c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 An Overview of Existing Power Electronics Courses Offered at Universities in the United StatesAbstract: This paper presents the current number and location of academic programs offeringcourses in Power Electronics at universities in the United States of America. A survey ofElectrical Engineering (EE) and Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) programs has beendone to determine the US universities that are offering courses of Power Electronics with orwithout laboratory/practicum content, within their respective EE and/or EET programs.Data was collected from each university’s on-line catalog, and has been analyzed to evaluate theextent of practicum
used comes when the student is faced withthe task of working through laboratory assignments that cover assembly language programming,to some complexity, and microcontroller-peripheral interfacing at the same time. In Fall of 2003, Page 25.38.2Mississippi State University began a process to address this issue. Previous to this time, theintroductory microcontrollers course was set up in this fashion, with a heavy emphasis onassembly language programming. The course was modified to discuss assembly coding, but tohave the majority of the focus of the topics geared toward embedded system concepts and designprototyping, including hardware
. Moreover, as the professionalengineering topics are required for graduation, students cannot replace the capstone designcourse with other opportunities closer to their professional interests, for example, completing aproject in the Student Space Programs Laboratory. Page 25.51.2Following a critical review and discussion of the design component of our curriculum, theundergraduate committee identified three areas for improvement: (1) coupling the undergraduateand graduate programs by engaging undergraduates in faculty research projects, (2) diversifyingthe spectrum and depth of capstone design projects, and (3) increasing the number of credit
design process at least 1.2 times per week throughout the term of the project.IntroductionFreshman engineering design coursework, now widely termed “Cornerstone” experiences, beganwide adoption in the 1990’s and into the new millennium through the National ScienceFoundation’s eight Engineering Education Coalitions, among other efforts. These first-year Page 25.1141.2engineering design laboratories serve to complement the already established seniorundergraduate level, or “Capstone” design experiences widely adopted in the 1980’s atengineering colleges across the United States. The combination of the Cornerstone and Capstonecoursework for beginning
thispropulsion curriculum unique. The opportunity for students to take the design out of thecomputer and on to the test bench improved their understanding of the design process. Thecourse timetable and deliverables were the responsibility of the students, helping to transitionthem to an engineering employment experience.Course StructureThe Propulsion System Detail Design course is a 4 credit hour course that meets twice a weekfor a total of 5 hours per week of lecture and laboratory time. The detail design course lecturescovered component specific issues that had not been examined elsewhere in the curriculum. Thefirst offering of the jet engine detail design course focused on compressors and rotatingmachinery. The lectures were front-loaded in the
Technology in Materials & Architectural Technology (Ed)(Construction) course undertake laboratory based basic skills development modules in bothmetalwork and woodwork, whilst their counterparts participate solely in the metalworkmodule. Nevertheless, in semester two both groups of students participate in a further twomodules in woodwork and metalwork. Both of these modules share a common educationalphilosophy where pupils are required to participate in a six week front loading of knowledgeand skill. On completion of this task the students are required to develop and further theirknowledge and skills through a six weeks design-based project.DesignThe design-based project which the students are tasked with completing comprises of anumber of
, wealso have the joint laboratory sessions where hands-on collaborative multi-disciplinary activitiestake place. The following Figure 3 shows the students engaged in these multi-disciplinaryactivities. Figure 3: Hands-on Activities in CET and MET Joint Laboratory Sessions4. Comprehensive Design Capstone Project ActivitiesAs discussed in Section 3 on the collaboration activities, it is importance to know that theseactivities are part of the comprehensive capstone projects. The capstone project presents anideal opportunity for cross-departmental collaboration. Students from both departments canjointly work together on their capstone project activities.The students’ design projects simulated the actual design activities that occur in industry
AC 2012-4004: A SYMPHONY OF DESIGNIETTES: EXPLORING THEBOUNDARIES OF DESIGN THINKING IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONProf. Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin Kristin L. Wood is currently a professor, Head of Pillar, and Co-director of the International Design Center (IDC) at Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering (Division of Engineering and Applied Science) at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in Sept. 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing
University of Technology and Design (SUTD). Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering (Division of Engineering and Applied Science) at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in Sept. 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering, and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of Texas, Austin.Dr. Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin Richard H. Crawford is a
NexOne, Inc., in the Center for Aircraft Structural Life Extension (CAStLE) located at the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs. He taught in the AF Academy Department of Engineering Mechanics for four years, where he earned his Assistant Professorship and served as the Director of the Applied Mechanics Laboratory. He currently works as an advisor for a senior capstone research team and mentor to multiple mechanical instrumentation project teams. He earned a B.S. in mechanical engineering with minor in engineering mechanics from the Pennsylvania State University and an M.S. in mechanical engineering from MIT. He spent 22 years on active duty in the U.S. Air Force and is a Flight Test Engineer graduate of the USAF Test
2008, he was a Postdoc- toral Associate at the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He visited the Centre Automatique et Systemes at the Ecole de Mines de Paris for four months. He is the recipient of the National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award, the Air Force Young Investigator Research Award (YIP), and the 2010 IEEE Control Systems Magazine Outstanding Paper Award. He was an Air Force Summer Faculty Fellow in 2010 and 2011. His research interests are in modeling, stability, robust control, observer design, and simulation of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power systems, aerospace, and biology.Dr. Giampiero Campa, MathWorks
Engineering Edu- cation at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illinois. He has published conference papers on cooperative learning and team innovation. His research focuses on teamwork, innovation, and laboratory education. Page 25.664.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Gender Differences in an Energy Conservation Idea Generation TaskAbstractEngineering student teams are often formed under the assumption that diversity will increaseteam innovativeness. Rather than approaching the problem from an
multidisciplinary design that created hybrid-electricvehicles.The hybrid-electric powertrain project is divided into six discrete modules, each of which can becompleted in a few regularly-scheduled laboratory periods. A simplified diagram of a hybridpowertrain is shown in Figure 1. The powertrain is very similar to the one used in a first-generation Toyota Prius. In this design, power is supplied to a load using an air motor andmotor/generator. The contributions of the air motor and motor/generator are combined in theplanetary gearset, which is in turn regulated by a second DC electric motor. The strategyemployed by the controller is to keep the output shaft turning at a constant speed, despitevariations in load. It does this by regulating the 1) air flow
Laboratory and Professor of Practice of in the Electrical, Computer, and Sys- tems Engineering Department. His responsibilities include managing the operation of the design lab and optimizing the experience for students working on engineering design projects.Dr. R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida R. Keith Stanfill holds the academic rank of Engineer and serves as the Director of the Integrated Prod- uct and Process Design (IPPD) Program for the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at the University of Florida (UF). He received his B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from UF in 1985, 1991, and 1995, respectively. He joined the UF faculty in 1999 as the IPPD Asso- ciate Director and
methodological framework for investigating how, when, andwhy educational innovations work in practice11. It allows researchers to “simultaneously pursuethe goals of developing effective learning environments and using such environments asnaturalistic laboratories to study learning and teaching”12. Within this framework, 4 models of aRube Goldbergineering curriculum were iteratively designed and implemented. Fundamentally,all models shared the same learning objectives, content material and pedagogical approaches, butvaried in terms of the implementation setting and structure. Some of the specific variations were:number, demographic distribution, and cultural and educational background of the students;methods of recruitment; mechanisms for financially
AC 2012-5299: PRODUCT REALIZATION EXPERIENCES IN CAPSTONEDESIGN COURSESDr. Mohamed E. El-Sayed, Kettering University Mohamed El-Sayed is a pioneer and technical leader in vehicle durability, vehicle integration, vehicle development process, and design optimization. Through his research, teaching, and practice, he made numerous original contributions to advance the state of the art in virtual simulation, lean, and integrated design and manufacturing in the vehicle development process. Currently, El-Sayed is a professor of mechanical engineering and Director of the Vehicle Durability and Integration Laboratory at Kettering University. He is the SAE International Journals Committee Chair. El-Sayed has more than 30
to Design Complex Tool Design” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, Utah.[8] Sinha, A., “Integrating a Reverse Engineering Project in a Laboratory-Based Introductory Engineering Course” Section 514, 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 14- 17, Austin, Texas.[9] Otto, K.N.; Wood, K.L., “ A reverse Engineering and Redesign Methodology for Product Evolution”, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Design Theory and Methodology Conference, August 18-22, 1996.[10] Student Design Project, “Reverse Engineering of a Lighted Ball-Point Pen” Junior Class of 2008-2009.[11] Student Design Project, “Reverse Engineering of a
Introduction to Engineering. Cottleville, MO: Great Lakes Press.10. Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. (2000). Introductory Engineering Design: A Project-Based Approach. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder. Accessed at http://itll.colorado.edu/index.php/courses_workshops/geen_1400/resources/textbook/11. Design Squad: Teacher’s Guide. (2010) Public Broadcasting Service. Accessed at: http://pbskids.org/designsquad/parentseducators/guides/teachers_guide.html12. Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages. (2008). Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of
and extent of design and analysis the quality of the documentation the quality of the figures, tables, data, etc. whether experimentation and laboratory work was involved the quality and extent of the referencesFinally, the Capstone Review Committee collect and summarize the oral presentation evaluationsgenerated during project presentation day to assess the quality of the presentations, areas in needof work, and long term trends. Once the project reports have been read and analyzed, and the oralpresentation reviews have been tabulated, a report is generated that summarizes the methods,data and observations, and makes recommendations for quality control and overall projectprogram improvements. This review includes a
modeling for design, drawing, assembly, mass property analysis andmanufacturing operations on a CAD/CAM/CIM system. Emphasis is on computer hardwareutilization for designing products. Two hours lecture and two hours laboratory.ETM 464: CAD Solid Modeling & DesignComputer-aided design and analysis of solid, surface, and sheet metal models emphasizingproduct design. Uses computer software for design, detailing, mass property analysis,dimensional standards, and family tables. Two hours lecture and two hours laboratory. Page 25.222.13Appendix B: Web-based Questionnaire Page 25.222.14Page 25.222.15
design.Dr. Patricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patricia Brackin is a professor of M.E. at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, where she teaches a vari- ety of design courses including capstone design. Her B.S. and M.S. are from the University of Tennessee in nuclear engineering and her Ph.D. is from Georgia Institute of Technology in M.E. Her industrial ex- perience includes Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Chicago Bridge and Iron, and Eli Lilly. She is a registered P.E.Dr. M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University Javed Khan is professor and Head of the Aerospace Science Engineering Department at Tuskegee Uni- versity. He received his Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from Texas A&M, M.S. in aeronautical
similarly developed a three course sequence providing an immersive, laboratory-basedexperience; the third course in this sequence focuses on the engineering design process andfollows the IDEO design process.13 At Rowan University, an engineering clinic course sequence(which is comprised of one course per term for all four academic years) provides immersivelaboratory based experiences for students across all engineering majors.14 The sophomore clinicbegins during the fall term with a disciplinary design experience and culminating during thespring term with multidisciplinary design experiences.14 Compared to the first four programsmentioned, the last four programs mentioned are smaller and offer an immersive, moreintegrated engineering design
. Students have an opportunity to work with leading international researchers, graduate students, and research laboratories. 3) Student Organizations and Design Competitions include Engineers Without Borders and SAE design competitions. 4) Student and Faculty Created Projects include creative and challenging projects with an entrepreneurial perspective.A variety of challenging projects are created each year to appeal to varied student academic andcareer interests. Student project selection and team formation can be a challenging and timeconsuming process that is critical to the success of the design project and course experience.Successful student teams should include enthusiastic, motivated and engaged students3,4. Thispaper will
Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in Sept. 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering, and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of Texas, Austin.Dr. Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin Richard H. Crawford is a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Texas, Austin, and is the Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow No. 3. He received his B.S.M.E. from Louisiana State University in 1982 and his M.S.M.E. in 1985 and Ph.D. in
AC 2012-4850: ON THE BENEFITS OF USING THE ENGINEERING DE-SIGN PROCESS TO FRAME PROJECT-BASED OUTREACH AND TORECRUIT SECONDARY STUDENTS TO STEM MAJORS AND STEMCAREERSDr. Jean-Celeste M. Kampe, Michigan Technological University Jean Kampe is currently Department Chair of engineering fundamentals at Michigan Technological Uni- versity, where she holds an Associate Professorship in the Department of Materials Science and Engi- neering. She received her Ph.D. in metallurgical engineering from Michigan Tech, M.Ch.E. in chemical engineering from the University of Delaware, and a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Michi- gan Tech. She was employed as a Research Engineer for five years at the Naval Research Laboratory in