduate research is now considered a High Impact Practice (HIP).[2] Undergraduateresearch benefits to students are well reported and include: research skills, the ability to think andwork like a scientist, enhanced preparation for
the project), theauthors noted a lack of protocols and processes by which participatory action design research canbe used to document and create consensus between a faculty advisor (FA) and their graduatestudent (GS). To minimize harm to the target population, which already is severely underservedand marginalized in engineering, the authors opted to test this protocol and process amongstthemselves and document its outcomes. The research design was participatory research with acollaborative autoethnographic approach to systematically, iteratively, and critically incorporatethe knowledge, expertise, experience, propositions, and practices to deepen the experiences of theparticipants and researchers. This paper specifically focused on the
strategies 22. Entrepreneurship and Innovation 19.Work in Progress 23. Green and Environmental Engineering 24. Humanitarian, Peace, and Service-Learning Engineering 25. Information Technology 26. IoT, Industry 5.0 and Society 6.0 27. Logistics and Transportation 28. Mechanical and Electromechanical 29. Natural Hazards 30. Oceanography and Marine Sciences 31. Project and Product Life Management in Engineering 32. Production Engineering 33. Sustainable Development in Engineering 34. Technology Management 35. TelecommunicationsIn this article, we selected publications that are linked to engineering education. To do this, wehave 1690 articles
Paper ID #47401A Review of Four Concept Inventories on Statics: Content, PsychometricCharacteristics, and ApplicationMr. Ibrahim Nihad Awartani, University of Cincinnati Ibrahim Awartani is an international doctoral student pursuing Engineering Education in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of Cincinnati. His BSc is a Mechanical Engineering degree from Philadelphia University in Jordan. His MSc background is a Master’s of Sciences in Engineering Management from Eastern Michigan University. He has 5 years of project management work
that qualifying universities enact effective methods to support theHispanic-identifying portion of their student body. In this study, Hispanic and Latiné studentexperiences in engineering are studied at the University of California-Irvine, an R1 HSI. Firstyear students in various engineering disciplines were interviewed as part of an overarchingproject titled the UBelong Collaborative project. Follow-up interviews are still being conductedwith these students to investigate their perceived sense of belonging throughout theirundergraduate experience. This paper will focus on analyzing a subset of the first set ofinterviews, which were conducted at the start of students’ introductory programming course. Aqualitative analysis is conducted on nine
University Women (AAUW)San Juan Puerto Rico Branch, for providing a Community Project Grant to purchase materials andfor their overall support and encouragement.References[1] J. Ogbeba and V. O. Ajayi, “Effect of Hands-On Activities on Achievement and Retentionof Senior Secondary Chemistry Students in Stoichiometry,” Journal of the International Centre forScience Humanities and Education Research, Vol 2, No 2. Dec, 2016.[2] M. Hubbard, “Development of a biomedical engineering course for high school studentsusing a framework of student-centered pedagogy,” in ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceProceedings, Arlington, Virginia: ASEE Conferences, Mar. 2023, p. 44999.[3] S. Madihally and E. Maase, “Introducing Biomedical And Biochemical
BME 4901 intervention, students completed apost-test to reassess skills gained and retained over the entire training sequence. The assessmentinstrument, which includes both multiple-choice and open response questions, is available on theOpen Science Framework [10]. Student responses are collected via paper instruments and thensaved in a spreadsheet with response identifiers, course information, and answers. This protocolwas reviewed by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board and was approved as aQuality Improvement project (IRB #232075).The first portion of the assessment consists of a series of multiple-choice questions (Q3-Q12).We used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to compare the proportion of correct answers from eachBME class
Teaching Excellence Award, the Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching Award from UTD’s Jonsson School, and the UT System Regent’s Outstanding Teaching Award.Dr. P.l.stephan Thamban, Dr. Thamban is an associate professor of instruction in the Mechanical Engineering department at the University of Texas at Dallas who contributes to the teaching mission of the department. He brings with him more than a decade long teaching experience and teaches foundational, introductory ME undergraduate courses and advanced mathematics courses for undergraduate and graduate students. He values and incorporates project-based learning components in undergraduate courses. ©American Society for Engineering
for publication.ConclusionAdditional REU projects, which will build on these preliminary findings, are scheduled forsummer 2025 and 2026 respectively. As part of this REU, the lead researcher successfullycompleted the following objectives: create a qualitative social science research design,efficiently utilize research software (Qualtrics, EndNote, and Atlas.ti), understand how tonavigate the IRB process and its historical importance within research, conduct qualitativecontent analysis and report findings in diagrammatic, poster, and written formats. The successof this REU was grounded in clearly defined weekly objectives, ongoing monitoring, open two-way communication, and tailored hands-on guidance provided as needed by both the
-Solving SuccessAbstractThis paper presents one of the findings from a National Science Foundation (NSF) fundedresearch project aimed at enhancing engineering and mathematics (EM) education. The researchproject specifically focuses on the role that students’ self-regulation in action (SRA) andmetacognitive knowledge about tasks (MKT) play during problem-solving activities. To gaininsight into academic problem-solving practices, the study examines how undergraduate studentsenrolled in second-year engineering and mathematics (EM) courses (Engineering Statics andOrdinary Differential Equations) use their MKT to navigate problem-solving challenges whileconcurrently monitoring and evaluating their cognitive processes.Twenty undergraduate students (7
. The faculty member developed a gradingrubric and provided a short list of potential feedback statements for the TA’s. For eachassignment the faculty member met with the TA’s individually to walk through the grading,working with them on several student assignments as examples. After the semester, one TAcollected feedback provided to students for each assignment, to modify the standard feedback forthe next semester.During the semester the two faculty members met periodically to discuss how the course modulewas progressing. As the librarian involved with the project has taught shorter format data literacyworkshops her insights into challenges were invaluable. Finally, a post-semester survey wasdeveloped with the primary goal of hearing how
time, I noticed that my students exhibited much deeperengagement with the material and greater initiative when assigned hands-on work e.g. projects tobuild something or demonstrate an idea [13]. Understanding the role of hands-on minds-onlearning, I devised this simple activity with minimal materials to help students acquire a deeperunderstanding of the fundamental concepts of heat transfer. Its current form has evolved over theyears through a process of feedback and reflection.The purpose of this activity is to have students think about and engage with the material deeperthan they would if it were part of a lecture / passive reception of knowledge. The purpose is notto develop a quantitatively accurate model of the three modes of heat
through education research and service in Graduate Student Government.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE
ideologies in the professional cultureof engineering that devalue non-technical considerations [3-7], engineering education programsoften de-emphasize public welfare responsibilities compared to technical skills and can evenfoster disengagement with public welfare considerations as students learn to be engineers [8].As part of a broader project on engineers’ recognition of their public welfare responsibilities, wedeveloped a one-credit course to teach Master’s and upper-division undergraduate students torecognize their public welfare responsibilities, equip students with strategies to intervene (e.g.,bring issues to the attention of team members, use organizational hotlines, report to federalagencies, work with journalists), and prepare students to
challenges of different academic contexts, fostering a culture of growth andinnovation within higher education [3].In engineering education, faculty development plays a particularly critical role due to thedynamic and applied nature of the field [4, 5, 6]. It ensures that instructors stay abreast of rapidtechnological advancements, emerging industry practices, and interdisciplinary approaches,enabling them to prepare students for the evolving workforce. Programs focused on innovativepedagogies, such as project-based learning and entrepreneurially minded learning, enhancestudent engagement and equip learners with skills in creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving [7]. Faculty development also supports alignment with accreditation standards
group ofacademic entrepreneurs. Hayter et al. (2016) highlighted that graduate students serve asoperational leaders in entrepreneurial projects, managing day-to-day activities necessary forlaunching startups. This is particularly true in fields such as biotechnology and engineering,where their technical expertise and innovative ideas are essential for transforming academicresearch into marketable products (Bagheri, 2011). Students bring fresh perspectives andenhance the diversity of entrepreneurial activities within universities (Guerrero et al., 2020).Motivations driving graduate students to engage in academic entrepreneurship are multifaceted.They are drawn by the opportunity to apply their research in real-world contexts, enhance
Paper ID #46692Laboratory Fixture for Heat Transfer Using a Hair DrierProf. timothy C scott, Sweet Briar College Engineering Professor of Practice, Wyllie Engineering ProgramMr. Lemuel T Curran, Sweet Briar College Lem Curran is a licensed educator and mechanical engineer with over 25 years of experience in engineering design, advanced fabrication, and STEM education. He currently manages the engineering lab at Sweet Briar College, supporting student projects, faculty research, and curriculum development in courses such as Capstone, Thermodynamics, and CAD. He has also taught engineering, robotics, and fabrication at
Figure 4. Construction trade courses for educating low-income individuals 5 4.50 4.45 4.5 4.23 3.94 3.89 3.94 4 3.5 3.85 3.33 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 In-person Lectures Hands-on experience Individual projects Group projects On-the-job training Problem-based learning Co-curricular activities Virtual/online education Figure 5. Effective
projects aimed at enhancing learning experiences for students, trainees, and professionals.Hannah Farias, Texas A&M University Hannah Farias is a first-year master’s student in mechanical engineering at Texas A&M. She is passionate about energy generation, consumption, and reduction, as well as engineering education. In her time with the Gulf Coast Center of Excellence at Texas A&M, she hopes to develop high quality tools, videos, and educational curriculum that will enable students and industrial workers to make changes that will reduce energy waste.Mr. Digvijaysinh Barad, Texas A&M UniversityMatt ElliottDr. Bryan P. Rasmussen, Texas A&M University Dr. Bryan Rasmussen is the Leland T. Jordan
mechanicalengineering, including vibrations, motors and control, thermodynamics, and aerodynamics.Students are given project-based learning assignments where they write in response to a clientwho requests some sort of engineering work. Each of these assignments are therefore rooted insome sort of real world context that asks students to make arguments based on their work in thelab.The activity focusing on the Flint Water crisis was part of a lecture that was focused on languageand style. The goal of the lecture was to introduce students to language as a cultural phenomenaand to recognize linguistic difference as intrinsic to all language practices. Students first did anactivity where they explored accent and dialect differences in the student body in the
Paper ID #45956Exploring Faculty Perspectives on Challenging Threshold Concepts in StructuralEngineeringAdeed Khan, University of Nebraska - LincolnDr. Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Perry is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His work contains a unique blend of engineering education and civil engineering projects. Dr. Perry’s current work centers workplace readiness, broadening participation, and construction safety education.Prof. Jacob Henschen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
occupations in the state (15.5%).In line with the nationwide trend, there is an identical statewide and local pressing demand tostimulate and sustain the interest in STEM careers for K-12 students, particularly for URM andfemale students, with many ‘dropping out’ of the STEM career trajectory starting in middlegrades. In the state of Georgia, there is a significant disparity between the number of computingdegrees and certificates awarded to students of color compared to White students and thatawarded to female students compared to their counterparts; only about one-third of such degreesare awarded to the students of color and around 40% to females [3]. According to the NationalGirls Collaborative Project (NGCP) [4], there exists a large gap in the K
sciencestudents are required to take this course. The program graded AutoCAD homework, wherestudents reproduced drawings from the textbook with a single solution. Students were allowed toresubmit until the due date, and then a 20% late penalty was applied. The exams in the coursewere graded by their instructor since the students were in a timed environment with a singlesubmission. Similarly, web grading cannot evaluate open-ended projects. Similarly, the programgraded the Excel homework, where there was a defined solution to the problem. An image ofeach calculation’s location is also necessary for Excel homework, as the program matches thecell calculation result. The instructor graded the Excel tests for the classes.Students in two sections of a