and control of environmental and ecological systems. He is also active in engineering education innovation, where he has contributed to innovations in student learning of systems thinking and complex engineered systems.Prof. Rhonda R. Franklin, University of Minnesota Rhonda Franklin (S’84-M’96) received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Texas A&M Uni- versity, College Station, TX and M.S. and Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI in 1990 and 1995, respectively. She is currently a Professor with Electrical and Computer Engineering department at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests include RF/microwave passive circuit design
. Page 26.628.12References:1. Goldberg, M.R. and Pearlman, J.L. Best Practices for Team-Based Assistive Technology Design Courses. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2013. 41(9): p. 1880-1888.2. Catalano, J. D., P. Wray, and S. Cornelio. Compassion practicum: a capstone design experience at the United States Military Academy. Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 89(4): p. 471–4743. Enderle, J. D. An overview of the National Science Foundation program on senior design projects to aid persons with disabilities. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 15(4): p. 288–2974. Green, M. G., J. S. Linsey, C. Seepersad , K. Schmidt, and K. L. Wood. Design for Frontier Environments: A Novel Methodology and Results of
provided by the governments, most of theprestigious research centers in Latin America are found in public universities, with veryfew exceptions in Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. On the other hand, universitiesstruggle to get economic resources, beyond student´s tuition and fees, to support theirresearch and improve the quality of the education they deliver to be well positioned in themany university ranking systems produced by large international companies. Moreover,defining priorities in the research lines becomes a very hard task for deans and graduatedirectors, most of the time these budgetary discussions affect the organizational climatethat is needed to ensure good results in scientific production. Tecnológico de Monterrey isthe largest
engineering design and project management, and different workplace environments. The complete list of companies, plus primary engineering discipline(s) and location, is detailed in Table 1. The author covered her travel expenses from research funding she had been saving at Smith for this purpose. The author signed NDAs for all companies who requested, about half of the total short visits. Table 1 Company List for Sabbatical Short Visits (Spring/Summer 2014) Company Engineering Discipline Location Analytical Methods Aerospace Seattle, WA BETH Biomedical, Entrepreneurial Boston, MA
engineering education.BackgroundCBAM was developed in the 1970’s and 1980’s by researchers at the University of Texas atAustin. Over this timeframe, three main components were created; Levels of Use (howindividuals interact with the innovation), Stages of Concern (the feelings of individuals), andInnovation Configurations (how the innovation is adapted to a particular setting). When used inconjunction, these components aid in assessing and guiding the adoption of innovations in aneducational setting7. Explaining the full complexity of CBAM is beyond the scope of this paperbut this body of research can be further explored in the included references 3,6,8,9
Transmission II (THS II)," Toyota Public Affairs Division, Japan, May 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.evworld.com/library/toyotahs2.pdf. [Accessed 20 February 2013].[2] E. W. Constans, J. Kadlowec, K. K. Bhatia, H. Zhang, T. Merrill and B. Angelone, "Integrating the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum using a Long-Term Green Design Project: Part 1: The Hybrid Powertrain," ASEE Annual Conference, 2012.[3] E. W. Constans, M. S. Acosta, K. K. Bhatia, H. Zhang and J. Kadlowec, "Development and Implementation of a Control Strategy for a Hybrid Power Train System in a Classroom Setting," ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.[4] M. S. Acosta, E. W. Constans, K. K. Bhatia, J. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, H. Zhang and B. Angelone, "Integrating the
. Yee, "How Service Learning Affects Students," Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000, p. 21.4. J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, Jr., Where's the Learning in Service-Learning?, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.5. I. S. Fisher, "Integrating Service-Learning Experiences into Postcollege Choices," in Service-Learning in Higher Education, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996, p. 209.6. S. Krishnan and T. L. Nilsson, "Engineering Service Learning: Case Study on Preparing Students for the Global Community," in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, 2012.7. B. Tempest, M. Pando, S. Loree and M. A. Hoff, "A Student
more of the large-scale initiatives being discussed for the Higher Ed Maker Initiative.AcknowledgementsFunding for Design Competitions, K-WIDE, B-FAB, provided by a grant from KEEN.ReferencesBrunhaver, S. R., Lande, M., Sheppard, S. D., & Edward Carryer, J. (2012). Fostering an enterprisinglearning ecology for engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 355.Communications, B. U. O. O. Bucknell Makers. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.bucknell.edu/makers.Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (Eds.). (2013). Design, Make, Play: Growing the next generation of STEMinnovators; The Maker Mindset. New York: Routledge.President, E. O. O. T. (2014). Building a Nation of Makers. Retrieved June, 2014, from https
the dataset begins to growthrough repetition of the study, considerations will need to be given to sample sizes and the typesof inferences that can be applied to an overall instructor population.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation undergrant number 1140763. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. J. D. Bransford (Ed.). Washington, DC:National Academy Press.2. Cox, M. F., & Cordray, D. S. (2008). Assessing pedagogy in bioengineering classrooms: Quantifyingelements of the “How
, intra-subject and inter-subject connections.Related WorkLearning objectives emerged in the literature in the late 1950s and 1960s primarily through thework of Benjamin S. Bloom and his colleagues.2,6,8 Literature in the 1970s and 1980s focusedmore on pedagogy than on outputs, but a renewed focus on the outputs of education in the 1990sdrove a new wave of literature based on learning outcomes and objectives.In contrast to the methodology used in the widely-cited successor to Bloom’s original taxonomy,this project focuses on learning outcomes rather than on learning objectives.1 Whileacknowledging the complexity of the debate,9,10,11 we agree with the assertion in Harden 2002that learning outcomes and learning objectives are distinct from each
learningthrough SWPPP exercise needs to be reinforced with additional relevant assignments that wouldenhance student critical thinking skills related to the subject matter.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the BagleyCollege of Engineering (BCoE), and the Office of Research and Economic Development(ORED) of Mississippi State University (MSU).References1. Jacquez RB, VG Gude, A Hanson, M Auzenne, S Williamson, “AC 2007-907: enhancing critical thinking skills of civil engineering students through supplemental instruction.” Proceedings of ASEE National Conference, Hawaii, USA, 2007.2. Facione PA, Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and
some assumptions. Identifies context(s) when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa).By necessity the rubrics are written such that they can be applied to the broad range of topics thatfall under the FYS umbrella. Particularly relevant to the premise of the FYS Bridge course arethe rubrics that address establishing the background, exploring ambiguity, questioningassumptions, and identifying context, but applied to challenges in engineering, technology, andscience in society. With this in mind, the authors have selected tentatively the following topicsand readings for the course:The questions that science, engineering, and the humanities can answer… and those theycan’t. Selected
occurs within the larger more) other vehicle(s) or vehicle design and system of vehicle object(s) collide. A front- materials have changed, operation: design of end crash begins at the tire design has changed, roads; speed limits; moment of contact safety restraints and other design of guardrails, between the vehicle and safety features (e.g., road signs, light poles; other object(s); it ends safety glass) have design of parking lots when all energy transfer changed. Also, changes and ramps/ structures. has been completed. in road
. There is a multi-week final project in which two-person teams programa game that requires a hardware interface. Students are loaned a LabJack and an additional kitwhich contains electronic parts like resistors, LEDs, switches, jumper wires, and a protoboard.In past years, the ECE 102 final project has been based either on the television game show“Wheel of Fortune” or the 80’s electronic toy “Simon”. At this stage a fair amount of technicalassistance and background information is given, since many of the students have not worked onsubstantial program development or interfacing before. For Wheel of Fortune, students build acircuit using a 3-to-8 decoder chip and eight LEDs to simulate the wheel (Figure 2). A discretepush-button activates the spin
, Page 26.1515.8 2014.[11] F. Martinez, L. C. Herrero, and S. de Pablo. Project-based learning and rubrics in the teaching of power supplies and photovoltaic electricity. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 54(1):87–96, Feb 2011.[12] N. Hosseinzadeh and M. R. Hesamzadeh. Application of project-based learning (PBL) to the teaching of electrical power systems engineering. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 55(4):495–501, Nov 2012.[13] M. Prince. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3):223–231, 2004.[14] A. Cheville and C. Bunting. Engineering students for the 21st century: Student development through the curriculum. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(4), Summer 2011.[15] Shanna
Capacity of the United States Engineering Research Enterprise, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.[4] Clough, G. W., 2004, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in a New Century, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Engineering.[5] Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., and Sullivan, W. M., 2009, Educating Engineers: Designing the Future of the Field, Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.[6] Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Holubec, E. J., 1990, Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.[7] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and Leifer, L. J., 2005, "Engineering Design
range, and whether or not the position was held priorto the Living Lab. The remaining questions asked were a focal point of the study, as participantsindicated if their Living Lab experience contributed to obtaining their current position and howoften Living Lab skills are applied during the course of their job. The final questions collecteddemographic and educational background information, including their graduation year andconcentration(s) studied.ResultsA total of 11 valid responses were recorded to the Survey Monkey questionnaire. Seven werefrom male graduates and four were from female. Figures 1 and 2 provide more demographics ofthe respondents
tointroduce active manipulation for learning about, for example, aerodynamics, flight mechanics,and structural design. The radio-controlled airplanes, however, are often only available tostudents through clubs or student competitions. This paper will describe an active learning class,the Flight Vehicle Design and Fabrication Class (known by students as the Sailplane Class), inwhich student hands-on learning includes flying radio-controlled airplanes. BackgroundThe Sailplane Class has been at Penn State University since the early 1990’s and was originallysponsored with funding from the National Science Foundation through the Engineering Coalitionof Schools for Excellence in Education and Leadership (ESCEL
project based course in using fundamental MATLAB programmingas a tool in engineering problem solving. The course usually requires that students completethree projects per semester, generally requiring software input and output, but no building orconstruction of any kind.Hands on learning is well documented as an effective teaching tool for kinesthetic learners.5,6Such students seemed to be underserved by the conventional teaching methods of the course, soefforts were undertaken to create more hands-on and real world application projects. 7Implementation of project based courses can be challenging, but many universities have createdsuccessful hands-on project based courses. Penn State has been using robots of its own designsince the mid-1990’s
attributed to the development of value systems andvery high ethical standards, teaching others to generate knowledge, and the use of creativity anddiverse backgrounds to bring “unique perspective[s]” to research problems. One engineerdescribed the need for diversity in engineering in order to innovate: “The advances come whenyou’re sort of looking at—you’re applying something new to a different area and you’re bringingin people who haven’t looked at it before.” Others refer to the importance of collaborations andcollaborative work in generating advances in technology, especially between different fields (ex.mechanical engineering and psychology to advance mental health technologies), collaborationsbetween university research facilities and industry
sample of the students’ papers. The preliminary results provide insight intostudents’ evaluation of their success during their first semester, which is a critical semester instudents’ college careers.IntroductionProject Control is an interactive process in which actual performance is compared to plannedperformance with adjustment(s) being made to address identified deviations3.The project controlcycle has seven basic steps: (1) develop project plan, (2) establish benchmarks, (3) monitorproject performance, (4) identify deviations, (5) evaluate corrective options, (6) makeadjustment, and (7) document, report and evaluate4. When attempting to teach this projectcontrol cycle, the importance of ‘evaluate’ can be difficult to convey to students
the course.References1. Abudayyeh, O., Fredericks, T. K., Butt, S. E., & Shaar, A., (2006). An investigation of management's commitment to construction safety. International Journal of Project Management, 24(2), 167-174.2. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), (2013). Accessed 2-28-2014 from: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.nr0.htm3. Construction Industry Institute (2003, February). Safety Plus: Making Zero Accidents A Reality, Research Summary 160-1. The University of Texas at Austin.Delatte, Jr., N. J.4. Delatte, N. (1997). ‘‘Integrating failure case studies and engineering ethics in fundamental engineering mechanics courses.’’ J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 123(3), 111–116.5. Delatte, N. and Rens
using the AssociateConstructor Exam. Journal of Technology, Management and Applied Engineering, 28(1), pp 2-7.Thambyah, A. (2011). On the design of learning outcomes for the undergraduate engineer’s final year project.European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), pp 35-46.Weber State University website, (2015). Retrieved on January 24, 2015 from:http://www.weber.edu/CMT/CMT_Sidebar/ACCE_Accreditation.htmlWolcott, M., Brown, S., King, M., Barnstone, D., Beyreather, T., and Olsen, K. (2011). Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education & Practice, 11(4), pp 94-101. Page 26.1264.8
download at www.themanufacturinginstitute.org/News-Articles/2013/02/08-4-Year-Roadmap-Release.aspx, last accessed in February 2015[6] Kadlowec, J., Bhatia, K., Chandrupatla, T. R., Chen, J. C., Constans, E., Hartman, H., & Zhang, H. (2007). Design integrated in the mechanical engineering curriculum: Assessment of the engineering clinics. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(7), 682-691.[7] Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. F. (1999). Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program. International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1), 20-31.[8] Lamancusa, J. S., Jorgensen, J. E., & Zayas‐Castro, J. L. (1997). The learning factory—A new approach to integrating design and
course, AAE418 “Zero-gravity Flight Experiment” who donate tosupport subsequent undergraduate team travel. In addition, three consecutive Department Heads Page 26.1287.12in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics and three consecutive Deans in the College ofEngineering at Purdue University have been avid supporters of these educational endeavors.Bibliobgraphy1. Stern S. A., “Commercial Spaceflight Companies Will Revolutionize Space Science,” Scientific American, 308:69-73, 2013.2. Collicott, S. H., “An Undergraduate Project Course for the NASA Reduced Gravity Student Flight Opportunities Program,” 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences
200 35cm 100 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Time (s)Figure 5: Temperature of the reactor compared to the varying the wire length ofKanthal 145 alloy.Testing was also done on Kanthal 145 alloy comparing wire lengths of 20, 30, and 40-cm at themaximum voltage on the power supply, 18.3-18.5V. The voltage was held constant in theexperiments for all lengths of the Kanthal 145 alloy. It was used to complete the quantitative Page
. Page 26.1396.2APOS Theory In this section, APOS theory and the relevant literature that is employed to evaluate thequestion and the corresponding interviews to discern the students’ conceptual function knowledgeare explained. The philosophy of mathematics affected engineering and mathematics education in theundergraduate curriculum in the 1990s. Piaget‘s schemes idea in the 1970’s, and its developmentwith detailed explanations by Piaget and Garcia in the 1980’s, influenced researchers ofundergraduate engineering and mathematics education curriculum in the 1990’s. Students’conceptual view of the function was defined by Breidenbach, Dubinsky, Hawks, and Nichols in1992, which relied on Piaget’s study of functions in 1977 (Piaget, Grize
credit hours.” Among these experiences, the author suggestedsupporting a student organization, participation in conferences, and networking activities withstudents at other schools. In summary, this literature review demonstrates that empirical studies of entrepreneurshipprograms often overlook socio-demographic characteristics and simplify the conceptualization ofco-curricular experiences, suggesting a vague alignment with the curriculum.Conceptual Framework In an effort to work towards a more structured approach to studying the complexities ofengineering entrepreneurship education and its impact on students in higher education, we havechosen to position this analysis in the context of Lattuca et al.’s (2014)30 use of the Terenzini
. Sheeran, P., Abraham, C. & Orbell, S., “Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta- analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 125, pp. 90-132 (1999). 9. Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Lane, D. J., “A social-reaction model of adolescent health risk,” In J. J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness (pp. 107–136). Oxford, England: Blackwell (2003). Page 26.200.910. Webb, T. L. & Sheeran, P., “Identifying good opportunities to act: Implementation intentions and cue discrimination,” European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 34, pp
morelikely to implement codes into their work even when not required or enforced by law. A portionof learning to build back stronger includes educating to the IRC. Understanding the current statusand best practice for teaching students majoring in architecture, civil engineering, andconstruction science management (here in after known as “construction students”) about the IRCprovides the first step to mitigating communities in the future 6.BackgroundA literature review for teaching about the IRC produced no new publications since the early2000’s when the International Code Council (ICC) was formed and states began adoptingversions of the IRC. Prior to the ICC, research publications discussed the difficulty in codeintegration to the curricula due to