, equity, inclusion, andjustice (DEIJ) initiatives facing persistent and systemic barriers. At the time of writing, thesechallenges have intensified as higher education institutions and diversity, equity, and inclusion(DEI) initiatives come under direct political attack, with a chilling effect on academic freedomand institutional autonomy. The termination of federally funded DEI-related grants signals anescalation in efforts to suppress research and programming that address systemic inequities. Inthis context, this study investigates how arts-based practices—specifically speculative design,remixing, and futurisms—can deepen members’ DEIJ change intentions and foster theirengagement as change agents. By blending critical reflection with creative
workshops and structuredinterventions (intentionally designed activities with guided steps, such as promptingquestions, that help students reflect, think conceptually, and reach the appropriate solution toa problem) [16]. Haas et al. [17] demonstrated that workshops focused on team effectivenesssignificantly enhance teamwork perceptions by ensuring all members are familiar withproposed solutions. At the same time, Miralami et al. [3] warned that a lack of formal trainingin teamwork skills can exacerbate inequalities, particularly those based on gender and race,negatively impacting students’ sense of belonging and team dynamics.Innovative approaches, such as game-based methodologies, offer additional opportunities todevelop critical teamwork skills
for Master’s and upper-divisionundergraduate engineering students. The course had three learning goals: (1) teach students torecognize their public welfare responsibilities, (2) motivate students to act on public welfareissues, and (3) equip students with intervention strategies (e.g., understanding whistleblowingprotections, writing an op-ed) to confront issues they may encounter in their future professionalwork. In this paper, we provide a detailed description of the course and present data from pre-and post-class surveys and open-ended reflections to illustrate how the class produced notablechanges in students’ (a) recognition of their public welfare responsibilities, (b) motivation totake action, and (c) familiarity with intervention
mentees achievehigher GPAs [6] and graduation rates [9] compared to students who do not have a peer mentor. There has been less research exploring the impact of the peer mentor role on peermentors themselves, however. First-generation students serving as mentors to first-year,first-generation students participated in a qualitative research study exploring the leadershipskills gained during their time mentoring students [13]. Mentors reflected on their experience inguiding students and how they exhibited exemplary leadership practices. Furthermore, mentorscan make a difference in student mentees’ academic experience by creating inclusive learningspaces [17]. One study suggests peer mentors reported gaining leadership skills necessary to
engineering and construction context aims to engage engineering and constructionmanagement students in world history in a way that is more interesting for them than a typicalhistory course. Essays throughout the course ask them to reflect on aspects of the projects thatdirectly relate to construction such as (1) challenges that were encountered during theconstruction, (2) examples of modern structures that were inspired by the projects, and (3) howconstruction techniques and project management have evolved over time. Students are alsoasked to reflect on political, economic, and social aspects of the projects, which help to engagethem in the historical context and be exposed to the fact that many complexities of constructionprojects go beyond just
has been given to the unique experiences and challenges of nontraditional students inonline and evening programs. This study seeks to fill this gap by providing insights into theirexpectations, perceptions, and learning outcomes.MethodologyA qualitative, focus group-based study explored students' perceptions of physics courses in anevening and online engineering program. This approach was selected because it generates rich,dynamic, and collaborative discussions, allowing participants to reflect and build on theirexperiences [6] collectively.ParticipantsThe study included seven students enrolled in an engineering program at a private university inChile. The participants were divided into two focus groups: one composed of four students andthe
Retrospective SurveysThe questions were designed to evaluate students’ understanding of the key learning outcomesassociated with the three EOP framework topics: EIA, MS, and ST. The surveys assessed students'perceived proficiency both before and after the course. To measure self-reported learning gains, aLikert scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”) was employed. This scalewas tailored to capture the extent of students' agreement with statements regarding their knowledgeand skills in sustainability concepts. A score of 1 indicated strong disagreement, reflecting that thestudent perceived minimal proficiency in the topic, while a score of 5 indicated strongagreement,indicating high proficiency in the learning outcome. The
our instructional approach, still inits development stage, in its first classroom setting. At the beginning of the term, we gatheredpre-course reflections from students that guided our adaptations to teaching methods. Post-coursefeedback was used to evaluate the success of our implementation. Initial observations from thisfirst iteration reveal both successes and challenges in promoting contextualized learning aseducators. In addition to enhancing problem-solving skills and applying numerical methods tovarious real-world scenarios, we also emphasize the application of computer programmingabilities, which are essential in engineering contexts.Since our approach is still in the development phase and this is our first implementation iteration,we
University, contributing to a group funded by the Department of Energy. Her primary research focused on the long-term evaluation of near-surface waste disposal under climate change impacts at nuclear waste sites. With a background as an environmental engineer/planner at Gresham, Smith, and Partners, as well as General Motors Corporation, Dr. Worthy brings a wealth of industry experience to her academic roles. She has a proven track record of addressing critical environmental challenges. In her recent endeavors, Dr. Worthy is actively collaborating with the Lemelson Foundation to institutionalize the Engineering for One Planet framework at Kennesaw State University. This initiative reflects her commitment to sustainability
opportunities fora diverse group of undergraduate research assistants; and 2) To develop a novel adaptive real-timeoptical sensing algorithms in near-Ultraviolet (UV) spectrum by combining reflected-UV and UVfluorescence techniques to transform our ability to detect biological surface contaminants, such assaliva, that could potentially contain infectious pathogens. The reflected-UV and UV fluorescenceimaging methods are used in various scientific, industrial, and medical optical sensing systems,such as in germicidal irradiation (disinfecting), digital forensics, food/agricultural industries,remote sensing, space science (NASA Perseverance), etc. The recent use of UV light surfacedisinfection mobile robot platforms and devices has shown promising
, including developing students’ funds of knowledgeand culturally responsive mentoring, supporting teachers in incorporating these practices intolesson planning and instruction. Pre-service teachers engaged in workshops, reflective journaling,interactive activities, and actual teaching experiences with students. Throughout the program,mentors were supported with training in culturally responsive mentoring practices to ensureongoing guidance.To assess the impact of this experience, data were collected through semi-structured interviewsconducted after the program and a post-program survey. Findings suggest that exposure to EDPand CRP with guided implementation experiences solidified participants’ beliefs, encouragedthem to apply these methods in real
, with potential for broaderapplication across institutions.IntroductionComputing and technology occupations are predicted to rise by 7.3% in the next decade,outpacing the national average grow rate of 4.8% [1]. Along with a skilled workforce, theindustry needs to maintain a diverse workforce reflecting the community. Currently only 25.8%of computer and mathematical occupations employees are women. Among those, only 23.1% areAsian, 8.7% are Black/African American, and 7.8% are Hispanic/Latinx [2].Black women alone comprise 7% of the U.S. population [3] and yet make up only 0.5% ofcomputer science degrees awarded [4] and just 3% of computing professionals [5]. Black womenalso face specific barriers from just being black and a woman. [6], [7], [8
chosen because it’s a simple and common itemthat is easy to prototype with found materials, but could be easily substituted with an alternative.During the 75-minute classroom session, after an introduction by the instructor, the interactiveactivity is divided into four active phases: (1) Question Brainstorm, (2) Client Interview, (3)Artifact Generation, and (4) Class Wide Sharing/Reflection.1. Question BrainstormStudents begin by brainstorming interview questions for a client, with generative AI assistingthem in refining those questions. As a human-centered design task, students are encouraged todesign questions that will help them gain the perspective, problems, preferences, and needs of aclient. This exercise immediately highlights how
. Prior to full deployment, the survey underwent a face validityassessment with a faculty panel to ensure clarity and relevance. All participants in the study weretraditional undergraduate students, primarily aged 18-19, with the majority being domesticstudents. Approximately 15-20% of the respondents were international students. Unfortunately,socioeconomic background information was not available at the individual level.The surveys were administered in two stages: a pre-survey (AI use and student perceptionssurvey; deployed four weeks into the semester) conducted at the beginning of the semester, priorto an AI-focused lecture, and a post-survey (AI use reflection survey) conducted three to fiveweeks after the lecture. The lecture provided
as “global awareness, global understanding, and theability to effectively apply intercultural knowledge [4].”In the context of engineering education, it is crucial to recognize the role of academic programsin cultivating leadership skills that go beyond technical expertise. The importance of globalleadership competencies in engineering education has been increasingly recognized in literature,reflecting the growing need for engineers to operate effectively in multicultural and internationalenvironments. Studies emphasized the necessity of integrating global competencies intoengineering curricula to better prepare students for the complex challenges of a globalizedworkforce. Taylor and Green highlighted the significant role that student
overlooked. This imbalancein STEM education can impact graduate students’ preparedness for various career paths in bothacademia and industry. GAPS course design combines active learning and inductive teachingmethods, enabling students to apply professional skills directly to their thesis research throughcommunity-based experiential learning. In-class discussions, online forums, and peer feedbackalso facilitate collaborative problem-solving and reflective engagement.In this study, GAPS was used to evaluate the effectiveness of these pedagogical approaches. Thestudy aimed to understand how these strategies lead to the development of essential professionalskills among STEM graduate students by examining the incorporation of active learning andinductive
as reflecting the challenges forbiomedical engineers, or any engineers, that begin before and end well after the use of any particular AI or MLalgorithm or approach. The critical role of data in such work is well established and represents a necessaryperspective in preparing BMEs to lead technically competent and morally defensible AI/ML work [6], [7].Our data skills curriculum is actively evolving. We aim to increase student engagement in data skills-relatedlearning longitudinally. Many programs have created specific course(s), majors, or minors in data science[2],[8]. While adding a major or minor is effective for students who choose this type of coursework, we see abroader need to create a variety of opportunities that are tailored to the
group was given 15 minutes to create their own mind map with the centraltheme described as “STEAM careers related.” Importantly, the instruction did not specify theexact phrase “STEAM careers” but rather allowed participants to interpret the topic more freely.Interestingly, the groups independently selected slightly different central topic names: “Career inSTEAM,” “Pursuing a STEAM Career,” and “STEAM Career.” While the variation in namingwas minimal, the emphasis reflected in their mind maps differed significantly, as will bediscussed later in the results section. The mind-mapping exercise was conducted with minimalsupervision and teaching intervention. Guidance was provided only in response to logisticalquestions, such as “Can I draw a
academic year that followed. Each week of the institute included 9 hours of livemeetings over videoconferencing, during which nationally recognized speakers facilitatedsessions on culturally responsive teaching, intersectionality, and students of color experiences inSTEM. As well, participants completed reflections, discussions and readings outside of the livevideo meetings on their own utilizing the institution’s learning management system.Our research questions were: Does participation impact faculty beliefs and self-efficacy in usingsuch practices? Do students who take classes with faculty trained in culturally responsive andinclusive practices show higher levels of academic achievement in STEM?MethodsParticipantsParticipants were recruited via
narrative psychology.Major Project Goals: This project aims to enhance the professional identity, sense of belonging,and retention of STEM graduate students through an innovative storytelling pedagogy. Byfostering reflective and personal storytelling practices, the initiative addresses three corehypotheses. First, it posits that storytelling will improve students' self-perception, including theirprofessional identity and sense of belonging, while reducing feelings of impostorism. Second,the project hypothesizes that participating in storytelling workshops and performances willreinforce graduate student retention and facilitate their transition into STEM careers. Finally, itaims to challenge stereotypes about individuals pursuing STEM careers
reflective process. Significant work this past year includes department-driven callsaround supporting (new) faculty in their success, engagement, sense of belonging, and any otherway (new) faculty might define their experiences in the CPE department. Faculty identified threekey areas to be attentive to: onboarding (from informational to creating the conditions fortransformation), mentoring, and community through facilitated dialogue sessions. We initiatedresearch strands on the student experience and equitable teaching practices in our department.This paper and accompanying poster highlights key aspects of our work during the past year.IntroductionPart of our work to transform our department into one that is equitable and just involveddeveloping a
of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research and service interests include teaching and learning experiences in fundamental engineering courses, faculty development and support initiatives – including programs for the future engineering professoriate, and leveraging institutional data to support reflective teaching practices. She has degrees in Electrical Engineering (B.S., M.Eng.) from the Ateneo de Davao University in Davao City, Philippines, where she previously held appointments as Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering. She also previously served as Director for Communications and International Engagement at the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech
disciplines, including engineering, where traditional assessment methods often focusheavily on quantitative metrics such as exams and problem sets.In engineering education, portfolios have been employed to assess a variety of skills andoutcomes that are not easily captured through conventional means. For example, portfolios areused to evaluate students' design capabilities, teamwork experiences, and communication skills,core competencies emphasized in ABET accreditation criteria [3]. Portfolios provide a structuredplatform for students to document their iterative design processes, reflect on their decision-making, and align their learning artifacts with specific course or program outcomes [4].Furthermore, the reflective component of portfolios has
background and experience prior to the course, spanning from lowexperience, reflecting minimal exposure to programming and robotics, to high experience,indicating strong foundational knowledge and confidence in these areas from beforehand.From these axes, four distinct categories of learners emerged: Self Reliant, Pioneering,Overwhelmed and Engaged learner. The first category, Self-Reliant Learners, includes studentswith high prior technical experience but low willingness to engage with AI. These students aredescribed as autonomous and confident in their coding and robotic abilities, preferring to rely ontheir own skills rather than embracing generative AI as a resource. This category refers tostudents who prefer to use the chatbots sparingly
PCK to investigate connectionsbetween teacher backgrounds, personal PCK (pPCK), the personalized professional knowledgeheld by teachers, and enacted PCK (ePCK), the knowledge teachers draw on to engage inpedagogical reasoning while planning, teaching, and reflecting on their practice. Observation,interview, and survey data were triangulated to develop narrative case summaries describingeach teacher’s PCK, which were then subjected to cross-case analysis to identify patterns andthemes across teachers.Findings describe how teachers’ backgrounds translated into diverse forms of pPCK thatinformed the pedagogical moves and decisions teachers made as they implemented thecurriculum (ePCK). Regardless of the previous subject taught (math, science, or
end of the term. These concept maps wereanalyzed using standard metrics of depth and connectivity, and they were compared using anevaluation rubric to identify the types of concepts that were expected to be included, based ondefinitions of equitable infrastructure that are commonly endorsed by professionals.The paper offers insights into the efficacy of different approaches to integrating equitableinfrastructure concepts into first-year courses, reflections on student outcomes, and suggestionsfor faculty to effectively and efficiently introduce students to these topics. Our goal in sharingthis work is to inspire discussion within the engineering community about how faculty anddepartments across the U.S. can address equity and infrastructure
EnvironmentAbstractHackathons have emerged as a beneficial platform for fostering innovation and practicalproblem-solving skills among students. These events encourage participants to prototypesolutions to complex problems rapidly and promote personal and professional growth. As onepart of a grant effort, it was proposed to study how students reflect upon, articulate, and exhibitthe entrepreneurial mindset (EM) in their hackathon-based problem-solving approaches. Asdefined here, the entrepreneurial mindset is based on the KEEN framework. The KEENframework consists of the 3Cs: Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value. The Curiosityconstruct encourages learners to explore different perspectives and question the norm. TheConnections construct emphasizes integrating
reported on the influence of Design Talks on participating teachers.This paper reports on a qualitative study focused on teacher reflections and perceptions of theirexperiences facilitating Design Talks in their classrooms. Specifically, we ask: How doelementary teachers perceive the benefits of intentionally facilitated whole-class conversationsduring engineering design units? Study participants were the six classroom teachers in ourDesign Talks community of practice.Background and Conceptual FrameworkWhole-class talk in science and math. By using “Design Talks” as a catchphrase, we havehoped (1) to emphasize the importance of discussion in the learning of engineering, and (2) toexplicitly align with seminal work on “science talks” (Gallas, 1995
insights from a semester-long collaborativeclassroom ethnography that embedded in three engineering faculty classrooms and allowed forexploration of what worked to help them learn. The study draws on a broader project with multiple data sources including an embeddedclassroom ethnography, student survey responses, faculty weekly reflective meetings, andfaculty pre-post interviews; we used the project as an intervention to guide engineering faculty intransforming their pedagogy and creating racially-equitable learning environments.Theoretically, we draw on a few conceptual frameworks, including good pedagogy (e.g.,Ladson-Billing's 1995 "good teaching"), learner-oriented pedagogies, equity pedagogy, andpragmatism. Our three faculty
. Preliminary results reveal aspectrum of understanding, ranging from predominately narrow task-oriented views to lesscommon broader evaluative and reflective approaches. The findings underscore the necessity ofintegrating explicit critical thinking instruction into engineering curricula to addressmisconceptions and strengthen this vital competency. This study aims to inform engineeringeducators and administrators of where first-year students are starting with this understandingwith the intention to illicit strategies for improvement and contributions to the development ofpedagogy to educate engineers who can navigate complex societal and technical challenges.IntroductionThis complete research paper discusses critical thinking in the context of first