activities which have been shownto enhance retainment of those individuals most likely to leave engineering career pathways.While EIA is only one of these experiences, future work could investigate the impact of otherextra-curricular activities, in addition to embedded experiences such as internships, co-ops orsenior capstone projects. Experiences which provide students with a connection to their peersand to communities, while reinforcing a sense of belonging to the engineering community arecritical to retain those at risk. The researchers continue to work with EIA investigating the on-going collection of data, as well as a deeper understanding of the qualitative responses.Additional studies will also compare responses to these survey questions by
examined the workplace transitionexperiences of undergraduate queer engineering students and revealed a notable gap in the literatureconcerning transition experiences of these students. To address this gap, we have developed a new researchagenda that specifically investigates the school-to-work transition (STW) of undergraduate engineeringstudents. The aim of this project is to analyze and map the existing literature on this topic through a scopingreview (ScLR). A scoping review is a type of literature review designed to systematically explore and map thebreadth of available evidence on a specific topic (Samnani et al., 2017). It identifies key concepts, researchgaps, and the variety of study designs within a field (Grant & Booth, 2009). For
ethicseducation. CEM programs should develop clear assessment plans aligned with ACCE and ABEToutcomes. These plans can include evaluating students’ ethical decision-making skills throughcase analyses, role-playing exercises, and capstone projects. Regular feedback from alumni andindustry stakeholders can help assess the relevance and impact of the ethics curriculum. Periodicprogram reviews will ensure that ethics education remains up to date with evolving industrytrends and emerging ethical challenges, such as those related to technology, globalization, anddiversity.By implementing these strategies, CEM programs can produce graduates who are not onlytechnically competent but also equipped with the ethical judgment necessary to make responsibledecisions
together engineering students from both thehuman rights specialization and SOMAM. This approach allowed them to criticallyanalyze the previous reports done by other student teams while inviting for the first timea formal exploration of the impact of their design that could adapt to future accessibilitysituations and circumstances while promoting sustainable innovation practices andalignment with the Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).Through the constant revision of their timeline and hands-on experiences, students inthis capstone project considered the consequences of their decisions in short and long-term timeframes, the use of proper materials, and the choice of engineering solutionsthat aligned with the broader goals
passionate about building community and belonging in undergraduate research experiences and designing effective mentorship strategies for new researchers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Integrating Research, Design, and Communication Learning Outcomes in the Materials Science and Engineering CurriculumAbstractLearning outcomes in undergraduate capstone, design, and laboratory courses are typicallycentered around hands-on experience, providing students with the technical skills necessarywithin their engineering discipline. However, leaders in engineering education suggest that thesehands-on courses should encompass a broader set of learning outcomes in order to train studentsto “think
Milestones micro-certification initiative, aimed at advancing hands-on, skills-based learning within the College of Engineering. In his current role, he teaches design courses and mentors industry-sponsored capstone projects while contributing to curricular development in the Design and Manufacturing area. With industry experience as a program manager for Siemens Professional Education in Germany, Francisco brings practical expertise and global awareness to his work.Beth Hess, Purdue UniversityLexy Chiwete Arinze, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Lexy Arinze is a first-generation PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a Graduate Research Assistant with the Global Learning
of practice should offer professional development programs to help educators stay current with AI trends and pedagogical approaches. CIT-E is well situated to address this need. 6. Engage Industry Partners in Curriculum Design - Collaboration with industry professionals can ensure that academic programs align with evolving workforce needs. Industry input can inform curriculum updates, internships, and capstone projects that reflect current and future AI applications in CEE practice.References[1] P. Lu, S. Chen, and Y. Zheng, “Artificial Intelligence in Civil Engineering,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2012, no. 1, p. 145974, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1155/2012/145974.[2] J. Duan, S. Yu, H. L. Tan, H. Zhu, and C. Tan, “A
combination of hand calculations and different meshing strategies. • Courses dedicated to FEA can meaningfully involve industry; in one case, students were given general requirements for a truck wheel and devised ways to reduce weight [37]. • Recognizing that students are not motivated to study FEA if the course starts simply with deriving a stiffness matrix for an abstract network of springs, an instructor instead started the course by introducing a project on reverse-engineering a flexure from the James Webb Space Telescope; as students learned new techniques through the course, they would revisit this task to improve their models [38].Capstone DesignBy the time they reach the capstone design experience
Competitive Advantage, Vol. 4, No.1, 2008, pp. 1 – 17.[5] L. Perry and N. Barker, Six Sigma in the service sector: a focus on non-normal data,International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 2, No.3, 2006, pp. 313 –333.[6] J. Van Den Heuvel, R. Does, and J. P. S. Verver, Six Sigma in healthcare: lessons learnedfrom a hospital, International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 1, No.4,2005, pp. 380 - 388.[7] M. Leon, H. C., & Crimi, M. (2019, June), Assessing the Impact of University-Industrycollaborative Lean Six Sigma Capstone Projects on Engineering Management Students Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—32122[8] P. Nonthaleerak and L.C. Hendry, Six
control. The classroom experience revealedgains in students’ self-efficacy in engineering design and improvements in ability to recognizekey components of feedback-control systems. Class tests also revealed challenges associatedwith scaffolding both students and teachers at these grade levels and levels of experience orinterest in computational subjects. Students struggled with algorithmic design in particular,which made it harder for them to complete the capstone projects in the curricula. There werealso lessons learned about robust design and instrumentation of physical devices in classes thatmight only use them for a short period of time, posing hurdles for both students and teachers.Software affordances developed for programming and analyzing
to explore innovative projects, develop critical thinking, andenhance problem-solving skills. Expansion of the Capstone Project: Extend the capstone project to span two semesters,allowing students more time to engage in in-depth, real-world problem-solving and projectdevelopment. Development of New Industry-Aligned Courses: Design and implement new coursestailored to emerging industry trends and workforce demands, ensuring graduates are prepared forevolving challenges in applied engineering. Incorporation of Certification Programs: Integrate industry-recognized certificationprograms as a core component of the curriculum to enhance students' professional qualificationsand career readiness. Table 4: Key Components of Curriculum Revision
) Senior Capstone Design Lab on the third floor into a bustling international metropolis. With this developmentof the facility. UWT has the distinction of being the closest four- came the need for warehouses and markets to spring up alongyear program in the world to this famous CE landmark with it both sides of the track near the terminus. This was so that waresbeing located just six miles directly west of the campus. from the east coast could be unloaded and sold to the growing Keywords – place, new engineering facilities, Tacoma Narrows population in Tacoma, and timber milled in large
circuit analysis, Laplace and z-transforms, Fourier analysis, and signalprocessing techniques.Through a combination of lectures and lab sessions, students explore concepts like sinusoidal steady-state analysis, phasors, impedance, and the natural and step responses of RC, RL, and RLC circuits.Laboratory activities reinforce theoretical knowledge, offering hands-on experience with real-worldtools and techniques, such as designing, analyzing, and building signal processing systems.The course concludes with a final project in which students design a Multi-Functional SignalProcessing System, integrating their knowledge and teamwork to solve practical engineeringchallenges. This capstone project aligns with ABET accreditation requirements, emphasizing
students to refine their designs through progressive testing under increasingly complex conditions.These objectives were implemented in the context of a first-year, introduction to mechanicalengineering course that introduces students to foundational engineering concepts and practicalapplications. The boat design challenge served as the semester’s capstone project, providing apractical framework for applying theories of buoyancy and fluid dynamics.Design Challenge ParametersThe design brief provided students with specific constraints to guide their creativity andproblem-solving efforts. Key parameters included: § Boat Dimensions: Maximum length of 4.5 inches, width of 3 inches, and height of 3.5 inches to ensure compatibility with
experiences. ● Junior Year: A two-course sequence in classical and state space feedback control, one in modeling and simulation, and a mini-capstone design experience. ● Senior Year: A required course in articulated-style robotics plus four elective slots that embrace the breadth of modern robotics (e.g. embedded-systems, mobile robotics, advanced control systems, autonomous vehicles, computer vision, artificial intelligence and desktop manufacturing). All students complete an open-ended capstone design sequence, working in teams on projects of their choosing. Figure 1: Students at USNA engaged in project-based learning.Trend: An Increase of Undergraduate Robotics Engineering Degree ProgramsTraditionally
recently integrated Environmental Data Science course forenvironmental engineering junior students, including a description of its assignments andassociated semester project. In addition, the paper provides a course map outlining how theexisting undergraduate environmental engineering curriculum can be improved to include datascience courses and application domains. Statistical methods and computational tools coursesserve as prerequisites and are expected to provide students with essential knowledge and skills tosucceed in the data science class. The data science class empowers the students with valuable toolsto be used in their subsequent senior courses, especially the capstone senior design project.It is the hope of the authors that the course
trust, mutualrespect, and camaraderie.Conclusion Two summer research programs for teachers in middle, junior high, and high school wereenacted in the patterns described above. They involved the provision of research training andexperience in a manner that involved other HIPs besides research engagement, collaborativeassignments, mentoring, a learning community, and a capstone project. The projects completedinvolved planning, conducting, and presenting findings from a research undertaking and usinglearning from that process to create new curricular material for use with the participants’ studentsin the coming school year. Evidence gathered indicates that the process increased teacherconfidence in multiple areas related to understanding
College Lecturer for New College and a Senior College Lecturer in Engineering Science for Keble College. He has interests in the formation of engineering identity, and increasing synopticism at a curricular level.Dr. Chamille Lescott, Northwestern University Chamille Lescott is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. She advises first-year engineering students as a member of the Undergraduate Engineering Office, teaches first-year and capstone-level design coursework, and serves as the Director of the Biomedical Engineering Master’s Program. Her research interests center around academic resource use, metacognition, and the first-year
-physical systems and the broader engineering infrastructure they create and support.Figure 1 presents the recommended placement of the CIE course within the flowchart of anengineering program. The junior/senior year is suggested for the inclusion of the CIE course dueto the level of knowledge students have in their engineering field. In their senior year, they canapply cybersecurity concepts to their final projects or capstones. However, the cybersecuritycontent does not require any prior knowledge or prerequisite courses in the cybersecurityfield. Figure 1: Recommended Placement of the CIE Course within the FlowchartTo better tailor the course to the various engineering disciplines, several considerations must betaken into account
exist as 120 credit hourexperiences, with many programs exceeding this desired number of credit hours. Frequently,compromises are executed where a generic public speaking general education course is used tojustify meeting a communications requirement. Many programs will augment the publicspeaking course by expanding additional professional communications developmentopportunities across several classes in the curriculum. For example, classes that require studentsto present a technical report could be used to assess communication skills. Professionalcommunication skills could be incorporated into the capstone experience for the program,especially if the capstone requires students to work as a group with a project sponsor. Whilethese approaches
addressing these challenges. Front-end design deals withthe highly open-ended nature of the design process such as problem framing, need finding, and ideation. Given thisopen-endedness, it can be particularly hard to implement in K-12 settings. This NSF-funded project seeks to supportteachers in engaging secondary students in front-end design where they explore and define problems; and thengenerate and review design ideas that combine scientific, technical engineering, social and contextualconsiderations. The project takes a design-based research approach in developing curriculum and a web-basedplatform. The platform enables collaborative content generation, sharing, sketching tools, and scaffolding for ideageneration. We present preliminary results
interdisciplinary engineering education and faculty decision-making.Stephanie Adams, Oregon State University Stephanie Adams is currently enrolled as a doctoral student at Oregon State University, where she is working towards her PhD in Civil Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education. Her current research focuses on the adoption of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs) among engineering faculty members. Additionally, she is investigating the identity development of engineering students in capstone courses.Dr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor – Engineering Education in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at the New Jersey
in the School of Engineering + Technology at Western Carolina University (WCU). In addition to teaching in the field of electrical engineering, he coordinates the senior engineering capstone program which is a multidisciplinary, two-semester course sequence with projects sponsored by industrial partners. Within this role, he focuses on industrial outreach and the teaching and assessment of professional skills. Prior to joining WCU in 2018, he spent a decade in industry managing and developing innovative technologies across a broad spectrum of applications: SiC and GaN high voltage transistors for energy-efficient power conversion, radio frequency (RF) surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters for mobile phones, and
-based engineering design project focused on designing for thedisabled community. Articles were excluded if they were (1) not available in English, (2) the fulltext was not available, or (3) was a “Work in Progress.” The keyword search strategy is below:(disab* OR "assistive technology" OR rehabilit* OR prosthetic* OR "special needs" ORhandicap* OR ADA OR therap*) AND (design* OR capstone* OR project OR projects ORcourse).During the data extraction phase of the systematic review, words used to refer to disabled folksin the research article were extracted. The extracted terminology was sorted into multiple usesand single uses, where 34 words were used more than once, and 266 words were used only oncein the 60 articles from the systematic review
goals to broaden the project’soriginal objectives. In particular, we aimed to teach students conceptual frameworks and basicskills for performing responsible data science research and analysis. The capstone lectures onalgorithmic fairness served as models for how we expected students to approach their ownprojects. These lectures demonstrated that a sociotechnical approach to research and designwould require students to know how to look for and identify the most relevant human contexts oftheir research project, for example, paying attention to the identity and positionalities of thepersons represented or otherwise implicated in the data in question.Responsible sociotechnical practice involves more than just the application of
, data structures, and algorithms designed explicitly for non-computingcollege graduates. Additionally, during the first two semesters, the curriculum incorporates aninnovative excursions component that provides students with breadth in computing by readingand discussing CS research papers, participating in hands-on activities with core computingtools, and engaging with guest speakers in the field. The final semester serves as an off-rampfrom the iCAN program. The coursework includes a capstone experience (or individual study)and a graduate-level CS elective. Capstone projects can be research experience, a softwaredevelopment project, or an internship. iCAN students are paired with faculty mentors for thecapstone project. Overall, we have had 20
University Craig Baudendistel has been teaching for 10 years in the Mechanical Engineering department at Wright State University. He has been heavily involved in first year courses focused on retention. This includes courses in applied mathematics, first-year seminar, programming, and computer aided design. Additionally, he advises 2-3 senior capstone groups per year related to SAE competitions or industry partners like GE Aerospace. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in Progress: College-Wide First Year Seminar Building the Foundation for Career SuccessAbstractThis Work in Progress paper was motivated by understanding the unique challenges
research initiatives and problem-solving exercises, enabling students totailor elective courses to their interests. Each participant is required to complete either a capstoneproject or a research thesis. The program, which spans three semesters, commences with rigorouscoursework and culminates in a comprehensive final project. Students opting for a thesis engagein advanced research endeavors, while those fulfilling the capstone requirements exerciseconsiderable autonomy in designing and disseminating their projects. The increasing appeal of thisexperiential, student-centered model has led to a rise in enrollment, presenting challenges inmaintaining personalized faculty oversight. In response to these developments, the program hasinvestigated the
challenges comprehensively. underrepresented groups in mind. Framework - Iterative Design Cycles: Students test - Practical Readiness: Students Application prototypes in real-world scenarios, gather gain experience in implementing feedback, and refine solutions. designs in real-world settings. - Integration into Curricula: The framework is - Community Engagement: Strong embedded into engineering education programs partnerships lead to solutions that through courses, projects, and capstone directly benefit the intended experiences
development projects of their choosing weeklyover the course of the semester. The course was conducted over two semesters: an initial pilot,followed by a refined iteration incorporating lessons learned and student feedback.In both iterations of this course, students live stream for a set amount of hours each week whilemaintaining a diary of their accomplishments and how they felt their individual streams went. Weevaluate the students on their perceived self-efficacy and the evolving perceptions of their goalsand desired achievements during this course through three reflection assignments.Our observations reveal that students initially took the course to set aside time to work onpersonal projects and develop their programming skills, with motivations