Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eliud Quintero, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Patricia Salinas, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación En Matemática Educativa, 12(3), 355– 382. 5. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Mavrikis, M., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., & Pearce, D. (2009). Broadening the sense of “dynamic”: A microworld to support students’ mathematical generalisation. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 493–503. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0182-8 6. Salinas, P., Quintero, E., & González-Mendívil, E. (2014). An environment to promote a visual learning of Calculus. In H. R. Arabnia, A. Bahrami, L. Deligiannidis, & G. Jandieri (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (pp. 425–429). Las

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Approaches to Sustainability and Grand Challenges

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

initialscholarship recipients left the program to pursue non-STEM majors where theycould help others and four left for that they perceived to be less time consumingundergraduate programs so that they could spend more time working or on socialactivities.In this program, NSF S-STEM scholarships were awarded to 15 students. Therequirements for students to maintain their NSF scholarship were continuousenrollment in courses leading toward a STEM degree, 3.0 GPA, and activeparticipation in the one-credit course associated with the scholarship eachsemester. The course was used to enable more one-on-one interactions betweenstudents and faculty as well as with their teammates from different disciplines.Interacting with faculty, whether in the classroom, the

Conference Session

New Teaching Pedagogies: Methods and Assessments

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University; Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

tRAT is keyto help students to correct misconceptions in real time, and the points-scale gives the studentsmotivation to learn to work together effectively as a team without instructor input. After allteams have completed the tRAT, the instructor can give a short—typically 5 to 10 minutes—lecture clearing up any remaining confusion about the topic. Students are given an opportunity tosubmit a written appeal, as a team, of any RAT question they believe might be ambiguous. Anexample of a RAT is given in the appendix.The applications–on which the most time is spent in class–are problems that the students mustsolve as a team. The applications follow a 4-S format: Same problem, Significant problem,Specific choice, and Simultaneous report. A class

Conference Session

Mobile Devices and Apps

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andreas Karatsolis, MIT; Suguru Ishizaki, Carnegie Mellon University; Marsha C. Lovett, Carnegie Mellon University; Mollie Kaufer, Carnegie Mellon University; Stacie L. Rohrbach, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

/Accreditation_Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012–2013.pdf[4] Zimmerman, Donald E., and Michael Palmquist. 1993. "Enhancing Electrical EngineeringStudents' Communication Skills." In Proceedings of the IEEE International ProfessionalCommunication Conference, Philadelphia, October 5-8: 428-31.[5] Fisher, E., Usrey, M. W., & Beaslq, H. A. (2003). OWL: A wise way to enhance engineering students’ writingskills. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 5-November 8.[6] Rohrbach, S. ; Ishizaki, S. ; Werner, N. ; Miller, J. ; Dzombak, D. (2013). Improving students' professionalcommunication skills through an integrated learning system. Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2013IEEE International[7] Werner, N. ; Ishizaki, S. ; Rohrbach, S

Conference Session

Design Throughout the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David C. Jensen, University of Arkansas; Dennis Beck, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

STEM outreach with a full engineering design, build, and test cycle. GlobalJournal of Engineering Education. 2012;14(3):225-232.15. Brown JS, Collins A, Newman S. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading,writing, and mathematics. In: Resnick L, ed. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays inhonor of robert glaser. Vol 487. Psychology of Education and Instruction Series ed. LawrenceErlbaum; 1989.16. Tillman D, Kjellstrom W, Smith S, Yoder E. Digital fabrication scaffolds for developingpreservice elementary teachers’ mathematics pedagogy. Society for Information Technology &Teacher Education International Conference. 2011;2011(1):892-897.17. Tillman D, Ducamp G, Dejaegher C, Cohen J, Kjellstrom W, Smith S. A role for

Conference Session

Technical Session: Professional Development Opportunities for Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew William Priddy, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Student

andlearning center. There are two ways to approach this overlap. The first is to make the ASEEprogramming unique. On large campuses, some Chapters have found success in providingSTEM-specific content as a supplement to the campus-level content for all majors. The secondapproach is to partner with other organization(s). This approach has extra benefits; it exposesASEE and its mission to the members of other organizations and it can provide extra assistancefor planning and execution. For research-specific programming, some campuses have foundsuccess with ASEE-hosted STEM education poster sessions. While almost 90% of therespondents reported having some campus-level teaching programming, at least 65% reportedthat they are interested in ASEE providing

Conference Session

Software and Programming

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University; Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Peter Y. Wu, Robert Morris University; Ali A. Ansari, Virginia State University; Walter W. Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

toolsthat are being developed to achieve project objectives, the work related to the development ofcase studies is described here. Historically, case studies have been as educational tools inbusiness, law and medicine but not so much in software engineering. The hypothesis is that casestudies would be effective educational tools to introduce real-world professional practices intothe classroom which would help the students in identifying and solving problems, and develop aperspective on knowledge application. In this paper we describe a set of V&V related case-studies that we have drawn from industry experiences and developed them as pedagogical tools.These case-studies cover several important topics in S/W V&V domain such as software

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Sophia L Poulos, Smith College; R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, Disciplines in which used, Type(s) of institutions in which used, Capstone course duration, Nature of capstone General projects connected with resource, Timing of resource usage in capstone, First (for all Resources) year that the resource was used in capstone, Notes/observations/constraints/advice Category(s) of outcomes assessed, Types of student responses required, Rubrics for scoring, Number of students typically assessed at one time with the resource, Assessment Specific Instrument testing, Scoring consistency by multiple raters, Validity or accuracy in measuring what

Conference Session

First Year Programs Division Poster Session: The Best Place to Really Talk about First-Year Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen E Silliman, Gonzaga University; Toni Boggan, Gonzaga University; Vladimir A Labay, Gonzaga University; George D. Ricco, Gonzaga University, Spokane; Suzann Girtz, Gonzaga University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

attributesof the students entering the LLC and experiences within the LLC during the first semester. Theimpact of the LLC appears to be retained, via personal connections gained through studentinteractions within an engineering/computer-science focused dorm, through the remainder of theundergraduate years.Introduction Page 26.345.2Living-Learning Communities (LLCs) have been studied by a number of authors under a numberof conditions since at least the early 1990’s.1,2,3 As documented by multiple authors, a widerange of LLCs exist,3,4,5 including both LLCs focused on specific disciplines and residentiallybased LLCs. Within the realm of LLCs, a wide

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan; Grace Louise Cravens, Sienko Research Group; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

methods you would employ to gather user requirements? If you list 5 multiple methods, please rank them in order of importance. What challenges might you face when performing these requirements gathering 6 method(s)? How would you overcome these challenges? With respect to the user requirements and engineering specifications you developed for your design project: Specify the type of data you collected and from where this 7 data came from (also speak to data you haven’t collected yet, but hope to in the future). 8 Specify your methodology for collecting the data. Specify how you analyzed or brought together your data to develop user 9 requirements and engineering

Conference Session

Student Motivation and Faculty Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessie Keeler, Oregon State University; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Debra May Friedrichsen, Unaffiliated; Jeffrey A Nason, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Harvard-Danforth Center, 10-21. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic771890.files/OTL3-Mosteller- Muddiest.pdf 5. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, P. K. (1993). Classroom assessment technique examples. In Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd ed.) Retrieved from http://www.ncicdp.org/documents/Assessment%20Strategies.pdf 6. Hall, S. R., Wait, I., Brodeu, D. R., Soderholm, D. H., & Nasr, R. (2002). Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class. Frontiers in Education. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1157921 7. Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education 11, 113– 120. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033 8. Krause, S. J

Conference Session

Sustainability and Hands-on Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Palomo P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Jeffrey Alan Cole, Pasadena City College

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

PCC scientists constructed the devices and evaluated the biological inputs/outputs in the system (picked biological seeds, plate counted bacteria, conducted DNA sequencing). Similar experimental set-ups were operated at both institutions. Cal Poly Pomona engineers provided support with system operation and water sample analysis. Student interaction was achieved by using: (a) Initial in-person two-hour meetings. Every semester, to break the ice and engage PCC and Cal Poly Pomona students with the collaborative work, initial meetings were hosted at Cal Poly Pomona. PCC students and the professor(s) visited the campus and had the opportunity of touring the engineering laboratory facilities. The initial meetings

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven D Hart, Virginia Military Institute; Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Matthew W Roberts, Southern Utah University; Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, the CIT-E community had a deeper understanding of flipping.We understood that flipping is not simply a matter of recording some screencasts for students to watchout of class. Rather, the design of the flipped classroom exercises must be intentional. The SecondAnnual Infrastructure Education Workshop is planned in May 2015 to answer the following questions,and the answers will be reported on the companion poster to this paper.  What material in the current course(s) can readily be adapted to out-of-class screencasts? The answer to this question will provide an estimate of how much class time is now freed up for active learning exercises.  What are the characteristics of an effective in-class question for the flipped

Conference Session

General Technical Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John P. Mullen, New Mexico State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

with the first answer, the first answer isnot correct. In cases 2 and 4, the instructor gives feedback on why the answer to the follow-up isnot consistent. Here are some examples: Q1’s answers are correct, o but the answer to the follow-up is, “Only A or B can drive. o Instructor’s response: Why didn’t you select the third option, (A, B, C, C)? Selected (B, C, A, D), but not (A, B, D, C). o Follow-up answer was, “Because all the other answers except the answer I choose they put B in the back and B is the driver who should be in the front (sic).” o Instructor’s response was, “You explained correctly what you did, but you got part of Q1 wrong. Please read the question more carefully next time. Q1’s answer is

Conference Session

General Technical Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy Wayne Gilreath, Guilford College; Chafic Bou-Saba, Guilford College

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. The Model B Raspberry Pi has twicethe SDRAM, an additional USB 2.0 port (both of which are moved to an integrated 3-port USBhub,) and a 10/100 MBit/s Ethernet USB adapter which takes up one of these ports on the hub;the tradeoff is that the Model B takes 3.5W of power as opposed to the 1.5W required by theModel A. Both Models run on a variety of Linux distributions such as Raspbian (a DebianWheezy port) and Pidora (a Fedora port), in addition to other OS such as OpenElec and RISCOS. The official distributions are optimized for the CPU's ARMv6 instruction set and are freelyavailable for download, yet many more are available for download. 5 Nearly all distributions areLinux-based, with the notable exception of Plan 9 developed by Bell Labs

Conference Session

Concepts and Conceptual Knowledge

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Direnga, Hamburg University of Technology; Bradley Presentati, Hamburg University of Technology; Dion Timmermann, Hamburg University of Technology; Andrea Brose, Hamburg University of Technology; Christian H Kautz, Hamburg University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

lossesfrom posttest to retest for individuals as well as for group average scores. We therefore use thenormalized change proposed by Marx and Cummings 21 , which relates losses to the maximumpossible loss instead of the maximum possible gain:  % S −% Si f   100−% Si if % Sf ≥ % Si = 100      f −% Si c = % S% Si

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron; Lakiesha N. Williams, Mississippi State University; Linda T Coats; Debora F Rodrigues, University of Houston (CoE); Judit Eva Puskas; Frank "Fritz" J Claydon, University of Houston (CoE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineering degrees and reported thatunderrepresented ethnic minorities held 12.6% of B.S. degrees, 7.9% of M.S. and 4.6% of thePh.D.'s, and less than 10% of the faculty positions. Similarly, although women held 18.4% ofthe B.S degrees and 22% of the Ph.D.'s; only 13% of the faculty was women; of which only8.7% held the rank of full professor.19 Studies have also shown that the gap between male andfemale faculty was narrower in early career and widens significantly by 15 years after theirPh.D.18 Underrepresented minorities, both ethnic and gender based, need to comprise at least15% of academia before they can influence the culture and agenda.7The Computing Research Association for Women (CRA-W) has several mentoring programs forwomen in computer

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Subodh Bhandari, Cal Poly Pomona; Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Fang Tang, Cal Poly Pomona; Scott Matthew Boskovich, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Navigation,” U.S. Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-4462, May, 2008.5. Tanner, H.G. and Christodoulakis, D.K., “Decentralized Cooperative Control of Heterogeneous Vehicle Groups,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 811-823, 2007.6. Fechheimer, M., Webber, K., Kleiber, P. B., “How Well Do Undergraduate Research Programs Promote Engagement and Success of Students?,” CBE Life Sciences Education, Sundberg, MD, 2011.7. Anderson, N., Hagenauer, B., Erickson, R., and Bhandari, S., “Flight Testing of a UAV Airplane for Autonomous Operation using Piccolo II Autopilot,” Proceedings of AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Honolulu, HI, 18-21 August 2008.8. Bhandari, S., Pernalete, N., Bettadapura, A

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

. Ramos, R. F., “Introduction of Active Learning Techniques Increases Student Learning in a Systems Physiology Laboratory Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.4. Sieving, A. L., M. Pool, S. A. Jewett, T. Eustaquio, R. Madangopal, A. Panitch, K. Stuart, A. E. Rundell, “Development of Verification and Validation Engineering Design Skills through a Multi-year Cognitive Apprenticeship Laboratory Experience,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.5. Kirschner, P. A. “The laboratory in higher science education, problems, premises, and objectives,” Higher Education, vol. 17, pp. 81-90, 1988.6. Litzinger, T., L. R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, W. Newstetter, “Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hatice O. Ozturk, North Carolina State University; Dianne Raubenheimer, Meredith College; Alina N. Duca, NC State University; H. Joel Trussell, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

ASEE Conference, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006. 6. Lopez, A. (2007). Mathematics education for 21st century engineering students: Literature review. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. Posner, G. J., 7. Manseur, R., Ieta, A. & Manseur, Z. (2010). Mathematics Preparation for a Modern Engineering Program, Panel Session. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 8. Ganter, S., & Barker, W. (2004). The Curriculum Foundations Project: Voices of the Partner Disciplines. Mathematical Association of America. 9. Buechler, D.N. (2004a). Mathematical Background Versus Success in Electrical Engineering, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City

Conference Session

Concept Inventories and Assessment of Knowledge

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dion Timmermann, Hamburg University of Technology; Christian H Kautz, Hamburg University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

treated as ideal voltages sources. The long line indicatesthe positive terminal of the respective battery. All four bulbs areidentical.Question 1 (2 points, if both items are correct)Switch S is closed.Item 1.1 Bulb B is A off, e.g. does not glow, B less bright than bulb C, but not off, C equally bright as bulb C,! D brighter than bulb C,Item 1.2 because a the current from bulb B is used up. b the same current flows through both. c a part of the voltage drops at bulb B. d bulb C has a lower potential than bulb B. e the electrons flow through bulb C first.Question 2 (2 points, if both

Conference Session

Fundamental: Tools and Content for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jale F. Akyurtlu, Hampton University; Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University; Lumumba Harnett, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

not introduced as a tool; methods like brain-storming, trial-and-error, etc., are employed14. However, „system analysis‟ approach provides a roadmap to theproblem-solving process, by which the reasoning activity is streamlined and generalized. Thismethod may also be employed to demonstrate to the students how to formulate either wordproblems or a design basis. It also helps the teachers to show to their students how to switchfrom rote memorization to critical thinking.‘System Analysis’ ApproachThe system analysis approach considers the definition of a system as composed of componentswhich interact with each other to produce output(s) based on inputs. The best way to define thebehavior of a system is to define the variables which govern the

Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dianna Newman, University at Albany/SUNY; Meghan Morris Deyoe, University at Albany, SUNY; Jessica M Lamendola, University at Albany/SUNY

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

structure, communication was noted by all as the key element for success. Initiative anddirection taken by students supports the flipped classroom approach. Table 3 Primary Decision-Maker by Activity* Decision-maker Team A member My team Decided Activities Instructor TAs Leader of my team as a group myself F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University; Emily M Hunter, Baylor University; Steven C. Currall, University of California, Davis; Ed Frauenheim, The Great Place to Work Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J Skromme, Arizona State University; Paul Rayes, Arizona State University; Brian McNamara, Arizona State University; Xiaoxuan Wang, Arizona State University; Yih-Fang Huang, University of Notre Dame; Daniel H. Robinson, Colorado State University; Xiang Gao, Arizona State University; Theodore Thompson

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the mesh equation game.7. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation through the TransformingUndergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Program underGrant Nos. DUE-1044497 and DUE-1323773. We thank Drs. J. Aberle, M. Ardakani, R. Ferzli,S. Goodnick, R. Gorur, G. Karady, Hongwei Mao, B. Matar, L. Sankar, Donghoon Shin, MengTao, C. Tepedelenlioglu, T. Thornton, D. Vasileska, Chao Wang, Hongbin Yu, and Hongyu Yufor using our software in their sections of EEE 202 at ASU; A. Holmes for using it in his courseECE 2630 at the University of Virginia; and Y. Astatke for using it in his course EEGR 202 atMorgan State University. We thank Daniel Sayre of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. for

Conference Session

Assessing URM Programs Targeting the K-16 Continuum

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pablo Biswas, The Mercer University; Rohitha Goonatilake, Texas A&M International University; Gerardo Javier Pinzon P.E., Texas A&M International University; Mahmoud Khasawneh, Texas A&M International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Wednesday Work on projects Work on projects 7/23 Mr. Luis Portilla - Rheem Mfg Thursday Work on projects Plant 7/24 @ 3:30 PM Friday Ms. Rosa E. Trevino @ 1:30 USDA tour @ 10:00 AM 7/25 PM Monday Mr. Adrian Uresti - AEP Mr. Peter S. Davis – 7/28 @ 10:00 AM

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Hands-on Projects and Spatial Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University; Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Chao Wang, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

and project timeline can be found in Table A.1 in AppendixA.Based on the feedback the course developers received after the course has been offered during2013 Fall session A, weekly units have been reordered for 2013 Fall session B, the details ofwhich can be found in Table A.2 in Appendix A. The main reason for the reordering was tomore evenly distribute the workload over the semester and give students more time to work onthe project. Units with time intensive activities were paired with units that did not require asmuch work. This seemed to have helped students better manage the workload and pace of thecourse.The course developers agreed that for the first half of the course, each unit should contain a fewshort video lectures, discussion(s

Conference Session

Graduate Recruitment & Professional Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Adam Blake Baker, University of Michigan; Diane L Peters, Kettering University; Steve J. Skerlos, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

, including:  Please first indicate the amount you consulted with each of the groups below and the degree to which they were resistant or supportive of your decision to pursue a PhD.  Please indicate how important each of these factors was in your decision to attend to graduate school prior to enrolling.  Please indicate how much you used each of the following sources of information when you were selecting a PhD program.  Please rate how important each type of information was when selecting a PhD program:  Did you already know the topic of your dissertation work prior to beginning your PhD?  Did you already know which professor(s) you wanted to work with prior to your PhD?Returners considered numerous factors

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Epicenter Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Matthew, VentureWell; Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group; Ari Turrentine, VentureWell; Angela Shartrand, VentureWell; Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

Working in Teams: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Andrew Jackson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kevin Andrew Richards, Northern Illinois University; Angelika N Zissimopoulos, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dawn Laux, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

opportunity to hear the students’ voice and perceptions on peerfeedback experiences in the course; in that way it is an indicator of how well these assessmentopportunities are being integrated in the course. Brutus et al.30 stated that “one of the mainlimitations of [their] study is that it does not specify what, in the PES [peer evaluation system]experience, underlies the detected effects. Questions remain as to which component(s) ofstudents’ educational experience actually contributed to their increase in confidence withobservation” (p. 28). While previous studies have been able to demonstrate significant effectsthrough repeated uses of peer feedback during team projects, this study aims to explore theunderlying mechanisms that lead to those