Conference Session

FPD III: Innovation in Design in the First Year

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Tara Lynn Sulewski, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

AC 2012-2991: DESIGN OF A ZERO ENERGY HOME AS A FIRST-YEARDESIGN PROJECTProf. Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew (Andy) S. Lau is Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of first-year seminars for the Penn State College of Engineering. Lau is a 1977 graduate of Penn State with a B.S.M.E. and was a Research Fellow and 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, with an M.S.M.E. He has worked since 1977 as an engineer in the areas of solar energy applications in buildings, simulation of building energy use, and general consulting in the energy field. Most recently, his work has involved green buildings, engineering ethics, and sustainable design. He is a licensed

Conference Session

FPD VII: Research on First-year Programs Part II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Doug Bullock, Boise State University; Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

University. His research interests are in low dimensional topology, representation theory, quantum topology, and STEM education at the post-secondary level.Dr. Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University Seung Youn (Yonnie) Chyung is a professor in the Department of Instructional and Performance Tech- nology in the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She received her doctorate of education degree in instructional technology from Texas Tech University and teaches graduate-level courses on evaluation methodology. Page 25.267.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012

Conference Session

FPD VI: Presenting "All the Best" of the First-year Programs Division

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lorelle A. Meadows, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Elizabeth S. Hildinger, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

total artificialImplants hearts. In this section, we will examine various engineering aspects of these implant systems with particular focus on mechanics and materials. Topics will also cover a broad spectrum of integrated engineering disciplines including biomedical engineering (biocompatibility and implant fixation), corrosion, design, mathematics and statistics. This research-oriented section should be particularly well suited for students interested in materials science and engineering, mechanical engineering, and biomedical engineering.Engineers In this section of Engineering 100, we explore the responsible practice of engineering

Conference Session

FPD VII: Research on First-year Programs Part II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell Pryor, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

facilitators when they must grade 30-50 tests/day compared to 5-10 tests/day earlier in the semester. • Procrastination has been cited as a reason for cheating when students are confronted with plagiarized work. • Students do not spend as much time studying the material. A reason often cited for repeated failures in a single module is a desperate attempt to learn the material while taking a test since they procrastinated too long to budget time for practice and study.It is our hope that quantified procrastination metrics allow instructors to evaluate the effective ofnew course strategies designed to combat these issues. The next section offer insights intopredisposition towards procrastination in the traditional form

Conference Session

FPD X: Addressing Retention in the First Year

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andria Costello Staniec, Syracuse University; Helen M. Doerr, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 518-529.7. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.8. Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362-372.9. Arendale, D.R. (2004). Pathways of persistence: A review of postsecondary peer cooperative learning programs. In Duranczyk, I.M., Higbee, J.L., Lundell, D.B. (Eds.). Best practices for access and retention in higher education (pp. 27-40). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy

Conference Session

First-year Programs Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jess W. Everett, Rowan University; Patricia Dee Zobel, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

intellectual engagement. Journal of College Student Development,46(4), 429-441.13. Schroeder, C. C., Minor, F. D., & Tarkow, T. A. (1999). Freshman interest groups: Partnership for promoting student success. New Directions for Student Services, 87, 37-49.14. Denzine, G., & Kennedy, A. (1997). Creating learning communities across the lifespan. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 668-9.15. Elkins, S., Braxton, J., & James, G. (2000). The impact of a living learning center on students’ academic success and persistence. Research in Higher Education, 41(2), 251-268.16. Pike, G. (1997). The effects of residential learning communities on students’ educational experiences and learning outcomes during the first year of college

Conference Session

FPD VIII: Crossing Bridges and Easing Transitions into the First Year

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Jones, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Carmen R. Zafft, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Evan T. Curtis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, 26, 349-361.7. Zamani, E.M. (2001). Institutional responses to barriers to the transfer process. New Directions for Community Colleges, 114, p. 15 – 24.8. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Fact Book (2010-2011). Retrieved from http://irp.U___.edu/dmdocuments/fb10_11.pdf9. Tsapogas, J. (2004). The role of community colleges in the education of recent science and engineering graduates. Info Brief Science Research and Statistics: National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.10. Ishitani, T.T. & McKitrick, S.A. (2010). After transfer: The engagement of community college students at a four-year collegiate institution. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 34, p

Conference Session

FPD II: Hands-on Curriculum in the First Year

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lacey Jane Bodnar, Texas A&M University; Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; Jacqueline Q. Hodge, Texas A&M University; Travis Austin Smith, Engineering Student Services and Academic Programs; Jesus A. Orozco; Joshua Grant Corso; Cristian R. Sanchez; Jillian Kathleen Freise, Texas A&M ELLC Children's Museum; Hannah Ringler, Texas A&M University; Ivan Cortes, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, and the National Research Council’sBoard of Engineering Education.7-9 The latter report identified a need for “including earlyexposure to ‘real’ engineering and more extensive exposure to interdisciplinary, hands-on,industrial practice aspects, team work, systems thinking, and creative design.” Employers’ needsparalleled these new educational paradigms, as changes in the marketplace placed greaterimportance on communication and persuasion, team leadership and problem solving, and anunderstanding of the multiple factors affecting engineering design.10The criteria for implementing the above educational changes were codified by ABET as a set ofsix professional skills. Effective in 2001, these standards include: communication, teamwork

Conference Session

FPD V: Increasing Engagement and Motivation of First-year Students

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine S. Zerda, University of Houston; Diana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston; Stuart A. Long, University of Houston; Fritz J. Claydon, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

generalacademic success and personal skills development. The emphasis of the curriculum element ison experiential, hands-on learning. Students have the opportunity to develop competency inengineering design principles, basic project management, basic programming, teamwork andinterpersonal skills, time management—all while forming a community of practice that willsupport them throughout their undergraduate studies. Many studies relate persistence of studentsin science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) majors to levels of student engagement inthe classroom.2,3,4,5 Hake reported on the impact of Interactive-Engagement (IE) strategies in thephysics classroom compared with more traditional instructional methods, concluding that IEmethods enhance

Conference Session

FPD XI: Tidbits and Cookies

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Jae Hoon Lim, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Patricia A. Tolley P.E., University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Kimberly Warren, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

., University of North Carolina, Charlotte Patricia A. Tolley, Ph.D., P.E., is Associate Dean for undergraduate experiences in the Lee College of En- gineering at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. Her responsibilities include the introductory en- gineering and engineering technology courses, a large freshman residential learning community and peer retention program, a junior/senior multidisciplinary professional development course, student leadership academy, employer relations and industry-sponsored senior design, and ABET and SACS accreditation. Her research focuses on engineering education research using quantitative methodologies.Dr. Kimberly Warren, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Kimberly Warren is

Conference Session

FPD V: Increasing Engagement and Motivation of First-year Students

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Since 2006, entering freshman take an “Introduction to Engineering” course, a two credithour course that meets the university’s “freshman experience” requirement. The course also givesfreshman engineers an introduction to the engineering profession, engineering design, differentengineering disciplines, and critical thinking. In the fall of 2011, there were 450 students in 12 sectionstaught by an instruction team of four faculty and six graduate teaching assistants. Critical Thinkingbecame an explicit part of the course in response to the University’s Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP),and the introduction to engineering course is responsible for teaching students the critical thinkingframework adopted by the university. Another significant

Conference Session

FPD IV: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-year Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian M. Argrow, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel W. Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Nathan E. Canney, University of Colorado, Boulder; Suzana Brown, University of Colorado, Boulder; Adam J. Blanford, University of Colorado, Boulder; Corrina Ladakis Gibson, University of Colorado, Boulder; Eric Donnelly Kenney

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

choice; pedagogically it is a first opportunity to emphasize themultidisciplinary nature of contemporary engineering practice. Therefore, the pilot course wasdelivered with the expectation that it will replace the current introduction-to-major courses.The course objectives address both first-year pedagogy and the overall first-year experience.Accordingly, this paper is presented in two major parts. The first part describes the design andpilot of the new GEEN 1500 Introduction to Engineering course in Fall 2011. The second part isfocused on a broader look at the first-year experience with research from Teaching as Research(TAR) projects supported by the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning(CIRTL).Part 1: Pilot of the New

Conference Session

FPD X: Addressing Retention in the First Year

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew G. Green, LeTourneau University; Alan D. Niemi, LeTourneau University; Melanie Roudkovski, LeTourneau University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

for improvingretention include several best-practice components, namely: 1) exposure to engineering practice through two new courses employing multidisciplinary projects6, presentations by practicing engineers, presentations by students involved in co- op education, and presentations by senior capstone design project students; 2) the development of the faculty mentoring program for first-year students; 3) the development of a peer advisor mentoring program for first-year students; 4) the development of an industrial mentoring program for first-year students.We are implementing all four initiatives, and this paper focuses on initiative #4, industrialmentoring.1.3 Other Industrial Mentor ProgramsFreshman

Conference Session

First-year Programs Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jordan Michelle Hornback, University of Colorado at Boulder

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

not have to be found for the FYEP course to impact retention.Previous research indicates that the highest instructor ratings on the FCQ are related toavailability of the instructor when the team is needed. [10] Focus group data support these resultswith students providing positive feedback on instructor access and negative feedback oninstructor unavailability with comments such as , “Improve the communication with us.” Thus,the FYEP model is robust enough to be imported into a college of engineering with less seasonedinstructors or a smaller instructor pool. Page 25.1347.8Future research on the impact of instruction within first year design