Paper ID #12921Black Male ”Buoyant Believers” in Engineering and Engineering-RelatedFieldsDr. Leroy L. Long III, Ohio State University Dr. Leroy L. Long III recently earned his PhD in STEM Education with a focus on Engineering Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University (OSU). He earned his Masters in Mechanical Engineering at OSU and his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. He has been a Graduate Teaching Associate with the First-Year Engineering Program and a Research Affiliate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise at OSU. He has also served as
person embodied and significant others in affecting the protagonist’s actions and goals. 4. Recognize that the cultural setting, body, and others provide limits and context. 5. Consider the historical continuity of the characters. 6. Keep in mind that the narrative analysis outcome is the generation of a story. 7. Remember the narrative analysis must make the research plausible and understandable.Narrative ResultsThe following paragraphs detail examples about the personal, professional, and mentoringexperiences and relationships of “Dr. Laura James”.Personal and Professional ExperiencesIn her personal and professional experiences, Dr. James saw her family members’ influence ontheir students as educators. As an undergraduate engineering
findings. However, we improved the survey based on the responses andexpanded it outside engineering majors.Literature ReviewHofstede [2] defines culture as patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting that every human beingcarries. He analogizes culture as the “software of the mind” in that culture is a mental programthat is developed by social interactions and experiences collected across an individual’s lifetime.In his words, “the programming starts within the family; it continues within the neighborhood, atschool, in youth groups, at the workplace, and in the living community” (p. 6). In order tounderstand this culture, Hofstede developed a series of dimensions to characterize the commontraits and beliefs every individual has, with each dimension
problem seems to be in the fact that the academic foundation that should have beendeveloped over the years in K-12, is not at the level that is expected from incoming freshmen.This raises the question: how can engineering students receive adequate training if they are notcollege-ready? One has to keep in mind that one-year programs are likely unable to help studentscatch up on all K-12 skills and knowledge. The task seems even more formidable consideringthat study habits and academic attitudes are usually formed and solidified during K-12.Clearly there is no single remedy for the problem. Study habits, general attitude towardseducation, and academic preparedness need to be addressed. A solution for the latter issue maybe obtained by integrating
School of Mines Dr. Barbara Moskal is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics and the Director of the Trefny Institute for Educational Innovation at the Colorado School of Mines. She is also a senior associate editor of the Journal for Engineering Education. Her research interests include: measurement, assessment, outreach, and diversity.Dr. Jerry Dwyer, Texas Tech University Dr. Jerry Dwyer is a professor in the Department of Mathematics & Statistics and Director of the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Center for Outreach, Research & Education (STEM-CORE) at Texas Tech University. He worked for many years in computational mechanics related to fracture, composite materials and
Paper ID #14124A Scaffolding Case Study for Teaching Engineering Problem Solving to Un-derrepresented MinoritiesDr. Morris M. Girgis, Central State University Morris Girgis is a professor at Central State University. He teaches undergraduate courses in manufactur- ing engineering. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Hannover University, Germany. His current research in engineering education focuses on developing and implementing new educational tools and approaches to enhance teaching, learning and assessment at the course and curriculum levels
Paper ID #12899The Impact of Federally Funded Scholarship Programs on the Success ofTransfer Students at a Public Engineering CollegeDr. David M. Ford, University of Massachusetts, Amherst David M. Ford is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at UMass Amherst. He is also on the Faculty Advisory Board for the Diversity Programs Office (DPO) in the College. The DPO provides academic and non-academic support to increase enrollment, retention, and graduation among under-represented minorities and women.Dr. Paula Rees, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
2002, and has worked on many assessment, research, and evalu- ation projects, including the measurement of student learning outcomes in general education, longitudi- nal research on the effects of undergraduate engineering research experiences on minority enrollment in graduate school, and the evaluation of the Georgia Tech International and Research Plans. He is currently working on an upcoming evaluation of service learning and sustainability project as part of Georgia Tech’s Quality Enhancement Plan.Dr. Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute Comas Lamar Haynes is a Principal Research Engineer / faculty member of the Georgia Tech Research In- stitute and Joint Faculty Appointee at the Oak Ridge
Paper ID #12931A Qualitative Look at African American Students’ Perceptions of DevelopingEngineer of 2020 Traits Through Non-curricular ActivitiesDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American
NSF and USDE awards for gender and dis- ability projects, and is currently co-PI on the KS-LSAMP project. Her research foci include gender and disabilities issues in post-secondary STEM education, mentoring and program evaluation. Thurston has conducted research and taught about disability, gender and evaluation issues for over 35 years.Dr. Beth A Montelone, Kansas State University Professor of Biology and Associate Dean for Research, College of Arts & Sciences Page 26.1052.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 KS-LSAMP Pathways to STEM: A Systems
numbers, bothquantitative and qualitative studies are often unable to capture the experiences of this populationeffectively. And because, as Crenshaw explains,30 experiences vary by domain, studies ofAfrican-American women college students more broadly may not effectively address the domainof engineering, where both gender and race are highly visible minority identities. Moreover,these minority positions are reinforced not only in engineering classrooms at predominantlywhite institutions, but in popular culture where engineers are generally shown as white men, suchas Apollo 13 (1995), A Beautiful Mind (2001), and Fantastic 4 (2005). African-American femaleengineers rarely see mirrors of either facet of their identity in fiction or in fact
out the potentialtechnological decline of the nation. In order to prevent this decline, the Executive Summaryoffered four recommendations “that focus on the human, financial, and knowledge capitalnecessary for US prosperity. The four recommendations focus on actions in K–12 education(10,000 Teachers, 10 Million Minds), research (Sowing the Seeds), higher education (Best andBrightest), and economic policy (Incentives for Innovation)” 1.In addition, the 2010 report of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology2stated that “there is a large interest and achievement gap among some groups in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), and African Americans, Hispanics, NativeAmericans, and women are seriously
Paper ID #13347A Qualitative Study of Motivation in Alaska Native Science & EngineeringProgram (ANSEP) Precollege StudentsMichele Yatchmeneff, Purdue University, West Lafayette I am Unangax/Aleut or Alaska Native born and raised in Alaska. I come from a line of Unangax fishermen and spent much of my childhood in the Aleutians subsistence living. I am currently pursing my PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue University. My current dissertation title is: A Qualitative Study of Mo- tivation in Alaska Native Science & Engineering Program (ANSEP) Precollege Students. Prior to starting at Purdue University, I was the
colleagues49, mastery goals have been positively associated with how astudent perceives him/her academic ability and self-efficacy. “for me I’m the kind that likes a challenge I like to be in a challenging major,… I know there is a lot of praise in doing engineering, but I don't want the praise to be because I’m a women doing engineering… I know I’m a girl but it shouldn't be Page 26.1291.12 extra amazing it should just be that oh okay you’re doing engineering that's cool but uh it helps cause in my mind yea I can do this and
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
Paper ID #11738Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocatesfor Gender EquityDr. Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University Dr. Genalo is a University Professor and Associate Chair of the Materials Science and Engineering Department at Iowa State University. He is a Fellow of ASEE and has run the NSF Grantees Poster Session for nearly 20 years. He is a former chair of DELOS and the Freshman Programs Constituent Committee (the year before it became a Division).Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the