ABET.Mohamed Fadlelmula, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Mohamed Fadlelmula is an Instructional Associate Professor of Petroleum Engineering at Texas A&M University at Qatar (TAMUQ). Fadlelmula is dedicated to teaching excellence, therefore, he has participated in several projects to improve students’ learning experience, motivation and engagement. He has received different teaching awards such as the TAMUQ Teaching Excellence Award 2022, and the College Level Distinguished Achievement Award in Teaching from the Association of Former Students at Texas A&M University in 2020. Fadlelmula also serves as the ABET coordinator of the Petroleum Engineering Program since 2018.ROMMEL DUAVE YRAC
summer bioengineering projects into their classrooms, evaluateteaching materials for curricular relevance, design instruction tailored to diverse student needsand performance data, and create formative and summative assessments to monitor studentprogress and outcomes. Additionally, teachers will share their curriculum frameworks,instructional materials, and assessments with fellow teachers to promote collaboration and bestpractices.The lesson plans, instructional materials, and assessments are intended to be implemented withintheir classrooms the following academic year. To facilitate classroom translation, participantswere assessed on the development of their curriculum materials by College of Education facultyusing rubrics aligned to the
engineering program, we canidentify potential pathways towards an engineering career for neurodiverse individuals andidentify ways to better support neurodiverse students in their pathway to graduation.Co-Op Based Program Context[Program X] is a co-op based engineering program. Students typically complete their first twoyears of engineering curriculum at community colleges from across the nation, transfer toProgram X where they complete a semester that consists of taking technical courses, completingan industry project in collaboration with industry partners, and attending professionaldevelopment seminars and workshops, and complete the last two years of their degree while inpaid engineering co-op positions [3].In addition to programs to develop
, no. 5, 2006, pp. 861-885. [4] J. Engle and V. Tinto, Moving Beyond Access: The Importance of Student Retention, The Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education, 2008. [5] M. A. Miller and C. Murray, Advising Academically Underprepared Students, NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising, Academic Advising Recourses, 2005. [6] G. Orfield and C. Lee, Racial Transformation and the Changing Nature of the Public School, The Civil Rights Project, 2005. [7] C. M. Steele, "A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance:", in American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 6, 1997, pp. 613-629
Engineering in Innovation and Development and in 2019, the Industrial and Systems Engineering direction was added. Based on this trajectory, an educational channel was created in which academic topics, vocational guidance, and university promotion, among others, upload. He is currently part of a group of research professors in educational innovation, allowing him to publish in SCOPUS conferences.Mr. Jorge A. Gonzalez-Mendivil, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Master in Sciences with an speciality in Quality Systems and Industrial and Systems Engineer by ITESM in Mexico, twenty years of experience in engineering education, several projects in innovation of engineering education such as the use of 3D virtual ambIng. Luis Horacio
Antipatterns In Novice Code. PhD thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, Aug 2020.[2] L. C. Ureel II and C. Wallace, “Automated critique of early programming antipatterns,” in Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 738– 744, 2019.[3] E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software Addison-Wesley. Addison-Wesley, 1995.[4] W. H. Brown, R. C. Malveau, H. W. McCormick, and T. J. Mowbray, AntiPatterns: refactoring software, architectures, and projects in crisis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.[5] A. Koenig, “Patterns and antipatterns.,” Journal of Object-oriented Programming, vol. 8, pp. 46–48, 1995.[6] A
discussionof the homework policy will increase participation. The optional homework policy alone is not a sufficient assessment technique to preparestudents for summative assessments since only 44.7% of the students completed >75% of thehomework assignments per term. For Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, students wereregularly assessed for content comprehension with weekly textbook reading quizzes so that theycould track their understanding as the course progressed. In Aerodynamics, this wasaccomplished with regularly spaced small, graded projects. If these additional gradedassessments were not done, it’s suspected that students would not properly grasp theirunderstanding of the course content because they were not provided feedback on the
nontraditional community college students,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, Retrieved from: https://peer.asee.org/22591.pdf[12] National Girls Collaborative Project (2019)- State of girls and women in STEM. Retrieved Mar 11, 2023, from NGCP-TheStateofGirlsinSTEM-March2024.pdf.[13] K.-Y. Jin, F. Reichert, L. P. Cagasan, J. De La Torre, and N. Law, “Measuring digital literacy across three age cohorts: Exploring test dimensionality and performance differences,” Computers & Education, vol. 157, p. 103968, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103968.[14] E. N. Tetteh and E. J. K. Attiogbe, “Work–life balance among working university students in Ghana,” Higher Education Skills and Work-based
Paper ID #49221BOARD #110: WIP: A Reconfigurable Testbed for Assessing Cognitive Workloadin N-back and Multi-Object Tracking TasksYug Patel, Missouri University of Science and Technology Yug Patel is an undergraduate student in Computer Science at the Missouri University of Science and Technology (MST). Yug has conducted research in both the Department of Computer Science and in the Department of Biology at MST, exploring the intersection of these fields through interdisciplinary projects. As a previous NSF-REU intern, Yug has gained valuable research experience and a deeper understanding of the applications of computer
-12 teacher for several years before beginning her graduate degree.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical
[18,19] based on the knowledge transfer frameworkof Belenky and Nokes [20,21]. Multiple investigators conducted the interviews and analyzed theresulting data before peer debriefing within the project team was used to develop and integratethe resulting themes and discuss patterns in the data.These first three implementations of the think aloud protocol and problem solving activity arefurther detailed in [10-12]. A summary of the major findings of these activities is as follows: ● Across all implementations, only one UG student was able to correctly solve the problem without any additional help or prompting. ● The accuracy and completeness of the prior knowledge required to solve the problem appeared to differ significantly
basic discipline-specificconcepts, along with assignments that raise student awareness of other key skills important forABET course requirements including design, ethics, computer simulations, and life-longlearning. Each department has developed its own version of this course, numbered 121, toexpose students to their major discipline earlier in their program of study. The 121-courseoffered by the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE 121) was selected forredesign, instead of developing a new course, because the course was already part of thedepartment core-curriculum (preventing administrative barriers necessary for introducing a newcourse from impacting the project). The limitations of this decision are that the course time
3.90 3.72 4.01 3.82 4.16 3.80 4.13 3.75 Python, AutoCAD, or SolidWorks) Professional certifications (Ex. FE, PE, 3.73 3.58 3.27 3.78 3.60 3.83 3.74 3.87 3.71 3.94 3.66 AWS, CISSP, PMP, CSM, etc.) Research opportunities & general 3.67 3.57 3.60 3.74 3.48 3.61 3.69 3.84 3.63 3.78 3.62 information about research Innovation in engineering / engineering 3.53 3.55 3.20 3.49 3.63 3.51 3.49 3.75 3.49 3.63 3.50 education (Ex. AI & machine learning) Leadership and project management 3.37 3.33 2.93 3.31 3.52 3.28 3.32 3.69 3.30 3.40 3.35 Involvement opportunities
appliedwith input from an autism and childhood specialist psychologist and a special education teacher.This multidisciplinary team will contribute to assessing improvements in users’ communicationwith their environment and identifying new functionalities. The DBR process consists of severalsteps illustrated in Fig. 3.Fig. 3. DBR Design Diagram, Self-Elaboration.The DBR consists of four phases:• Foundation: Collect and analyze challenges faced by individuals with ASD at support levels 2 and 3 who are nonverbal or have communication difficulties to inform preliminary decision-making for the project and specify the roles of stakeholders. Interviews will be conducted with caregivers from institutions whose children exhibit the specified user
another on the ethics of big oil(Shingler, 2023). Overall, the video format was beneficial approach to student assignmentswithin the asynchronous course format as it allowed students to engage in a more meaningfulway than through only written assignments.The final 28% of their grade was a group project that required students in groups of 2 or 3 towrite a 15-page report that summarized the requirements for becoming a professional engineer inAlberta, complete a mock competency assessment for two competencies for each student, andanswer five reflection questions.Critical Context: Unethical Ethics Course?The critiques and critical reflections in this section are my own perspective and opinion, basedon reflections which I completed on a semi-weekly
Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is
, Manufacturing, & Systems Engineering at Texas Tech University. Dr. Son is the principal investigator (PI) of a NIST-funded engineering education project that is focused on developing educational contents for emergency, disaster, and crisis management (EDCM) standards for engineering students. Dr. Son is the director of Safety, Human factors, And Resilience Engineering (SHARE) Lab at Texas Tech. He is the recipient of George T. and Gladys Abell-Hanger Faculty Award of Texas Tech University Whitacre College of Engineering.Dr. Wesley Wehde, Texas Tech University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Preparing for the Unexpected: Needs for Emergency, Disaster, and Crisis
engineering self-concept in our prior study [4].Engineering self-concept, which is a student’s perception about their abilities as an engineeringstudent, can have a positive influence on academic performance, which can be further associatedwith improved retention in engineering [5, 6]. However, there is limited research that consistentlycaptures the construct from educational psychology and adapts it to engineering education, andthis research endeavor addresses this gap. This paper is step three of a larger research project, withthe two preceding parts documented in prior studies. First, a systematic literature review wasperformed to gain a deeper understanding of self-concept and identify sub-constructs for the samewithin engineering education
, acceptance, working harder, working smarter, shock, fear, renewed dedication,increased susceptibility to stereotypes, blame, shame, despair, changes in interest, reassessingcareer, reassessing self-perceived ability, and learning from failure[2]. Thus, these responses mayinclude combinations of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses. Research on responsesto success likewise suggests positive emotions in response to success on work projects, such aspride, satisfaction, and happiness. Educational research on response to failure across differentdomains and ages–not just in engineering education–has been quite narrow because research hasused theories that make very narrow predictions about response to failure, like self-belieftheory[4
identity,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 35697. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35697.[29] A. Richards, R. Anderson, and C. Myers, “Work in Progress: Formation of an engineering identity in first-year students through an intervention centered on senior design projects,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 35638. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35638.AppendixTable A1. Survey instrument to measure students’ sense of belonging in the university,academic engagement, and self-confidence in their academic major. Responses were a five-level Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Tend to Agree
Advisory Committee on Equity for the Office of the Vice President for Ethics and Compliance at Purdue University. She has also served as a Mentor for the USAID Liberia Strategic Analysis Program, mentoring an early-career Liberian woman on leadership and communication skills, professional development, and networking.Dr. Emeline Anne Ojeda-Hecht, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Emeline Ojeda-Hecht is a Post Doctoral Research Assistant at Purdue University in the department of Technology Leadership and Innovation where she serves as a mixed methods expert for the Scalable Asymmetric Lifestyle Engagement (SCALE) project and conducts microelectronics engineering workforce needs assessments. Her research expertise
concentrate in school with all that?Furthermore, the data indicates that communication breakdown between participants and peers,and participants and faculty contributed to stress. Cohen could not attend school regularly whiletaking care of his brother’s sugar disease. This limited his participation and feedback with teammembers in a team project in an engineering course. While Cohen’s stressful event affected hisrelationship with peers, Marissa attributed distress to faculty communication and understandingand stated: I had some difficulties after my car crash and sexual assault to my friend outside campus. This forced me to miss classes, but somehow some teachers couldn’t understand.The financial insecurity is evidence of capital-induced
the things I learned into my future career. A In any engineering project, it is important to work smoothly and efficiently as a team with good communication to resolve conflict easily, and have a streamlined process of iterating through multiple tests to have the best solution possible. TEAMWORK & COLLABORATION I also like the collaborative nature of the studios, because it provides an avenue B for discussion and gives me a feel of what collaboration in engineering would look like in the future. The studio put me in a
-assessment to set all students up for success in their labclass.About 20% of the students completed each end-of-semester survey. Unfortunately, the data fromthe surveys did not provide significant insight into the effectiveness of the feedback changes thatwere implemented throughout the semester. Additional data will be collected in futuresemesters.DiscussionThis project indicates substantial progress toward developing an engaging educationalenvironment in STEM fields. The project’s approach of improving assessment feedback andenhancing organization presents a comprehensive model for addressing clarity within laboratorysettings. These approaches assessed and enhanced classroom relationships and transparencybetween the professor and the students.With
Research Group for their ongoing support of thiswork, particularly through peer reviews, collaborative brainstorming, and critical discussions thatcontinue to shape our analysis. We also thank the leadership and staff at Trinity Haven forbuilding this partnership with us and generously offering space, time, and access to youth,classrooms, and projects that make this research possible.We further acknowledge our partners at Tumaini Innovation Center in Kenya, whosecollaboration continues to inform the refinement of the LED curriculum and the asset mappingprocess. Their perspectives and insight are vital to the evolving design of a more inclusiveengineering education.References[1] D. Holland, Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Harvard University
courses in this department’s chemical engineering curriculumare slated for inquiry lab implementation: Physical Chemistry II, Fluid Mechanics, Heat andMass Transfer, Thermodynamics, Separations, Process Dynamics and Control, and Kinetics andReactor Design. As such, a longitudinal study collecting more quantitative and qualitative dataafter each implementation would enrich the findings from this first iteration. If this semester’ssuccess continues to be replicated as the project evolves, we hope to encourage chemicalengineering departments at other institutions to consider similar curriculum adjustments,benefiting even more students, faculty, and the field.AcknowledgementsThis work is part of a larger study supported by grant funding through the
experience in talent acquisition, technical recruiting, campus relations and project management in the tech sector, she helps students majoring in STEM fielVictoria Lee, Duke UniversityErin Haseley, Duke University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work-in-Progress: Reclaiming Space, Fostering Inclusivity for Women in Engineering FieldsIntroductionEngineering's capacity to address society's most urgent challenges depends on fostering learningenvironments that support and empower diverse perspectives, experiences, and ways of knowing.While the field has long acknowledged the need for greater diversity, traditional approachesfocused primarily on increasing numerical
U.S. course syllabi were examined, and content analysis was conducted usingcourse titles, course description, weekly topics, homework assignments, project descriptions, andclasswork. Similarly, a total of 42 Chinese course syllabi were examined and content analysiswas conducted using course title, course description, and course topics.Three domain experts developed codes based on ACM curricular framework. They coded thesample syllabus data, achieving an acceptable inter-coder reliability with over 85% agreement.4. Results4.1 Comparison of Data Science Knowledge and Skill in Core CurriculumBased on the framework for data science knowledge/skill in Table IV, we coded course topicsfor all 82 courses. Table IX lists the total number of course
Attrition: Lessons from Four Departments,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 669– 700, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304.[3] B. E. Lovitts, Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.[4] K. M. Wilson, Of Time and the Doctorate: Report of an Inquiry into the Duration of Doctoral Study. SREB Research Monograph No. 9. 1965. Accessed: Dec. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED149658[5] P. H. Henderson and A. Others, “Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Summary Report 1995,” Doctorate Records Project, National Research Council, OSEP- Room TJ 2006, 2101 Constitution Ave, 1996. Accessed: Dec
U.S., collected between 2000 and2022 as part of an Ascendium Foundation research project. Each institution provided anonymizedstudent-level data, including demographic information, academic performance metrics, and cur-ricular complexity measures. Table 2.1 summarizes the participating universities and the numberof programs and students contributed by each institution. 3 University Number of Pro- Number of Students grams University of Arizona 175 47410 Colorado State University 114 34471 Florida