tools and application and having also total quality management diploma and being quality master holder dealing with all quality systems as documentation , CAPA management , RCA , facility maintenance and also ISO 9000/2008 expert in addition to being certified from Bernard Castle in UK as sterile area facility Design expert as per ISO regulations . Egyptian pharmacist graduate of 2007 who started my career as a research and development pharmacist in SEDICO pharmaceuticals in EGYPT for about 2 years dealing with new dosage forms formulation and then rotated to Methodology and stability department in which i dealt with dosage form analysis and innovation of new methods of analysis dealing with all laboratory
interested in research around recruiting and retaining underrepresented minorities and women in STEM. Prior to Purdue, she spent time in industry holding technical and operations-based roles and has experience with informal STEM community and outreach projects. She holds a BS degree in Industrial Technology and a MS degree in Engineering Management.Jake Davis, Purdue University Jake Davis is an undergraduate student studying Accounting and Management in the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University. He is also a research assistant in the Social Policy and Higher Education Research in Engineering (SPHERE) laboratory
its steering committee for several years. He has invested over twenty-five years in the development and maintenance of a multimillion dollar manufacturing laboratory facility complete with a full scale, fully integrated manufacturing sys- tem. Professor Harriger has been a Co-PI on two NSF funded grants focused on aerospace manufacturing education and is currently a Co-PI on the NSF funded TECHFIT project, a middle school afterschool pro- gram that teaches students how to use programmable controllers and other technologies to design exercise games. Additionally, he co-organizes multiple regional automation competitions for an international con- trols company
Teaching Strategies in a Laboratory Exercise. Advances in Physiology Education. 2012; 36: 147-53.6. Hibbeler RC. Engineering Mechanics: Statics & Dynamics 13 editon. 13 ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2013. Page 26.849.6
the circuit with PSpice.4. Using the oscilloscope and the trigger single function measure and record the transient phenomenon of voltage build-up across the capacitor. Be sure to include a printout of the data captured from the scope in your laboratory notebook. Use cursors and scope measurements and displays to experimentally extract all relevant parameters.5. Compare your experimental results with your calculations and discuss errors or discrepancies.Most students performing these tasks for the prelab come with an analytic solution that matches Page 26.136.2their PSpice simulation; both indicate that the system response is heavily
resolve these conflicts. This paper discusses the plans to begin a systemicspread of constructivist methodologies in all the engineering schools in Puerto Rico. This initialeffort specifically addresses courses in electrical circuits and electronic instrumentation. TheAnalog Discovery Board, essentially a circuits laboratory that fits in the palm of one’s hand, willbe used as the medium to explore the course concepts. The primary means for diffusion will Page 26.83.2consist of two NSF-funded faculty workshops in Puerto Rico designed and led by two of theauthors who have ample experience with the device and with these methodologies, including
: Page 26.84.10 Figure 7. CS MOSFET Amplifier – Multisim SimulationAvsim = -Vo / Vi = -3.54Vp / 49mVp = -72A good bit higher than our design goal of -50! Page 26.84.11Design VerificationWhen the circuit was prototyped in the laboratory it resulted in an actual output seen in Figure 8below. Figure 8. CS MOSFET Amplifier – Actual OutputNow the actual gain may be calculated:Avact = -Vo / Vi = -3.98Vp-p / 103mVp-p = -39A bit lower than -50. Page 26.84.12AnalysisIt is apparent that the Multisim simulation and the actual prototype demonstrate
programming, weexcluded them from the analysis. This resulted in a total of 29 freshmen in the control group and22 students in the test group. Table 2. Summary of schedules Week Control group (C only) Treatment group (CFL + C) 1 Intro to Computers, Prep for laboratory Intro to Computers, CFL basics, (incl. Linux and vim) operations, I/O 2 Beginning C programming CFL conditional, for loop 3 Integers and I/O CFL arrays, functions and recursion 4 conditionals CFL graphics and game project 5 while/for loops Linux and vim, Integers
IT Specialist in IBM China, Beijing, China. From 2000 to 2003, he was a research assistant with the Visualization, Analysis, and Imaging Laboratory (VAIL), the GeoResources Institute (GRI), Mississippi State University. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Technology, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX. His research interests include digital signal processing, image and video coding, and wavelets.Dr. Suxia Cui, Prairie View A&M University Suxia Cui is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU). She joined PVAMU right after she obtained her Ph.D. degree in Com- puter Engineering
runs for thirteen weeks,and includes both a lecture and laboratory component. It was chosen as the initial situation fortesting due to the flexible project environment and the heavy emphasis on design.In 2012, ENGG 200 students were asked to create a computer game as one of their multi-weekdesign projects. Students were asked to choose a client market, and then to justify their resultingdesign specifications, decisions, and game mechanics for the target audience. Few restrictionswere built into the project, allowing teams to exercise as much creativity as possible. A freegame creation platform was suggested and made available, but students were free to use anysoftware or environment they preferred. The development process lasted several weeks
on the Status of Women at Purdue in recognition of outstanding efforts on behalf of women (2007). In 2008, he received the ASME Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies Medal, for his ”unwavering commitment to diversity”.Dr. Daniel Lopresti, Lehigh University Daniel Lopresti received his bachelor’s degree from Dartmouth in 1982 and his Ph.D. in computer science from Princeton in 1987. After completing his doctorate, he joined the Department of Computer Science at Brown and taught courses ranging from VLSI design to computational aspects of molecular biology and conducted research in parallel computing and VLSI CAD. He went on to help found the Matsushita Information Technology Laboratory in Princeton, and later also
Engineering Teacher, pp. 30-35, May 2014.[2] International Technology Education Association, “Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology,” 3rd ed., 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.iteea.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf. [Accessed: 01- Apr-2015].[3] D. Sianez, M. Fugere, and C. Lennon, “Technology and Engineering Education Students’ Perceptions of Hands-On and Hands-Off Activities,” Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291- 299, Nov. 2010.[4] M. Milojkovic, M. Milovanovic, D. Mitic, S. Peric, M. Spasic, and S. Nikolic, “Laboratory CNC Machine for Education of Students on Control Systems Engineering,” Facta Universitatis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117-125, 2014.[5] D. Rijmenants
Technology in 1989. Dr. Woehr served on the faculty of the Psychology Department in the I/O Psychology program at Texas A&M University from 1988 to 1999 and as a Professor of Man- agement at the University of Tennessee from 1999 to 2011. He has also served as a Visiting Scientist to the Air Force Human Resource Laboratory and as a consultant to private industry. Dr. Woehr is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), the American Psychological Associa- tion (APA), and the Association for Psychological Science (APS). His research on managerial assessment centers, job performance measurement, work related attitudes and behavior, training development, and quantitative methods has
as a Professor of Man- agement at the University of Tennessee from 1999 to 2011. He has also served as a Visiting Scientist to the Air Force Human Resource Laboratory and as a consultant to private industry. Dr. Woehr is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), the American Psychological Associa- tion (APA), and the Association for Psychological Science (APS). His research on managerial assessment centers, job performance measurement, work related attitudes and behavior, training development, and quantitative methods has appeared in a variety of books, journals, as papers presented at professional meetings, and as technical reports. Dr. Woehr currently serves as editor for Human
use of these policies by faculty members. However, to provide quantifiableresults, two survey instruments were developed to collect relevant data and feedback fromfaculty and students across the campus. RLC members volunteered to promote the surveyamong their faculty, and registration staff helped broadcast the survey among the students. Thesurvey questions used are listed below in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1: Faculty survey questionnaire (89 responses) 1 Which school are you in? 2 For a 1000 level lecture course, do you enforce attendance policy in your class? (excluding laboratory/studio courses) 3 For the above 1000 level course, do you have an attendance policy written in your syllabus? 4 For the above 1000
laboratory development, antennas, wireless communica- tions, signal processing, and instrumentation.Dr. Richard J. Hartnett P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy Richard J. Hartnett is a professor of electrical engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, CT. He received his B.S.E.E. degree from the U.S. Coast Guard Academy, his M.S.E.E. degree from Purdue University, and his Ph.D. in EE from the University of Rhode Island. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut, and his research interests include efficient digital fil- tering methods, improved receiver signal processing techniques for electronic navigation systems, and autonomous vehicle design
Technology Mingyu Lu received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Bei- jing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 1997 to 2002, he was a research assistant at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Elec- trical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department
times a week. It now uses a 2+2 format: two days of lecture per week,with each lecture day followed by laboratory time to facilitate material understanding by hands-on practice. Approximately 120 students attend a one-hour lecture in an auditorium. Thefollowing day, students attend a small lab session, usually 26 students, to allow more contactwith each student while s/he practices. There has been concern voiced regarding large lectureswith respect to attendance rates, effectiveness of large lecture instruction, and connectivitybetween the instructor and students15. To provide a more flexible learning environment and improve student learningoutcomes16-18, a blended learning approach was adopted in 2010 by approximately half of theEGR115
lecture topics. Because of the large class, individual oralproject presentations were not scheduled in the interest of time. A project of this magnitude wasa big challenge for students. The students got access to all the facilities and resources of theuniversity. There was a dissection laboratory which was equipped with power tools, hand tools,and measurement devices. In addition, the facilities of the Engineering Machine Shop wereaccessible for difficult disassembly and assembly tasks.MATERIALS SCIENCE PERSPECTIVESThe work reported here addressed the material selection aspect associated with each individualproduct that was reverse engineered. This provided the material science perspectives of theproduct archaeology. Typically this originated in
. For each half bridge circuit, the students again take measurements ofthree different weights. This process is repeated once more for a full bridge circuit using all fourstrain gauges.The final part of the lab requires the students to choose one of the bridge setups (quarter, half, orfull) to measure an unknown weight. At least four known calibration weights are used to create acalibration curve relating weight and strain as measured by their chosen Wheatstone bridgesetup. They then choose some object that they want to weigh, which can be a textbook, abackpack, or even a fellow classmate. This object is weighed on their ‘scale’ – the instrumentedaluminum beam – and then weighed on a calibrated laboratory scale to get the reference value.This
showing that on average, women with Page 26.327.6a science or engineering degree, employed full-time in STEM, earned $75,100.16 On average,men of the same status earned $91,000, a difference of almost $16,000. In 1999, MIT conducteda study on women faculty in their life science departments and found resource discriminationsuch as differences in salary, laboratory size, funding, award nominations, and startuppackages.37 In regards to academic commercialization, according to Murray,40 faculty are ofteninvited to engage in this type of activity by former students involved in entrepreneurship. Thereis some evidence to show that resource discrimination
-mentoring. Incorporation of engineering design experiences across the undergraduatecurriculum with linkages to the university’s engineering innovation laboratory for access toindustry projects contributes to increased student retention and persistence to graduation.CASCADE uses promising practices from research to create a retention program that includesintegrated curriculum, peer-mentoring, learning communities, and efforts that build innovationand creativity into the engineering curriculum. CASCADE vertically aligns 32 problem-baseddesign efforts from the first-year to senior-year (capstone) courses. Research on engineeringstudent learning communities indicates increased retention and student satisfaction with theirfirst-year experience 18, 33
Laplace transform applications.Enrollment in the DSP course in our school has increased over the years despite the fact that, bynature, these subjects are considered by many students to be highly theoretical and with difficultconcepts to understand. We have tried to include many MATLAB/MATHCAD examplesthroughout our lectures so that students are not bored with mathematical details. This semesterwe are trying a software laboratory component for the DSP course. More examples and studentsatisfaction results will be presented at the Annual Conference. Page 26.385.8 REFERENCES[1]. “Fundamentals of Electric Circuits
this work, we use and adapt the critique to provide students with a fundamental learningexperience that scaffolds observing and envisioning, toward the creation of effective figures.To help them complete the activity, we provide them with a brief set of adapted designprinciples, drawn from visual design10, data communication11, and an assessment of previousyears’ figures from bioengineering capstone reports.ParticipantsBioengineering senior undergraduates at the University of Washington participate in a capstonedesign course, in which most of the project work is done in laboratories, but students also meetas a group once a week throughout the academic year. We utilized one of the spring quarterclass meetings for our workshop. Students were
low cost and exceptionally high value. They consume a polymer filament,typically polylactic acid (PLA) or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), converting itinto a physical object by depositing it in thin, sequential layers. The entire technology,both hardware and software, is open-source and freely available.University students, faculty and research staff at the Michigan Tech Open SustainabilityTechnology (MOST) laboratory have been researching, designing, building, testing anddocumenting versions of RepRap printers since 2010. Nearly everyone taking part in theresearch became caught up in the process of designing, printing, evaluating andmodifying parts that were used for a variety of different purposes. Researchers working
options, we decided to work withan external training organization (ETO), a corporation known world-wide as a leader increativity and innovation. Page 26.748.3A significant amount of discussion was undertaken to decide if the fieldtrip should be offered forcredit or non-credit. Upon a recommendation by the Dean of the College of Engineering, thecourse was offered for one credit. There were two reasons for this decision. First, students wererequired to participate in approximately twenty hours of lecture and laboratory activities over thefour-day trip. Second, offering the course for credit allowed the students’ participation to appearon their
experience that emphasized the interdependency of manufacturing and design with a focus in business development.2-‐3 The Learning Factory was originally developed jointly by Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University of Washington (UW), and University of Puerto Rice-‐Mayaguez (UPR-‐M) in collaboration with Sandia National Laboratories through the Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership (MEEP) funded from the ARPA TRP. This approach to manufacturing engineering education provides balance between engineering science, engineering practice and hands-‐on experiences. Furthermore, the National Academy of Engineering published their attempts to answer the
, genuinely open-minded and interested in growing as a leader.Student-centered approach Page 26.906.10Engineering students face a demanding course load. In the design of this program, the directorswere sensitive to academic load, and as a result, created a concentration in engineeringleadership rather than a minor. Classes are all offered late Friday afternoons at a time whenthere no other engineering classes are scheduled, ensuring that accepted students will be able tocomplete the three-year program by graduation.In addition, the classroom and indeed, the entire program is treated as a laboratory, where allinvolved (participants and instructors alike
(Sawyer, 2012). For the purposes of this project, innovationis defined broadly as the pursuit of a creative, imaginative, or inventive solutions duringengineering coursework (as opposed to, for example, carrying out a set of laboratory proceduresor following directions in a computer learning module).Instrument Development OverviewThe purpose of this project was to develop an instrument to assess the emergent characteristics ofstudent groups in engineering classrooms and examine them in relationship to studentengagement and student innovation. Our strategy for developing the items was to develop aconceptual framework that described collaborative emergence based on extant literature, writeitems to reflect that framework, and then administer them to
pursuing a career inindustry or consulting through a course-based, practicum-oriented program. The program willinclude laboratory components and industry-related collaborations to provide students with Page 26.484.2experiential learning and professional skill development.Within civil engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, there is precedence of adiscipline-specific, one-year course-based Master of Environmental Engineering program. Sucha program was recently developed and launched for structural engineering1. The programconsists of a year of course-work and a practicum that must be completed in the summer prior tothe academic year of