points others in the direction to continueinvestigations and towards better understanding student veterans.References[1] S. Brint and J. Karabel, “Organizing a national education movement,” In The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900– 1985, pp. 23–66, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.[2] B. Clark, “The “cooling-out” function in higher education,” American Journal of Sociology, 65 (6), pp. 569–576, 1960.[3] D. Clark, “The two Joes meet – Joe College, Joe Veteran: The G.I. Bill, college education, and postwar American culture,” History of Education Quarterly, 38 (2), pp. 165–189, 1998.[4] R. Serow, “Policy as symbol: Title II of the 1944 G.I. Bill,” The
Interdisciplinary Science Course for Non-Science Majors.," Journal of General Education, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 272- 281, 2002.[3] J. L. Abrantes, C. Seabra and L. F. Lages, "Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance," Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 960-964, 2007.[4] J. Harackiewicz, J. Smith and S. Priniski, "Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education," Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, 2016.[5] D. B. Thoman, E. R. Brown, A. Z. Mason, A. G. Harmsen and J. L. Smith, "The Role of Altruistic Values in Motivating Underrepresented Minority Students for Biomedicine," BioScience, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 183-188, 2014.[6] K. Sauer, "The Impact of
, (system elements and physical interfaces) that provides thesolution for a product, service, or enterprise [5].Function and Form Mapping: Often, it is easy for the engineer to neglect the actual valuecreation source of a system, i.e. its function, and concentrate solely on the tangible elements thatcan be seen, i.e. physical form [6]. However, both are mutually connected and form the basis fordefining a system’s purpose and value. As noted by Haberfellner et. al [6], function usuallyabstract, cannot be implemented without form and form usually tangible, without functioncreates no value [6]. In design, you know the functions you want and try to create the form todeliver the function(s) [6]. The function should be neutral and conceived independently
thesetypes of projects. The author feels this type of design-build project provides students with anauthentic and exciting design challenge that motivates them and promotes their learning anddevelopment as engineers.References1. ABET, Inc. (2024). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2024-2025 Accreditation Cycle. ABET, Baltimore, MD.2. Howe, S. and Wilbarger, J., 2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses. In Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 18-21, 2006, Chicago, IL, USA. available at: https://peer.asee.org/1023 [Accessed: January 20, 2020]3. Padmanabhan, G et al., A Unique Civil Engineering
K-12 students. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 342–366. Waynesville, NC, USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education.Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748Tonkal, M., Wu, A., & Rogers, C. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Systems Engineering Projects on STEM Engagement and Learning. Proceedings of the 2024 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference.Trevelyan, J., & Tilli, S. (2007). Published research on engineering work. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(4), 300–307.
circuits.References[1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” en, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, Jan. 2005, ISSN: 10694730. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00833.x.[2] D. H. Jonassen and W. Hung, “Learning to Troubleshoot: A New Theory-Based Design Architecture,” en, Ed- ucational Psychology Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 77–114, Mar. 2006, ISSN: 1040-726X, 1573-336X. DOI: 10. 1007/s10648-006-9001-8.[3] R. McCauley, S. Fitzgerald, G. Lewandowski, et al., “Debugging: A review of the literature from an educational perspective,” en, Computer Science Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 67–92, Jun. 2008, ISSN: 0899-3408, 1744-5175. DOI : 10.1080
, Mar. 3, 2022.[38] McDonald, "Engineering zero: Bringing the engineering profession together to meet the net zero ambition," Royal Academy of Engineers, Jun. 24, 2021.[39] Royal Academy of Engineering, "Educating engineers for the 21st century," Jun. 2007.[40] Hurix, "Top 6 teaching strategies adopted by higher-ed institutions post-Covid," Feb. 22, 2023.[41] "UK higher education providers – Advice on consumer protection law," Competition and Markets Authority, May 31, 2023.[42] S. Weale, "Funding model for UK higher education is 'broken,' say university VCs," The Guardian, May 31, 2023.[43] National Academy of Engineering, "The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century," 2004.[44] B. Bharkhada, "How has
most: theEnder 3 Pro and the Sovol SV06. The Ender 3 Pro, a very common hobby-grade printer, is highlyinexpensive and benefits from a large aftermarket parts supply and open-source software. TheSovol SV06, although more expensive, offers additional features that enhance automation andlongevity. Also, the SV06’s PEI-coated spring steel build plate, which self-releases the part whenit cools, is crucial for preventing difficulties with cobot-assisted part removal. For these reasons, theSovol SV06 printer was chosen, and it has performed as well as expected.IFM O2D520 CameraIFM O2D520 Object Inspection Camera has been used in the project for inspecting the printedpart. After inspection, camera sends digital input to robot for performing further
Positively Transforming Robotics Education at Postsecondary Institutions," IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 157-164, Sept. 2017.[2] M. Gennert and C. Putnam, "Robotics as an Undergraduate Major: 10 Years' Experience," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3] "A Roadmap for U.S. Robotics From Internet to Robotics 2013 Edition," sponsored by Robotics in the United States of America, Robotics VO, March 20, 2013.[4] S. McLeod, "An Analysis of Undergraduate Robotics Degree Programs in the United States of America," IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine. In press.[5] [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria-for- accrediting
sustainable performance of complex civil engineering projects from asystems perspective” and to “integrate a commitment to sustainability principles into the practiceof civil engineering.” See Section 4.3 for further discussion of CEBOK3’s guidance onsustainability and how the authors used it to assess the course content presented in the currentwork.3. The Wentworth Institute of Technology3.1 BackgroundThe authors are faculty at the Wentworth Institute of Technology (WIT), which is anundergraduate-focused university with five schools (Sciences and Humanities, Architecture andDesign, Computing and Data Sciences, Management, and Engineering) and an undergraduateenrollment of about 4,500 students. WIT offers 22 bachelor’s degrees and 11 master’s
for Studio Pedagogy in the Early Years,” in Practice of Teaching | Teaching of Practice: The Teacher’s Hunch, ACSA Press, 2019, pp. 2–6. doi: 10.35483/ACSA.Teach.2019.1.[10] H. Anay, “Creative use of Architectural Precedents in Design Education: A Framework for a Computational Model,” presented at the eCAADe 2006: Communicating Space(s), Volos, Greece, 2006, pp. 526–531. doi: 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2006.526.[11] E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, N. J. McNeill, Z. T. Malcolm, and D. J. Therriault, “Moving beyond formulas and fixations: solving open-ended engineering problems,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 627–651, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.738358.[12] California
educators.By removing technical barriers while maintaining pedagogical quality, we aim to support moreefficient and effective assessment creation processes across engineering disciplines. Future workwill focus on measuring this impact through detailed evaluation of system adoption patterns andeducational outcomes.References[1] J. Hassell, "Best Practices for Using Generative AI to Create Quiz Content for the CanvasLMS," 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference, ASEE, 2024.[2] S. Willison, "Things we learned about LLMs in 2024," SimonWillison.net, Dec. 31, 2024.[Online]. Available: https://simonwillison.net/2024/Dec/31/llms-in-2024/.[3] J. Yang et al., "Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT andBeyond," ACM Transactions on Knowledge
. Educ., vol. 9, p. e48291, Jun. 2023, doi:10.2196/48291.[5] M. Bernabei, S. Colabianchi, A. Falegnami, and F. Costantino, “Students’ use of largelanguage models in engineering education: A case study on technology acceptance, perceptions,efficacy, and detection chances,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, p. 100172, Jan. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100172.[6] E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large languagemodels for education,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 103, p. 102274, Apr. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.[7] J. G. Meyer et al., “ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities andchallenges,” BioData Min., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 20, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13040-023
beneficial. During Autumn 2023, in addition to knowledgetransfer, AGOH evolved into a social space where students could relax, connect with peers, seekcareer guidance, expand their professional networks, and stay engaged with the teaching team.This was particularly significant since many of these students belonged to engineeringdepartments other than that of the teaching team. Many of these connections persist even a yearafter the course has been offered.Beyond weekly instructor AGOH, EE 215’s main components include weekly TA-led labsections and office hours, regular homework, two midterm exams, and a comprehensive finalexam. By examining how AGOH affect students in our local context, we hope to inspireeducators to consider experimenting with and
, especiallyprivate colleges and minority-serving institutions, to validate and broaden the findings.Longitudinal studies tracking student success over multiple semesters would help establishcausal relationships between accommodations and academic outcomes.References[1] Couzens, D., Poed, S., Kataoka, M., Brandon, A., Hartley, J., & Keen, D. (2015). Supportfor students with hidden disabilities in universities: A case study. International Journal ofDisability, Development and Education, 62(1), 24-41.https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.984592.[2] Arco-Tirado, J. L., Fernandez-Martin, F. D., & Fernandez-Balboa, J. (2011). The impactof a peer-tutoring program on quality standards in higher education. Higher Education, 62(6),773–778. https://doi.org
xx/5 Pictures of packaging, user documentation, and the device x/3 Device meta data (serial/model numbers, manuf date, …) x/2 Accuracy Assessment (Reference: MightySat unit) xx/25 25 time-aligned meas pairs; devices worn on same hand x/4 Images of individual paired measurements x/4 Image(s) of the wider testing area x/2 Calculations o 25 pulse rate and SpO2 values x/3 o Absolute/relative errors x/2 o min, max, and average ± stDev for absolute errors, x/2 o min, max, and
realtimecollaborative engineer’s notebook iOS application,” Technology and Engineering Teacher., vol.82, no. 5, pp. 20–26, 2023.[4] L. Berland, W. McKenna, and S. B. Peacock, “Understanding students' perceptions on theutility of engineering notebooks,” Advances in Engineering Education., vol. 3, no. 2, p. n2, 2012.[5] P. Fernandez-Velasco, J. Nijman, and R. Casati, “The cognitive advantages of the notebook,”Cognitive Semiotics., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 2023.[6] International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA), Standards forTechnological and Engineering Literacy: The Role of Technology and Engineering in STEMEducation, Reston, VA: ITEEA, 2020.
pilot group offered suggestions forfuture offerings, which will be implemented to make the program more inclusive of all technicalskill levels. The goal of the summer camp was achieved, and the students left the camp with abetter idea of what an engineer does. 6References:[1] T. Robinson, A. Kirn, J. Amos, and I. Chatterjee, “The Effects of Engineering Summer Camps on Middle and High School Students’ Engineering Interest and Identity Formation: A Multi-methods Study,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 13, no. 2, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1351.[2] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, and J
/FIE49875.2021.9637172.[7] A. Benham, R. Fotherby, A. W. Johnson, and C. L. Bowen, “Student Perspectives of Aerospace Engineering Macroethics Issues and Education,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden: IEEE, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962654.[8] E. A. Strehl, M. Ennis, A. W. Johnson, and C. L. Bowen, “Work in Progress: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Macroethical Issues in Aerospace Engineering,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023.[9] E. A. Strehl, S. Olson, C. L. Bowen, and A. W. Johnson, “Work in Progress: Navigating Undergraduates’ Perspectives on Macroethical Dilemmas in Aerospace Engineering,” presented at the 2024 ASEE
) Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD,” ResearchGate, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.14483/calj.v19n1.11490.[2] J. L. Jensen, E. G. Bailey, T. A. Kummer, and K. S. Weber, “Using Backward Design in Education Research: A Research Methods Essay,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 3, p. 18.3.50, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v18i3.1367.[3] P. Armbruster, M. Patel, E. Johnson, and M. Weiss, “Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 203–213, 2009, doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025.[4] G. Bergtrom, “Content Vs. Learning: An Old Dichotomy in Science Courses
academic achievement and social transformation,” Science Education, 101(6), 1034–1060, 2017.[6] L. S. Vygotsky, The collected works of L.S. Vygostky, Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions (R.W. Rieber, Vol Ed; Hall, Trans) New York: Plenum Press, 1997. (Original work published 1941).[7] M. Fullan, The new meaning of educational change, New York: Teachers College Press, 2016.[8] M. Windschitl, J. Thompson, & M. Braaten, M. Ambitious science teaching. Harvard Education Press, 2018.[9] B. Glaser & A. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.[10] C. Giroux, “How do youth engage in engineering literacies?: A
Engineering at Auburn Universityhas been working to restructure the first-year engineering sequence, starting with the EngineeringOrientation (ENGR 1100) course. This course meets once a week for 50 minutes and is a required0-credit Pass (S)/Fail (U) course taken by all incoming first-year engineering and computer sciencestudents. Two sections of the course are offered each semester, and there is a maximum enrollmentof 410 students per section. Traditionally, this course served as an introduction to college life,campus resources, facilities, academic advising, and engineering departments/programs offered oncampus. To better serve students at the beginning of their engineering academic curriculum andcover more fundamental engineering topics, the
-promotions/standing-faculty-arts-sciences/faculty-leaves-absence[15] J. L. Roberts Dustyn, “Jessa Lingel and Dustyn Roberts | Penn must provide fair parental leave for all faculty.” Accessed: May 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.thedp.com/article/2024/08/family-leave-universal-all-penn-faculty-and-school s[16] E. Riskin, K. Quinn, and J. Yen, “Demystifying Family Friendly Policies For Faculty: Resources For Department Chairs,” in 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Chicago, Illinois: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2006, p. 11.394.1-11.394.8. doi: 10.18260/1-2--631.
," Plos One, 20 September 2017.[2] S. Olsen and T. Kyvik, "The relevance of doctoral training in different labour markets," Journal of Education and Work, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 205-224, 2012.[3] A. Mathur et. al., "Transforming training to reflect the workforce," SciTranslMed, vol. 7, no. 285, 29 April 2015.[4] E. Walsh et. al., "Evaluation of a programme of transferable skills development within the PhD: view of late stage students," International Journal for Researcher Development, vol. 1, no. 3, 2010.[5] Q. Cui and J. Harshman, "Reforming doctoral education through the lens of professional socialization to train the next generation of chemists," Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 409-418, 2023.[6] National
students gainedor lost confidence in transportation-related topics.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Federal Highway Administration’sNational Summer Transportation Institute’s award. This funding was instrumental in providing theresources necessary to develop and implement the program, fostering education and interest intransportation, construction and STEM among underrepresented students.References[1] Sáinz M, Fàbregues S, Romano MJ, López BS. Interventions to increase young people's interestin STEM. A scoping review.[2] M. Khalafalla, T. U. Mulay, D. Kobelo, B. Shadravan, and D. Akinsanya, "The Role of Hands-On Engineering Technology Summer Camps in Attracting Underrepresented High SchoolStudents to
softwaredevelopment tools (e.g., LabVIEW). Additional student feedback is needed to confirmconclusions.References[1] D. Loker and S. Strom, “Innovative Laboratory Projects for a Measurements and Instrumentation Course,” Annual Meeting, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[2] D. Loker, “Data Acquisition Using the Raspberry Pi Pico W,” Annual Meeting, American Society for Engineering Education, 2024.[3] T. Gaddis, Starting out with Python, Pearson Education, 2018.[4] JetBrains.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/[5] youtube.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZUNUB6nz3g[6] JetBrains.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/learn/[7] mvcc.edu. [Online]. Available: https
, A. J. Wright, R. Batty, H. Finch, A. Vezzoli, P. S.Keatley, and L. O’Brien, “Thermal nanoconversion of ferromagnetic nanoislands,” AppliedPhysics Letters, 124, 112411 (2024).[4] B. Erbas, A. Conde-Rubio, X. Liu, J. Pernollet, Z. Wang, A. Bertsch, M. Penedo, G.Fantner, M. Banerjee, A. Kis, G. Boero, and J. Brugger, “Combining thermal scanning probelithography and dry etching for grayscale nanopattern amplification,” Microsystems &Nanoengineering, 10, 28 (2024).[5] L. Shani, J. Chaaban, A. Nilson, E. Clerc, G. Menning, C. Riggert, P. Lueb, M. Rossi, G.Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and V. S. Pribiag, “Thermal scanning probe and laserlithography for patterning nanowire based quantum devices,” Nanotechnology, 35, 255302(2024).
—48296.[4] C. Burr, M. Taddeo, and L. Floridi, “The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2313–2343, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11948-020- 00175-8.[5] C. Themelis and J. A. Sime, “Mapping the field of digital wellbeing education: A compendium of innovative practices and open educational resources,” p. 37, Jan. 2020.[6] D. Peters, "Positive Computing: Wellbeing-supportive design and ethical practice in tech," Medium, May 2, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/ethics-of-digital- experience/beyond-principles-a-process-for-responsible-tech-aefc921f7317.[7] E. Marasco, K. Filali, J. Afifi, S. Ghasemian-Roudsari, “Supporting graduate sttributes through
University, 2019.[2] EU, "A European Approach to Microcredentials," European Union, 16 June 2022. [Online]. Available:https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/micro- credentials. [Accessed Nov 2022].[3] F. M. K. A. J. K. &. G. Y. C. Hollands, "Benefits and Costs of Participation in MOOC-Based Alternative Credentials: MicroMasters and Specializations.," EdResearcher, vol. 1, 2023.[4] M. N. M. B. E. &. M. L. C. Brown, "The global micro-credential landscape: Charting a new credential ecology for lifelong learning," Journal of Learning for Development, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 228-254, 2021.[5] R. &. S. M. Selvaratnam, "An integrative literature review of the implementation of micro- credentials in higher
Student Organization Chapter with Student Success. 2017.[4] B. F. French, J. C. Immekus, and W. C. Oakes, "An Examination of Indicators of Engineering Students' Success and Persistence," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 419-425, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00869.x.[5] S. Hu and G. D. Kuh, "Being (Dis)Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics," Research in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 555-575, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40197272.[6] X. Wang, M. Dai, and R. Mathis, "The influences of student- and school-level factors on engineering undergraduate student