Paper ID #12207Including Universal Design in Engineering Courses to Attract Diverse Stu-dentsDr. Brianna Blaser, University of Washington Brianna Blaser is a counselor/coordinator at the DO-IT Center at the University of Washington where she works with the AccessEngineering program. She earned a bachelors degree in math and psychology at Carnegie Mellon University and a PhD in women studies at the University of Washington. She has a background in broadening participation and career development in science and engineering fields. Before joining DO-IT, she was the project director for the AAAS (American Association for
concepts are presented in the reverse order.TRADITIONAL TEACHING VS. PROBLEM/PROJECT-BASED TEACHINGIn traditional teaching, first a concept is presented and then examples, problems, and projectsbased on the presented topic are presented. In the problem/project based teaching, first aproblem/project is introduced and then the skills needed to solve the problem are developed.INTEGRATION OF PROCESS MODELING SOFTWARE TO APPLIEDTHERMODYNAMICSThe combination of three aforementioned methods, namely conceptual learning, system levellearning, and problem/project-based teaching has led the teaching approach presented in thispaper. A commercial process modeling software is utilized to deepen student understanding
arecommonly given for encouraging participation in undergraduate research. [3-7]. Whilethe former reason is supportive of the desire to graduate more students in engineering, thelatter reason is less connected to the concept. However, the desire to use undergraduateresearch experiences to attract more students to graduate school tends to focusrecruitment on higher-achieving, more academically-successful students. These students Page 26.441.2are more likely to finish their degrees than weaker students. Therefore, usingundergraduate research projects may not be a productive way to increase the number ofengineering graduates, if the students who are engaging in
Based on Student FeedbackThe use of robots in undergraduate classrooms has seen a boom in recent years due to theuniversal appeal of robots, and the applicability of robot systems to preparing students for careerpaths in computer science, robotics and intelligent systems, and as well as for teachingfundamental engineering and programming concepts in a fresh way. At our University, a novelrobot platform was developed in 2008 as part of a funded outreach project, applicable to both K-12 outreach and university level instruction. The robot platform, named the CEENBoT, became acentral learning platform for instructing K-12 math and science teachers in a large educationalrobotics project and was simultaneously adopted into the Freshman and Sophomore
gatekeeping courses. Among many factors to this failure, an important one isattributed to the lack of engaging pedagogy inside and outside classrooms. Through this NSFWIDER Program sponsored planning project, a team of faculty and administrators at AlabamaAgricultural and Mechanical University (AAMU) are implementing evidence-based instructionalpractices in foundation courses in STEM curricula. Recognizing that it is essential to implementeffective pedagogy in gateway courses where most attrition occurs, this project has conducted apilot study, which focuses on: (1) collecting baseline data about the extent to which evidence-based practices are currently being used in STEM gateway courses; (2) redesigning threefoundational gateway courses in
junior-level. Collaboration with writing studiesfaculty ensured that the material in the writing guide was consistent with content taught in thosecourses. The writing guide is currently being piloted by civil engineering faculty in selectcourses and by the UMD’s writing center, the Writers’ Workshop, which offers one-to-onesessions led by graduate student or faculty consultants. Lessons learned from this pilot will beused to improve the writing guide before implementation across the civil engineering departmentin the Fall 2015 semester.The following sections first summarize the projects designed to improve writing in theengineering department and then describe the development of the writing guide and assessmentrubric, including the roles of the
engineering are people problems’6 - astatement since supported by researchers and industry pundits alike. Scacchi in his review of largesoftware engineering projects found that productivity in projects that were poorly managed or poorlyorganized was significantly lower7. In effect, it can be said that poor management can effectively erasethe potential productivity improvements that can be expected from the use of improved technologies andprocesses8. Viljan, in his recent work, has linked inadequate internal communication and lack ofteamwork to a company's weak performance9. On the other hand, productive work conditions can bemaintained, if the developers are strongly committed to team effort8,10,11. While there is strong andconsiderable influence of
14.6 Activities Creative 100 14.6 Project Short Paper 100 14.6 Class 85 12.4 Involvement (Attendance) Final Exam 150 21.9A brief description of each of the writing-based assessment strategies is included below with Page 26.1481.5particular emphasis on the short paper activity. Following a description of the short paperactivity a summary of the strengths of adopting a
experiencingpassive learning and the learning effectiveness is often small 5.A student-centered, project-based learning approach needs to be established to improve theteaching of MFG 333. In the student-centered environment, learning is often facilitated throughactive learning. The faculty member should actively involve the student in the learning process(besides the functions conducted under a teacher-centered approach). The active learning occurswhen the students do more than listening during class. It is accomplished through challenging thestudents to ask and answer questions, engaging students in small-group discussions, andincorporating problem solving and projects into the course 6.Several universities have started building a student-centered
by counseling on curriculum design, hiring interns, sponsoringcornerstone and capstone projects, holding in-class workshops, and participating in professionaldevelopment activities.The IBE program recruits a small percentage of business and engineering honors studentsaccepted at Ohio State each year. The curriculum is not for the faint of heart. Students mustmaintain a 3.5 GPA throughout the four years, and those entering college with substantialadvanced placement or post-secondary option credit toward their degree are the most likelycandidates to succeed. IBE students finish with a bachelor's degree in their home program, aminor in the complementary program, and diploma recognition for completing the IBE Honorsprogram. Effectiveness of the
benefit to thestudents’ retention.4 We strongly encouraged participation since, as the name suggests, activelearning elements (worksheets, presentations, discussions, debates) are most effective whenstudents actively take part in them. As instructors, we consistently encouraged our students bothverbally and through emails to participate in class and allotted 10 percent of the final coursegrade to participation. We encouraged students who are introverted to find another way to showus that they were interacting with the material and making an effort. We designed one project toprovide some breadth, but the main focus of the course was to have students truly understand themost important concepts. In other words, rather than being able to remember
involved in several research projects focusing on competencies- based curriculum redesign and implementation aimed to integration across curricula; increasing the re- tention rate of early engineering students; providing opportunities for STEM graduate students to have mentored teaching experiences.Mr. Michael Cavanaugh, Michigan State UniversityDr. Subashini Nagendran Sivakumar, Michigan State University Suba Nagendran Sivakumar is a Research Scientist in The Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER). She received her PhD in Plant Pathology from Michigan State University. Her scholarly inter- ests include: research and teaching in Plant Pathology, Molecular Biology and improvement of STEM teaching and learning
in research havedemonstrated a number of benefits, including increases in students’ research-based experience,facility in conducting individual research projects, ability to collaborate effectively in research-based settings, and ability to communicate and present research and research-based findings 1, 3, 8.Programs emphasizing research experiences for undergraduate students have a rich history, with Page 26.1243.2funded research experience for undergraduate (REU) programs arising more than twenty-fiveyears ago 1. A goal of such programs is to retain and strengthen the presence of students engagedin science, technology, engineering, and
courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential activity for Applied Mechanics courses. She is coordinator and advisor for capstone projects for Engineering Technology.Mr. M. Eric Carr, Drexel University Mr. Eric
. Educators increasingly recognize the challenge of finding quality curricularmaterials for integrated STEM education. In this study, forty-eight teachers participated in ayear-long professional development program on STEM integration funded by National ScienceFoundation (NSF). Teachers designed twenty STEM curriculum units as a part of the project.Each STEM curriculum unit includes an engineering challenge in which students use or developtechnologies to solve the challenge and integrates grade level appropriate mathematics (dataanalysis and measurement) and one of the three science content areas: life science, physicalscience, or earth science. The study aims to evaluate the STEM curriculum units developed bythe project teachers. We also
Paper ID #12534Building a STEM Pathway with Engineering by Design andMs. Laura E. LeMire, The Community College of Baltimore County Upon graduation from the University of Maryland at College Park with her masters in geotechnical en- gineering, Laura went to work for Baltimore Gas and Electric where during her career there she was responsible for substation and transmission line construction projects, relocation and installation of BGE facilities for Oriole Park at Camden Yards and for the Light Rail, and for improving service reliability. After obtaining her MBA, Laura became the Director of Corporate Purchasing and was a
Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their under- graduate student population. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. She remains an active researcher with MIDFIELD, studying gender issues, trans- fers, and matriculation models in engineering.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 20 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a
outreach program for kindergarten through eighth grade for over tenyears [12, 13, 14, 15]. These prior efforts were completed with a different school district and theresultant model is being transferred and tested here. DPS has been involved in this collaborationsince the summer of 2013. Page 26.383.3Recruitment of teachers and of graduate student participants to this program occurs in the springof each year. Contacts are made with teachers through the school partner district liaisons, e.g.,principals, special project coordinator, parent-teacher organizations, etc. Once an interestedteacher has been identified, follow-up emails or phone calls are
: How do members of under-represented groups' identities and pathways intersect with SELECT culture to facilitate or encumber participation in SELECT?The structure of the paper is as follows. The next section will describe the research methodology.The Results section will present two separate narratives of Sarah's and Alice’s engineeringexperiences as they pertain to team competition. The Discussion section will compare andcontrast Sarah's and Alice’s experiences and interpret those experiences, including placing theseexperiences in the context of the literature. The final section will draw conclusions.2.0 MethodologyThis manuscript uses data from a large research project using qualitative and quantitativeresearch methodologies and an
undergraduate students (freshman through senior) and has participated in several engineering education research projects, with a focus how faculty can best facilitate student learning.Dr. Nanette M Veilleux, Simmons College Nanette Veilleux is a Professor and Director of the Computer Science and Informatics Program at Sim- mons College, Boston, MA. Her research interests include pedagogy in STEM disciplines, particularly with respect to women students and computational linguistics where she investigates the use of intonation in human speech.Ms. Mee Joo Kim, University of Washington- Seattle MJ Kim is a Ph.D. student in Educational Leadership, Policy & Organizations Studies (Higher Educa- tion) at the
universe, is assisting in alleviating thisunfortunate trend. Engineering students and faculty members work together to develop, anddeliver, seminars in local schools and churches that demonstrate compatibility between scienceand religion, with emphasis on the role that engineering can play in this ongoing dialogue. Theproject team has committed to conduct 250 of these seminars over the life of the grant, with ananticipated total direct audience of approximately 12,500 people.Religions and religious denominations often take a simplistic view of origins based largely on aparticular interpretation of creation accounts offered by the special revelation of sacredscriptures. The project team is currently working to complement this view with up-to
instrumentation and control, renewable energy applications of control systems, and innovative teaching strategies and methods. Dr. Beauchamp has worked on a Solar-Assisted Air Conditioning project and is the co-author of two US Patents for this project. He was the coordinator of the Electrical Engineering Team that represented the University of Puerto Rico in the 2002 Solar Decathlon competition. He also was the general coordinator of the UPR Team for the 2005 competition. During the six years period from 1992 to 1998, Dr. Beauchamp was the Coordinator of the Pre-College Engineering Program, a Summer Internship for High School raising se- niors, sponsored by the National Science Foundation. He has also served as the Process
research project supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), one primaryobjective of which is to develop and validate a global competency assessment tool. This paper isorganized in three major parts, each focused on a different phase of the project and a variety ofassociated questions and challenges. After giving a general overview of the larger researchproject, the first major section of the paper is focused on clarifying our main domain of interest,including our efforts to develop a working definition of “global engineering competency” (GEC)that is grounded in both the extant literature and our own qualitative data set. This part of thepaper is particularly concerned with how we meaningfully delineate, define, and study specificdomains
University Dr. Bahram Asiabanpour is an Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Texas State Uni- versity and a Certified Manufacturing Engineer (CMfgE). He received his Ph.D. from Daniel J. Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Southern California. His main research interest is Additive Manufacturing, Product Development, and Renewable Energy. Since joining Texas State, Dr. Asiabanpour has secured 27 externally funded projects from NSF, NASA, Toyota, USDA, DOE, and several local industries. He is currently the PI for the $614K grant from the DOE (2014-17), called ”REENERGIZE: Recruitment and Retention of Students in STEM Programs through a Renewable Energy Research
that wouldplace fewer burdens on educators, while helping engineering students take the time to understandthe lessons that are afforded by engineering courses through reflective activities.To address these issues, a few researchers in engineering education have successfully designedor developed new methods and tools to support student reflection. For example, Chen et al.combined the use of weblogs and wikis with the creation of portfolios (Folio Thinking) tosupport learning and reflection in an introductory freshman seminar on design engineering atStanford University. Chen et al. indicate that a challenge in project-based design courses is thatstudents “see what they have produced but they do not see what they have learned.” They reportthat
” logic and persist after years ofinvestment and countless new programs. 8 Similar trends are widely reported by research centers,professional societies, and consultants among others. 4,9,10The world is intertwined with the advancing of distributive business processes, i.e., additivemanufacturing, big data, massive multiplayer online role playing (MMORPG) technology, andsocial networking all converging and accelerating the skill gap between engineering educationand the workforce. This disruptive landscape presents a significant challenge to future workforceand advanced manufacturing leadership in the United States. This skills gap manifests itself inthe unfamiliarity that recent hires often face when working on projects where they are required
Paper ID #11397The Impact of Educators’ Training in Photovoltaic Solar Energy in Develop-ing CountriesDr. Rim Razzouk, Arizona State University Rim Razzouk is a Senior Instructional Designer at Arizona State University’s Ira Fulton School of Engi- neering. In her current position, Rim leads the curriculum development and the assessment and evaluation processes for the VOCTEC (Vocational Training and Education for Clean Energy) project. She coordi- nates the production of instructional materials with subject matter experts. Rim is also responsible for the data analyses and the write up of research reports for the purpose
associated model. (a) ECP inverted pendulum 38 (b) Simulink model of ECP inverted pendulum Figure 2: ECP-505 inverted pendulum and associated model.pendulum is balanced by driving a rod back and forth at the top; this results in a difficult plant tocontrol that is both unstable and nonminimum phase. The Simulink model of this invertedpendulum system is shown in Figure 2. Students will use this as a pre-lab exercise to test theircontroller designs before using the hardware equipment in SDSMT’s Spring 2015 control systemselective, and this model will also be used for a class project on dynamics modeling andlinearization in a future semester of the dynamic systems course.The third system that was modeled was a
) at Queen’s University, Kingston, On- tario, Canada in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science. Educational research interests include engineering education development, cultural change in higher education, higher-order thinking develop- ment and assessment, outcomes-based data-informed continuous improvement, educational data visual- ization & reporting and authentic performance-based assessment.Ms. Natalie Simper, Queen’s University Natalie Simper coordinates a Queen’s research project investigating the development and measurement of general learning outcomes. Natalie comes from an Australian Senior-Secondary/ Post-Secondary teaching background, with experience at the State-wide level in curriculum
interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incor- porating engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. Page 26.1617.1 c