Paper ID #47239Assessing the Impact of Teaching Style on Problem-Solving Skills and ConceptualUnderstanding in Undergraduate DynamicsDr. Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University Geoff Recktenwald is a member of the teaching faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. Geoff holds a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are focused on best practices for student learning and student success. He is currently developing and researching SMART
Experiences in Research. He is passionate about student success and finding ways to use research experiences to promote student growth, learning, and support.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Deputy Executive Director of the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT).Dr. David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Gray receieved his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2000. He then earned a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2002 and 2010, respectively. Much of his graduate education
Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Mississippi State University. Her research used Self Determination Theory to analyze Summer Bridge students’ experiences and senior engineering students’ graduation plans. She also researched how different first-year structures affect students’ engineering identities and involvement in communities of practice over time. Shaylin joined the University of Virginia in July 2023 and serves as an assistant professor and academic advisor in the First Year Engineering Center. She maintains interests in learning more about what contributes to engineering students’ success, how they can get the most out of their undergraduate programs, and how programs can be better designed to cater
to justifyseeking help. [6]. Additionally, they may receive cues from those around them validating successthrough sacrifice instead of byprioritizing their mental health, leading them to neglect their ownwell-being in favor of academic achievement [8]. By actively involving students in identifyingtheir challenges and co-creating solutions, we can foster a more supportive environment thatprioritizes academic success and mental well-being.Participatory Research and Group Level AssessmentParticipatory research is an approach that actively involves the target population in the researchprocess to better address the community's needs. It is designed to foster meaningful engagementand ensure that community members play an active role as
” factor was found to have a Cronbach’salpha near the low-end threshold of 0.7, suggesting internal consistency should be monitored forthis factor as additional data are acquired.Discussion and conclusionsLongitudinal self-efficacy measurement as a tool for EL program evaluationSimilar to prior works, we find self-efficacy measurement to be a promising means for assessmentin an EL program based on conventional measures of model fit and internal consistency. Yet, sinceprior research highlights that this type of measurement can be sensitive to differences in incomingstudent capability levels (across measures) and to the extent of students’ prior practice experiences,we find it appropriate to develop mitigations for such sensitivities as components
University in 2013. She holds a M.S. in Product Design and Management from University of Liverpool and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Isfahan University of Technology. Her research focuses on data analytics and natural language processing in different areas of Business such as Marketing, Finance and Sports. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Navigating Institutional Opportunities and Challenges: Interdisciplinary Program Development for Product Design and EntrepreneurshipIntroductionThis paper presents a case study of the development of an interdisciplinary program in design,innovation, and entrepreneurship – a Bachelor of Science in Product Design andEntrepreneurship (PDEP
to provide a comprehensive, hands-on learning experiencein AI and cybersecurity: 1) In the ‘Discovery’ module, students identify and design use cases ofcybersecurity and AI discovering applications of AI for Cybersecurity and Cybersecurity for AI,analyze system features, and work with relevant datasets; 2) The ‘Analysis’ module deepens theirunderstanding of integrated cybersecurity and AI, focusing on the development of trustworthy,safe, and reliable AI/ML algorithms in practical scenarios; 3) In the ‘Research’ module, studentsinvestigate open research questions within emerging areas of machine learning, fostering criticalinquiry and innovation; 4) The ‘Exploration’ module introduces emerging applications,emphasizing AI explainability
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engineering in Clinical Practices: An Evidence-Based Review of a Two-Course SequenceAbstract: The impact of two Biomedical Engineering (BME) graduate level courses, BME 6301:Engineering in Surgery and Intervention — Provocative Questions, and BME 6302: Engineeringin Surgery and Intervention — Clinical Interactions, is explored in this study. Designed tointegrate an engineering approach into clinical practices, these courses aim to bridge the gapbetween theoretical understanding and real-domain applications. The first course in the sequence, BME 6301, is a structured clinical experience in theclassroom that focuses on the intersection of
promoting the practice the sustainable development, local to global. Dan is a Past President of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists. He is a Diplomate of the American Academy of Sanitarians. Dan is a Fellow of the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors, the American Academy of Nursing, and the National League for Nursing. In the United Kingdom, he is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, the Royal Society for Public Health, and the Society of Operations Engineers. Professor Oerther’s awards as an educator include the Excellence in Environmental Engineering Education Award from the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists, the
(redindicates option for earlier exposure to EnvE in the curriculum; green indicates options forreallocation of two credits;purple indicates option of a new EnvE course)Data Collection MethodTo support decision making of course rearrangement and the content desired in the new EnvEApplications course, this study was designed to explore the experiences of practitioners.Specifically, this study was designed to address the following research questions: 1. Which key topic areas in EnvE should be prioritized to best prepare students for professional practice? 2. What depth of coverage is most effective in EnvE topic areas to best prepare students for professional practice?To be able to prioritize EnvE content in our civil engineering curriculum
Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. He graduated from Furman University in 1992 with degrees in Computer Science and Philosophy. In 2008 he earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science Engineering from the University of Louisville. His research interest include cyber-security for industrial control systems and active learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025The Use of Generative AI for the Rapid Development of Qualitative Interview Transcripts for a Human-Centered Design ProblemAbstractThis paper describes how generative AI (i.e., ChatGPT) was used to rapidly develop fictitious,yet realistic, qualitative interview transcripts for industrial engineering
from different areas of expertise and have had diverse livedexperiences that relate to several aspects of this work.Mouallem is a sighted graduate student at Stanford University, formally trained in ElectricalEngineering, and conducting research on the accessibility of engineering education to learnerswith disabilities. Rogando and Mendez Pons are sighted undergraduate students in the Designprogram at Stanford and have conducted research on accessible practices in design. Dougherty isa low-vision, senior director at LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired, and he has priorwork experience in the education technology industry. Finally, Sheppard is faculty at StanfordUniversity and has taught blind students in her Mechanical Engineering
engineering degree program incorporating humanities components, with a student body consisting mainly of international students (https://igp.shibaura-it.ac.jp). As part of her current role as Deputy Director of the IGP, she is the Principal Investigator for the following research grants: - Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research: Grant 24K06133 (2024-2027) - Shibaura Institute of Technology Grant for Educational Reform and Research Activity (AY2024). Her research interests include: (1) Impacts and potential benefits of including humanities components in science and engineering degree programs (2) Innovative methods of assessment in science and engineering education, especially in the context of remote
Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departurefrom Doctoral Study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [Online]. Available:https://books.google.com/books?id=gMNC3NhxryUC[21] A. Kirn, “Motivation and Identity as Signals of Systemic Problems in EngineeringEducation,” Virtual (University of Michigan seminar), Mar. 10, 2021. Accessed: Oct. 06, 2022.[Online]. Available:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDaXhm5znHU&ab_channel=UniversityofMichiganEER[22] A. G. Greenwald et al., “Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test,”Behav. Res. Methods, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1161–1180, 2022, doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3.[23] T. P. Carpenter et al., “Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological andempirical analysis
study.IntroductionIn 2020 the University of Washington Tacoma (UWT) started a new mechanical engineering program tosupport high regional demand for additional engineering students. The program was designed withprogressive thinking about high impact practices to support student experiences. In particular, theprogram faculty pushed hard to create meaningful undergraduate research experiences for students in theprogram.Many prior studies have demonstrated the power of course-based undergraduate research experiences(CUREs) as a way to support students in retention [1–3]. CUREs are considered a high impact practice, asthey create a direct mentoring relationship between a student and a faculty member. One challenge ofundergraduate research is the time required to
builder’s approach to theory of change: A practical guide to theory development, 2005. Retrieved from Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change website: http://www.theoryofchange.org/pdf/TOC_fac_guide.pdf. .[12] G. Wiggins, G. P. Wiggins, and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design. ASCD, 2005.[13] Stories for Impact, Theory of Change, 2025. Retrieved from: https://storiesforimpact.com/toolbox/theory-of-change/[14] Mosobalaje, O., Aku M., Egede, F., Adali, F., Salihu, A., Aghaulor, G. and Ojegbile, P.PyPE_CoP: Enhancing Digital Literacy in Python for Petroleum Engineering Educators, througha Community of Practice. Abstract accepted for presentation at the 2025 SPE Nigerian AnnualInternational Conference and Exhibition.
setting [16], [17], [18], [19]. Drawing studentsfrom majors across the university’s colleges, the program emphasizes the value of diverseperspectives, promoting rich interdisciplinary collaboration. Students are offered a mix ofindividual research opportunities, team-driven design projects, technical training related to theseprojects, and various activities that promote community engagement and all-arounddevelopment. The program prides itself on its holistic approach to learning, preparing studentsnot only for the laboratory but for a balanced life and career after graduation. Fairness anddiversity are thus necessary guiding values for the program to cultivate a culture of collaborativeinnovation and personal and professional growth. This
training. She is currently a Data Science Research Associate at the Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation at Carnegie Mellon University. She uses her training and years of experience as a faculty member to support graduate students, faculty, and programs on educational research projects and making data-driven improvements to courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Harnessing the Power of Generative AI: A Case Study on Teaching Data Science to Environmental Engineering Students1 IntroductionData science has played a transformative role across research, industry, and education in the 21stcentury
catalyzed by the Covid-19 pandemic, increased researched review of automated assignments and grading have exposedopportunities to accommodate a greater grading load. Faculty can design assignments, andcommercially available software easily allows them to administer not only the assignments butalso allow for unlimited attempts. Affording more attempts has been supported by research inlearning as a mechanism for improved retention of knowledge for students. Without incurring theburden of additional grading, faculty can more positively impact the knowledge transfer. However,the increase in grading capability may be reaching a capacity limit with students. Research focusedon the student perceptions of graded assignments tends to cite concerns of
observed at a much lowerfrequency. Researchers documented the frequency of the following sociotechnical practices:stakeholders (5%), power/position/identity (4%), social context (2%), interpersonal awareness(2%), future impacts (1%), ethics (0%), and the natural environment (0%). They found similarpatterns across different subfields of required IE courses. For example, in courses with a focus onengineering design and simulation, there was no mention of concepts such aspower/position/identity and social context, and discussion of stakeholders only appeared with 6%frequency.Figured worlds theoretical frameworkIn this study, we draw on the figured worlds framework by Holland et al. [12] to understand themechanisms by which disciplinary culture
-based teaching. Implementing PS-I would requireprofessional development to help instructors design effective problem-solving activities andmanage classroom dynamics. Finally, it is important to keep in mind that PS-I should align withaccreditation requirements (e.g., ABET) and institutional learning outcomes. Ensuringconsistency across courses without disrupting the broader curriculum is a challenge.Second, considerations should be made for the long-term sustainability of implementing PS-I.Demonstrating the effectiveness of PS-I beyond a single course is crucial to gaining widespreadfaculty support. Providing evidence-based best practices and training opportunities canencourage adoption. Also, universities must invest in necessary
Lancaster Dissertation Award for her PhD thesis. She has also been awarded the Fiona and Michael Goodchild best graduate student mentor award during her PhD. Shailja’s research vision is to develop AI methods for healthcare that ”close-the-loop” between surgeons, research scientists, educators, and engineers.Mr. Thomas John Williams, University of California Merced Thomas Williams is a first-year undergraduate student at University of California Merced. Thomas has extensive experience in the tool and die trade and is currently pursuing a bachelors degree in electrical engineering. Thomas enjoys teaching others and is actively interested in improving educational processes to make them more engaging and ideally inspire
engineering solutions. (ABET 2b) An ability to communicate effectively. (ABET 3) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,… An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. (ABET 4b) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. (ABET 5) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data. (ABET 6) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning. (ABET 7) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Fig. III.3
), advanced manufacturing, advanced communications, andbiotechnology were recommended by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology (PCAST) to the President of the USA [1]. The IotF topics are critical for futureindustry development and thus the workforce development in these areas is of great importance.Meanwhile, K-12 education requires enhanced STEM content in high school curriculum as partof the graduation requirement [3]. Therefore, it is imperative to train secondary school teachersto be better prepared for more advanced learning engineering modules. One way advocated byNational Science Foundation is to provide authentic research experiences to preservice teachersin a STEM setting. The mission of this project, Industries of
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Electronic System Design: A Hands-on Course on Creating a Professional Electronic ProductAbstractA new curriculum has been developed for an advanced embedded systems course. In this course,students construct a webcam from the ground up, resulting in a professional, aesthetic product.Along the way, they practice surface-mount soldering, PCB design, web design, 3D design, andembedded programming. The course is a guided journey in creating a device at the level of aminimal viable product at a startup company, and feeds into a followup class where studentspursue the journey without constraints, with novel projects. To assess the efficacy of thecurriculum, several
, Engineering, and Individualized Study programs at UMBC. He has been teaching role playing game design and leading campus wide RPG events for the past ten years. He also leads the multidisciplinary sustainable design course entitled INDS 430: The Kinetic Sculpture Project, which won the grand prize in the 2015 Baltimore Kinetic Sculpture race.Dr. Jamie R Gurganus, University of Maryland Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Computing Education Program and the Associate Director of STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Informational Technology. She also directs the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate
questions were: 1) What types of pedagogical approaches ground TRANSPIRE as a successful strategy for embedding students in the process of germinating PTRQs that have the potential to contribute to solving seemingly intractable scientific and societal challenges? 2) How and why does a transdisciplinary dialogic approach support change in helping students germinate more impactful research questions (even though their current projects are not expected to be transdisciplinary or team-driven)? What challenges remain?To pilot the TRANSPIRE program, we focused on two objectives: 1) Design, deliver, and evaluate the TRANSPIRE program, with a focus on: a. How well does it enhance mentoring postdocs in germinating PTRQs
appropriate use of AI. Wehave discussed these procedures and shared topics of mutual interest in passive conversation, soin some ways individual institutional policies were informed by decisions being made at theirsister institutions. Based upon these mutual interests, this paper is being assembled to compareand contrast directions being made and to share lessons learned and best practices with theengineering education community as a whole. Furthermore, institutions who are developing,revising and/or refining their AI policies may find the information contained within this article ofinterest.Artificial Intelligence (AI) is impacting daily life, especially within higher education. Facultyworry about the likelihood of student cheating [1] and have seen
and marginalization mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences, and feminist approaches to EER, and connects these topics to broader understandings of student success in engineering. Justin completed their Ph.D. in Engineering Education (’22) and M.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics (’21) at Purdue University, and two B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education at the University of Nevada, Reno (’17). Atop their education, Justin is a previous NSF Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 ASEE ERM Division Best Diversity Paper for their work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and
a model for ongoingtechnical support.IntroductionThe broader goals of this project have been to enhance program evaluation within and acrossNSF-funded ERCs (and other large, STEM-focused research centers) by: 1) expandingdissemination and providing validity testing of a collaborative evaluation survey, 2) developing acomplementary set of qualitative tools (e.g., interview, focus group, observation protocols, etc.),3) facilitating an evaluator’s toolbox to guide and support center evaluation leads, and 4)providing updated information to available resources (e.g., drafting new content for the NSFEngineering Research Centers’ Best Practice Manual). Over the duration of the grant, this workhas been completed while aligning with each of the four