module helps students physically visualize the process to better understand thedirectionality and magnitude of the force components and the moments generated.Guided Discovery is a novel methodology that borrows aspects of challenge-based instructionand discovery learning. The method is designed to facilitate students’ paths to discovery of keyconcepts that are often misinterpreted or not readily mastered. The method is optimized forshort, in-class activities. It is a low-cost, active-learning method intended to bring laboratory-like experiences into the classroom to improve concept mastery and elucidate commonmisconceptions. The intent is to target concepts that students commonly fail to master and thatnegatively impact learning outcomes in
acquisition.This paper presents a framework that is applicable in the laboratory development and approach.IntroductionThe challenge of teaching freshman engineering classes has always been one of the mostinteresting aspects of engineering education in the last decade1-6. Traditionally these classeshave been the way into engineering thinking and problem solving. The problems that theengineering education community is facing is how to make these classes more interesting,expand students’ thinking process, bring in a more systems level thinking, and help studentsappreciate what is engineering all at the same time. The above challenges together with thetypical characteristics, behavior, and attitudes of the new students actually increase theimportance of the
technology in energy efficientmotion control and vehicle design, Parker Hannifin Corporation collaborates with a group ofuniversities across the nation. They helped to incorporate fluid power practices in engineeringand engineering technology curriculum and establish laboratories in these universities. Since2004, Parker is sponsoring a hydraulic bicycle design competition among those universities. Thepurpose of the competition was to challenge undergraduate engineering and engineeringtechnology students for innovative design and development of a bicycle that would transfer arider’s manual power to the driving wheel through a hydraulic media without using any chain ordirect drive mechanism. In a one year time frame, students of engineering and
the end of the semester, a general courseevaluation was given. This survey included the open ended question: Do you think that you learned engineering design in this course? If yes, HOW (through what classroom readings, activities, discussions, etc.?)Without prompting 35% of students mentioned the impromptu design projects. This may notseem like a huge percentage, but in a class where there are numerous ways to learn the designprocess (hands-on laboratories, homework, Beetlebot competition discussed above, impromptudesign, other in class projects, etc.), a 35% share of responses is actually quite significant. Thisshows that students were indeed interested in the projects, but also that they perceive them asbeing a good education
retrieval in the second half of the semester, where students are expected to applysimilar ideas in team settings as they conduct experiments of their own design. Each week of labbrings feedback from the previous week and a new assignment for more practice building onexperimental design, statistical analysis, and communication skills. These skills are further testedin the senior level laboratory and design courses, which require the same reference texts.Clemson University is a medium-sized, Southeastern, public land-grant state institution with aunique governance system: of the 13 members on the Board of Trustees, seven are life trusteeswho select their successors, and six are appointed by the State Legislature. The overall studentpopulation is 54
enrollment ofunderrepresented students with a goal of retaining them through graduation.Future ConsiderationsRefinement of the Robotics in Manufacturing course will be allowed for given the introductionof POGIL into the robotics laboratory. The Lego Mindstorms will be used in POGIL teams andto complete POGIL exercises. As the second quarter is closing out, the author of this effort iscurrently contemplating this summer in terms of research and advising students. Proposals forLSAMP will be submitted in March. Recruitment of another student for TUES will be ongoing.AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank Mr. Tyrone King and Mr. Yaw Donkor for their enthusiasm inperforming summer research and serving as role model for underrepresented students
building energy efficiency. Guest speakers from the HVAC contractor for thebuilding were invited to lecture the class. After conclusion of the lectures, the building itself wasused as a large laboratory to reinforce many of the LEED design principles. The building itselfwas completed in 2010. Although it is not a LEED certified building, it was originally intendedto be and many of the LEED design principles are readily evident. Of particular note, the HVACperformance of the building can be monitored via a software installation in one of ourengineering laboratories.The LEED block of instruction concludes with a computer based examination intended toprepare the students for the types of questions and pacing that they will experience on the LEEDGreen
realized as the College replaces 1,428 light fixtureswith those containing LEDs. Recently, there have been many attempts to incorporate solar powerwith LED indoor and outdoor lighting due to its low power consumption. Researchersinvestigated feasibility of such projects especially focusing on economic feasibility and siteassessments [13-16].Faculty, students, and staff in the Industrial Technology program at Sam Houston StateUniversity took the initiative to replace current security night lights for one of the biggestlaboratory facilities, a large metal building remotely located to the main campus and surroundedby residential properties. This laboratory houses a large classroom, tool cabinets, productionequipment, and training resources for wood
) is extremely fast-paced. Traditional manufacturingtechnologies such as CNC milling, turning, metal casting, and welding used to be thecornerstones of the program. With the rapid advance of technology, a number of new subjectshave been added to the program. Electronics and automation, strength of materials, and rapidprototyping are just a few of the courses added to the program in recent years. The addition ofthese new courses has required consolidation of traditional manufacturing courses. Students nowlearn the same material in one course that used to be taught previously in two to four courses.Homework assignments, laboratory assignments, mid-term, and final exams are the typicalassessment methods instructors would use in these courses
each level ofteaching depending on teaching style. It was determined that formal lecture, hands-on laboratory,guest speakers, and comprehensive/intern projects are employed in order to achieve active andcooperative learning, along with the nature of each course and instructor’s preference.First, students must know the BIM basics before they can use BIM for project applications. Page 25.794.4Similar to many construction curricula, our construction engineering and management programshave a course of Graphic Communication (CAD). In the past, the focus of this course was usingAutoCAD to produce 2D drawings with basic sketching skills and graphic
the vehicles with the highest sales figures were done elsewhere.In fact, less than 10% of hybrid-electric vehicle sales went to US manufacturers in the years2005–20098. To regain the lead in such cutting-edge technologies, US engineering students mustbecome more proficient in the kind of multidisciplinary design that created hybrid-electricvehicles.The hybrid-electric powertrain project is divided into six discrete modules, each of which can becompleted in a few regularly-scheduled laboratory periods. A simplified diagram of a hybridpowertrain is shown in Figure 1. The powertrain is very similar to the one used in a first-generation Toyota Prius. In this design, power is supplied to a load using an air motor andmotor/generator. The
multidisciplinary design that created hybrid-electricvehicles.The hybrid-electric powertrain project is divided into six discrete modules, each of which can becompleted in a few regularly-scheduled laboratory periods. A simplified diagram of a hybridpowertrain is shown in Figure 1. The powertrain is very similar to the one used in a first-generation Toyota Prius. In this design, power is supplied to a load using an air motor andmotor/generator. The contributions of the air motor and motor/generator are combined in theplanetary gearset, which is in turn regulated by a second DC electric motor. The strategyemployed by the controller is to keep the output shaft turning at a constant speed, despitevariations in load. It does this by regulating the 1) air flow
. Typically, engineering students arenot exposed to engineering drawing or CAD until their first or second year in an engineeringuniversity. The campers get very excited when they realize that they can design aircraft thatengineering students, who are much older than them, design at a later stage. This is a valuablelearning experience for the students.4. Flight SimulationsThree different flight simulators are used during the camps. These include radio controlled modelaircraft flight simulator, a fixed wing aircraft flight simulator, and a rotary wing flight simulator.The fixed wing flight simulator is part of the visualization and simulation laboratory at SPSU. Itprovides an immersive environment for the students. They learn the basic flight
watching them completethe exercises has a positive effect8. Second, students do not feel that they had enough access tohelp. While they were encouraged to email the instructor with questions, this was not enough.These problems will be addressed by offering video chat sessions several times a week. Studentswill be required to attend a minimal number of these sessions. The video sessions will be used toanswer student questions and force them to think about their assignments. Page 25.897.9AcknowledgementThe authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation throughthe Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement
).2. S. Coradeschi and J. Malec “How to make a challenging AI course enjoyable using the RoboCup soccer simulation system, in RoboCup-98: Robot soccer world cup II: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 1604, pp.120-124, ed. M. Asada and H. Kitano. Berlin: Springer, (1999).3. M. Goldweber, et al. “The use of robots in the undergraduate curriculum: Experience reports,” Panel at 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Charlotte, North Carolina..4. G. Droge, B. Ferri, and O. Chiu, “Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform,” submitted to the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, (June 2012).5. F. Klassner, K. Lehmer, J.C. Peyton Jones
situation that provoked their prediction. These situations are designed so that the predictions based upon the most common misconceptions fail to explain what is observed. Students are allowed and encouraged to “mess with” the experiment to verify that the surprising result isn’t a trick. Finally a series of follow-‐up and reflection questions encourages students to incorporate the new information into their existing understanding. Each activity is designed to take about 15 minutes and use materials found commonly in chemical engineering laboratories or available at Wal-‐Mart. These activities have been shown to improve students’ concept
themechanical design of the system including the motion control aspects.Company C is a medium-sized Nordic product development company acting as consultancyprimarily within embedded systems and industrial IT. The company is involved in the earlystages of product design in a wide range of fields and for many different customers. In thisspecific case, Company C was recruited by a “third part” who hired Company C to design andmanufacture a prototype of a machine to be used in a medical laboratory setting for theanalysis of tissue samples. The “third part” was kept secret for the student team and CompanyC basically took the same design brief as being given from the third part to the student team.This company was also located within the Stockholm area. The
describedengineering degrees as possessing “a remarkably homogenous curriculum and pedagogy”. Theydescribe this curriculum as a building block curriculum, where the four main building blocks areanalysis, laboratory, ethics and design. The first order of business in these degrees is to establishdisciplinary expertise, to deliver technical knowledge to the student. Sheppard et al. note that theportion of the degree that is most clearly related to building broad understanding, the generaleducation requirements, is viewed by engineering faculty as a hurdle faced in the delivery oftechnical knowledge. It is interesting to note that electives do not appear in Sheppard et al.’sdiscussion. Indeed, the discipline specific engineering degree is often designed to be
to practice how to use bid documents, contractdocuments, perform estimating, scheduling, understand the mechanism of logistics, safety,quality control, project administration, close-out, and master the communication withstakeholders and construction staff.When covering the above mentioned topics during the laboratory hours of the course, studentsare trained by the instructor on non-verbal communication skills. These qualities especiallybecome an integrated content when covering the construction administration during the course.The ultimate goal of the students is to make a presentation as a team (the team represents aconstruction company) and compete against each other in front of the construction industryprofessionals at the end of the
of male professors… I couldn’t really integrate myself into that group! I couldn’t just walk [up] to them and say, “Hey guys! What’s up?” I can definitely feel the intimidation as a young female professor getting into that circle or even as a social group… to meet and network with this large group of old male professors. Interview participants also pointed out that male students usually had “the privilege” tosocialize with their professors outside of the laboratory setting, while their female counterpartswere omitted from many non-academic related social events, such as sporting events, conferencesocials, and barbecues. Such experiences seemed to cause doubt and concern among womendoctoral students about their
was puzzling since the online discussion was fairly simple andwas conducted over a one-week period to allow for students with asynchronous schedules to participate.In comparison of grades for like categories using the same materials, the average assignment scores were 83% and90% for the in-seat versus online courses. The final exam average scores were nearly identical at 92% for eachclass. This appears to indicate that given the same course content, the engineering ethics course can be successfullyimplemented in-seat or online.Conclusions and RecommendationsVirtually all engineering faculty are very familiar with traditional lecture and laboratory course instruction.However, many instructors have not had the opportunity to offer the same
students.During lecture time, as students have questions they simply click a designated key, which causestheir video feed to the instructor to be outlined in green, alerting the instructor to the pendingquestion. At which time the instructor can click on the student allowing them to ask the questionand the class to hear the question and the response, creating complete dialog in real time.As we address the specifics of online education for engineering technology, we need to answerthe experiential learning, or the “hands on” learning that is a traditional part of our educationalmodel. Laboratory experiments in our solution are resolved in two ways. As the cameras areused in full duplex communication for the lecture, they can be used for the lab, too
Laboratory and Professor of Practice of in the Electrical, Computer, and Sys- tems Engineering Department. His responsibilities include managing the operation of the design lab and optimizing the experience for students working on engineering design projects.Dr. R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida R. Keith Stanfill holds the academic rank of Engineer and serves as the Director of the Integrated Prod- uct and Process Design (IPPD) Program for the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at the University of Florida (UF). He received his B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from UF in 1985, 1991, and 1995, respectively. He joined the UF faculty in 1999 as the IPPD Asso- ciate Director and
two criteria: 1) importance ofthe area in the environment and 2) applicability of technology in the area.Six assignments were given to the students, one on each area. Each assignment consisted of acritical thinking issue and several questions demanding: (1) an understanding of the nature andhistory of technology, and (2) the ability to think critically about technological development15.Inaddition students conducted three hands on laboratory experiments that addressed technologicalissues regarding sound pollution, acid water, and energy use. Each assignment (the issue and thestudent answers) and experiment was loaded with additional technological literacy detailsconsisting of charts, tables, graphs, equations and/or number crunching exercises
academic’s duties. However the resources, encouragement, andmotivations can vary significantly between faculty and institutions. The recommendations in Table 3 aredirected to helping these faculty set personal priorities when developing new courses, revising programs,adding new programs, developing new laboratories, adopting new teaching methods, and adding newtopics. Table 3 – Curriculum Revision C2015 Category C2015 RecommendationsCurriculum Revision and 3. Develop stronger ties between research and the classroomDevelopment 4. Identify and teach new technologies 7. Encourage
technological literacy across the university curriculum. Prior to SSU, he was employed at McDonnell Douglas Corporation (now Boeing), St. Louis, Mo., as an engineer and manager. He is a member of ASEE, AIAA (Associate Fellow), ASEM (Fellow), and ATMAE.Mr. Randy Libros, Community College of Philadelphia Randy Libros is Program Director, Applied Science and Engineering Technology, and Associate Professor of physics.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State UniversityMr. Steven R. Walk, Old Dominion University Steven Robert Walk, P.E., is an Assistant Professor of electrical engineering technology in the Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University. He is Founder and Director of the Laboratory for
AC 2012-4826: DESIGN OF A MOBILE ROBOT AND USE OF RFID FORFAST WEREHOUSINGDr. Masoud Fathizadeh, Purdue University, Calumet Masoud Fathizadeh has been with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology since 2001. He has worked more than 15 years both for private industries and national research labs such as NASA, Argonne and Fermi National Laboratories. Fathizadeh has established his own consulting and engineering company in 1995 and performed many private and government projects. His areas of interests are, control systems, power systems, power electronics, energy, and system integration. Fathizadeh is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Illinois.Mr. Joseph Edward Cody, Purdue
methodological framework for investigating how, when, andwhy educational innovations work in practice11. It allows researchers to “simultaneously pursuethe goals of developing effective learning environments and using such environments asnaturalistic laboratories to study learning and teaching”12. Within this framework, 4 models of aRube Goldbergineering curriculum were iteratively designed and implemented. Fundamentally,all models shared the same learning objectives, content material and pedagogical approaches, butvaried in terms of the implementation setting and structure. Some of the specific variations were:number, demographic distribution, and cultural and educational background of the students;methods of recruitment; mechanisms for financially
will allow the students and faculty in Javelina Innovation Center tohave meetings with participating company managers or faculty in Del Mar College, to discussthe detail requirements and progresses of the engineering projects without having to travel toeach location. One more HP Virtual Room will be used in the computer laboratory, so that thestudents in Javelina Innovation Center can have a real-time discussion with the students in DelMar College. The HP Elitebook Tablet PCs will also allow the instructors to create innovativeinteractive class materials that will increase the attraction of STEM related topics. We hope theengineering related interactive class materials and real life projects can raise the awareness ofengineering students and
AC 2012-3131: DO STUDENTS DREAM BEYOND LEDS? INNOVATIVEQUALITIES OF IDEAS GENERATED BY FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERINGSTUDENTSNicholas D. Fila, Purdue University Nicholas D. Fila is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the School of Engineering Educa- tion at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illinois. He has published conference papers on cooperative learning and team innovation. His research focuses on teamwork, innovation, and laboratory education.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Senay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and is the Director of Assessment Research for