Write efficient, structured, and task-driven code. 3 Follow the best practices in coding, e.g., commenting, modularity. 4 Develop algorithms for fundamental problems using existing and custom libraries. 5 Analyze, debug, and adapt code written for robotic systems. 6 Describe the components of a robotic system and their interactions through code. 7 Interface with robotics actuators and sensors via code and microcontrollers. 8 Collaborate with peers to develop a robotic application that integrates multiple subsystems. 9 Apply concepts learned to make functional code that runs on hardware.Weekly Schedule and Course FlowThe course schedule spans 7 weeks, providing a structured and scaffolded approach to learning.Each week builds upon
engineering students. Alternative pedagogical approaches, such as peer-to-peer learning andflipped classrooms, provide more engaging and contextualized learning experiences, particularlyfor skill-based courses. The novel approach which is investigated in this research paper is the useof project-based learning as an effective pedagogy to teach an intensive theoretical course oncritical thinking. The course, titled ‘The Art of Thinking and Reasoning’, was designed andtaught to 137 first-year students, aiming to instill in them the cognitive skills of critical thinkingand scientific reasoning in an engineering context. The course was structured in two parts: thefirst part employed traditional lecture-driven pedagogy, and the second part utilised a
strategies. Content knowledge for theclass(es) being taught can also be an important component of competence but it is not one weinvestigated. All the GTAs in this study were teaching introductory-level physics, math, and CS sowe assumed that they had sufficient knowledge and understanding of the subject content.Recognition in this model is the acknowledgment of a GTA’s teaching efforts by students, faculty,or peers. This recognition by others can significantly impact GTAs’ confidence and motivation.Positive feedback and validation reinforce GTA identity as effective educators, while well-delivered constructive criticism promotes growth by encouraging reflection and refinement ofteaching methods [11]. As Carless [12] highlights, clear and
address this challenge, KEEN provides resources through the Engineering Unleashedplatform[6], which offers over 2,500 activities—referred to as cards—designed for rapidclassroom deployment and peer collaboration. Additionally, KEEN organizes annual meetings andworkshops to support faculty in integrating EM into their teaching practices. Developing active,engaging, and time-efficient EML activities can further promote the sustained growth of anentrepreneurial mindset in engineering education.EML micromoment activities are a pedagogical tool to facilitate the incorporation of the 3 Csthrough short activity implementations that only last 2 - 30 minutes[1], [7]. These micromomentactivities also promote inclusive teaching[8], improve teaching, and
in which students learn about academic writing and out-of-classroom research with a professor. As a result, the program significantly prepared the student prior to joining a research group, helping eliminate his “fear” of research. Universities that have and encourage students to join such programs can strengthen the abilities of their students [3]. • Active recruitment by peers: The student was recruited into the lab by one of its undergraduate researchers. The researcher recognized their interest in computer vision and believed they would be a strong candidate to join. • Professor mentorship: Once accepted into the lab, the professor explained computer vision using one of the field's
Fellows to asupportive network of peers and professionals through assignment to an i2 mHub. Each i2 mHubwill consist of two to three iREDEFINE Fellows, one to two junior ECE faculty (iREDEFINEalumni), and one to two ECE academic leaders, such as current or former department chairs.Through structured virtual activities, Fellows actively applying for academic positions willreceive guidance from both junior and senior faculty within their Hub. This unique mentoringstructure also fosters a multi-level support system, where senior members provide mentorship tojunior faculty while encouraging peer mentoring among the iREDEFINE Fellows.2 BackgroundAccording to the latest U.S. Census, 50.5% of the U.S. population identifies as female 1
learning) and Theme 3 (refiningcareer goals), showing how reflection can shape academic and professional aspirations.Abstract Conceptualization (AC) and Active Experimentation (AE)The transition from conceptualizing to experimenting is a dynamic process where students applytheir developed theories to real-world challenges. A poignant example is given by Zaher whoengaged in the analysis and scripting of engine timings using MATLAB: I think courses that have a Learning Studio component, you get to see… the difference between real-world and theoretical like results. So like for the forklift dynamometer, we had to think about the timing of the engine. We had to look at all those different signals, and we had to write a
self-directed learning opportunities. In this course, students learn how togather and analyze data as part of the engineering design process, apply systems thinking to anengineering or societal phenomenon, collaborate with peers to find solutions, and effectivelypresent solutions to an audience. Moreover, students are exposed to the introduction of theapplication of machine learning techniques to environmental datasets and Google Earth enginefor remote sensing datasets.This work will aim at reporting four main issues, namely (1) the unique components of thecurrent integrated data science course, (2) an account of selected environmental engineeringprojects using Python, (3) a survey result collecting data on students’ perception about the
based on their engineering experiences willhighlight possible misalignments between inclusive policies for women and their realities ofbeing part of a minority population in engineering. However, accessing stories of epistemicinjustice can be difficult due to the complexity of the theory; as such, intentional processes forgenerating data collection tools must be developed and documented.This paper details the piloting phase of an interview protocol for narrative analysis for a largerresearch study. We elaborate on the stages of instrument development, including methodjustification, building a preliminary interview protocol, peer review, piloting, and refinement.First, we justify methods by explaining the alignment between narrative analysis and
andimproved health. However, their dual roles often come with big challenges, particularly in fields likeengineering, where academic demands are notably rigorous. The intersection of these roles – parent andstudent – raises critical questions about how institutions can better support this population, whose successhas implications far beyond individual achievement. The journey of a student-parent is unlike that of their peers. Time is insufficient, resources arestretched, and the stakes are high – not just for themselves but for the future of their children. Theirmotivations to persist are powerful, driven by the promise of better opportunities. Yet, the obstacles theyface often undermine their aspirations. In engineering programs, where time
that theyare specialized, interdisciplinary, and uncommon at both the undergraduate and graduate levels.As a result, librarians or subject specialists who liaise with these areas can encounter a lack ofresources and knowledge to support the students and faculty in these programs. A group oflibrarians who have NAMOE programs as part of their institutions recently started a dedicatedgroup, combining elements of communities of practice and peer group mentoring to discuss howbest to support these programs and each other as professionals with varying experience in thissubject area. Plans include the development of a resource similar to chapters in Osif’s Using theEngineering Literature, a crucial source for librarians supporting engineering
apply the knowledge acquiredin the first semester, for example, to replicate in a controlled laboratory environment, real-worldmissions like flight surveillance operations. Students’ schedules in the laboratory overlap toincrease peer interaction, collaboration, and mutual support. This study’s goals were to explore the high-impact research-oriented learning experiencesfor the Latinx undergraduate participants of the ROLE program and how they built strongtechnical skills while sharing space and knowledge with their fellow peers and mentors. Tworesearch questions framed this study. The first research question addresses the qualitative data,and the second research question informs the quantitative section of the study: 1. How did Latinx
. Throughout the entire freshmanyear, program support services are provided to students in the form of personalized academicadvising, faculty and peer mentoring, corporate networking, academic and other student supportservices, see Figure 1.Students selected to participate in the STEPUP program must first receive an official letter ofadmission from the UF Office of Admissions. From this pool of admitted applicants, the HerbertWertheim College of Engineering (HWCOE) is provided with a list of students who haveselected an engineering field as their major of choice. Correspondence is targeted towards thesestudents both electronically and in writing to congratulate them on their success in beingadmitted to the University and to welcome them into the
Appendix Table 1. Comprehensive publication searches were conductedin databases including Compendex, INSPEC, the ASEE PEER Repository, Scopus, GoogleScholar, IEEE Xplore, and ProQuest. The chosen databases facilitate the integration of recordswith library tools (e.g., Zotero) for efficient downloading and exporting of relevant studycharacteristics (authors, publication year, abstract, citations, journal name, publisher, etc.).Utilizing a root search term—“culturally relevant pedagogy”—we incorporated four keywords:“international students,” “engineering education,” “deficit narratives,” and “inclusivity,” as theyappeared in article titles, abstracts, or keywords. These keywords were combined using Booleanoperators ("AND" and "OR") to refine our
experience, highlighting its focus on real-world applications, intercultural collaboration,and technical writing—elements they felt were lacking in their previous coursework. Participantsnoted that collaborating with peers from diverse backgrounds allowed them to gain differentperspectives, problem-solving approaches, and insights into various cultural norms. Instructorsreinforced the importance of equipping students with practical skills and tools relevant toreal-world engineering contexts, promoting a pragmatic approach to problem-solving [F2, F3,F5].DiscussionThe interviews provide valuable insights into student experiences within the global engineeringcourse. The identified themes and suggested improvements can inform future iterations of
Paper ID #47284FORE: A Student-Centered Framework for Accessible Robotics Educationthrough Simulation and Interactive LearningHossein Jamali, University of Nevada, Reno Hossein Jamali is a PhD student at the University of Nevada, Reno, focusing on Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, and Cloud Computing. His research encompasses a range of interdisciplinary topics, including AI-driven recommender systems and resource management algorithms. Hossein has authored several peer-reviewed papers in leading conferences and journals and has actively contributed to advancing AI and optimization techniques. His work
Learning and Individual Identity using Cognitive Load TheoryAbstractCognitive Load Theory (CLT) is a foundational framework in educational psychology thatexplains how learners process and manage information. As engineering programs face growingchallenges in student retention and engagement, CLT offers an evidence-based approach toenhance learning efficiency. This paper introduces key concepts essential to applying CLTeffectively and proposes a promising research direction for extending its use to also supportgreater inclusion in engineering education. Research shows that students from minoritizedpopulations in engineering experience more stress and anxiety than their peers from dominantgroups. To date, most studies have approached this issue from
of Practice (CoP) that connects them with peers, e4usa teammembers, university faculty, and practicing engineers throughout the year. CoP sessions are heldvirtually bi-weekly in two different formats. Once with the coaches in a small peer group andanother time with the entire cohort. These sessions encourage teachers to share classroomexperiences, exchange lesson plans, and engage in discussions. e4usa team also providesongoing support through a learning management platform addressing curriculum-relatedquestions and facilitating collaboration and professional growth within the teaching community.PersonasTo achieve its goals, e4usa has treated the curriculum design process as a Learning Engineering(LE) [8] design challenge. The team has, at
LMS offers an opportunity toask questions or share implementation experiences. Currently, 38 participants are distributed atinstitutions across 19 states and territories. Institutions include large research universities, smallliberal arts colleges, and minority serving institutions including one institution designated aHistorically Black College and University (HBCU). We also recognize there is a great need forthese activities to be agile and adaptable. The kits are designed to facilitate distribution todistance learning students and implementation on a virtual platform. Activities were designed tofollow inclusive pedagogical practices such as collaborative learning, peer-to-peer instruction,real-world connection, immediate feedback
student approaches a project with a visionary, high- level perspective or a detail-oriented mindset. 2. Leadership Role: Determines whether a student prefers to take on a leadership role or follow others. 3. Leadership Preference: Identifies whether a student favors a single designated leader or a shared leadership structure. 4. Commitment Level: Assesses the amount of time a student is willing to dedicate to the project. 5. Hands-On Skills: Measures a student’s prior experience with hands-on tasks and practical applications.To evaluate team dynamics, we utilized the CATME peer teamwork dimension surveys, whichare based on a comprehensive research-driven methodology [10]. These surveys require trainingfor
potential bias that may impact their teaming and interactions with peers in anengineering design setting, educators can share evidence from psychological sciences about whatstereotype threat is, how stereotype threat may affect students in science and engineeringcontexts, and how to lessen the impact of stereotype threat on students’ performance. Evidencesuggests that discussions of stereotype threat before a key assessment (e.g., exam or designreview) can improve student performance on that assessment [9], [10]. Such critical primingprior to or during team-based design projects allows students to raise their awareness andpotentially implement some behavioral changes towards others (e.g., not defining others by theirgender or race or associated
were able to complete all activities due to absences. The class meets 5 days per weekfor 90 minutes each day. Algebra 1A is an almost exclusively freshman class consisting of mainly low achievingmath students who were deemed to require extra time to master concepts. Those passing Algebra 1A move on to Table 1: High School Standards encoded using Scratch Programming. Teaching Standards Application in Scratch Hacker name: use variables to learn how to 6.EE.B.6 Use variables to represent numbers and write expressions use the various blocks in Scratch to create a when
content (e.g. economics, ethics) and skills (e.g. writing, oral presentations) that are usefuland necessary for both personal and professional development. However, students can often seethese courses as not useful or unrelated to their future careers. In this study, a first semestercourse in Civil Engineering was designed and delivered to make deliberate and clear theconnections between the general education portion of the curriculum and students’ future careersas civil engineers. An existing instrument was adapted to measure student aptitudes towardsdifferent skills and knowledge typically presented in general education courses and given to thestudent pre and post instruction, revealing statistically meaningful increases in the
visualizations. 2. To focus students on thinking critically about what statistical parameters indicate in a particular problem. 3. To facilitate students’ ability to read and respond precisely to an engineering-related problem. To develop our approach and content, we drew from literature across multiple fields, including information and data literacy pedagogy, technical writing in engineering, argumentation, and data visualization. The resulting data literacy module comprises assignments paired with applied engineering problems derived from the existing scientific literature and real-world datasets.We deployed the new assignments in Fall 2024. While we have confidence in the revised module, werecognize that some elements of the assignments
interactive approaches learned at the Stanfordd.school’s Teaching & Learning Studio. The stated learning objectives of the bootcamp are: ● Ability to formulate and test non-scientific hypotheses ● Ability to identify the broader impact of your research work ● Ability to apply these methods to grant writing, job search, and career development ● Develop an understanding of the NSF I-Corps program principlesAdditional objectives include networking skills development, personal reflection and actionplanning, and community building. The bootcamp is typically delivered in 3 half-day sessionsover a 3-day period, although a 2-day version has also been piloted. The advantage of holdingthe bootcamp over 3-days is that it provides additional time
curriculum.They then developed a method to build new courses and a plan for putting together the contentand projects for the new first- and second-year environmental engineering courses. Thesecourses were first implemented in the 2023-2024 academic year and a description of theoutcomes, content, projects, and lessons learned follows in Section 3.0.3.0 IPBC DiscussionOne overarching goal of implementing project-based courses in the first and second yearof the curriculum is to motivate students with diverse skills and backgrounds to continue topursue environmental engineering. Too often, students with less experience in technical subjects,such as calculus or chemistry, fall behind their peers in courses and may begin to feel as ifengineering is “not for
are not permitted to seek anyadditional donated funding. An example project for a faculty-driven project is the“WhiteBoardBot” used in the first year of implementing this model. For this project, studentswere tasked with designing a robot that could automatically write and erase text on a whiteboardbased on user inputs. This project was selected because it meets the requirements for amechatronics engineering project. It requires a combination of mechanical, electrical, computerengineering, and control system design to solve a real-world challenge. Students must design andselect appropriate mechanical components, sensors, and actuators. The system also needed tocontain a user-friendly graphical user interface. Safey and professionalism were
along with. I like to think that I can work for anyone and with anyone after my time playing football at Mines.Students also identified ways that their peers’ FOK contributed to the success of the capstoneproject. One of the welding students both appreciated the potential for the robotic welder to maketheir work more efficient and came to see that “everyone sees things differently and everyonecan bring a good idea to the table.” An MME student emphasized commonality, writing,“Communication between engineers and technicians can be challenging but shouldn’t. We seemto have more in common with each other than not and are working towards common goals justfrom different points of view/contributions.” Another student similarly emphasized
the challengesof engaging students without the presence of teachers and peers to encourage, motivate, andsupport them [5]. While there is little research on effective pedagogies for engaging students inonline labs, a recent study suggests that providing support for students before and during thehands-on projects, clear instructions about the experiment and set-up, and pre-structuring of labactivities, lead to successful student engagement with the activity [6]. Moreover, an importantgoal of Discover UC San Diego is to build confidence and self-efficacy, especially infirst-generation high school students, for college success. As defined by [7], “self-efficacy refersto an individual’s subjective conviction in his or her capabilities to perform
from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. After graduation, she worked as a post-doc for approximately three years at Monash University in Clayton, Victoria, Australia. She then spent three years working as a Senior Research Specialist at the Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, Missouri, where she trained users on the focused ion beam (FIB), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). In 2016, she moved to the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, to serve as a lecturer in the department of Materials Science and Engineering. Here, she is responsible for teaching the junior labs as well as providing instruction on writing in engineering.Dr. Caroline