resident physician at Rutgers University - New Jersey Medical School in Newark, NJ. He is a graduate of the Milton S. Hershey Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. He completed his undergraduate studies in Biology from the University of Utah. His research interests are varied and involve pediatric hematology and oncology as well as higher education curricula, both with universities and medical schools.Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy is currently a medical student at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. He completed his undergraduate studies in Biology from the University of Pennsylvania in May 2012. Currently, his research interests consist of
Figure 7 – Selection from a student’s digital media portfolio for PN4011Not only was it observed that students with below average spatial skills benefited Page 26.286.9significantly from this extra class time, we also found that those students with high spatialskills also valued the activities. This is supported in some of the comments extracted fromstudents’ reflective diaries:“My strengths are the lab 1’s, I enjoy these and have no issues as I work through theworkbook. I also find my sketching a strong point as I am confident enough to try anythingeven if I make a mess of it ill still try again and give it another go.” Student 8 (Male) – Pre-Test
, "Breaking the chemical and engineering barriers to lignocellulosic biofuels: next generation hydrocarbon biorefineries," Washington, 2008. Page 26.423.104. Naik, S., V.V. Goud, P.K. Rout, and A.K. Dalai, "Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, pp. 578-597, 2010.5. Damartzis, T. and A. Zabaniotou, "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 366- 378, 2011.6. Wang, L., C.L. Weller, D.D. Jones, and M.A
theirresolution would certainly be a welcome addition to the literature.AcknowledgementThe authors gratefully acknowledge the kind support of colleagues from partner institutions whohelped advise and shape this research. This material is based in part upon work supported bythe National Science Foundation under Grant Number DUE-0717820. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. T. H. Chi, M. Bassok, M. W. Lewis, P. Reimann, and R. Glaser, “How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 13, pp. 145–182, 1989.[2] R. Schwonke, A. Renkl, C. Krieg, J
26.1753.9determine similarities and differences among several design solutions” (MS-ETS1-3) than theywere able to address having students “define the criteria and constraints of a design problem”(MS-ETS1-1). An example of a lesson that integrated all three key MS-ETS1-3 elements was thesuggestion for students to “test several different bridge designs to figure out which one is able tosupport the most weight . . . [and] from these tests they could assemble a new design using themost effective shape, material(s), and method of construction.” Alternatively, a lesson that didnot address any of these three elements was the simple suggestion of having students constructscale models of playground equipment.Table 4. MS-ETS-3, Alignment of Lesson Suggestions with
should befocused on the specific subjects instead of providing too much computational support. Thus,further research is necessary to identify what are the differences between different type ofchallenges and the level of scaffolding in student understanding and student performance intransfer tasks.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation under the awards#EEC1329262 and #EEC1449238. Page 26.744.10References1 Turner, P., Petzold, L., Shiflet, A., Vakalis, I., Jordan, K., & St. John, S. Undergraduate computational science and engineering education. Society for Industrial and Applied
-stateproblem (Fig. 1) was adopted from an exercise at the end of Chapter 4 (“Two-Dimensional,Steady-State Conduction”) of Incropera et al.’s textbook25, while the transient, semi-infinitemedium problem (Fig. 2) was adopted from an exercise at the end of Chapter 4 (“Transient HeatConduction”) of Çengel and Ghajar’s textbook13.After the introduction of the problem statement and summaries of the educational objectives andrelevant FE and course theory, each ALM includes the following solutions steps (these steps areapplicable to thermal ALM’s using SolidWorks and SolidWorks Simulation, but similar steps arefollowed for ALM’s that use other software packages): 1. Using SolidWorks to create a 3-D model. The steps required to draw the model in
%), African American (3.8%), Hispanic/Latino American (9.2%). Twenty-six percent ofthe sample identified as international students, and a similar percentage (24.2%) identifiedEnglish as their second language.Protocol To evaluate the effectiveness of the new interpersonal communication focused content, arandomized controlled trial was conducted, as it provides the strongest evidence for evaluatingthe effectiveness of an intervention49 An essential component of randomized controlled trials isthat participants are randomly split between treatment and control groups. Control group(s) arenot exposed to the intervention, while treatment group(s) are. Following treatment groupexposure, differentiations between the treatment and control groups are
examination data.References[1] Garrison, D., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 4-8.[2] Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 131-146.[3] Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended Learning Enters the Mainstream, In C. Bonk, & C. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (195-206), San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.[4] Twigg, C. (2003). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: New Models for Online Learning. Educause
a) The weight of the new chassis is still heavier than the original fuel cell car, which reduces run time. b) The fuel cell car`s maneuverability is limited by the size of the chassis and the type and number of sensors. c) Running time is still short (2 minute approximately) so it would be beneficial to increase this. d) New fuel cell car requires twice as much fuel in order to maintain original run times.The case activities, course concepts and report due dates were planned for five stages,summarized in Table 2. Ultimately, the students recommended design improvements for the nextversion of the chassis based on the case activity results. Students worked in teams of five andcompleted
social development into engineering studies8 or using PBL inleadership development9.On the other hand, general frameworks have been used for the universities to improve theirprograms and operations. The main assumption is that the same framework used by an industryis adjustable for all kind of organization, including higher education institutions. An example isthe Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence explored and adapted for some USuniversities in the 90’s. The Criteria provides codified values and concepts of performanceexcellence from industry to education. Even though models developed outside education Page 26.86.3environments
- Page 26.108.2income students, and/or students who start college significantly later than 18 years of age are atbest underrepresented, and at worst socially marginalized in many engineering classrooms.Furthermore, McIntosh explains that the myth of monoculture assumes that there is a single“normal” experience8. Recognizing and acknowledging that a “monoculture” is embeddeddeeply in the engineering education system may not be easy for those of us who are engineeringeducators and researchers. McIntosh points out that such a monoculture mirrors that of the USsocial system, not merely by what she calls “active forms” of interlocking oppressions, but moredeeply—in embedded forms—forms which “member[s] of the dominant group are taught not tosee”9
launchesstudents into a successful future by promoting academic engagement, encouraging success, andimproving the overall student learning satisfaction.References1. Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, “Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology (SME&T)”, NSF 96-139. Page 26.120.132. Cudney, E., Corns, S., Grasman, S., Gent, S., and Farris, J., “Enhancing Undergraduate Engineering Education of Lean Methods using Simulation Learning Modules within a Virtual Environment”, ASEE Annual Conference &
success. 4. Flipped classroom strategies that involve providing instructor feedback to students on an individualized basis require significant resources. Scheduling and proper classroom setup can pose additional challenges. Institutions must adapt to accommodate the changing educational needs.References 1. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201319030. 2. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231. 3. Tucker, B
. 107th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, St. Louis, Missouri.14. System Dynamics Society (2015) www.systemdynamics.org15. Forrester, J.W. (1961) Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Reprinted by Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA.16. Forrester, J.W. (1969) Urban Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Reprinted by Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA.17. Aström, K.J., and Murray, R.M. (2008) Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press.18. Palm, W. J. (2014) System dynamics. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Science.19. Zelinka, I., Vaclav, S. and Ajith, A. (2013) Handbook of Optimization: From Classical to Modern Approach. Berlin: Springer
images, it also tells you these theories behind” (Student CE_Se_03). “We use a lot of quantum in doing…like bonding… how the orbital form into bonds… the models of those help me … in pulling out … this is how a s orbital looks like, this is how a s orbital looks like…” (Student CE_Se_01).Integrated with interactive capabilities, students could manipulate and explore a givenphenomenon and understand the abstract concept, for example, one student said, “you could drag electrons like different levels and achieve like different colors and say wow that’s cool why did that happen. And you kind of, work through that in your head” (Student P_Ju_01). To off-load complicated mathematical calculations. Quantum mechanics
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. Leaning, J. & Guha-Sapir, D. Natural Disasters, Armed Conflict, and Public Health. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1836–1842 (2013).2. Garriga, E. & Melé, D. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J. Bus. Ethics 53, 51–71 (2004).3. National Society of Professional Engineers. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. (2007).4. Herkert, J. R. in Social, ethical, and policy implications of engineering: selected readings 45–73 (IEEE Press, 2000).5. Hess, J. L. et al. Empathy and caring as conceptualized inside and outside of engineering: Extensive literature review and faculty focus group analyses. in
. 20, no. 3, pp. 305-312, 2004.[8] C. Dym, A. Agogino and O. Eris, "Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning," Journal of Page 26.1100.15 Engineering Education, no. January, 2005.[9] N. Hotaling, B. B. Fasse, L. F. Bost, C. D. Hermann and C. R. Forest, "A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 630-656, 2012.[10] J. L. Zayas, J. S. Lamancusa, A. L. Soyster, L. Morell and J. Jorgensen, "The Learning Factory: Industry- Partnered Active Learning," Journal of Engineering Education, no. January 2008, pp
Paper ID #13586Qualitative Analysis of Boundary Spanning Implications within Interviews ofEngagement StakeholdersDr. David A. Delaine, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo and IFEES David A. Delaine has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA. He currently serves as an executive member of the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES), as Vice President for Student Engagement, Diversity, and Inclusion. IFEES aims to strengthen engineering education practices around the world. He has recently completed his tenure as a Fulbright Scholar and is currently performing
, Pages Textbook Title Author(s) Edition Chapter Analyzed Analyzed rd Fluid Mechanics: Cengel, Y.A., & 2014, 3 Ed. 5. Bernoulli and 230-242 Fundamentals and Cimbala, J. M. Energy Equations Applications Fundamentals of Munson, B.R., 2013, 7th Ed. 3. Elementary 141-156 Fluid Mechanics Okiishi, T. H., Fluid Dynamics – Huebsch, W.W. & The Bernoulli Rothmayer, A.P. Equation
. Page 26.1404.125. References[1] Assessment and Institutional Research. (2010). CUNY Student Experience Survey. New York City College of Technology, CUNY.[2] Barnett, S. & Ceci, S (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637.[3] Bateman, C. (Ed.). (2007). Game writing: Narrative skills for videogames. Boston: Charles River Media.[4] Benander, R., & Lightner, R. (2005). Promoting transfer of learning: Connecting general education courses. The Journal of General Education, 54 (3), 199-208.[5] Brooks, R. E. (1977). Towards a theory of the cognitive processes in computer programming. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 9, 737-751.[6] Cabo, C
experiences support science career decisions and active learning.” CBE Life Sciences Education 6: 297-306.3. Russell, S. H., M.P. Hancock, and J. McCullough. (2007 ). “The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.” Science 316(5824): 548-9.4. Kinkel, D. H. and S. E. Henke. (2006). “Impact of undergraduate research on academic performance, educational planning, and career development.” Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 35: 194-201.5. Lanza, J. and G. C. Smith. (1988). Undergraduate research: A little experience goes a long way. J. Coll. Sci Teach. 18:118-1206. Hunter, A-B., S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour. (2007). “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students
the assessment of that academy.References 1. Kumar, S., & Hsiao, J. K. (2007). Engineers learn “soft skills the hard way”: Planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 7(1), 18-23. 2. Galloway, P. D. (2008). The 21st Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform, ASCE Press, Virginia 3. Creed, C. J., Suuberg
from engineering; it also attracted others from across campusencompassing such diverse disciplines as education, library science, chemistry, biology, andatmospheric science. The group’s intended purpose was to lower the activation barrier to helpinterested faculty try flipping, by sharing group knowledge and experiences. Accordingly, thelearning community was planned as a “working” community where members would learn fromeach other as they redesigned and flipped their respective course(s) and created online material.The specific goals of this learning community were to: 1) Explore pedagogy of a flippedclassroom. What do students do within and outside of a flipped class? 2) Explore technologiesavailable to support flipping a course. 3) Flip
. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.4. Atman, C. J., Sheppard, S. D., Turns, J., Adams, R. S., Fleming, L. N., Stevens, R., . . . Lund, D. (2010). Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the center for the advancement of engineering education. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.5. Whitt, E. J. (2006). Are all of your educators educating? About Campus, 10(6), 2-9.6. Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D., & Puma, J. (2010). Comparing the undergraduate
capstone design project, but will help build their identity as engineers and better preparethem for professional practice 41, 42. Research points to several contributing factors which play arole in improving student learning during engineering design experiences, including the impactof active, project-based, and hands-on learning methodologies, and the development of a sense ofcommunity and a peer support network23, 43-45. Cooperative learning approaches that are hands-on and interactive are particularly appealing to underrepresented students 46-49. First-yearengineering design was highlighted as one of six key areas in engineering education innovationat the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference 50. Pioneered in the 1990’s and implemented in severalNSF
hardware/software platform issues and design and develop activities with activelearning strategies in mind.References1. Lewis, L., K. Snow, E. Farris, and D. Levin. 1999. “Distance Education at Postsecondary Institutions: 1997-98 (NCES) 2000-013.” Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.2. Morrison, G.R. and S. M. Ross. 2007. “Designing Effective online Instruction. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Learning Communities in Online Education.” Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing: 75-85.3. Hsiung, S., J. M. Ritz and J. Eiland. 2008. “Design and Develop a Cost Effective Microcontroller Training System for Distance Learning Engineering Students.” In Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering4. Hsiung, S, Ritz, J. M
. Therefore, future studies regarding student motivationsystems or other psychological factors are in need to explore factors that facilitate or impedestudents to transfer to a four-year engineering institution and factors that facilitate or impedetheir subsequent success at the four-year institutions. Third, time to graduation was consideredonly at the final degree granting institution. Therefore, further exploration about the amount oftime that transfer students have spent at their initial institution(s) is necessary in order to accountfor total time to graduation. Fourth, some factors that could be investigated here are the slope ofhow fast they graduate from the degree granting institution which is an indicator oftransferability of courses that