engineering.Prof. Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D.Dr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific UniversityDr. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Computer Science Department and Integrated Engineering program at Min- nesota State University, Mankato. She is a 2011-12 AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow at the National Science Foundation.Dr. Nanette M Veilleux, Simmons College Page 25.858.1
AC 2012-3282: THE GENESIS OF TRANSFORMATION: PREVENTING”FAILURE TO LAUNCH” SYNDROME IN GENERATION IY FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENTSDr. Jesse J. French, LeTourneau University Jesse French is currently an Assistant Professor of mechanical engineering at LeTourneau University. He earned his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 1995. His M.S. and Ph.D. degrees are both in mechanical engineering from the University of Tulsa, with a con- centration in solid mechanics, polymer and composite materials, and sustainable energy. French served in the U.S. Army for eight years on active duty and six years on reserve status. He served as a Cavalry Platoon Leader and Aeroscout pilot, a
AC 2012-4981: EXPOSING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TO CONCUR-RENT PROGRAMMING PRINCIPLES USING VIDEO GAME SCRIPT-ING ENGINESMr. Michael Steffen, Iowa State University Michael Steffen is a Ph.D. candidate in computer engineering and NSF graduate research fellow. His research interests include computer architecture, graphics hardware, computer graphics and embedded systems, and specifically he focuses on improving SIMT processor thread efficiency using a mixture of custom architectures and programming models. He received a B.S, degrees in both mechanical engineer- ing and electrical engineering from Valparaiso University in 2007.Prof. Joseph Zambreno, Iowa State University Joseph Zambreno has been with the Department of
AC 2012-4344: FUTURE ENGINEERING PROFESSORS’ VIEWS OF THEROLE OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNINGMrs. Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida Ana T. Torres-Ayala is a doctoral candidate in higher education at the University of South Florida. She holds a B.S. degree in computer engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez, and a M.Eng. degree in computer and systems engineering from Rensselear Polytechnic Institute. She has experience in the telecommunications industry where she worked for Lucent Technologies. Torres-Ayala was previously an information technology instructor. Her research interests include faculty development, scholarship of teaching and learning, graduate education, and
AC 2012-4874: THE TEACHER EFFECT: EXPLAINING RETENTION GAINSIN FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING PROJECTS COURSESDr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Engineering Assessment Specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Pro- gram (ITLL) and the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of reten- tion, program evaluation, and teamwork practices in
, emphasizes theimportance of training successful engineers who are well-rounded, being both technologicallyproficient and also possessing attributes such as strong leadership, communication skills, andingenuity.2 In order to meet the challenges of the world, these engineers need to be cognizant ofthe social implications of technological decisions and implementations. As the document states,“Successful engineers in 2020 will…recognize the broader contexts that are intertwined intechnology and its application in society” (p. 156). The National Academy charges universitiesand colleges to develop engineers that have these attributes and are ready to meet the globalchallenges facing us. Similarly, Sheppard, Macatangay, Colby, & Sullivan describe the
that engineering students are well preparedto navigate the new challenges that arise as a result of the changing dynamics in the growinglyinterconnected global community. In the book, Educating Engineers: Designing for the future ofthe field, Sheri D. Sheppard et al. (2008) 20 highlight that engineers cannot continue to functionas a “neutral problem-solver” because the work of engineers has a global impact. In a similarvein, Miller (2007) 14 makes an argument for engineers to be prepared beyond technology andtechnical skills. Twenty-first century prepared engineers will need competencies “in teamwork,communication, entrepreneurial thinking, creativity and design, and cross-disciplinary thinkingin a global context” (Miller, 2007, p. 1) .A range
AC 2012-4668: A FIRST STEP IN THE INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENTOF ENGINEERING-RELATED BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIREJi Hyun Yu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ji Hyun Yu a Ph.D student of learning, design, and technology at Purdue University.Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and Assistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support
-established milestones, and the encouragement ofdivergence and convergence in the way students are thinking about their designs6 whereappropriate. A strong case for increasing design in engineering education curricula is also madeby Dym7.Literature ReviewLand and Zembal-Saul investigate technology-based scaffolds in a project-based learningenvironment8. They found that appropriate scaffolding can enhance student articulation andreflection and help students focus on the more educationally-relevant aspects of project-basedlearning tasks.Shuman, Besterfield-Sacre, and McGourty discuss throughout their paper how ABET 2000Creterion 3 Outcomes are addressed by student engineering design projects9. Dym reflects ondesign as an appropriate context for several
. in system and industrial engineering from the University of Arizona in 1995, a M.S. in reliability engineering from the University of Arizona in 1993, a M.S. in system engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) in 1988, a M.S. in engineering management from the University of Dayton in 1988, and a B.S. in electrical engineering from Boston University in 1984. His primary research interests are in supply chain risk analysis, decision making, engineering optimization, quality, and reliability. Page 25.672.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
AC 2012-3370: COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH: INTEGRATION OF CON-CEPTUAL LEARNING THROUGHOUT THE CORE CHEMICAL ENGI-NEERING CURRICULUM YEAR 1Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a professor of chemical engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has re- search activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is inter- ested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Dr. David L. Silverstein, University of
published more than 100 articles in refereed journals and conference proceedings. He has been either PI or Co-PI for numerous grants and contracts, totaling more than $10 million in the past 15 years. NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Na- tional Science Foundation, Office of Naval Research, Department of Defense, Department of Education, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, Texas Instruments, and Lucent Technologies have funded his research projects. He is the recipient of the excellence in engineering research award at the College of Engineering at UTSA in 2010, the best teacher award in the College of Engineering at UTEP in 1994, and the NASA monetary award for contribution to the space exploration. He has been
Wisconsin, Madison Michael T. Braun is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Communication Arts at the University of Wis- consin, Madison. His research uses advanced statistical methods to look at interpersonal communication technology use through the lifespan. Page 25.1046.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Playing the TA Lottery A Study of How Teaching Assistants Impact Grades in Engineering CoursesAbstract – In this paper, we evaluate the impact of Teaching Assistants (TAs) on student
AC 2012-4147: TENSIONS WITH PBL IMPLEMENTATION IN UNDER-GRADUATE ENGINEERING EDUCATION: RESULTS FROM TEACH-ING PRACTICEDr. Angela van Barneveld, Purdue University Angela van Barneveld is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the College of Education (learning design and technology) at Purdue University, and a Program Manager at IBM (business analytics). Research inter- ests include problem-based learning, engineering education, professional education, and the transfer and application of academic learning to practice (workplace).Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and Assistant Professor of engineering
Merriam-Webster dictionary is “the DESIGN and MANUFACTUREof complex products”. In contrast, the definition of engineering design by AccreditationBoard for engineering and technology (ABET) is provided: Engineering design is theprocess of devising a system, component, or process to meet the desired need. Extensivediscussions on the two definitions are conducted in class with examples of engineeredproducts such as razors, computers, and automobiles. Importance of iterative nature anddecision making of engineering design as well as the roles of design objectives andcriteria to implement and evaluate the design are discussed. Next, the needs for designand different types of design solutions are discussed. For example, design solutions areclassified
AC 2012-4051: ELECTROMAGNETICS MISCONCEPTIONS: HOW COM-MON ARE THESE AMONGST FIRST- AND SECOND-YEAR ELECTRI-CAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS?Dr. Chris Smaill, University of Auckland Chris Smaill holds a Ph.D. in engineering education from Curtin University of Technology, Australia, and degrees in physics, mathematics, and philosophy from the University of Auckland. For 27 years, he taught physics and mathematics at high school level, most recently as Head of physics at Rangitoto College, New Zealand’s largest secondary school. This period also saw him setting and marking national examinations, and training high-school teachers. He has a successful, established and ongoing publica- tion record where high-school physics texts
90.4 90.4 499 int. 69.2 69.2 86.5 86.5 86.5 95.1 68.1 70.2 Average 79.0 87.8 78.1 85.2 78.3 73.0 79.8 81.4 78.8 75.5 79.8 Page 25.90.4review of the literatureWe live in an era with unprecedented changes due to dramatic advances in technology on many fronts. The explosive growth incomputing and communication has revolutionized the way we work and live. Increasingly, the engineering work force requires thatteams work with global foci. There have been many national level studies about critical issues facing the nation and related the crisesin engineering education3,4. With
GenEd curriculum 8. Although eachuniversity may have different requirements for GenEd, a survey of the American Association ofColleges and Universities identifies common themes, including science, global studies,technology, sustainability, and others 7. We maintain that the class described can be tailored tomeet a General Education requirement at many institutions. The course also is well suited foraddressing the ABET expectations that students understand the broader impacts of engineering.Practically speaking, it is our claim that energy is also an excellent topic for extending STEMeducation into the realm of social, cultural, economic, environmental, ethical, and other domains.Energy is clearly a subject for scientific and engineering study
AC 2012-2972: APPLICATION OF INTERRUPTED CASE METHOD FORTEACHING ETHICS TO GRADUATE STUDENTS IN TRANSPORTATIONENGINEERINGDr. Robert M. Brooks, Temple University Robert Brooks is an Associate Professor of civil engineering at Temple University. He is a Fellow of ASCE. His research interests are engineering education, civil engineering materials, and transportation engineering.Jyothsna K. S., Jyothsna K. S., Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore, secured a gold medal for the high- est aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature Course at St.Joseph’s College (autonomous). K. S. has been working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College for almost two years now, teaching both
focused on commercial innovation and globalcompetition, instead reproduce: ...people prepared to secure themselves, and all of us, against the risks of unpredictable and precarious futures.3Such conditions for technological participation, predicated on the attainment of consensus andcontinuity, seem likely to produce very narrow definitions of the environmental, social, political,ethical, and health and safety constraints to be shared with the engineering learner via Criterion3.The distance between understandings of social and political matters of that kind exhibited byengineering educators, and those evinced in many social-scientific studies of engineering, arenothing less than extreme. In part, this reflects that much larger
an entire curriculum, have the potential to be extremely powerful learningaids because of the cohesiveness of knowledge they would promote. Interpreting large-scaleconcept maps is difficult however, due to the user’s cognitive limitations (Section 2.3). Thesecognitive limitations lead to problems learning with large-scale concept maps. The authors arecurrently exploring ways to mitigate the problems associated with interpreting large-scaleconcept maps using interactive digital technologies. Doing so will unlock the potential of large-scale concept maps as learning tools and enable the creation of concept maps that connectinformation throughout an entire engineering curriculum (Section 2.4
disciplines andeventually enter the science and engineering workforce as researchers, academicians andpractitioners. The exigencies of diversity are economic and technological, as well as, social andmoral cannot be ignored as the demographic population shift that is projected to take place hasalready started. This can be seen in the school age population of underrepresented groups inthe following 2000 U.S. Population Census Graph and State Growth Projection. Whenavailable, it will be interesting to note the results of the recent 2010 U.S. Population Census. Population Shifts, 2001 – 2010, Ages 15-19 4,500 4,011 4,000 3,370 3,307
buildings for a similar sizedfaculty in Hapugala/Galle completed the year in 1999. The report naively recommended aDepartment of Computer Technology (rather than Computer Engineering), not realizing thatEngineering Technology is a sub-engineering field not appropriate for students whose strengthsare in mathematics as in Sri LankaIt seems that in writing the report, its authors were confident that no one on the Council wouldhave the competence and expertise to read it and ask simple questions. That was the depth towhich Jaffna, the pride of the Tamils, had sunk in its education endeavors.In a milieu where the main shortage was qualified personnel rather than money, in a shortsighted move the Council without processing the application received from
: Social Responsibility," 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.entrepreneur.com/encyclopedia/term/82646.html. [Accessed 21 July 2011].6. M. Pantazidou and I. Nair, "Ethics of Care: Guiding Principles for Engineering Teaching & Practice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, pp. 205-212, 1999.7. I. Nair, "Ethics of Care," in Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, Detroit, MI, Macmillan Reference USA, 2005, pp. 695-700.8. C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Campbridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.9. R. C. Campbell and D. Wilson, "The Unique Value of Humanitarian Engineering," in Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC
AC 2012-3820: THE NATURE OF PEER FEEDBACK FROM FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENTS ON OPEN-ENDED MATHEMATICAL MOD-ELING PROBLEMSMiss Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University Kelsey Rodgers is a graduate student at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Education. She is currently conducting research on peer feedback within model-eliciting activities (MEAs) in the First- year Engineering program with her advisor, Professor Heidi Diefes-Dux. Prior to attending Purdue, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E in engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation. She began her research in engineering education on disassemble, analyze, assemble (DAA) activities with her previous advisor at
Professional Development (ECPD and today’s ABET)quickly implemented changes that resulted in a shift from the practical aspects of engineeringthat were taught in the laboratory to an increased emphasis on theory and basic science.2In the 1970’s with the completion of the moon mission and the cancellation of major engineeringprojects such as the supersonic transport, engineering education saw a significant decline infunding and as a result, many schools reduced laboratory requirements to save money. At thesame time, industry demanded more practical skills and in response, many education institutionsdeveloped technology programs. The boundaries between engineers and technologist becameblurred and so ECPD began to accredit two and four year programs
of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. She obtained her Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Aalto University School of Science and Technology, Finland, in 2010. She is also a Chartered Member of the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE). She has been working in the area of inherent occupational health studies for more than 10 years. Her research studies also include inherent safety, multi-criteria decision making, and industrial hygiene. Page 25.557.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Engineering Students' Perception on Learning through
AC 2012-3258: GRADUATE STUDENT PEER MENTORING: A MEANSFOR CREATING AN ENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH COM-MUNITYMs. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Brook Sattler is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Her dissertation focuses on mechanisms for supporting engineering student development, specifically self-authorship.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Adam R. Carberry is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology and Innovation, Department of Engineering, at Arizona State University. He earned a B.S. in materials science engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University
this was only for citizens of the United States. Non citizen participants were notallowed in the facilities.STEM Outreach at Cottonwood Elementary Engineering Day In November of 2011, SLCC engineering students were invited by CottonwoodElementary to actively participate in an event devoted to the promotion of engineering toelementary students. The engineering community considers this particular practice a STEM(science, technology, engineering, mathematics) Outreach. SLCC engineering students wereinstantly drawn to the opportunity to once again teach and promote engineering through a simplelecture and hands-on approach. SLCC engineering students began the process of selecting engineering discussions andpresentations that were
. Page 25.1337.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Role Model Affect and Its Effect on Underrepresented Minorities Pursuing Doctorates in Engineering Education1. BackgroundRegardless of race or ethnicity, engineering education began to see a decline in enrollmentbeginning in the early 1990’s. To address this concern, among others, ABET adopted theEngineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000), which introduced a new paradigm in engineeringeducation.1 The new paradigms in engineering education went beyond the need to keep studentson the cutting edge of technology, but required students to have interpersonal skills, beinquisitive and innovative, and most importantly, possess inter